What do you think of the term "mansplaining"?
Mansplaining is when a man dismisses my intelligence, experience and knowledge, disrespects what I have to say, and tries to tell me how to feel about things. If you demonstrate a basic level of respect for me, I don't usually feel like I am being mansplained to. If you have way more experience and knowledge about a topic, I don't feel like I'm being mansplained to. Constantly I am being told what feminists are by men who don't know a thing about feminism - guess what, your opinions don't equal my facts. Those guys are mansplaining. Constantly I am being told how my body and orgasms are supposed to work by men who have never studied anatomy, physiology, or any recent findings on female sexual response in studies, and are sometimes even virgins, but they are just so damn sure their myths and old wives tales equal my formal education. Those guys are mansplaining.
Sometimes men just do not get that their opinion is irrelevant in a given situation - they have no dog in the fight, they have no expertise, they have no actual knowledge base, but still they feel like they need to shout me down with all the angry, childish, completely false things they believe. That's mansplaining.
Talk to me like an equal, engage in an exchange of ideas with me like what I say matters, stop discounting me just because I am a woman. Then you'll stop being accused of mansplaining.
You know, I like the most that you've posted this as anonymous. :-) That gives it credebility. :-)
I could tell you, what I think, but instead, find my comment here.
whats funny is women doe the SAME thing, so the real question will always go back to this, why do people like you always make things so one sided? Is it that men are at fault and women are someone immune to this behavior? Your facts on femenisim is not what the general population observes when we see a bunch of man hating women going around saying insane things and honestly, you defending the term doesn't help make your radicalized movement look ANY better than it already looks. It has nothing to do with you being a women, and I am not ''mansplanning'' to you just because you happen to be a women who make asinine statements, if you were a man you would get the same treatment. Everything isn't as black and white as you are making it seem like
@FreedomByChoice Thanks for making my point.
Mansplein... a new word invented by this radical, irational and intolerent movement, with marxist roots, named feminism... brain washed women thinking that all wrong in their life and in their relation with men is comming from men hating or disregarding women. The single movement that has a such thinking I ca compre with is ISIS. If you read the feminists sites you'll have the strage feelling of being on a nazist sites, full of stupid, intolerant ideas simplistic thinking and dehumanization.
@lucian_lucian_123 Thanks for making my point.
As a woman, I hate the term and will never use it. It's so incredibly ignorant and obnoxious.
When a man tries to explain something to me about myself, I think two things. Is he a professional doctor/expert in this field that I may never have noticed before? If the answer is no, then why do I bother entertaining him with a conversation? Literally, why are you there trying to argue back? There will always be someone that knows more than you, man or woman. But if they don't actually have the expertise or knowledge, then I conclude them as idiots. And who cares what an idiot rambles on about?
Just don't degrade their entire gender because of momentary irritation. That's just your own childishness and immaturity coming out. Because you should be smart enough to know by now that everyone is different.
I agree, but needing credentials to know something isn't all that logical. I think that's one of the logical fallacies called the Appeal to Authority. If someone tells me something I don't know or understand, I look it up myself.
I always kinda chuckle because it's like:
"Excuse me, sir, my burger is undercooked"
"How do YOU know that?"
"Its bleeding"
"Oh, sure. And you went to culinary school?"
"No"
"Then how can you say it's undercooked?"
"Muhfcker, I know when my fckn burger ain't done!"
@JayParris I don't necessarily mean a person with a formal title or degree, I just mean someone that may have studied, learnt or delved into that subject without me knowing. Curiousity is a part of being human. I'm only semi mildly interested in science, but have read a lot on different various diseases as such from my school years. Simply due to curiousity and eagerness to learn.
Anyone can know something. You don't have to specifically be a man or a woman to know knowledge that is freely available. That's what I meant 😊
I think the word is stupid used in all settings. There are plenty of women who act like they know everything just like there are men who do that. There's already a phrase for it.. it's called a know it all. The fact that some women are trying to make it a gender thing is so stupid, it's ridiculous. Plus, how your uterus works is just biology so a man can know more about it than you do.. it's called a male gynecologist. And if he didn't know what he was talking about then he's just ignorant. No need to make it a male problem.
I think it is a stupid term. People discuss things all the time, explain their points of view, opinions, share facts, explain the processes of life.
I see women explaining themselves to men all the time, about their preferences, about how women are, or how men should be, etc. Why isn't that "womansplaining"?
