OddBeMe - You mean, do "your" ("you're" is a contraction of "you are") own research, and bringing logic into "arguments" (not "arguements"). Yes, I'm pedantic.
Is that sarcasm, or are you serious about killing yourself? You know, you can go to this place where your poor English can be fixed. It's called a "school", and you'll have a lot of fun there with all the other children :)
Don't try to pretend that you are more than one person, like that means that what you are saying carries more weight.
This is what we call an 'argument from popularity', its a logical fallacy and totally meaningless.
Of course, just because your arguments are complete bullshit, doesn't mean you are necessarily wrong, just that if you are right you are right for a reason you dont understand.
In this case you're right about one thing; I am funny, but dont presume to speak for me. I am more than capable of speaking for myself. You should already be aware of this of course as I have been destroying you and your imaginary friends all day.
Oath Keepers are police and military personal who have reaffirmed their commitment to the 2nd Amendment right to bear arms and sworn to act against the state in the event that the government tries to dearm the population.
@Guffrus Okay, thanks. I'd never heard of them before. Now I'm wondering why 'OddBeMe' wants to punish them, because what happened on the 6th of January wasn't an "insurrection", but a "fiery, but peaceful protest".
They had firearms stockpiled just outside DC in case they "needed" them on Jan 6th, and the election had nothing to do with the 2nd. amendment. I guess they forgot the rest of their oath, to protect the constitution (not the president or their favoured party) against "all enemies foreign and domestic". (They're the domestic ones.)
Let the coward know that if he wants a discussion, he's free to unblock me.
What Girls & Guys Said
Opinion
29Opinion
UK here. Plotting to prevent the peaceful transition of power is worse than murder in my book. I'd throw away the key.
I don't even know who these people are
Well, dont allow OddBeMe to define who what they are because he doesn't have the first idea what he is talking about.
Do your own research.
@Guffrus he's right, do you're own research. But guff doesn't like me bringing logic into arguements.
@OddBeMe Im sorry but at this point you have completely departed from reality.
I have literally just brought your logical failings to your attention.
I am the one presenting logic, you have done no such thing.
You are so fucking pathetic that Im embarrassed for you.
OddBeMe - You mean, do "your" ("you're" is a contraction of "you are") own research, and bringing logic into "arguments" (not "arguements").
Yes, I'm pedantic.
@Gal67 my god... I'm gonna kill myself now. How could I make such a mistake. Its over... its all over...
Is that sarcasm, or are you serious about killing yourself? You know, you can go to this place where your poor English can be fixed. It's called a "school", and you'll have a lot of fun there with all the other children :)
@Gal67 yes I'm kidding.
This is hilarious
@neeeeeeeko Listen, we tolerate his craziness because it’s sometimes funny. Eventually it’ll get sad. So I apologize on his behalf.
@OddBeMe 'we' ?
Come on buddy, grow a pair of nuts already.
Don't try to pretend that you are more than one person, like that means that what you are saying carries more weight.
This is what we call an 'argument from popularity', its a logical fallacy and totally meaningless.
Of course, just because your arguments are complete bullshit, doesn't mean you are necessarily wrong, just that if you are right you are right for a reason you dont understand.
In this case you're right about one thing; I am funny, but dont presume to speak for me. I am more than capable of speaking for myself. You should already be aware of this of course as I have been destroying you and your imaginary friends all day.
Exile. Send them to Russia.
life in prison, no chance for parole
You're still calling an insurrection?
Yeah. Liberals call spades a spade. We don’t pretzel ourselves just to sleep at night.
Would you rather we discuss Benghazi or emails for the 1000th time?
Have they been convicted?
Well we’re speculating. This isn’t a courtroom.
Have they already been convicted?
What insurrection?
It was at best a riot.
The what? Who are they, and what did they do?
Oath Keepers are police and military personal who have reaffirmed their commitment to the 2nd Amendment right to bear arms and sworn to act against the state in the event that the government tries to dearm the population.
It is nothing what so ever to do with Jan 6.
@Guffrus Okay, thanks. I'd never heard of them before. Now I'm wondering why 'OddBeMe' wants to punish them, because what happened on the 6th of January wasn't an "insurrection", but a "fiery, but peaceful protest".
From what i can see its because he is a total fucking moron.
They had firearms stockpiled just outside DC in case they "needed" them on Jan 6th, and the election had nothing to do with the 2nd. amendment. I guess they forgot the rest of their oath, to protect the constitution (not the president or their favoured party) against "all enemies foreign and domestic". (They're the domestic ones.)
Let the coward know that if he wants a discussion, he's free to unblock me.
@goaded actually you both can be domestic
What did they do?