https://www.tiktok.com/tag/stopasianhate
Do you support the new movement “Stop Asian Hate”?
https://www.tiktok.com/tag/stopasianhate
Always have supported it. Being xenophobic is gross. I can’t believe people voted no to this..
There was a case of a black man rapping a Asian girl and killing her. They didn’t show his face on the reports. They are basically trying to somehow blame white people again even though there’s a large amount of attacks coming from black people. Specially black guys. I only saw one video of one black girl in there saying stuff about Asians.
I’m aware, I keep up with what’s happening
I don't know how many times some dudes here call me names.
Opinion
45Opinion
I voted no because there's nothing that can be done.
there's a whole bunch of really stupid people out there. Like honestly, do you think a person who attacks an Asian person over COVID is an intelligent person?
These people are braindead. You have to be extremely dumb to want to attack Asian people because of covid. there's zero logic. They're just insane people who are the bottom of the barrel in aociety.
What can be done? You really think this movement will do anything? The only thing that would do anything is a fear of retaliation. Maybe we catch the perpetrators and we torture them. That'll reduce the attacks lol. If they knew they'd get tortured for doing it.
Its unfortunate that these people exist. But I donf think this silly movement will have any effect whatsoever. It's just another movement like every other one. White people being SJWs and all that. Nobody cares what they think except others with the same mindset.
It's funny because apparently lots of black peoppe are doing it. Like 1/3 of the attacks. Black people are just as ignorant and shitty as anyone else. What a world we live in. So many retarded people out there amazing.
I voted "yes". I totally agree that there have been more hate crimes against people of Asian descent recently, mostly due to this virus that "originated" in an Asian country. As if that's a valid reason to be racist towards anyone.
There are many Phillipino and Hmong people where I live, I've even worked with some at a Thai restaurant. We got many white customers who thought it was okay to be rude to them based on what they looked like and what kind of establishment they worked at. No human should be treated less than that -- HUMAN.
Yes but I also oppose Asian grooming gangs targeting young white girls for rape and gang rape.
@doopayo so white children raped by asisns should shut their mouth for the good of diversity is what you are saying?
No, I’m saying since this is about Asian American issues it doesn’t make sense to change the topic to white women/children. It’s a good topic but what it’s unintentionally referring to is that Asian Americans shouldn’t be cared for because they r*pe white women” so that’s good to educate people if it’s in a more related context.
@doopayo so it doesn't matter because the victims are white English girls?
I never said it didn’t matter, I said it isn’t appropriate to bring up their suffering under this topic specifically only asking about Asian American struggles because it’s kind of missing the point. Why respond to a certain groups pain with saying, well this group r*pes white women after. It’s as if you’re subconsciously trying to Intel that what their going threw doesn’t matter cause some Asians happen to r*pe white women. That’s horrible but it’s also inappropriate and highly insensitive to comment that on a post regarding on how poorly Asian Americans have been treated leading the spark of COVID 19
@slay_girl, those countries are in Asia. They’re south Asian?
Lol those are not "Asians" those are muslims 🤦🏻♂️
@slay_girl hey you recognized it too! 👏 But yea the fucking newd media would rather die than ever report correct information about grooming gangs and terrorists. They always use extremely vague words like Asians instead of just saying it how it is and say they are muslims lmfao
@vald9inches... muslim PAKISTANIs
@Hanoi_Jane00 Islam is a religion and an ideology, its not race or nationality silly 😊
@vald9inches and yet 85% of these grooming gangs fall into the ethnic grouping of Pakistani Muslims. That is immigrants or descendants of Pakistanis in Britain who are also Muslim, a massive figure considering they are a tiny minority in Britain. They also account for the majority of incestuous marriages and children born with congenital birth defects.
The perfect muslim is Mohammed and he married and had sex with a 9 year old girl that is why muslims around the world do this.
Have not seen anything like this where I live, and my town is now (apparently) 17% Asian, most of them 1st-generation immigrants.
Given how the news cycle actually works, it would probably be more accurate to say, "After actively promoting actual, institutionalized discrimination against Asians in the education system, we here in the media find it convenient to start labeling/acknowledging more incidents involving an Asian victim as a hate crime because it's politically convenient."
I support them. Some of my partners are Asian ( like 3 lol) and they supported BLM..
Even though I don't support BLM white liberals tripping with that one.
I mostly support it because I need them to push a new bill or legislation. To put more cops on the streets and make longer jail time.
