Are you too scared of name calling, to admit that the ADDED co2 is too diluted to trap more heat?

[strateguy632]

in theory co2 traps heat but what about reality in a mixed atmosphere? the deceivers are ready with "facts co2 traps heat" undeniable... but what about when mixed and diluted?
if we know the "average temperature in New York City" in February year of 2023 [last year], when no sun adding heat, so we can measure if heat ESCAPED or not, "the average nightly temperature was 41 degrees Fahrenheit (5°C)" that means ice will still melt but several issues!

however this year, 2/2024, not only did the heat of day escape each night, as usual and common, but MORE heat left than average... despite AN ADDITIONAL YEAR OF TRUCK exhaust from millions of trucks... and infinite explosions in war zones adding fire, that burns producing more co2 and also added heat besides sun.

night here was colder than 41 degrees Fahrenheit... because heat was not "trapped"... SOME heat left! and MORE heat left now than last year's average. in simple terms last year's heat also left.

now, even after a few hours of sun temperature was 41 gasp! which was the average at night as above.

we need to cut through the tricky names "global warming" is certainly not "global" if even ONE place less warm than before. "climate change" it was always changing so change of a change would be... stable? if not stable then did not "change" from changing.

but the so-called "science" predicted: co2 traps heat therefore added co2 traps more heat? we see more heat left, not trapped, not only every night some heat leaves, but more heat left than historical average! past heat and recent day heat left! not trapped.

after seeing facts are you TOO scared of name calling to admit co2 despite added is not "really trapping" heat as the "concerned scientists" explained their claim? or would you rather speak facts without fear of name calling.

call me a weirdo... i do not care i do not have an academic career to threaten!

Updates

3 mo

websites that used to say "actual temperature and historical average" changed their websites to hide data and make such facts harder to find!

because it might "fuel the error that global warming is not real" better to hide the data! awful websites changing to hide data like that!

[Joshydavid25]

This is a good point, CO2 is actually a good thing honestly.. More CO2 means more green, and the world can use more green right? But yeah if global warming was getting worse like they said, then we would be experiencing the hottest temperatures right? But we're not.. Plus, the climate obviously naturally changes.. Some periods are colder, and some periods are warmer..

[strateguy632]

well said co2 is tree food! and is the food that grows our fruit food!

[Joshydavid25]

Yes Sir! Thank you for MHO!

[Dargil]

Man caused co2 based global warming is unproven and is a religious cult. If co2 doubled, worldwide hunger would end. Co2 has been 10 times higher and the poles have I've free in most of history.

[strateguy632]

i wish! how did you hear Antarctica was ice free in past? and was less land above water, then?

[Dargil]

I studied science. The poles were largely ice free up until "snowball earth" and, at times, during interglacial periods.

[Zestyassmf1997]

I know fuckall about science. I thought it wasn’t that CO2 traps heat, but that it dissipates ozone.

[strateguy632]

lucky you! not exposed to false propaganda on biased news networks and "concerned scientists".

[strateguy632]

i heard a chemical in spray cans got switched because of ozone but that was not co2, which can't react with o3 according to chemistry. ozone is o3.

[Zestyassmf1997]

Why can’t it react with ozone?