To me it is more like, everyone has a perspective, and just because a person is elaborating on that perspective, doesn't mean they saying their perspective supersedes yours, even if they think they are correct.
I suppose some men live by the idea, especially in dating, that what women say or think is different than what they actually feel and do, which leads them to come up with all kinds of crazy theories backed by armchair biology and anecdotal evidence. That isn't a mansplanation, that is a friggin' interpretation from ONE man's point of view.
The word "manspreading" is what I'd like to put in a category of word usage call "diffusion speak": it's only purpose is to "diffuse" serious debate into contrivance and meaningless argumentation about the nature of speech and who gets to use it, i. e. the only reason you use words like mansplain and manspread is if you can't bring anything of substance to the table and you're only contribution is to simply shut down the dialogue completely.
Better to stop people from voicing their opinions and possibly causing hurt feelings than to actually get anything done.
Opinion
143Opinion
In a debate setting, the person who is first to accuse an opponent of "mansplaining" is the one who has already lost.
The word "mansplaining" seems simplistic as a term that suggests that men have a uniform style of explaining when in actuality, every man is different.
i love you
It’s a made up word used to silence men who speak out against misandry.
Aren't every words made up...
@kickass_arman It’s a portmanteau.
No it isn't. You've totally misunderstood what it's for and instead hijacked it to try and make a statement about feminism. You would be much better actually learning what it is than looking silly by being wrong.
@sofaking erm... no...
@lumos would it be any different If I coin a phrase such as women splanning, claiming that their genitals makes them think their opinion is absolute because its not exclusive to men. your thought process is an arrogant person who happens to be a male thinks he is the best because of his penis and think he is ''more logical'' no, this is just an arrogant person, there are plenty of women who fit that role. Whats vile is how you have basically been trained to think in such a way.
@FreedomByChoice as someone who works with coding (quite a male dominated field) I've stumbled upon this mindset by a fair share of guys. This word didn't appear out of thin air and I don't understand why you're taking offense if you don't fit the description. What's the difference if I call him arrogant or a mansplainer? Because to me it doesn't make a huge difference, and if y'all started using womansplainer to describe a woman who does the same thing (thinks she's better and smarter than men because she's a woman and therefore she knows best), I'm not gonna stop you. It's just a word.
@Annie_Mosity Actually it is.
adfsdf thats exactly the case, she will defend a disgusting word, its her choice. No one can change her mindset, she has her mind made up.
You have misunderstood the word. It isn't used to silence men who speak out about misandry. You are 100% wrong about that.
I do agree it's sexist as fuck... I use it but I use other sexist terms. Doesn't mean I actually think it's a male trait... I'm sure if a man went in to a female dominated world he would encounter the same issues: being patronised and spoken down to. It's nothing to get your knickers in a twist about but it is definitely sexist.
@Annie_Mosity “I do agree it’s sexist as F... but I use other sexist terms.” So you admit you are sexist against males?
I'm not sexist but I use sexist terms and make very un-PC jokes...
It's interesting because the meaning of the word ultimately already exists, but without gender. You could just as easily say that the guy patronized you or condescended to you. Both of those get the same exact meaning across, without gender-specificity.
I think the disappointing thing is that that kind of condescension from men to women happens frequently enough for a word like mansplaining to exist. Rather than guys bemoaning the sheer existence of the word, there should be a concerted effort to remove the behaviors that sparked the coining of the term in the first place.
Are you a guy that hates the word mansplaining? If so, then when you see men condescending to women, disregarding their knowledge and experience on a topic, speak up.
You get dick head women speaking to men in the same manner though, about issues they assume a man to know nothing about. Patronising assholes come in all genders.
Thank you for paraphrasing my post, in case others didn't get that part. Though I still prefer my version as it comes off with less animosity.
That wasn't paraphrasing... and less animosity? Well I wouldn't be living up to my name if I wasn't...
FYI, sometimes some men will tell you something and explain it to you not because they think that you need to be educated about it. They might already know or expect that you're already knowledgeable. They may just be trying to impress you, or demonstrate that they actually understand a concept you wouldn't expect them to. The fact is, most men have no idea how a uterus works, unless a guy is a healthcare provider or a scientist for example.
However, there are too many men who are arrogant and condescending, not only towards women, but equally (and sometimes even more so) towards other men.
Then there are the men who are definitely misogynists, and unsympathetically so.