If I say this black people will call me a Tap dancing sellout. But if Asians do this they can get it done.
It's for the betterment of my people even if they don't know it.
If you're not a criminal it won't affect you.
Also, I appreciate Asian say atop Asian hate instead of just black people cuz I seen a lot of stories were it was us but I seen a lot stories were it was other groups.
Either way they have my support. They'll get tid of having newspm and gascon and Andrew cummo
Yeah, except it may not actually be due to Covid as over 90% of the crimes committed against "Asians" are unfortunately from "Black" dudes.. 😅🙄.. As most of the crimes are a rise in burglaries, robberies, and assaults.. The media is associating it with Covid but I doubt it's actually because of Covid..
You are right
the far majority of these attacks have been from black dudes
but once again the blame goes towards white people.. or trump.. etc
im sure anti-asian sentiment was increased with the "china virus" statement by Trump
but THESE same attacks are coming from demographics that are NOT Trump supporters
@EmperorRetribution Yeah unfortunately that's what the media will usually do.. Blame the "White" Supremacist boogie-man or Trump Supporters.. As for the rise in crime being due to Trunps comments.. I don't know, if we could really blame it for that.. We would have to see when exactly the crimes started rising.. Could be when the BLM riots started..
indeed...
Don't get Americans. After 9/11 they had this thing where it was "patriotic" to kill and abuse Muslims. Similar things down the years against others, but under Trump it seems to be "Chinese looking" that are getting it.
Seems Americans can't live without a nemesis to target.
@ItsTheNephilim Actually the United States helped Pakistan and the Mujhadeen (largely based in Afghanistan/Pakistan.. but also had many Arab elements) against the Soviet Union and the Democratic Republic of Afghanistan (the Soviet supported government of the nation).
The United States helped supply the movement through Operation Cyclone
the Pakistani ISI largely organized the forced on the ground.
@EmperorRetribution 'helped Pakistan', yeah right. It was the same old rivalry of the Soviets and USA that was destroying Afghanistan and when Pakistan created Taliban under the nose of USA, USA didn't react directly to it and didn't do anything against them while Afghanistan still suffered under hardcore radical Islamists.
@ItsTheNephilim
Of course it was for political reasons
the reasons for any relationship was for the value of the nation itself
The United States wouldn't support a nation that didn't serve its purposes
and furthermore
the Taliban were created in 1994.
5 years after the end of the Soviet involvement in Afghanistan
the Afghan Government collapsed in 1992
Operation Cyclone ended in 1989
@ItsTheNephilim ^ further more the Soviet Union collapsed in 1991
forgot to add that detail
so your argument is a mute point.
@EmperorRetribution that's what I'm talking about, USA, for its own purpose and interests made conflicts in other countries. I didn't know about when was Taliban founded but it certainly controlled Soviet influence after the main conflicts. It was mainly Al Qaeda before them. Unsurprisingly, USA didn't mind them then.
And the only 'terrorism' done in that area was put on Islamic radicals (of course according to America).
So USA didn't help in any way, other than just adding fuel to the fire and burning the country for its own interests and ego.
@ItsTheNephilim
And why is that big deal?
every nation on the planet only looks out for its own interest.
Nations don't do deals with others, unless it has value
Nations dont create alliances.. unless it has value
Nations dont supply resources unless it has value
that is the reality of all groups.
Al Qaeda was created in 88 in Pakistan
and was not an American ally (quite the opposite, they would launch a string of attacks on Americans throughout the 1990s)
Simply because the USA supported the Mujhadeen (which was a large group of people... many of them didn't agree)
doesn't mean the USA actually agreed with them
the USA was more interested in harming the Soviet Union.. than creating lasting alliances
they wanted the Soviet Union to have its own "Vietnam" (Basically a quagmire.. that creates struggles at home.. and drains resources... the Soviet Union in Afghanistan.. like the USA in Vietnam.. won the majority of the battles.. but ultimately issues at home forced a change of policy.. in the case of the Soviet Union it was the Gorbachev reforms...)
The conflict in Afghanistan also started due to a Soviet coup in the late 1970s
They installed a Pro-Soviet government (which is why the Afghan public in large didn't agree with them.. and why most of the mujhadeen were Afghan)
You can argue about the pros or cons of it
or rather the USA was a "Good Guy"
but that is a very simplistic way to look a conflict
Sure the USA did its a fair share of bad things
same with most every other nation on the planet
This comes from your own biases
than any basis in reality.
