Deep down are all women Bisexual?

[Anonymous]

So recently i saw a Question on GAG asking if all straight girls had been bicurious at one stage.
Are most girls bisexual?
My reasoning for this is, to be bicurious there has to be a slight sexual attraction to recongise "Hey this is something that might interest me"
Poll: https://www.girlsaskguys.com/sexual-behavior/q2221246-have-all-straight-women-had-a-bi-curious-stage#new
Seeing as half of the women who have replied have claimed to be bicurious at one stage, does that mean around half of the female population is bisexual? I'm interested in seeing your experiences and feedback:)

[D_Bone_Steak]

I would dig deeper into this. There was a study I saw a few years back where they measured female and male responses to porn. Straight males showed no physiological response to male on male porn...'straight' females also showed no physical response to the male on male porn.

But when it came to the girl on girl porn, ALL the females got wet and their clits got hard. It didn't matter if they claimed being straight or not, physically at least, the females got aroused at the sight of same sexed porn, whereas the straight males watching two dudes sword fight with their cocks has no sexual response to the sight.

... Another study I found interesting was one where 'straight' females are capable of judging if other females are sexually attractive or not, whereas straight males don't have that ability when looking at their same sexed individuals. The hypothesis was that straight dudes like me just size other dudes up as if we'd win in a fight, whereas females, straight or not, have to judge or size up their competition in a different way.

All in all, I think it's really interesting that a straight woman gets physically aroused at the sight of two women, yet mentally can just go full on denial mode, which brings me to my own anecdotal observations of some female's actions------> Because I'm a cocky asshole that gets a 9 out of 10 score on 'hot or not dot com' and knows it, I've been told that I'm not attractive at all by plenty of women... women that would score closer to a 5 at best. Basically they're out of my league except in a ugly way.

So they go into this mode where they'll claim up and down I'm the ugliest beast known to mankind... no sexual attraction at all. Then I'll give them the green light that they have a chance with me and they'll magically change their mind about it in general (sudden D-bone hankering syndrome). This is just my personal theory, but if they can be that way about the 'D,' then wouldn't they be capable of being like that about the 'V'? Based on everything I've seen in my short life, I'm leaning towards straight women having the ability to judge if another woman is 'sexy' and being sexually aroused by that said 'sexy' when it comes to other females... at least physically. Mentally though, a female's powers of denial determine what they roll with whether they're getting a lady boner for a lady or not.

[fuuuark]

Lol at anyone who believes women are heterosexual, they are all bisexual, they consume 2.5 times as much lesbian porn as guys and it's is by far the most popular genre of porn to the female demographic (pornhub statistics, like you posted). "straight" women are also literally more aroused by the female body than the male body, indiana. edu/.../Chivers_Seto_Blanchard_2007. pdf (read that, it's scientifically sound proof). Playboy once did a test where women where aroused by a lap dance by both male and female strippers, while men where only aroused by female strippers.

Most women will make out with other girls after minimal alcohol, and will be willing to do sexual things to another girl during an ffm threesome.
Normally the thing that makes a girl want to have sex with a guy will be non physical, non gender specific traits and will need these non gender specific traits to feel sexual attraction to them in the first place.

Female sexuality is fluid while men have a hard wired sexual orientation. Anthropologists say women don't actually have a sexual orientation, just an amorphous mess based off sexual narcissistic self affirmation.

Disagree with me if you want, but there is too much evidence (both scientific and anecdotal) to consider women straight. Do your own research and see that Anthropologists and cognitive scientists agree with me (well i agree with them).

[cipher42]

Yo we covered this. The actual experts on this subject think you're wrong, both the linguistic and the psychological ones. The American Psychological Association (the largest scientific and professional organization of psychologists in the United States) says "Sexual orientation refers to an enduring pattern of emotional, romantic and/or sexual attractions to men, women or both sexes. Sexual orientation also refers to a person's sense of identity based on those attractions, related behaviors and membership in a community of others who share those attractions."

Note the " enduring pattern" thing and the personal identity thing.

As for linguists, the above definition is also the one I see most commonly used. Actually, there's something of an issue of a fortuitously somewhat smallish group of people trying to say that bisexuals who have settled down with one person aren't bisexual, or that bisexuals aren't real at all but merely "confused". So basically practically no one uses or agrees with your definition. And because linguists by and large believe "correct" English is determined by what's commonly used and understood, that makes your definition simply incorrect and the APA's much more accurate.

[Asker]

Thank you for your descriptive response:) I agree my claim was very bold and was prompted largely due to curiosity rather then fact.
However i have 2 more questions i would be interested in hearing from you.
1. Do you know many bisexual women in your day to day life?
2. What do you think the reasoning for lesbiaNn porn being the apex of sexual preferences for women equates/ means in terms of female sexuality? Does this signify bisexual nature or?