It's just a dumb and ridiculous word feminists made up as a another excuse to attack men. The word itself is ignorant and ridiculous
I could just as easily say a woman is womansplaining when she explains to me how it's sexist to spread my legs when I'm sitting down. Despite the fact that I know that I'm not being sexist adn that I'm sitting the way I am because I have balls, balls that are highly sensitive and hurt and cause discomfort when they're crushed in between my legs.
But in reality she's just a ignorant bitch.
Just like any man who acts in an idiotic and rude way is a dick, douche or schmuck.
All you do when you add a gender before a word is cause pointless aggression and set yourself up to be one of those women the kind that everyone dislikes.
Mansplaining a ridiculous made up term used to dismiss a mans point of view. Your example, for example, is ludicrous, men also take health and biology in school. Just because someone is a man you think they don't know how a uterus works? Unless you were talking to an idiot that had no idea what he was talking about, which there are idiots of both genders, there's a good chance he probably knows how a uterus works. Would you like it if men used a ludicrous term like womansplaining any time a women spoke on a subject to dismiss whatever it is they said? The term is idiotic. People are people, regardless of gender. You shouldn't use a term that dismisses over half the population. I won't make it about feminism, although feminists are the ones that coined the phrase. I'll stick to making it about humanitarianism.
"Unless you were talking to an idiot that had no idea what he was talking about"
That's the whole point of the word. It's not a word that should be used to dismiss any man just because he opens his mouth. It's specifically meant to dismiss those who are talking out of their asses and think they know more just because they have a penis.
By the way, the guy asker was arguing with claimed that periods can only last for 5 days and that asker was in the wrong because hers lasts for 6 days. He was in the wrong but kept arguing that he was right.
We'll call him what he is, an idiot. Why adopt a different term when there's already tons to choose from? You could easily have called him an idiot, a dumbass, a retard, a fuckwit, a twat, a halfwit, or even a nitwit. Just to name a few. Mansplaining is a term coined by feminists and is used to write off an explanation from a man just because it came from a man, and not because he's wrong, but because the person it's used against is a man.
Just because you are a woman, and you have a uterus, does not mean you know how it works.
The notion that you have it... therefore, you are an expert at the subject is a logical fallacy made by idiots. Whether it is having a uterus, being gay, lesbian, trans... etc, unless you actually have a good understanding of the subject, merely possessing something or being something does not make you knowledgeable.
Here's a more obvious example...
Do you think schizophrenics are knowledgeable experts about their own condition? Are people with Down's syndrome experts with regards to their genetic syndrome? Are all women more qualified to make medical diagnosis about their uterus than a male doctor with a true understanding of how your body works?
If a woman who is explaining how the prostate works to a man, is she "womansplaining".
I wonder if you even notice how using made up terms by feminists and SJWs makes one sounds stupid.
No. I get that, I can't magically know everything about it just because I have one, but I do know stuff like why I use birth control and how many days my period last, because that is what this man in particular was telling me.
I don't disapprove of men teaching women stuff, and never did I even say, but when a man disagrees to a thing I am telling about my body, for example, when I said my period lasts for six days, this man was quick to correct I probably meant five because "that's how long periods last" according to him, when I told him I was 100% sure that it is indeed six days he refused to listen and tried to come up with facts as to why he was right. (he wasn't
I fail to see how that is "mansplaining".
Men also act this way with other men. To be more accurate, every person does this... including women.
This is why arguments and disagreements start.
The simple response to this person would have been, "It's not an exact science, and a text book does not always reflect reality". That would have been enough to snub him, along with a mild suggestive hint that he can't get a woman - and hence he would have no first-hand experience dealing with a woman's period... except his mother's.
I think, that it’s product of SJW, it’s beyond stupid and nobody should use it. And it is also sexist. Where is womansplaining? Oh, that’s right, nowhere.
OK. You have uterus, sure, but that doesn’t make you expert on that. Shocking, right? Now, I guess I mansplain, right? :-D Do you see, how stupid it is? Let me say this. I have…red blood cells. Like…a lot of them. But that doesn’t make me expert on them. Something what is exclusive to one sex only, I hear you saying? OK. I have penis. And…I don’t know that much about it. Now, imagine, that some (female) doctor would explain me, how it all works. For some reason. OK. I’m fine with that. I would never call it womansplaining. It simply wouldn’t even cross my mind.