@EmperorRetribution talking of biases, it's the hypocrisy of USA I'm pointing out. The Taliban and Al Qaeda didn't do any good with to civilians of Afghanistan nor did USA or The Soviet. And anyone who acts against the interests of USA is a terrorist while USA doesn't take any such lable for creating nuisances in other countries and literally destroying them.
@ItsTheNephilim That is likely due to the fact that the Taliban Regime was overthrown by the Northern Alliance (who were viewed as the official government of Afghanistan by the United Nations)
Yes, the USA was involved
but it was largely Afghans on the ground
that Government was then created through a Loya Jirga (a Pashtun tradition of elders making decisions) and through the 2002 Bonn Agreement
While the United States supported the government, and continued to support it to this day
since 2014, its largely been the Afghan Government handling its own security..
NOT TO MENTION UNAMA often reports most civilian losses are due to insurgents
from 2009 to 2011 (the peak of USA involvement) around 80% of all civilian deaths were attributed to the Insurgents...
and now the war is MORE BLOODY.. without heavy American involvement.
blame the USA all you want
but facts do matter here
@ItsTheNephilim ^ I will further add that the Taliban Regime in the 1990s lost much of its international respect due to its brutality... and numerous massacres (borderline genocide) it carried out.
This is why even TODAY.. most Afghans view the Taliban as outsiders (and due to their Pakistani backing. many view them as Pakistani proxies)
^ not to mention Pakistan was usually the Safe Haven for Taliban after every defeat in the battlefield throughout the conflict
made it easy for them to recoup their losses.. retrain... recruit... regroup.. and launch more raids.
there losses were so high throughout the conflict
that even Antonio Guistozzi consulted them in the "Al Somud" obituaries..
from 2001 to 2014 there were around 70,000 names in those lists (much higher than most mainstream media claims)
even NOW
RIV Monitoring (an Afghan based news source... based out of Orbandi News)
reports that since
Feb 2020 (the RIV period.. for the peace agreement)
at least
3,500 ANDSF... 16,000 Taliban.. and 2,000 Civilians have died
and the Taliban are quite litearlly the only group
not taking the peace agreement seriously.
@EmperorRetribution never not blamed others. Now it's a fuck up, I admit and the country is going through shit without much of USA's involvement. But the starting point of all is this was USA and The Soviet, a little before the involvement of Islamist radicals.
Now, the shit has escalated to a lot of things and the Afghanistanis are fighting among themselves.
I never said Taliban stood for any good. Nothing more than radicals they were brutalizing the people of the country. Look above, I blame them too. I don't wanna repeat what I said about USA too.
@ItsTheNephilim Yes
and what I am saying is
its not particularly UNIQUE
and to be honest
the United States has led the world in an era that has been VERY peaceful compared to most others
during an era of massive economic growth (for all) and technological/social/political progression
where certain standards are being held that were NEVER considered before
were laws are in place that simply didn't exist in the past..
Sure the USA is NOT perfect.. and has done its fair share of bad things
but trust me when I say its fairly good compared to most
@ItsTheNephilim ^ and in regards to Afghan history
they have spent most of their history being CONQUERED.. by others
be it the Persians.. Indians.. Greeks.. etc
they are very diverse
and have always suffered from internal struggles
the issues TODAY.. are not unique to Afghan History
they are fairly normal :P
@EmperorRetribution USA's ideologies and laws of liberties and all are all admirable. But the way they were and are still being abused by the leaders and how they work of collective good goes against how their ideals would wanna work in other 'unorderly' places. Clearly driven by self interests and not so much for good of others. Best example, it's influence in middle east.
I agree on the history of Afghanistan, the ones who exploited are all the same. Just didn't like the way how USA could dodge the blame and put it on others.
@ItsTheNephilim How is the USA dodging any sort of blame
considering the USA seems to be blamed for EVERYTHING
from most internal conflicts in nearly every nation
for how the the market works
for racism... or sexism.. ETC
the list goes on
I dont see the USA avoiding blame on anything
if anything I see the USA as the prime target for blame for most things (even if it isn't really the party that is particularly influential on the topic at hand)
@EmperorRetribution for the starters, Islamophobia. It would be highly localized to Afghanistan and the area nearby unless it gained too much momentum (like in Syria afterwards). The way USA acknowledged Islamophobia after 9/11 (in many ways being itself responsible for it) cost a lot of Muslims their image worldwide and all the focus was on how Muslims terrorize the world. Of course many innocents died that day but people started to value loss of some lives as more valuable than others. USA interferes in many ways in other nations, some for good, some for bad but mostly, for self interests and it costs greatly to many others.
