Will science learn how to merge and unite the relationship between the physical (natural) world and the spiritual (supernatural) world in the future?

[Cryptic-Game]

Do you believe we will advance scientifically to the point where there are solid efforts to see the relationship between the physical world and the spiritual world?

Many people say the spiritual world is more real than the physical world. The only reason people seem to doubt the spiritual world is because they aren't currently living in it. If you were in the spiritual world, it would feel real to you. The world in which you live in feels real because you are in that world.

If you doubt science will be able to unite the physical and the spiritual world, what would be your main reasons?

Please share how you'd feel if there were major similarities in these worlds!

Science will figure out how to do it and make it work

Science is capable of doing it but won't

Science is incapable of doing it

[Skadouchebag]

it's important to realize that if science ever does come to aknowledge the existence of the supernatural then theology will just get reclassified as another field of science

[Metlahaed]

There is no such thing are the spiritual world, so no.

[Cryptic-Game]

How can you know what there isn't? What process have you used to rule out the spiritual world?

Please vote or opinion gets removed!

[Cryptic-Game]

Science more so suggest the spiritual world is plausible than implausible.

[Metlahaed]

Because we made it up... Things we make up aren't real. That is how I know, the same way I know Santa isn't real, or Super Sayans, or Zeus, or anything else that we made up.

[Cryptic-Game]

I can tell by your background pic, you're Satanic. They are not going to admit a spiritual world as Satan has blinded them.

[Metlahaed]

Satan is made up too...

[Cryptic-Game]

That's not necessarily true.

I can make up right now that it is raining in Sacramento and 3 rabbits got burnt by a candle. It could be true altho I made it up.

Wusses speak in terms of what doesn't exist. Real people say what does exist.

[Metlahaed]

Lol the irony. I'm the one here trying to tell you to stick to earthly things corporeal things... And you are talking about what doesn't exist, just saying it does.

You see though, Sacramento is real, rain is real, bunnies are real, and candles are real, fire is real. So it is possible that these real things interacted with the real world and just coincidentally happened the way you described it. But, you didn't make any of those things up, you made up a situation involving those real things. Which is why it is plausible. All of those things are measurable and testable.

[Metlahaed]

Plus, you asked the question buddy, I am just answering it.

[Cryptic-Game]

But your point was invalid that if it is made up, it is false.

People don't say what doesn't exist unless they can falsify its possibility to exist. If you can't rule God or Satan out from existing, you are dishonest to say they don't, regardless if they actually do or not until you can prove they can't. Even of you later received proof they don't, you were dishonest when you weren't sure. You'd just happen to guess it right.

[Cryptic-Game]

It is possible I could have an elephant and tiger in my house but it is not going to be believed by most people.

[Metlahaed]

Definition of made-up
1: fully manufactured
2. Invented; not true
3: fancifully conceived or falsely devised

By definition, I am right.

"People don't say what doesn't exist unless they can falsify its possibility to exist"

Ok, I highly disagree, but fine, I will give you that. Unfortunately that is the same logic that has kept religion around so long, because every religion says the same thing about their religion. And there have been thousands of different ones, meaning that 99.99% of them were wrong, because at MOST only 1 could be right... but most likely, none are.

But based on that logic I can say God sucked my dick last night and swallowed, then took it up the ass by Satan, and you'd be dishonest to say he didn't until you can prove that he didn't.

[Cryptic-Game]

Correct. I would be. Also, I can go by God's nature and know you wouldn't get a blowjob by the Almighty Creator of the Universe. You wouldn't be worthy of getting one from God.

[Metlahaed]

God loves blowjobs, why else would he make them feel so good?

[Metlahaed]

And by his nature, he loves me, and he loved blowing me too

[Metlahaed]

Listen, the best I can do for you is tell you that the way I feel, and I guess that is all these conversations could ever come down to, is that given the evidence, I'd say the likelihood of there being a spiritual world with God and Satan is the same as Harry Potter being real. Not impossible, but not worth any meaningful, serious, or profound consideration.

[Cryptic-Game]

Right. Not impossible, meaning if you can't falsify their existence, you were dishonest to say there isn't a spiritual world, which I correctly called you out on.

[Metlahaed]

Yup, I guess we are both just two dishonest people... You really won this one

[Cryptic-Game]

How do you know I can't prove the spiritual world exists?

[Metlahaed]

I think you've proven that neither of us know anything, but please prove it to me.

[Cryptic-Game]

If you didn't know, why say the spiritual world doesn't exist?

One strong evidence is the fact that Robert Lanza has shown the afterlife to be quantitized in a patient that actually died and came back to life.

www-psychologytoday-com.cdn.ampproject.org/.../does-the-soul-exist-evidence-says-yes

[Cryptic-Game]

www-psychologytoday-com.cdn.ampproject.org/.../does-the-soul-exist-evidence-says-yes

[Cryptic-Game]

The link ain't working for some reason.

[Cryptic-Game]

Type into a Google search:

Psychology Today Does the soul exist

[Metlahaed]

I read it, it proves absolutely nothing.

[Cryptic-Game]

It doesn't prove nothing. It shows the afterlife is possible. Thus meaning that the spiritual world is not as mythical as some seem so sure to be.

[Metlahaed]

It doesn't show that.

[Cryptic-Game]

Robert Lanza is a top notch neuroscientist.

[strateguy632]

it won't