I don’t know, who that man was, what was that context of that conversation, because you haven’t provided these information (convenient?), so I cannot judge.
I don't like the term
Yes I've come across men who have too much ego and think they know everything and need to explain that all to me.
However, I've seen women do this too.
Men more often, but to make a whole word only adressing men is stupid.
Especially because the only effect it gives is that men who do care about feminism etc are being shut down, because they're afraid of mansplaining.
If you have an annoying conversation partner who only screams over you, find a new one or express your thoughts.
Don't make a whole word for it and blame every man that they do things wrong.
I think it's a funny word, but people seem to be throwing it around willy nilly without thinking too hard about the actual meaning. You hit the nail on the head in terms of its meaning, though. Mansplaining isn't just about a man explaining something. Mansplaining is specifically when a guy *thinks* he knows more than a woman (without actually knowing that for a fact), usually on a topic that concerns women more than men, and he explains it in a way that's kinda antagonistic and all holier-than-thou. People don't seem to get that that's the definition and either a) use it to attack men just because they're trying to explain something or b) feel offended by the term because they (men) think it means they're not allowed to express their thoughts anymore. Both of which are incredibly wrong.
I think the term needs to be changed to include anyone who patronisingly explains something to someone who obviously knows the in's and out's of the process being explained. My female friend "mansplains" to people all the time. She will hear someone explaining something and feel the need to explain it back to them in more confusing and less clear terms. She thinks being as technical and confusing as possible is better than bringing things down to a level everyone can understand. It's embarrassing a lot of the time.
Working in a slightly engineering field I have been "mansplained" to countless times. Anyone who thinks society see women and men as equals in the workplace obviously hasn't been a woman in a male dominated sector. I get mansplained to by people who know a lot less than me about things. It's very hard trying to talk to men like these without damaging their fragile egos. I think the term is sexist though, needs to be unisex because women can be just as bad for it.
Was he wrong about how your uterus works? lol
I think it's used to be dismissive the majority of the time. Basically man + explanation/theory/thought = something a lowly male shouldn't be allowed to do.
It's the equivalent of a woman trying to explain anything or some other concept she is privy to or has any thoughts on, and I just dismiss anything she has to say because she is a woman... and that just simply equals womansplaning... so meh and and look down my nose at her instead of having any consideration for another point of view.
Dismissive snobbery with a (feminist) chauvinistic edge.
Its a word annoying women employ when they don't want men to explain things to them. I see it very liberally used to dismiss people. I understand its origins came from a woman having a book explained by a douchebag to her at a party which she wrote herself in a shitty way that underestimated her own intelligence with sexist undertones, but I don't really feel like the internet-or feminists especially-view words as saceed in their meaning. Just look at the word cuck, its used to decribe people you have political disagreements with or to describe someone you find to be overly submissive when really it came from a specific (weird) sexual fetish, cuckolding. Or words like literally, uber, etc. I generally see the word 'mansplaining' and get the same urge to throw up in my mouth a little that seeing 'manspreading' gives me. If its used in the right context, I can forgive it, but 87% of the time its purile bullshit. I hate it.
I've got a really high I. Q. and I have to mansplain everything to everybody all the time and my absolute level best efforts have only ever yielded the most marginal results in terms of edification.
But I'll keep trying to make dumb motherfuckers turn their fucking brains on for the rest of my life, and like Batman, you never need to thank me, because I may be a martyr for the stupidity of Man, but I am doing it purely for my own selfish reasons of trying to understand my own deep-seated psychological trauma.
pics.me.me/...nt-to-run-a-subpar-page-12536533.png
It's rude, childish and makes people look stuck up.
If you don't want to talk to someone or listen to them. Just don't talk to them. Don't need to be rude about it. Just don't interact with them. Just remember that if you can act like that, we can too. I get some men are dicks. But sometimes we are trying to have an intellectual conversation to show we have some understanding of things or to connect on a higher level than just a physical one. But if he is just being rude and acting like you stupid because you are a woman. This is when they speak down to you and very much treat you to the equivalent of a child. Then just cut contact all to get him. You deserve a man that will be kind to you. But be careful he may be trying to show you he cares, by trying to explain that he understands what might be going on and is willing to connect with you. It is ok to ask him why he wanted to explain that to you.
Men think is straight logical lines; women get lost, finding every single connection on the way.
Our brains literally work differently, so we are going to comprehend on slightly different levels, and conceptualize in different ways.
