Why didn't Jesus "protest" his crucifixion?

[Anonymous]

Shouldn't he have wanted to

I'm Jewish so I not only renounce but also denounce him as my lord and savior but, I'm just curious, if he was crucified, shouldn't he have wanted to protest that

[smølf]

Jesus accepted his crucifixion as part of his mission and purpose on earth. According to the Christian faith, Jesus came to earth to offer himself as a sacrifice for the sins of humanity, and his death and resurrection are considered central to the Christian message.

In the Gospels, Jesus is portrayed as knowing that his arrest and execution were imminent, and he even predicted them to his disciples. However, he did not try to avoid them or protest them in the sense of fighting back or using his miraculous powers to escape. Instead, he willingly submitted to arrest and trial, and he did not resist his crucifixion.

One possible reason for this is that Jesus believed that his death and resurrection would ultimately lead to the salvation of humanity. In the Gospel of John, for example, Jesus says, "I lay down my life for the sheep... No one takes it from me, but I lay it down of my own accord" (John 10:15, 18). Jesus saw his death as part of a divine plan, and he accepted it as a necessary sacrifice for the greater good.

[jshm2]

Because he wasn't

According to the scriptures "all the apostles fled," when Jesus was captured. Hence the famous/emotional "scene" that allegedly happened right up to his alleged "resurrection" is myth and hearsay at best.

The Romans were cruel bastards for sure, but it's unlikely they would give an innocent man -even a Jewish one - such a punishment in the open. Let alone let a "resurrected" man walk free and clear.

The Muslims and Jews do not take any of that seriously. Hence think the Christians fabricated it to have their "Jesus died for your sins" guilt trip. One the Church murdered on behalf of.

[Guy13]

You must not like Forensic evidence and a historical monologue that begins Gen. 3:13-17 up to Isa 42 when the Messianic prophecy is fulfilled. Never mind all the secular historians of Rome, eye witnesses, and Jewish, Muslim, archaeology, as well as Christian historian documenting the life and events of the Christ. If one ascribes to the Torah then the final blood sacrifice was made plain in Isa 42. I think that is Luke 10 or 13 at the final synagogue invitation for visiting rabbis... last Formal teaching outside of the evangelism as He made his way through the path of Crucifixion.

The first being to defeat the death of Si as the final blood sacrifices atoning for the Sins of the "first-born" Jewish state as well as the "vine extensions"(non-Jewish in Christ Jesus). The work is completed and you can seek the sources above for conclusive evidence if you are truly interested. It is not difficult to seek your your Savior, Lord, and Judge.

[Asker]

I'm good bro. All i did was ask why he didn't protest it

[Guy13]

You're a student of the Old Testament and Jesus is line of David so surely you know that Jesus did

not protest it because it was His calling.-I mean this is Torah, Pentateuch, Prophets, Law, Apostles,

and the cornerstone being Jesus the Christ.

[LiamJHayden]

That would have defeated the stated purpose of dying so that many could live. The idea is that the perfect, infinite sacrifice is sufficient as a complete propitiation for the sins of all who believe.

[Anonymous]

Nobady wanted to suffer, not even Jesus, God Father decided this plan for Jesus and he accepted as his obedient son.
He wished things may had go in a diferent way but that whasn't his decision

[BCRanger10]

Why would or should He have