If the government demanded that you donate blood, would you do it?

[Anonymous]

Yes - Tell us why

No - Tell us why

Other - Explain

[Lliam]

Because the government doesn't own my body. Its reasons would probably be nefarious. It doesn't have people's best interests at heart. I wouldn't trust it if it said water was wet. I wouldn't comply out of principal because that would be the same as volunteering for tyranny. The only way to resist tyranny is non-compliance.

If there's bonafide reason to give blood I'll give blood. But if someone orders me to do it, they'll have to strap me down and do it by force. The same with taking the eugenics jab.

[Asker]

Do you support a woman's right to not supply blood to another person? As of today a woman has no right to say "no".

[Lliam]

Yes. I absolutely support a woman's right to say no.
Can you explain what law is compelling her?

[Asker]

The Supreme Court of the United States has decreed that a woman must give her body over to the service of another person regardless of what she wants.

[Lliam]

That's crazy. I haven't heard about that. I can't find anything about it. So you have a link to the information?

[TrueConfection]

@Lliam I just asked my husband about this crazy ruling;

The Supreme Court of the United States has decreed that a woman must give her body over to the service of another person regardless of what she wants."

He told me hethought that's always been the case. 😂

[Lliam]

@TrueConfection. Oh, well, then my new pick up line is going to be, "The Supreme Count has ruled that a woman must give her body over to the service of another person regardless of what she wants."
I'll let you know how it works out. 🤣🤣🤣

Under the constitution, Incels and rapists have a right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. Plus, women are not mentioned in the constitution, so they have no rights. It's time for them to learn their place and perform their societal duties.

(Don't tell my wife what I said. She'll kill me.)
It's a solid ruling.

[TrueConfection]

🤣🤣🤣 I won't tell.

[Lliam]

@TrueConfection
🤣🤣🤣

[MCheetah]

Nope. Because it's my blood, they don't have a right to control me, and I have really sh*tty blood anyway; A+, which is like the worst blood possible, despite it's name. That's why I don't donate blood now after the first time; I have garbage DNA. (And in case this is a Roe v Wade analogy, you should know I'm pro-choice.)

[CelestialSiren]

That is entirely dependent on how/why it became required and whether or not the process through which it ended up being required was performed legally. The funny thing, though, is that I actually am not allowed to donate blood at most places because I’m underweight. 😂

[Asker]

Do you think the government should be allowed to force women to provide blood to another person even if it puts them at risk?

[Jessica405]

No, because I am a stroppy cow and buck against authority, when it makes unreasonable demands. Now, if it were to be voluntary, as it is now, then it's a different matter.

[Asker]

Is forcing a mother to give birth an unreasonable demand?

[Jessica405]

Yes. It is.

[Effably]

For what reason? Big species threatening crisis? I'll do it happily.

No reason? I'd probably give them the finger.

Noteworthy to add I do voluntarily give blood. The screening is surprisingly strict.

[Asker]

Do you think a woman should have the right to give the finger to a government that tells her she must provide blood for another person?

[Effably]

Always. Even if your blood would save the rest of the world giving it is your call. Obviously I feel you should, but you do decide.

[IsoUser]

I am -O- negative and have routinely donated blood since College. It at one point been embossed on back of our helmets and dog tags one around my neck the other laced into my boot during whole time in the Iraq and Afghanistan in case of IEDs, Missile Strikes, Mortars and Artillery.

[Aerissa_Jade]

Only if the demand including a heavy payment to make it worth my time... of course I'm not eligible to donate for awhile... getting a new tattoo will do that.

[Asker]

Then do you support helping women financially who have unplanned pregnancies with hospital bills and costs to raise their babies?

[Aerissa_Jade]

No and I don't even know what your talking about, people have the freedom (yes freedom) to earn money and pay for their own choices.

You went from selling blood to giving people free stuff.

[Lionman95]

I can't because of a genetical dysfunction my rate of building red bodies plus that would Infekt guys more than girls hence guys have more blood since they have a bigger heart.

[Asker]

If a woman suffers severe life-threatening medical problems during a pregnancy, states like Texas will not allow the mother to end the pregnancy. Do you support the mother or the state?

