Yes I do.
I think it's best for young children. We have 3 kids, one of them a 6 week old baby. I work, she stays home and takes care of the kids. All are breast-fed because that's the healthiest option, we aren't feeding them powdered shit. That means she can't work at this time. She might do at a later stage, but not for now.
I also think it's just better for the relationship in general. In general, women are more attracted to masculine men, and men are more attracted to feminine women. They say otherwise just because the popular culture seems to want to encourage androgyny and brainwashes people into obsessing over equality. That's all it really is.
For example here, a study shows that women are more satisfied during peak fertility when their husband is more traditionally masculine:
www.psypost.org/.../wives-masculine-husbands-satisfied-peak-fertility-study-finds-48909
There are plenty of studies showing the same thing:
www.livescience.com/...ertile-women-manly-men.html
Feminists think that "sexist" men are sexier than "woke" men. What they mean by that is benevolent sexism e. g. chivalrous behaviour, protective behaviour, paying the bill - the opposite of what most feminists say they want:
www.psychologytoday.com/.../feminists-think-sexist-men-are-sexier-woke-men
Here's the funniest one. Feminists say that the sexiest thing a guy can do is to help with housework and do the dishes, right? Men who do more housework actually have less sex:
www.scientificamerican.com/.../
That's mainly because the masculine-feminine polarity is out of balance. People are so obsessed with trying to make men act like women and women act like men, and it's just not attractive. This should be common sense.13 Reply
Most Helpful Opinions
- 9.6K opinions shared on Relationships topic.
u +1 yI am very comfortable with traditional gender roles in a relationship. I don't think that we should be so rigid about those roles that we have no flexibility to make some modifications, but I am good with about 95% of traditional male/female roles in relationships.
316 Reply- +1 y
I don't think a car can have two drivers same with a relationship. I'm fine with 60/40
- +1 y
I deviate from the traditional roles because I try to make all major decisions jointly with my partner. I want an equal partner who is not subordinate in any way.
- +1 y
I understand you want a strong woman who can think for herself
- +1 y
I need a woman who has at least an IQ of 120-125 and I do better with women who have IQ of 135-145. I dated a retired judge for two years, she had an IQ of 140, and we got along great. . . except that she was too self-centered in the relationship and that was a deal breaker
- +1 y
Dang I'm like one 115
High standards sir - +1 y
Yes, it makes dating more difficult. I have dated women who probably had a 100 IQ and we could have fun short term but just didn't really match up well long term.
I hope all is well with you. - +1 y
@Juxtapose I was not boasting. I graduated from law school with honors. Am I supposed to tell other people that I am stupid? False modesty is not modesty.
The issue of high IQ is very relevant to traditional gender roles. High IQ women are accustomed to being leaders, not followers, and I would never expect a high IQ woman to yield to my wishes just because I am a man. Ignoring this issue would be foolish. - +1 y
@Juxtapose I got nothing I'm not gifted oh well. Lv ya sir
- +1 y
@Juxtapose thank you for that and I don't I'm much more then a score
- +1 y
@Juxtapose I know a great deal about the difference between an IQ score and intelligence. I know a great deal about how to judge character. I know not to judge a potential partner by a single trait or character. I am not the one-dimensional dragon that you want to slay.
- +1 y
@Juxtapose Okay, you're right. Feel better now?
- +1 y
@Juxtapose Good question.
+1 yNo, I am personally against them. Like when it comes to cooking I think both people should cook in the relationship. But some people say that if you are home first from work then you cook first. But what if one person in the relationship is always home first? I feel like that would be messed up to always assume they'll be cooking. It's good to switch it up. Make it fair and on the weekends cook together and make it this cute little date with each other. Cooking doesn't have to be perceived as this awful thing that only one person has to do. Cooking is nice and you are making delicious food at the end of the day. Both partners should be part of it. I also think women should work along side with their guy. You know there's that gender role where some guys want their women at home taking care of the house and just waiting on him hand and foot basically. They don't want their women working they want them home just basically doing nothing unless there are kids. I would prefer to work and help with the bills. Plus I am going to school, I'm not going to waste my career. I know there are more guys wanting their women to work which is better in my opinion.
00 Reply
370 opinions shared on Relationships topic. Yes, but that doesn't necessarily mean what a lot of people think it means. The woman is allowed to have a job - the virtuous woman commended in Prov31 ran a business - but is not obligated to do so. It's the man's responsibility to provide for his wife (Exodus 21:10, Eph 5:28-29, Prov 19:14).
Furthermore, the man is in authority in the relationship, but Biblical authority is about serving the people under your authority, and putting their interests before your own needs (Matt 20:25-28, Eph 5:25, Phil 2:3-4).11 Reply- +1 y
Yessss
What Girls & Guys Said
Opinion
23Opinion
+1 yFor day to day things, no. For certain other things, yes.
