Do you support banning thousands of hunting rifles, most of which haven't been near a battlefield or crime scene in the last 100 years?

[Anonymous]

The largest single gun ban in Canadian history by the same government that allowed gang crime to increase 90%.

That includes the weak long guns typically used to teach children how to shoot. Some having less firepower than a concrete nail gun, and reload even slower than one.

This same government that lies about everything else, claiming that it's only after assault-style-rifles and not hunters, includes the Webley & Scott Wild Fowl Gun in their own list.

Do you support this gun ban knowing that this same government only caused murder to increase?

Yes let's ban everything

No

Updates

+1 y

Really? 2/3 want to ban everything? So from nail guns back to hammers?

[MCheetah]

No, because that's how you get tyranny, like the modern-day Chinese Communist Party. Which is why so many government officials want to ban the citizen's insurance policy against said tyranny.

And the ONLY people who support banning firearms are the pussies, cowards, and little girls who will NEVER have to be in a position to defend others, let alone their own life, once the sh*t hits the fans. It's true 99.9% of the time, the weakest people in society are always the anti-gun nuts who know NOTHING about defending liberty and freedom, or protecting others from those who would hurt them or their loved ones; criminal or politician.

[Asker]

Benny Franklin seemed like a wise woman.

[MCheetah]

Wow, thanks for the fast MHO.

[MCheetah]

Oh, and I know who wrote this... They didn't have those kind of people you hate back then.

[Asker]

Remember Washington.. they were exactly that. Look at their bodybuilder wives..

[Asker]

You even snapped when I posted king tut on your question. What do you mean occult androgynes didn't exist?

[MCheetah]

I just don't want to see naked trannies on my crap I post.

[Asker]

But it does prove that they existed back then.

[Anonymous]

If you outlaw guns only outlaws will have guns. I don't understand how Canada a country that is almost as geographically diverse and large as the USA can allow one distant goverment to enact such polices.

How are Canadians going to even survive in the rural areas where the nearest Law Enforcement officers is maybe an hour or more away?

A criminal or animal for that reason could just do whatever the heck he or she wanted and be gone before anyone else with a gun had a chance to get anywhere near.

[NamerOfStars]

The movie Red Dawn centered around a Soviet paratroop invasion of Colorado. If you take a look at a map of the US, you'll see that Colorado, while definitely on the western side of the country, is pretty far inland, from all four directions. Soviet paraplanes would've had to have gone 1,700 miles OVER the country, undetected, AFTER passing TOWARD the country, in order to pull that off. I kinda figure if they managed to do that, they deserve a chance to invade Colorado. Similarly, if you manage to pull off a mass shooting with a single-shot muzzle loader, even in Canada, that's more impressive than horrifying.

I had to flee my home state because of the insane power grabs of the former governor, who essentially had the state supreme court declare him emperor. I had high hopes for him getting thrown out in the election last month... but he won in a landslide. Eventually, you just have to accept that some people aren't going to object until they're literally in chains. It looks like the people of Canada are in that group.

[monorprise]

@NamerOfStars Even in the movie Red Dawn they para trooped into Colorado using commercial airliners.

That is as easily as scheduling a international flight. As for Invading Colorado on the ground this would most easily be done after a successful invasion of New Mexico and Arizona.

This would be the more difficult feat to accomplish but also not impossible as there is plenty of flat land near the Rio Grand valley across which to advance.

The problem is as the movie Illustrated holding theses territories, around the world such mountainous terrain heavily favors the defenders in any insurgency. Having personalty seen a lot of this area, I agree it would be very difficult to hold and control against the wishes of the natives.

There are an endless number of ideal places to hide and setup ambushes as illustrated in the movies and the people of theses areas have been waging war like that for thousands of years.

Still cities would generically fall in a surprise attack to modern weapons quite quickly, as they are even more vulnerable today than in the past.

[NamerOfStars]

@monorprise Did they, now? I haven't seen that movie in many, many years. But even in the 80's, smuggling an assault rifle and ammo onto a commercial flight, with not just one but LOTS of soldiers doing it, is still pretty damn impressive.

[monorprise]

@NamerOfStars The movie imply the aircraft themselfs were simply posing as commercial airliners.

That the USA was also isolated around the world with NATO collapsed and of course Mexico once again entertained cooperating with our enemies. You wil notice that many of the troops that invaded were Not Russians but Central Americans, I would presume that includes At least passive cooperation of Mexico.

Although if you ask me its more likely Mexico would be entirely in on such an invasion if they are going to allow the Russians and their central American neighbors to use their territory to attack these united States.

This is also not as unreasonable a as it sounds believe it or not. Mexico entertained such an idea already prior to World War 1.

Historically Mexico has not always been nessarly the best ally, they are regularly run by socialist/communist and still teach their people to be bitter about the loss of the South West.
If the chips are down and Mexico thought they could get away with it I would expect them to try again as they have in the past.

