It seems like forming relationships came much more naturally and easier for previous generations but that could just be me looking back too fondly
1.5K opinions shared on Relationships topic. Of course they were better in past generations up to and including the baby boomers. Those generations before internet and social media. Those generations that were not ruled by the pornography industry that fries the brains of youth nowadays and that is under the protection of the governments because of the revenues they generate.
If I could, I would prohibit the internet and social media and keep society the way it was in the 1960s.
Relationships were more on a person-to-person basis and not on social media and hook up sites.
We do not idealize the past; the past WAS better, much better.
47 Reply- 30 d
The past is far too often romanticized (I added my own response to the question in a longer, jumbled-up mess). You lean back to the 60's and we (women) lose quite a bit in terms of rights and protections. Granted, things did seem simpler, but then that was because there wasn't easy access to see the horrors and injustices that plague the rest of the world just outside our doorstep.
- 30 d
@Sirenboobzilla While I do agree with your post and that women lacked protection from toxic relationships, those relationships were much stronger and lasting than today.
Nowadays, everything in a relationship revolves around sex. "Compatibility" is such an issue that it is taken as excuses for cheating. People place so much importance on this sexual compatibility and make it their prime argument in case of failed relationships.
To me compatibility is this
https://ibb.co/4nWjDTL4
a square block has to fit in a square hole, a triangular one in triangular hole and a round block in a round hole. Any other combination is not compatible. A penis is designed to fit into a vagina and thus, it is compatible. End of story.
- 30 d
@SueShe The Liberation Movement in the EU didn't start until after it had gained traction in North America. Plus immigrants that arrived to the US who were hitting their partners surely didn't learn to do that once they stepped foot in the new country. It was just as bad whether it be in the US or EU.
Most Helpful Opinions
- 30 d
I think the whole dating and the family dynamic was better but there was also bad things with it too. I just wish men and woman now days weren't such whores and obsessed with porn and objectifying themselves. But that is what is wrong with humans, if you put in place rules people abuse those rules to gain power and treat others like shit but if you get rid of the rules you end up in a shit hole we are living now. You can't win with humans because we are a trash species that should just be wiped out.
04 Reply- 29 d
- 29 d
- 1 mo
I think it’s some of both. The grass is always greener on the other side however people did have better moral standards. Sure there was bad marriages. There was affairs. There was people marrying for the wrong reasons but not like it is now at least people got married to stay married.
A lot of people though over glamorize relationships until they get into them and realize it’s not all they imagined it would be. Especially with this trad wife trend.
00 Reply
- 1 mo
It was both better and worse at the same time. That said, I do believe we idealize the past too much.
10 Reply
AI Opinion

Ah, the charm of nostalgia can be quite the love potion! Relationships back then might seem simpler because they weren't drowned in the sea of social media and dating apps we have today. But every era has its love hurdles—unspoken red flags or ghosting under the guise of mysterious disappearances! Each generation has its quirks, but hey, don't let the past outshine your chances of falling head over heels today. 😄✨
00 Reply








What Girls & Guys Said
Opinion
20Opinion
- 1 mo
Yes, but ever relationship works or doesn't work for different reasons.
00 Reply - 30 d
The past is too often romanticized. When you look back at relationships in the early-mid 1900's you do indeed see more lasting relationships and the depiction of stronger family values. But that's only what you see on the surface. Look deeper and you see start to see various degrees of toxicity. We (women) weren't allowed to do much of anything without a husband's approval. We couldn't buy a house, get credit, buy a car, even vote. If you as a woman were unhappy in a marriage, you had to pray your husband royally fucked up so you could get a divorce as no fault divorces didn't become a thing until the 60's. Up until the 70's it was actually socially acceptable for men to beat their wives for things like speaking out. That's not at all tonsay that every relationship was toxic. Genuine love and happiness have always been a thing. But we cannot pretend like it was all peaches and cream.
Fast forward to the modern age and of course things evolve. We have more rights and protections than we did 100 years ago. Some, of course, abuse these protections (we don't like those people either, they give us a bad rep). The advent of the internet and social media expanded our voices and we learned that we're not alone. We can see how people rejoice in success and happiness worldwide, but we can also see the horrors the world has to offer even just next door.
I don't particularly think things were better back then; everything tends to evolve with time. It seems that there's a bit of a morality war as people choose different routes to exercise their freedoms and pursuit of happiness, but even that has always existed. To pretend otherwise is blatantly ignorant.
Sorry for the extra rant. On my lunch break and the topic opened my feminine urges to rage a bit 🤣10 Reply - 1 mo
No, it isn’t. If gender relations were better in the past, we would stick to them, no? Hundreds of years undone like that, hmmm?
We had less women in lawyer positions, no women in politics, and less / oppression of women’s rights though why did we shift towards a present that has a future where all can indulge in the blessings of Liberty? Because women sought a role outside the household, envisioned a world where men and women are created equal with certain inalienable rights. Men also stepped up and allowed women their new roles, with the flexibility to gain success in whatever field they so choose and so they did.
10 Reply 903 opinions shared on Relationships topic. They were simply vastly more secret , multiple affairs , secrets , and in those days on pay night it was not uncommon for the husband to produce some " rough justice " if he was not obeyed , or the meal was not on the table , you were never arrested for domestic abuse pretty much unless you bashed them to within a inch of their lives , so reality was simply " swept under the carpet " massive alcohol abuse , ask any police officer from the period.
We simply try and glorify the past , it was not a nice time , high violent , not good.
00 ReplyYes. It was super-perfect when men spent 40 hours a week in an office doing nothing useful with their lives and came home to a grossly overcooked minute steak that resembled cardboard.
Even if you are one of the few men in the world that enjoys eating cardboard, the world has moved on.