21 Reply- +1 y
Good view
1.4K opinions shared on Relationships topic. No I do not. A man can do what a woman can like washing dishes, cleaning the house, babysit the kids and a woman can be the backbone when her man is at his weakest...
20 Reply855 opinions shared on Relationships topic. Not for me. I don’t care if others want to but definitely not for me.
01 Reply- +1 y
Fair enough
I'm a traditionalist, and I accept the responsibilities that go along with that, but it's reciprocal, meaning that girls have to be willing to take on their responsibilities too.
Too often we get into this habit of ranting about how women/ men have gotten worse, i. e. women don't know how to cook, sleep around, and generally don't do anything other than take selfies, gossip, and demand attention/ money, while guys are no longer brave/ honorable/ or assertive enough to take on their role in the workplace, too immature to leave their parents basements, etc. etc.
Ofc this isn't everybody, but a vast majority of people need to pay more attention to be worth someone they'd like to be with, which typically fall within the traditional roles.20 Reply778 opinions shared on Relationships topic. No I think everyone should contribute equal effort but threats in which they contribute are dependent upon their personal skills and weaknesses.
I don’t think requiring a person to to possess certain skills and behavior based on something that existed before they were conscious and is entirely out of their control , is rational nor practical.
I think you can lose a lot of the heat in people by ignoring who they are.
As for driving.. Long trips usually have at least more one driver. depends how many people are riding big it is def helpful to split the driving between at least two people. This helps avoid dangerous accidents.
.. life is a very long trip - hopefully 😊21 Reply- +1 y
Hey you... I knew what you would say I respect that
+1 yNope. Every relationship I've been there has been no gender roles. Sometimes I would clean while they cook or vice versa. Sometimes I would make breakfast while they make the bed and tidy up the room or vice versa. Sometimes I would carry all the groceries bag or they would. There was never a "_¥€ should so this because you're a man/women". I prefer it this way.
11 Reply- +1 y
Cool I think most people rather that way
No not really. I refuse to stay home to be a house wife. I went to college for a reason. A man who can clean and cook is super sexy to me. I just think if there is something that needs to be done, either partner get it done. Of course it would be hard for a man to describe puberty to his daughter, especially when he doesn’t understand it from a female perspective.
10 Reply
+1 yI don't get the point. Why does it matter?
All this gender shit makes no sense to me lately. Look... I can beat people up, you can't. What is there to figure out?220 Reply- +1 y
I can't?
- +1 y
- +1 y
- +1 y
... and to push the point... just because the threat isn't there... why some beta beta that has two faces is a better choice? What will he offer that a dude like me won't?
- +1 y
I mean he'll drop his chick under threat and he'll drop her for any other chick even of lower quality. It's about numbers for him... how many chicks. Is that better?
- +1 y
Time and place then I guess. You're right. Yeah I'm outdated in some places at the current time. Until I'm not, yet again.
- +1 y
Until then I guess the push over dude that agrees with everything that happens in his world is just fine... for now. Bring a little hell down to this world and oh wow... opinions change.
- +1 y
@AcidT0y Alright... keep your betas then... cheat on them... they don't fight back anyways, especially when you cheat on them with me. They develop weird fetishes where they pretend to like watching me pound his girl... okay... she's such a powerful whaman. Him... you'll diss him. Me... Still pounding pussies. Darwin wasn't wrong.
- +1 y
- +1 y
@AcidT0y True... I'm in a world where there's guys like me that get pissed off that your woman allows a guy to text her like a thot... but there are tons of dudes out there that accept that and want to suck that guy's cum out of her vagina after he cums in her. The contrast is harsh and very different. Your world might be very different. My definition of beta or alpha might be built on what two extremes I'm seeing here in real life... which might be different from what you are seeing.
- +1 y
Basically because of all these dudes that allow that (what I would realistically just call gay) stuff to happen, it's becoming something that many females try to use as a standard of acceptance.
I mean in reverse maybe I should use the same logic and say that me fucking other women at the same time is no big deal otherwise you're being sexist. Now does that really make sense either? - +1 y
2.4K opinions shared on Relationships topic. It depends... In some cases it could be helpful... Like for instance if a girl is better at cooking for example
21 Reply- +1 y
I do 100% but understand it's not for most
+1 yI am not into gender roles. I only want a woman who can procreate with me basically.
I am especially not into your biased gender roles where women must wear make-up and be paid for dinner and a man must be a violent degenerate who beats up other men to prove he's masculine. People hurting others are ungodly and drawing blood from others is barbaric and no justification can you give me to prove it is sexy to hurt other people and make them bleed.
I don't agree with your MMA crap. It is not feasible in real life. Sure, you need to protect yourself but having arenas set to where they practice hurting others for training experiences is barbaric. You should only know how to do this if needed.