[USLegionary]

No. Its complete bullshit. I've lived in some pretty rough places and one the biggest factors that stops you getting jumped by 6 guys in the street or eight or nine guys busting into you to rob or kill you and rape your partner is the chance you might have a gun which means the possibility that even though they may get you there's a good chance you may kill or wound one or more of them.

[USLegionary]

... any criminals look for soft targets.

[FreyaRed]

Hunting with a.22 rifle is animal cruelty. Those animals will flee and die but days or weeks after being hit because of wound infections.
You need much stronger calibers to kill animals than humans. NATO uses 5,56x45 for combat, this is same cartridge like Remington.223 in hunting rifles. This caliber isn't recommended for hunting bigger non-human animals than foxes.

[Pyrofox]

Just cause its banned doesn't mean people are suddenly gonna just go out and burn/destroy them. Laws don't do jack shit when it comes to firearms there are simply too many out there to even crack down on them.

[Asker]

If someone is immoral enough to kill a person, they must care about gun laws, right? And Trudeau puppets are smart enough to pull them out of farmer's hands.

[Pyrofox]

If your desperate enough you can get anything online now a days. These politicians should look up what the deep and dark web have for sale. LMFAO. We see only about 14-15% of the true "internet"

[Asker]

On that same pic, we see US recoilless M20. Which would be like carrying a pirate cannon with you. While not so easy to carry in your pocket to sell through deep web to a crisis actor who will shoot an elementary school to make the sandy hook father laugh on camera, that's the same point that makes the ban of it stupid.

[Pyrofox]

My friend graphed onto his remodeled humvee he bought post his service modified the turret removed it entirely swapped it out for EASILY the most scarry modified turret swapped it out for a modified turret full 360 Anzio 20 mm turret and if your wondering he swapped out and fully reconfigured the Anzio to be belt fed and while its not full auto. The semi on it is enough to make anyone in a mile radius flinch. Also after making the modifications he uh maybe made a skunk go poof. XD.

[USLegionary]

Most law abiding citizens will obey whatever gun law is in place just like most law abiding citizens have car insurance. Are you willing to risk 3 years in jail over an ilegal gun? I hardly think so. Its much like the social credit rating trudeu is trying to bring in or freezing accounts of anyone who donated to protesting truckers. All fascist of course.

[Pyrofox]

@USLegionary If a gun is the difference between living another day cause you live in a literal ghetto your gonna take the gun over ending up the next blood stain on the side of the road. That no body is gonna blink at. Its a lie that people in the US care about others if that was the case our crime rates would be more realistically 150% higher than they are.

[USLegionary]

Preaching to the choir but we saw it happen in us cities where guns were banned, law abiding citizens had no choice but to give up their guns.

[Pyrofox]

@USLegionary Yeah thats the law abiding citizens ROFL... You just gave the ones that "WANT" to break the law the free ability to do it. There is a reason why the police's credibility is drying up faster than the salt lake cities famous lake.

[USLegionary]

Police's credibility is drying up for a variety of reasons the number 1 is because they are a political punch bag, two is a lack training, three is they can't attract suitable candidate, 4 is they are bogged down with red tape, 5 is that they are deployed with poor tactics, 6 is that half of them are so jumpy and have ptsd that they are walking grenades, 6 is a failure to properly implement proper use of body cam, 7 is a lack of respect from the public.
Those last two are important. What's is the point of body cams if cops turn them off or it can't be used as evidence in court. The body cam footage should be the first thing produced after an arrest or stopping of a crime.
7. Is important too. People being combative and aggressive with the police instead of talking to them reasonably and producing Id or whatever. Most conversations I've had with police have been 10 minutes tops. It's the same on airliners, people can't sit down and shut but have to cause needless problems.

[lightbulb27]

im ok baning everyhing globally. then we can go back to using bows. much less dangerous.

otherwise, no.

[Asker]

If we ban them from government would be nice.

[joeldalton]

Canada has gone from America’s little brother to a completely globalist-controlled failed state. It’s an embarrassment to the world stage.

[Anonymous]

Americans care more about weapons than human lives.

[monorprise]

We care about our own freedom and lives first and foremost. We have very little trust for other people, including other Americans to respect our rights and our life.

So we carry our own gun to protect ourselves, because like you, we don't trust others. Unlike you that distrust extends the capabilities and inclinations of the State and thus also the rest of sociability. This of course is rather self-evident to anyone who has seen what leftist do with the governments they control.

[MCheetah]

Pussies and cowards care more about banning everything and virtue signaling than protecting people or saving human lives, nether of which they'll ever be in a position to worry about doing themselves.

[Anonymous]

No, I am not in favor of that. Once a government starts doing that, than what will they come after next?

[Chazmatazz269]

I don’t support firearms bans of any kind.

[exitseven]

No, I believe in then second amendment.

[NamerOfStars]

Even in other countries?

[exitseven]

@NamerOfStars Yes, citizens in other countries need to defend themselves too.

[Anonymous]

No. Liberals are insane.

[BLP11520]

I own guns, you can't wait for the police.

[Miristheiss]

Ban you.

[jayhams]

Nope