He can see that a room needs painting, and she can see that the room needs the walls tinted with Robin's Egg Blue.
I think the fact many women have found themselves being talked down to and having things explained to them like they're a children, when they have full knowledge of the situation, is the reason why there's now a word for the action. Actions speakouder than words and those actions have earned themselves a name now
there are plenty of women who talk down on men, there are plenty of women who talk down on women, there are plenty of women who talk down on kids. Its not exclusive. the term is inexcusable
If we have "mansplaining", we should also have "womansplaining". Equality, bitches. It works both ways. XD
“Mansplaining” actually is when a man tries to explain something to a women because he thinks she’s too dumb to know. There’s no use of logic on the mans part, he’s dismissing the fact that women are smart and know more than men give women credit for.
Well let me explain.. You are just flat out wrong.. Perception is not reality..
Lol I’m just saying what it is. I’ve never experienced it.
what you are saying is not as one sided as the term suggests. Its just a way to simply denounce a mans opinion while claiming that they are trying to denounce women. the majority of people do not see women as second class, its the delusions of radicalized movements that push these phrases
Gah.. Now do I have to mansplain that I was just teasing you.. xD
lol 😂
@psychosam no I am mansplanning to the womensplaner and the white knight
well, in your example - if the guy knows a lot about the biology of it and you don't, I don't think that would fit with the usual connotations or expectation of 'mansplaning'. But if there is no reason for the guy to know more, then yes, it fits.
usually it suggests a level of condescending.
I think "mansplaining" is a sexist term usually used by feminists who cannot debate a subject or matter properly. Invoking gender to shut down a person's right to speak is a classic radical feminist tactic and is completely hypocritical.
I love when this Australian politician shuts down a feminist politician using the sexist term mansplaining
In all honesty it's a word that describes how people chose to interrupt someone and ignore their knowledge only to talk about what they supposedly know.
The only thing wrong with this term is that it is used towards men, even though all genders have the ability to be an ass
I don't know why - I have been on GAG a while - but I'm a little surprised by the hyper negative responses from men. I've personally seen this happen like a zillion times, so I'm not really sure what folks are upset about. I mean, it's a word that describes something that happens often.
If you think the word mansplaining is a real thing then you have to accept that womansplaining is a real thing as well
Mansplaining is not a thing. It's just a term used by irrational women whenever a man uses logic against them.
I just think it's a little hypocritical since it's a word invented and used by feminists who are supposedly all about equality and constantly complain that they're viewed as anti-male, to say that this is a gender specific issue as if women don't do the same to men, which they do all the time.
Would love to see the patent from "The Feminists" inventing "mansplaining"... or did you just claim that as fact to back up your narrative?
@Annie_Mosity
The word was first used in a comment section on a feminist writer's article (Rebecca Solnit) titled "men exolain things to me". It's safe to assume that most commenting there were feminists, and it is feminists who mostly use that term. Oh shit, am I mansplaining right now?
God... how dare you patronise me with some facts?
I use it too. Men don't like it because they think it's sexist. Well we don't like being talked down to like a child! Mansplaining is sexist. Don't get mad because we call you out on it.
In all seriousness, we can't really expect them to understand something that they don't experience.
Men talk like this to each other too, it's not because you're a woman, it's because men and women have different styles of communication... Men tend to be competitive and talk over each other, women are more agreeable and have more refined communication skills. And when these two worlds collide, women tend to get the short end of the stick :-/ When someone does this to you, dont be polite, just keep talking, be obnoxious if you must... that's how we do it ^^
Are you seriously "womansplaining" mansplaining?
@DonkeyRick69 yes, she literally just womensplanned, and she will never understand because its something that she doesn't experience
😂😂 You guys are trying so hard
@FreedomByChoice now she's dismissing our views in a condescending manner. Total womansplaining.
@DonkeyRick69 dont you just hate that? I feel so oppressed
Hahahahahahahaha. You poor guys really have no idea. But by all means keep trying. I'm sure you'll get it at some point.
we have no idea, the irony. This is not to patronize you or trying to mansplain but try and step away from media for a good month or so, look at the difference as to what it is doing to your personality. if you dont like purging then you can just go back to this state.
@FreedomByChoice Why would she? Blaming others and feeling morally superior and victimized is a perfectly comfortable place to be in.
@Journeyman11 Which is exactly why men tend to dismiss feminism. Thank you for that fine example.