@ItsTheNephilim As we both said, all nations serve their own self interests
no nation in history had done otherwise
No doubt the USA aided in the increase in Islamophobia
and I am unsure anyone has denied that?
I dont see politicians going out of their way to claim the opposite
or the news media going out of its way to claim the opposite
So I dont see where you are coming from that the USA is avoiding blame
@EmperorRetribution I'm going to put it in a simpler way and try the most recent happening as an example.
Someone from ISIS kills several innocents, that's an act of terrorism (and appalling indeed).
Biden bombed Syria, that's not terrorism.
I'm sure you can figure this out yourself what I'm implying.
@ItsTheNephilim Naturally after 9/11 .. the United States used terms like "Islamic Terrorism" (which is was)
but didn't recognize the negative consequences of using such terms..
this is why it was quickly changed.. and for over 10 years.. the term hasn't been used by the government in such a way
If anything the government made attempts to explain that
MOST Muslims were good... and MOST were doing the fighting against Radicals
But of course now we have movements against White people that use the same generalizations?
the idea that all whites are unconsciously racist... that they need to be less white (according to coke employer training)... etc etc
WHICH ARE CLEAR examples that are ignored today by the mainstream
But what you are speaking about is a very specific period of the past 20+ years
@ItsTheNephilim And Bidens strike was a retaliation against strikes on a Iraqi/USA base (where a Iraqi Civilian was killed... along with a foreigner contractor)
If we hold your standard
ANY WAR
is Terrorism
there is something completely different from launching a strike that kills 22 Iranian backed militia (according too SOHR)
and carrying out a Genocide against the Yazidis.
@EmperorRetribution didn't Trump promote Islamophobia too? And that's pretty recent to me.
Despite all the colonialism and exploiting *those* whites did worldwide, I still condemn how they're generalized today.
How liberals in USA promote BLM and stay silent on violence they cause, I see the hypocrisy. The situation is worsened when likes of Trump promote white supremacy. Many acknowledge that whites who stayed in America defended the native blacks from the other colonizers but that was all over the world and one side was clearly at entire fault.
But then again, what were the USA troops doing in that area? What if Iraq had a base in USA and it'd retaliate by sending bombers over USA if any harm was done to its troops?
That wasn't all over the world where the British had colonized*
@ItsTheNephilim
Not that I know of? Perhaps?
But many of his statements were taken out of context for political clout
TAKE THAT FROM A BERNIE SUPPORTER
for example the "Very Fine People" (where he supported KKK/Neo Nazis/White Supremacists)
in the actual interview (the full thing) he clearly denounces them multiple times.. and merely states that the Left and Right Wing has "very fine people" on both sides.. but also radical elements that were bad
^ he's routinely denounced them
But the media often portrayed him as unwilling to denounce those groups
even during the 2020 debates one of the questions involved denouncing them (which he immediately did)
So I have my doubt about how "BAD" or "RACIST" Trump really was
he said some stupid stuff
but much of it was taken out of context
2. those "whites" didn't really do anything particularly unique to world history.. but of course biases tend to highlight "white crimes" and ignore others
3. YOU ARE RIGHT... the crimes of the BLM were ignored
4. The USA has a defense agreement with the Iraqi Government... thats the main reason for the base.. and the continued support to fight against ISIS elements. (at this moment there are 2,500 troops in Iraq... and also 2,500 in Afghanistan... under similar purposes)
@ItsTheNephilim ^ Iraq also supported the United States when the base was attacked (Because its people were harmed)
and has launched raids to dismantle various militant groups within its own country
the USA and Iraq are allies
just as the USA and Afghanistan are allies
there are disagreements no doubt
but they work together.
@EmperorRetribution good to see a Bernie supporter acknowledging hypocrisies of BLM. Even though I'm not from the USA, Bernie's policies sounded good to me.
Now, Trump had Muslim ban in USA. I think that speaks a lot. Secondly, why did he kill Qasem Solemanni of Iran (who was known to have insurgencies against the ISIS)? All this adds to his agenda of having its vote bank. White supremacists, Christian radicals, Islamophobia. I admit he got rid of Baghdadi but why kill someone who is helping you in some way by killing the ISIS members? No ISIS, no Islamophobia, no vote bank for Trump.