If your boyfriend hurts me must to make you happy, I'd call the cops on your man and make you weep.00 ReplyI do not. I only date independent, ambitious women. I don't have any interest in traditional relationships. We both contribute equally, work, relationships, house work etc.
11 Reply- +1 y
Cool
I’m prefer more traditional gender roles than the idea that there is no difference between men and women
20 Reply- 644 opinions shared on Relationships topic.
+1 yYes. It keeps the relationship together when both parts know their duties.
21 Reply- +1 y
Thank you Eric
+1 yI do. When I get married, I plan on being a housewife and my husband would work.
20 Reply- 1.5K opinions shared on Relationships topic.
+1 yYes.. I am old school in many ways. Understand its never 50/50 but respect and support ea. other.
I wish we can all get along better.10 Reply 446 opinions shared on Relationships topic. Kinda. I’m the girl and he’s the boy. Those are our roles. Other than that, like cooking, cleaning, walking the dog, etc. we share those roles.
10 Reply
+1 yOh no! This is just boring
It stops people from being who they really are20 Reply- 3.6K opinions shared on Relationships topic.
+1 yTo a certain extent I do. Primarily the woman nurture her children while the Father disciplines the children. Stuff like that.
20 Reply - 2.9K opinions shared on Relationships topic.
+1 yYes and no.. In this day and age, if she is working, and he is working, than household stuff should be split.. If she is not working then I am 100% traditional.
04 Reply- +1 y
What about telling her no that is dangerous or paying for dates?
- +1 y
I've always paid for dates, I kind of got married before going destuch was fashionable.
- +1 y
Thanks dude
- +1 y
Welcome
+1 yYeah in a way... i get uncomfortable when girls pay for stuff like dinner or whatever... but at the same time I dont want a stay at home housewife whos only entertainment is me... when I'm tired and burnt out from work or whatever
10 Reply412 opinions shared on Relationships topic. If both people are happy with that dynamic then it can work really well. If they're not then it's best to have a discussion and figure out what will work best for their relationship.
10 Reply- 1.6K opinions shared on Relationships topic.
+1 yYes I do in every relationship each person has a part to play
20 Reply 1K opinions shared on Relationships topic. Relatively, yes. In fact, for the most part yes. But not in any oppressive or rigid way. It should be a mutually agreed-upon arrangement
10 Reply- 1.3K opinions shared on Relationships topic.
+1 yPeople should be happy and express themselves in their relationships no matter who is in charge.
00 Reply - 2.9K opinions shared on Relationships topic.
+1 yYou mean, Me.. Tarzan, you Jane? Me hunt and gather, you make babies and care for them?
13 Reply- +1 y
Yes.
- +1 y
If that's what both people want, why not? I think you define the roles in your relationship by what you want.
- +1 y
Thank you
459 opinions shared on Relationships topic. Of course , I also believe in gravity and that rocks are hard.
10 Reply- 458 opinions shared on Relationships topic.
+1 yYeah, but I don't think there should be a massive difference in those roles. Is that your boyfriend in the picture? He looks like an actor.
013 Reply- +1 y
No it's not
- +1 y
Ok. Are you still dating?
- +1 y
Yup.
- +1 y
Ok good. You're a very nice girl, so he's lucky. 😃
- +1 y
Thank you love took me long enough to find him. You will find someone too.
- +1 y
Yeah maybe some day.
- +1 y
Took me 30 years to
- +1 y
Yes, but you have had many boyfriends before as well.
- +1 y
Not really
- +1 y
I'm a relationship girl
- +1 y
Do you want to mske babies with him? ☺
- +1 y
Not at this point that's along way ahead
- +1 y
Ok. That's good, because some people rush with making babies, which is bad.
Yes, completely, distinct roles for all 39.773 genders.
11 Reply- +1 y
Lmao🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
+1 yYes. it works best that way.
31 Reply- +1 y
Agree
well yeah, without them it gets messy.
20 ReplyDefinitely not team work
21 Reply- +1 y
Most don't these days I get ya
+1 yYa I do.
20 ReplyI just go with the flow
00 Reply
+1 y90/30
10 Reply
+1 yNot really
00 Reply
+1 yYeah, they work.
10 Reply
Learn more
We're glad to see you liked this post.
You can also add your opinion below!
Girl's Behavior
Guy's Behavior
Flirting
Dating
Relationships
Fashion & Beauty
Health & Fitness
Marriage & Weddings
Shopping & Gifts
Technology & Internet
Break Up & Divorce
Education & Career
Entertainment & Arts
Family & Friends
Food & Beverage
Hobbies & Leisure
Other
Religion & Spirituality
Society & Politics
Sports
Travel
Trending & News 
Most Helpful Opinions