Since when are men morally superior or seen as victims? XD I'm laughing my ass off right now. I've been told by the media, by parents and by teachers that boys are the ones who cause all the trouble, who understand nothing about feelings and who are to blame for everything wrong in life as long as I can remember. I've been constantly encouraged to think about womens' issues and their place in the world, told I may never hurt them, while in every single comedy movie men get kicked in the nuts by women and get laughed at, I've been spat on by girls, punched in the face by as an 8-year old by girls who were twice the size of me and who I've never met before, laughed at and called gay by them when I had acne, and now they stare at me, they do EVERYTHING only men are accused of, and I'm SICK of it, of taking the blame for being a boy, so FUCK YOU and your MANspreading and MANsplaining and expecting us to give a fuck about what you want from us.
YOU are the one who only cares about their gender and who denies that the other one has problems, denouncing the other ones' life experience and seeing it through an egotistical lense. EVERY man knows that women have certain feelings about their place in life we can never experience, bit I doubt that nearly as many women ever had the same thought about men, including you. Look up the statistics and you will see that women in the western world are doing better in every aspect of life. Just stop calling us ignorant and condescending us or go fuck yourself. You're everything you accuse men to be.
Either they're explaining or they're being condescending. Trying to make up a word for it specifically because it's a man being condescending is just asinine. Women can be condescending too, but if we said femsplaining, or got aggressive and made bitchsplaining popular, there'd be riots.
The definition of mansplaining is that it is in a condescending and patronizing way. But it isn't even a real word. It's a slang term that never caught on. I don't think anyone would be taken seriously if they said that during a serious conversation
Ahaha... Some people get bad attitudes. Personally, I try to say that I am checking my understanding.. but sharing information can be a loving act.. (regardless of the sex of the person) but I think it was a thing that the guy appreciated... Being told how things work... So he is trying to share that... Maybe nievly...
It's suppose to be when a man is explaining something to a woman that women generally don't know much about like cars, or electronics or something, but do so in a condescending manner that is borderline insulting to the woman's level of intelligents.
Unfortunately, modern extremist feminism has warped this into anything and anyway a man explains anything to a woman becomes automatically "mansplaining" and therefore also automatically derogatory, insulting and sexist which is complete nonsense.
Since I met my girlfriend 10 years ago, I have this running joke with her that she was born under a rock until she met me. Certain things that are pretty common things to know she has no clue about. For example, the term "you need this done yesterday" completely flew over her head. She sworn she never heard it before. She had no clue what the guy meant. Or certain cultural references like "it doesn't matter if you win by inch or a mile, winning is winning (places arms up in the air)" . So many times that this happens I have to explain what these references mean.
She stumbled into a mansplaining video in Facebook and said "hey, you do this!" Then I replied "fine, look like a clueless moron meanwhile everyone around you is laughing because they get the joke/reference. "
What you do isn't mansplaining. That's just plain explaining. Are you really surprised that your girlfriend missed yet another cultural reference? You need to explain mansplaining to her... it's so close to being ironic...
Are you womansplaining mansplaining?
Cuz I'm sensing some real irony here.
LMAO!
A man can't know how a uterus works? I have and still teach women more about their sexuality than they knew prior. You're not going to believe me and that's fine but I've had more than one woman say it to me.
If a female doctor of prostate health hits me up should I just be like HA! Femsplaining!! You're a woman and can't possibly know anything about my prostate.
So if a male gynecologist were to explain something to you if you had an inflamed uterus, you'd cover your ears and yell mansplaining because he's a man talking about the female body? It's funny how people think they know more than someone because it affects them than someone who studied it in college and got a degree from it lol.
She didn't say it was a gyno just that it was a man.
I know, that's why I said "if." And besides that, you don't know another person's knowledge, so if you don't know solid facts/evidence about a certain subject or topic and don't know everything about it, how can you discredit another person just because of something trivial like their gender?
I suppose I have filed it in its jokey sense where certain stereotypical attributes of a group are parodied. My feelings on this once you are laughing "With" someone rather than "At" someone, its okay - Beyond that you move onto "Patronising" or "Offensive" behaviour which probably should be addressed seriously.
I think its a sexist term designed to dismiss a man's opinion and stop him from expressing himself.
And why do we need a gender specific term to accuse someone of being condescending. In my experience, women, especially feminists are just as likely, if not, more likely to be condescending when expressing their viewpoints.