Look dude, I'm from India and I know almost everything the colonizers did to the country and how left some things on us (like border disputes) about which idiots here still fight with each other. That aside, the colonizers here were all whites but I don't generalize against them in today's world. In fact even in my few encounters with the whites, none of them seemed to be a white supremacist so I'm gonna hold on to my experience and consider everything and not generalize.
I wasn't aware of recent developments between Iraq and America. The only thing that makes up the news is their disagreements.
But didn't USA destroy Syria before by bombing it to get rid of ISIS (which was directly or indirectly aided by USA)?
@ItsTheNephilim
Ehhh with Syria
long story short (and feel free to look up this.. so you know im telling the truth)
in 2011 there was this thing known as the "Arab Spring"
basically protests/revolutions throughout the Muslim world.. calling for reform.. or change of regime... etc... much of it based on human rights...
some governments buckled and made changes
others did not
FOR EXAMPLE.. Libya did not..
and the Assad Regime in Syria was open to it
until it started attacking its own civilians
this led to much of the Syrian Army breaking away and forms the "Free Syrian Army"
this created a Civil War in the country
and led to a breeding ground of Radical organizations (like ISIS)
The United States played a very minor role in the early years
Obama had no interest in being aggressively involved... and viewed it as one of his worst decisions (because ultimately a lack of decisive action by the United States.. led to chaos)
by 2014 ISIS has risen in the chaos.. and spread throughout the region
the United States didn't intervene militarily until it started to lead to a NEAR collapse of the Iraqi Government.. and the massacre of Kurds in the region
THEN the USA intervened
and by 2017.. 80,000 ISIS militants were killed in the US operations
soo once again NO
the United States didn't cause the Syrian war...
nor did it fire the first shots (nor has it really been heavily involved)
it was a complex war
with... Assads military.. Anti-Government forces (some moderate.. some radical)
Russia intervention.. Turkish Intervention.. American intervention.. ETC
ultimately the USA concentrated mostly on ISIS (though it would have been happy if Assad was overthrown)
the intervention of Russia prevented any chances of that
and the USA didn't really push heavily for it in any significantly military way
@ItsTheNephilim In regards to the Muslim Ban
that was actually outlawed by the United States Supreme Court
^ yet other nations do the same
take Japan for example which has policies that Americans would consider EXTREMELY Racist
but no one talks about that
and Solemanni was very influential in the Iraqi Civil War... the IRGC led by Solemanni supported various Shia Militias that fought against the Coalition and Iraqi Forces... FOR EXAMPLE.. the Mahdi Army... which during teh mid 2000s was one of the BIGGEST Anti-Government forces... ultimately they surrendered to the Iraqi Government
Also, he was at fault for the deaths of at least 700+ American forces (be it through his support of Shia militias.. or arms shipments to those groups... there were even claims of IRGC soldiers fighting in the field).
He also was influential in pushing Irans agenda throughout the region... aiding in revolutions in Yemen for example (which clearly neither... the USA.. or Iran.. or Saudi Arabia.. have been the good guys in)
Solemmani was leaving the Baghdad Airport with Muhandis (a leader of the Shia militias in Iraq)
CLEARLY it was a very aggressive strike
but it was necessity I believe
Iran was also able to launch a strike against a USA base (no one died).. but it helped them save face in the issue at least I suppose
in teh end I think both sides got what they wanted
USA killed one of its biggest opponents and a MASSIVE instigator of Civil War in Iraq
and Iran was able to save face.. and make it look like they responded.
@ItsTheNephilim
its so much easier to talk in private
if youd rather just message me
@EmperorRetribution just followed you.
Yes of course no one should be hurt bc of there race. Also it's dumb one they might not even be Chinese and two it's the same if if a few years ago i attack black bc ebola spread through africa.
So yeah people are attacking people bc of a virus that wasn't there fault, may have never been to that country and there origins may not be from that country since ya know not every Asian person is Chinese. Its just fucking stupid.
I could have. In fact here we were behind Asians, especially after one of them was murdered by thugs, and antiracists associations refused to support them, because they prefer supporting other communities. Also, Asians asked for more security, and those associations considering it was "far right speech". Seriously.
But this one in particular? no. Because as always, that movement target white people only. I don't know about the US, but in my country, those who attack Asians (and anyone else in fact) are most of the time arabs, or black.
