always a devils dance with that. on one hand, I don't wanna see big corporations controlling everything on the other I don't wanna see government do either. but sure, if more people would join on the alt platforms, it might be better. it used to be that way...
I guess if youtube acts criminally, as with doing criminal slander, they would not have the right to do that and could get fined etc.. plenty of cases going back and forth on that over time... battling big corproations is always tough.
@CatVader I don’t like big government either. Perhaps if a technology company has such an acceptance level and penetration in the market then there should be special rules so they don’t abuse that position to cancel people’s rights to speak and be heard. So not directly regulated but some special rules for the mega platforms.
well. if you got big corporations owning the government, then more rules is just worse. it's about culture.. start using other platforms. same issue and probably even worse is the chat apps. really really hard to get an app that actually respect your right to express yourself.
Found you at last. The police are not doing shit because they don't want anything to do with that... it's nothing but a smear campaign. Fuck his reputation up and take away his income is their only goal. Anything legal could expose how fake it is a little too quickly. https://youtu.be/Y4ket21Tg6w?si=uCp-S4ZQ-MwjqDUB
They can cancel him for whatever reason they want. They don't even need to give a reason. I think their reason was "due to the allegations", not that he actually did what he's being accused of.
What Girls & Guys Said
Opinion
30Opinion
It seems wrong to demonatize him if people don't believe him they can vote with there feet
Absolutely not. Obviously, they did it based on his views.
You tube should let the police handle him or even the law but what gives YouTube the right?
I think thats right, that the people can decide to not watch him (I sure don’t). But they are judge and jury with few facts.
youtube is a private company, gives them the right technically.
@CatVader No one argued that they do not have the right. One could argue that they are a near monopoly and should be regulated.
always a devils dance with that.
on one hand, I don't wanna see big corporations controlling everything
on the other I don't wanna see government do either.
but sure, if more people would join on the alt platforms, it might be better.
it used to be that way...
I guess if youtube acts criminally, as with doing criminal slander, they would not have the right to do that and could get fined etc.. plenty of cases going back and forth on that over time... battling big corproations is always tough.
@CatVader I don’t like big government either. Perhaps if a technology company has such an acceptance level and penetration in the market then there should be special rules so they don’t abuse that position to cancel people’s rights to speak and be heard. So not directly regulated but some special rules for the mega platforms.
well. if you got big corporations owning the government, then more rules is just worse.
it's about culture.. start using other platforms.
same issue and probably even worse is the chat apps. really really hard to get an app that actually respect your right to express yourself.
Found you at last. The police are not doing shit because they don't want anything to do with that... it's nothing but a smear campaign. Fuck his reputation up and take away his income is their only goal. Anything legal could expose how fake it is a little too quickly.
https://youtu.be/Y4ket21Tg6w?si=uCp-S4ZQ-MwjqDUB
They can cancel him for whatever reason they want. They don't even need to give a reason. I think their reason was "due to the allegations", not that he actually did what he's being accused of.
I don't think so. I don't agree with his views, but he didn't violate any YouTube guidelines. And the YouTube staff shouldn't act like saints.
Well, they don't like his opinions so I guess any excuse to end him is fair game.
Still, he got to bang Katie Perry so he still wins at life.
I'm a big fan of innocent until proven guilty. They should have waited until after he was put on trial and convicted of something.
I don’t think it’s fair that they’ve already made up their mind about him. At the moment they’re still allegations.
i believe everyone should be innocent until proven otherwise
I had no idea who he is, and now I don't want to know anymore. It is sad how people rally behind these morons.
Just like they rallied behind amber heard? Bet you supported her too
He is very outspoken and leans conservative, so he's had a target on his back with the woke cancel squad gunning for him for a long time.
Its not the new thing... Andrew Tate is also banned based on allegations.
There’s no such thing as a fair trial when u get trail by media. The names of the accused should be confidential until they r proved guilty.
Cancelled because of accusations?
Yeah, some women said he did things 20 years ago. So, cancelled.
I never liked him. Always something off with him.
They should not be censoring anybody.
No innocent until proven guilty
nope
I never liked him, but no