Afraid Bandit74 is spot on here. I find the term sexist. Both men and wmen can be pricks, problem is I think society tends to let us guys get away with that more than it allows women to do so.
I use bitchsplaining... When a bitchy person tries to explain stuff to me and bores me to tears.
A 24 yo woman, licenced psychologist, did not know she had a urethra. She thought she was peing from her vagina and that peing help her clean her vagina from period blood. Was I 'mansplaining' to her, or just explaining? She also did not know that the sun was a star.
She's an idiot and that, to me, is not mansplaining, that is talking some sense into her. What I was referring to was a man who strongly disagreed when I told him my menstruation lasted for 6 days, claiming a menstruation can only last 5 days, and did not listen to a word I was saying. (I was the right one)
I think it's idiotically sexist. Woman inturupt me way more than any other sex with me. Inturupting is basically ones etiquette with speaking. It goes for both sexes, and shouldn't be categorized farther than being a rude little shit. But, that's just me.
At best,
It's tool used by Feminists to silence the truth that contradicts their near religious ideological beliefs.
At worst,
A tool of hate and bigotry used to attack and demean 50% of the population, not better than any other form of racism, sexism etc..
We do that because women are usually fed a line of BS that they never challenge or understand or encounter themselves. I. e. explaining anything at all to a feminist... while smearing period blood on themselves.
"Why do hunters kill the poor animals? Why don't they just go to the store and get the meat there?"
It's when a man doesn't listen to a woman's perspective on something and insists that he knows better. This happens commonly with men who feel like they need to dominate the conversation.
So when a woman does the same thing is she expressing her opinion or just "womansplaining"?
@DonkeyRick69 no dude, that doesn't fir the narrative, women are impeccable in that area being the self righteous and high beings that they are. its only men who have the faulted characters
Women don't want to dominate conversations like men do. Women also don't try to demonstrate their superiority over others like men do. Because men are socialized within the patriarchy.
those horrible generalizations and not right under any sense. there are plenty of controlling and manipulative women out there. by being surrounded by it my entire life and emotionally scarred by dealing with a narcissistic mom, step mom and even grandmother I already know your ideology is just cult mentality and nothing more which tries to teach people the idea of men being the villain while women are the benevolent beings who will be heard. women are still apes with egotistical issues, just like men are. No gender is more advanced than the other. thats all I have to say on the manner because I would probably be blocked after this
and that of course is the obvious truth. There is no distinct difference, it all depends on circumstance. A mom will over talk her kid due to thinking that since they are a kid, they have no say in the manner. of course There are men who exist who think women are below them BUT there are also women who think men are below them, as you somehow make this a one sided issue and only point out flaws of a mans character when its not exclusive to them you seem to fit the description just fine. Try and denounce me all you want, and tell me its because I am a man and want to ''dominate'' things but anybody who doesn't follow this toxic way of thinking knows the obvious
@FreedomByChoice
Actually no. Just because men try to dominate things doesn't mean that bad women don't exist. You're conflating the two.
And yes it is a one-sided issue on a society-wide scale because of how men are socialized in our culture. If you don't understand that it's fine. I don't have the time or inclination to try to educate you.
you consider that education? you mean you dont have time to radicalize me? Its sad how the media has created such toxicity and hate. If you have read the examples I gave correctly, such as the mother over talking the kid, then you can clearly see its a domination issue. This is really common, otherwise known as ''mother knows best'' or ''you are to young you will never understand'' the act of undermining people due to the idea that they are below you in a certain way. My voice has been shunned out my entire life, and I have lived in the shadow of my brother due to our age difference. I have lived int he shadow of my cousin who is a female, due to age difference. This goes further then just men wanting to dominate, its a problem that all humans have, which is a ego. your ego tells you its men who has the problem, MGTOW says its women, but you both look the same. My ego is screwed up too, I lash out everytime someone tries to undermine due the the cycle my mom created.
I'm trying something as of yesterday called transcendental mediation. I know I have no say in what you want to do or how you want to think, but you should look into it. I am also cutting all sources of news and journalism out of my life
@FreedomByChoice
You still don't understand patriarchy. It's ok, I don't care. You clearly have a lot of issues of you own to deal with.
I know you dont care, and thats the problem. goodbye
Patriarchy. Thanks to modern technology and medicine men no longer have to carry women as a burden as now women can now "hunt" for themselves.