Yet, that movement disregard that, and target white people. So, fuck them. If you have us so much that you're overlooking who hurt you just to attack us, I don't see why I'd support you. Simple as that.
I’ve always been against racial hatred against my race and against other races. God loves all races and cultures.
Well I'm not sure if movement is the right word. But I don't know why you wouldn't support it. There's been clear evidence of elderly Asians being targeted for attacks.
And again there's been a lot of people throwing hate towards China. Even tho pretty much everything we own is made from China.
Unless Asians start burning buildings and causing riots then of course I support it.
I do. Unfortunately, there are a many shenanigans everywhere. Even if a particular country allows mass migration, there must be a few policies to safeguard the local community. We saw what happened in Sweden this week. I'm an Indian and have faced hate for being brown hither a few times. I condemn that.
Well, I have been attending Asian-American advocacy classes online. They discuss how to identify and discourage discrimination against Asians in public. I didn't know a lot of stuff. It has been helpful.
For folks who are interested in the sessions I attended, here they are;
zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_SZUbh2QQQzeCtUh4DJwYtw
There’s been a huge spike because of the coronavirus. People are fucking idiots. As if a random Asian person is responsible for the coronavirus. There’s a serious racist problem in America that needs to be addressed.
well of course, though a lot of these attacks are coming from the Black community
there has been a history of conflict between various minority communities (be it latino, black, Asian.. etc)
^ to be more specific with the idiots in the comments
1. Most of the cases reported of attacks on Asians have been caused by the Black community, FOR EXAMPLE Yahya Muslim, Antoine Watson.. who together make up 4 of the high profile attacks (among many others, who clearly in the videos are black men). YES!! There have been attacks by others.. but clearly this is largely being carried out by the Black community
2. Though Trump clearly stated stupid things about the "China Virus" as he put it, the Black community is the most disproportionately against Trump (roughly 80%+ voted for Biden).. How can we blame Trump (who would be ignored by the Black community for being racist).. for the actions of the Black community?
3. Statistically, the Black community is far more likely to commit hate crimes. . and has had a history of it. According to both the FBI Uniformed Crime Report, and the Justice Bureau National Victimization Survey... the Black community commits an EXTREME disproportionate amount of crimes... even just between Whites and Blacks... over 85%+ of Hate crimes are committed by Blacks themselves on a yearly basis... This extends into other communities (including the Asian and Hispanic community). It should also be mentioned that many of these issues like... Robberies and Homicide are very distinct to the black community as well (over 50%+ of those committed each year are from the Black community) <-- That is a depressing statistic for a community that only makes up 13% of the population
The Fact is, if you remove the Black community from USA Statistics... The USA Crime rates (be it murder.. racially charged violence.. etc).. decreases by a lot.
^ IMAGINE... a community that is pandered to on a daily basis... but makes up over 85%+ of Interracial crime between the White/Black communities...
Not to mention the Police shootings... which according to the Washington Post.. the Black community only makes up 26% (if you listened to the media tooo muchh.. youd assume it was all of them)..
Its nonsense
and somehow this is a White mans problem
Lets accept other communities NEED SERIOUS WORK
and that pandering to them on a constant basis does nothing but cause more problems
the Black community is one that now has around 80%+ fatherless homes
in an era where supposedly the Civil Rights movement has made such strives
PLEASE
Lets stick with the facts friends!
get away from this stupid BLAME THE WHITE MAN game.
Sorry folks! But these are facts!! :)
Evidence has been provided...
CHECKMATE
The End :)
cry all you want
No worthy replies here.
Oh well :)
AND THANK YOU FOR THE LIKES FRIENDS! :)
We all know truth matters
but the issue is most people can't get beyond political biases and narratives
and many want to preach hatred through the guise of equality
those people are not worth your time
the are lost.
really people who are commiting hate crimes towards anybody just need to get a life, if you care that much you have too much free time
It's always one group of minorities we have issues with in the US. When there is an attack, we automatically start hating middle-eastern assuming they did it. Every time there is an immigration issue, we blame the Mexicans. Nowadays, its the Asians turn! It's life in America!
I support it cause thats wrong what happened to that poor girl
C - need more details. Do you have some evidence to back this up? I've seen stories about isolated attacks against Asians but I have yet to see any evidence that there has actually been a significant rise in such attacks.
The way our media and social media work today it's easy to whip people into a frenzy about something that really isn't a thing.
seems to be hate specifically coming from black people
You can also add your opinion below!
Most Helpful Opinions