00 ReplyIt was terrible back then. Things we would consider child molestation today were just considered showing affection as Sigmund Freud discusses. Plus spousal abuse was also rampant. Back then being moral was about dressing nice, keeping your elbows off the table, and calling your elders Sir and Ma'am and if you could manage to do that you could be a brute and a pervert. Let's look to a brighter future people.
00 Reply- 30 d
Before the sexual revolution, BC pill and feminism, gender relations were MUCH, MUCH better.
Men and women needed each other and they found a way to get along, they don't anymore.
015 Reply- 30 d
no women needed men to survive and men js needed women for an ”heir”.
- 30 d
@chocolatetwopointo I can tell the feminist propaganda has gotten to you. Men are the real romantics. Chivalry only comes from a place of strength, women are biologically programmed to want men they look up to in strength, stature and status. Feminism tried to erase all that, they were funded by the Rothchilds and CIA to dilute the workforce and family bonds. The sexual revolution and birth control pill furthered both of those goals.
Then you have media like Sex and the City which tells women they can be strong, independent women who can have relations like men and still have everything they want. Meanwhile, they end up old and used up with their cats and wine bottles all around. If that's the life you want, believe their lies. - 30 d
so women having a choice bothers u? men abused women back then. no we’re not, so many women dont, like me.
so women having control over their own bodies with bc pills r bad?
women can be strong and independent. i totally want that life over being controlled by a man all my life. - 29 d
@chocolatetwopointo You don't have to have anyone control your life, you can get all the abortions you want, become obese, mess up your hormones so you don't even know who your body is naturally attracted to, and end up with all the cats you can feed. You can, but do you want to?
You can control your life like a car, but do you want to drive it to a loving home or into a ditch?
Women got all the "equality" they could ever want, but they're still not haaaappy. - 29 d
personally i dont, but many women aren't as fortunate as i am. id love to feed cats in my future.
most women are actually happier now. and did you know that women r happier when they’re single than when they’re married? i could give u a source if u want to read up on it🤷♀️ - 29 d
@chocolatetwopointo Men have been programmed for 3 generations to be weak and "nice" but that's not at all what women want. Unfortunately, that means most men are weak and they aren't satisfying their wives. Which is where they get those stats.
- 29 d
bro what? who told you that u have to be weak? and being nice should not be something forced. no they dont, they get those stats from many different women who dated many different men.
- 29 d
@chocolatetwopointo
Being "nice" gives women the "ick" if a man isn't also strong. He just comes off as a creep. That's the big secret women will never, ever tell a man. Because then they would lose any attention or investment other men might give her.
Women with 10 or more partners were the most likely to divorce, but this only became true in recent years;
Women with 3-9 partners were less likely to divorce than women with 2 partners; and,
Women with 0-1 partners were the least likely to divorce.
- 29 d
no woman has ever said that being nice gives them the ick bffr. women r naturally attracted to strong men, if men r attracted to big tits by ”nature” women should be attracted to strong men too🤷♀️ well yeah, if ur a creep no woman will like u, is that a surprise to u?
and id love to see ur source for that💀 - 29 d
@chocolatetwopointo I mean, I have a girlfriend and several other women who would like to sleep with me. So I'm not too concerned with that. But I was a creep 10 years ago and had to do immense work on myself to change that.
Source: ifstudies.org/.../ - 29 d
Other source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RB1Ed_kvZNM
- 29 d
why do you know other women than ur girlfriend that want to sleep with u? once a creep always a creep.
- 29 d
this is obviously purity crazy people talking ”ONLY 5% of prides were virgins” like come on. try not to be based for a minute. thats obviously fake bs.
- 29 d
@chocolatetwopointo Thanks for playing, I gotta go do stuff now. Enjoy old age and your cats!
- 29 d
lmao, go have 100 kids and a slave as a wife!
- 30 d
"History is a set of lies agreed upon" - Napoleon
We romanticize what we can't understand through lived experience. We denirate what we understand stand through lived experience. Exhibit A: MAGA
00 Reply - 29 d
We idealize the past too much. Things functioned better then but life was brutal. No way should we go back to sweeping incredible brutality under the rug like it isn't happening.
00 Reply - 29 d
I'm going to say that they had everything right, but people knew what was expected from them. I think that took some of the confusion out of it, and people were more successful.
00 Reply - 29 d
Not great today. Everyone fights and blames each other. There’s no self reflection or effort to improve at all. It’s mostly my generation and younger that’s being the problem
00 Reply 6.3K opinions shared on Relationships topic. They were a lot better. There were no hookups but people were happier.
00 Reply1.4K opinions shared on Relationships topic. That is probably because roles were more rigid. I don't think my grandmother had a lot of options.
00 Reply- Anonymous(18-24)1 mo
Bellisimoe! I would have to walk behind the rows with people from the past like Batmanfather and see what they see. I cannot be TheCaller of this question, except what I see in my reddreams.
00 Reply 7.5K opinions shared on Relationships topic. It wasn't better or worse
There's just the influence of social media now to brainwash everybody with the dumb shit that we see00 Reply- 30 d
women were abused a lot more in the past, y'all romantasize it wayy too much
00 Reply - 29 d
I think relations amongst people were better because we had actual face to face conversations.
00 Reply - Anonymous(30-35)29 d
All things considered, things were significantly better in the past, no question.
00 Reply - Anonymous(36-45)1 mo
I think gender relations were better in the past.
00 Reply - Anonymous(30-35)29 d
I doubt gender relations were better. I think people were better at face-to-communication back then though.
01 Reply- Opinion Owner29 d
*face-to-face communication
- 28 d
In some regions only
00 Reply - 28 d
Of course, there's no doubt
00 Reply
Learn more