It's true sometimes. Haven't had it happen to me since I hardly talk to guys or I tell them to STFU if they're being stupid (but in all due respect, I do that to girls too).
I think you're a sheep for using a buzzword you heard in order to further perpetuate your own ignorance. You can't just throw this sexist term out and act. like women don't do the same exact thing. Stop being a sheep and get over yourself
Was that man a doctor? Also, the term "manslaining" is inherently sexist. Woman do it too, so let's not assign gender to it.
Women can do the same thing about/to men. Same with the whole ‘manspreading’ thing, but replace legs with bags or purses. At least we have a reason to ‘manspread’: It hurts when you try to keep your legs shut cause your balls get squished.
It’s just to feel comfortable. It’s not about displaying dominance or some bullshit like that. Testicles hurt when squished between led or against a seat, especially in denim.
Legs*
Eh.
I don't like the term.
I'm sure there's womansplaining as well, but altogether it just sounds so dismissive and rude.
Why would you automatically assume that you know how your uterus works? Why would you assume that just because he's a man, he couldn't possibly know?
I mean, really. How many women out there think their clit is just a little button? How many men understand how their testicles produce testosterone? Just being a particular gender doesn't impart you with magical knowledge that three other can't comprehend.
*the* other.
Oh, well that was just stupid.
I think its a term that bitchy women have corrupted. I've seen a few odd guys here and there that talk as if women dont understand simple things but as sexist as that is, the term itself is sexist. There are women that talk that way too and the majority of men dont do that.
For example feminism is now a horrible curse word in society because its now like a crusade for superiority. I wouldn't say im a feminist, id say im for equal rights, as do most women i know.
Mansplein... a new word invented by this radical, irational and intolerent movement, with marxist roots, named feminism... brain washed women thinking that all wrong in their life and in their relation with men is comming from men hating or disregarding women. The single movement that has a such thinking I ca compre with is ISIS. If you read the feminists sites you'll have the strage feelling of being on a nazist sites, full of stupid, intolerant ideas simplistic thinking and dehumanization.
This is what you get in the real world for using such ridiculous term:
All i see is a rude ass man continually talking over a woman who literally just said that he was being rude and condescending, and instead of correcting his actions he tries to play the victim.
I think it's offensive and sexist to use a word to single out a man for sharing his opinion if a woman we're to sit here and tell me how my male parts work I wouldn't say she's womansplaining because that's offensive have respect and be the bigger person
It's bullshit term used against guys because when a guy tries explaining something to a woman and her dumb ass still doesn't understand him so she says that he is mansplaining, smart women would never use this term
In my opinion (with the example):
Male who is not a medical professional or gynecologist- Shut up about my uterus...
Male who is a medical professional or gynecologist (like mine)- I'll listen to the opinions and facts and acknowledge them..
And vice-versa. You are forbidden now from speaking on men's issues and genitalia
OK since admittedly the inner workings of the penis allude me.
So if a male doctor tells you something about your body, he is mansplaining?
What about when a woman tries to tell a man something about his dick? Is she womansplaining?
You sexist, retarded, stupid fucking lesbian shit.
It's stupid.
If I add the gender before it it's a stupid agression.
Like.. why would it be impossible that he know is better then you do?
When someone uses this term I have to assume that this person is frustrated and stupid
For example?
Like if I use this uterus example.
I am almost finished with nursing school and it's embarrassing how little the females in my class (24) know about the female anatomy compared to the males (5).
Most of em didn't know what is where and what it does.
And so.. if a woman is explaining something where she knows nothing about, do I call this mansplainig too?
Or can only woman use this word?
Cause that would be sexist.
So if a male gynecologist tells a woman how her uterus works, is he mansplaining?
Please, so many women don't even know how it works themselves.
Mansplaining is basically what a woman who's wrong but has too big of an ego to admit she's wrong, will say to silence a man. Typical misandry masked as victimhood.
There's a category of behavior that the term "mansplaining" makes some sense for. But more often than not, it's just used to refer to a man daring to state an opinion.
It's a term I personally don't like because, like many other controversial terms, everyone seems to have their own interpretation of what it means and whenever uses the word it always ends to a lot of fighting and butthurt people.
It's not even a catchy word though so as a new word it's already on its way to decline... Try saying it... 'Mansplain', not only would one sound like an utterly fool using it, nobody would *truly* understand them.
You can also add your opinion below!
Most Helpful Opinions