[Lionman95]

What´s the connection to the question? Plus how often is that?

[Blackcosmo]

I don't like their approach but I wouldn't mind donating some blood to people who need it. So I wouldn't do it to obey them but do it to help those people.

[Asker]

Do you think a woman should have the right to say "no" if she's commanded to provide blood to another person?

[Blackcosmo]

The command part is very unnecessary so no she doesn't have to do it to "listen" to the government. So technically yes she has the right to say no but at the same time should not be against donating some blood just to help those in need. It's mostly about the intention.

[love_neptune]

I mean if I legally had to I wouldn't break the law, otherwise no, because I have a phobia of needles and blood ;-; plus I'm anaemic so they wouldn't want it 😞

[Asker]

Sometimes anaemia and other serious health risks show up while a woman is pregnant. Do you think a woman should be forced to go through with it when there's a strong possibility she will die? Texas now has a law that a woman must give birth if she's pregnant and there are no provisions for health risks. Do you support the mother in this regard or do you support the Texas law?

[love_neptune]

I think that women should have the rights to choose what happens to their own bodies

[Asker]

Me too.

[Avicenna]

Given that blood banks don’t accept blood donations in a number of circumstances, including if you’ve lived overseas, I don’t see that happening. There are already people who would donate but aren’t allowed to.

[Bluemax]

I sense a disturbance in the force... as if a person is about to make this an abortion related question...

[LazerBean]

If the government demanded that you accept that some humans are superior to you and are allowed to kill you if they feel like it, do you?

[Asker]

If the government dropped a baby off at your door and commanded you to take care of it or go to jail, would you do it?

[SaartjieJane]

If it was to help people then sure but if they were coming to me and demanding? Hell no, kiss my ass

[Asker]

Do you support a woman's right to say "no" to being forced to provide for another person?

[SaartjieJane]

Asking for blood and and stopping women from murder is COMPLETELY different

[SaartjieJane]

If they came to me and were like “hey we desperately need blood, could you please provide?” I’d say he’ll yes! If they were like you HAVE to give blood and were all rude about it then no.
Stopping women from killing their babies because those women were foolish is completely different.

[humanearth]

No one demands me

I am a free man, I make the choice not them

I am not a slave to be ordered around

[Asker]

Do you support a woman's right not to be a slave to another person and be forced to give blood? As of today a woman doesn't have any option to say "no".

[exitseven]

I donate blood sometimes. If the government mandated it I would refuse. I do not want anyone sticking needles in me without my permission.

[Asker]

It is now illegal for women in America to refuse.

[exitseven]

Did CNN tell you that?

[Red-Blaze]

Yes, bloodbanks are running dry all the time, donating can save lives
I donate volenterly for now

[anon1903]

Government is mostly idiotic. But this sounds like something for a good cause, so why not.

[Asker]

You would be ok being forced to give blood?

[anon1903]

They wouldn't have to force me. I'd donate it willingly.

[Sixgunsound]

If the government demanded that I crap in a toilet I’d drop it right where I’m standing. Screw them.

[Shadow_Monarch]

I'm already a regular blood donor, so I don't see why not. Unless they take more than they should, then no.

[driven159]

no one would want my blood I am too old and have a bad attitude

[Sparkie460]

Fuck the government. They can kiss my ass. It's my body ill do what I want

[Asker]

Do you support a woman's right to do the same?

[Sparkie460]

Men, women we're all the same

[nomadme]

I think I would, but it doesn't mean everyone should. There are so many people with so many conditions living around the world.

[Asker]

Mother's are being forced to donate blood.

[nomadme]

Where? And to who?

[Asker]

Pregnant mothers are now required to give their bodies over to the service of another human regardless of what the women want for themselves.

[Anonymous]

If it was a legal requirement, I possibly would. If it was moral blackmail, I probably would not.

[Asker]

Do you support a woman's right not to be blackmailed into supplying blood and nutrition to another person? As of today a new law requires a mother to supply blood to another person.

[Opinion Owner]

This doesn't make sense and blackmail is different to law. Do you comments related to abortion law changes?