[cipher42]

1. A few, yeah.
2. I don't know. Potentially the fact that lesbian porn has to focus on the pleasure of the chick, but in straight porn it's mostly about the guy getting off? It doesn't have to be about whether it's straight or gay, it could very well be more a matter of the non-sex/gender based differences between the two genres.

[Asker]

Hmm so does this mean it isn't so much the male body women in general find sexually attractive? Are women sexually attracted to men beyond personality at all or does is simply derive from the stimulation their body presents to males?

[cipher42]

Buddy porn is not made for the girls as is, there's really not a lot of focus on the guy in standard porn. But at the same time, I do think it's true that girls focus less on the male body as sexy, though I think that's less about how people naturally are and more about how sexualized/objectified women are in our society, especially compared to men.

[Asker]

But do girls find the male physicality sexually attractive at all or is it just nice if a guy is in healthy shape but no more sexually appealing on a purely visual level.

[cipher42]

I think plenty do. I don't know about all or to what extent, but I think it's pretty obvious that plenty of girls do find men's bodies directly sexually attractive. I just don't think it's to the same extent as it is with guys.

[fuuuark]

Didn't you get proven wrong last time, The dictionary and the APA agreed. And linguistics isn't relevant. Wanting to do sexual acts is sexual attraction, were does the Apa diagree with that? were do they disagree with the dictionary? and the dictionary is a better source. The dictionary decides language, the apa will diagnose mental conditions and further explain it, but when they say bisexual or sexual orientation they mean what the dictionary says, as they have no say in what words mean, they aren't an English department.

[cipher42]

No? The APAs definition means that sexual orientation is not determined by curiosity alone, but by a pattern of action as well as by self identity.

And why the fuck is a dictionary relevant but linguists are not? Again, English is determined by how people use it, not by the dictionary. And the dictionary is hardly a fantastic source for getting the full nuance of words anyhow. If the dictionary were as infallible as you seem to think, language would never change and all dictionaries would have the same definitions. So uh, nahh boi.

[fuuuark]

"The APAs definition means that sexual orientation is not determined by curiosity alone' Quote the line? And i will explain how this curiosity has to encompass a lot more than you think. If you chose to go to colloquialism and the sort, you will come out even worse.

[cipher42]

I did? The quote I'm talking about is in my post. The APA says that identity and continuous behavior define sexual orientation, so clearly just being curious about trying something is not enough to define someone's orientation.

And what are you talking about with "colloqialism"? If you mean language being determined by what's popularly used, that's a perfectly valid stance, and one that the majority of linguists espouse in regards to English.

[fuuuark]

When they APA use the term sexual orientation, bisexual etc, they refer to what the dictionary describes it as, they aren't an English department, they can't decide what words mean, they have no authority on the matter. And the first line of that text agrees with the actual definition. The can go into the why, and further poke at causes and contexts, but when they use English words they are governed by the definitions English departments make.

[cipher42]

They can decide what scientific terms mean. Maybe colloquially sexual orientation means something different than it does scientifically, but I find that the scientific definition is far more useful, because it's based on actual science rather than just the whims of the populous.

[cipher42]

Also, English departments don't determine what words mean either, nor do dictionaries. The way words are commonly used determines their colloquial meaning, because English is descriptive rather than prescriptive. Which is why new words can appear or existing words can change meaning if people use them a certain way commonly enough.

[fuuuark]

They don't actually give a definition, it's an explanation written by their web designers and has no references in it. It's vague at best too. It is in no way official while the dictionary is. And honestly if you think someone who wants to do sexual acts with someone of their own gender is straight, then you are wrong true by virtue of the meaning of the words and concepts used to express it, so that its denial would be a self-contradiction. And they are a social science, they don't decide scientific definitions, they analyze after the fact. I did psychology as an elective at university.

[cipher42]

The dictionary is official while the APA's definition isn't? Sure Jan. What dictionary exactly? As I already stated, dictionaries do not in fact set the rules for language, and they have next to no authority over the English language. For the thousandth time, English is not prescriptive. Dictionaries describe how words are used, they do not set the rules how they must be used.

They decide scientific definitions relevant to their field. Who else would have more authority over what sexuality is than psychologists?

[fuuuark]

They don't actually give a definition, it's an explanation written by their web designers and has no references in it. It's vague at best too. A psychiatrist, an anthropologist, a cognitive scientist (all have more say) and if you want to go that route, scientists say all women are bisexual, indiana.edu/.../Chivers_Seto_Blanchard_2007.pdf (actual peer reviewed scientific research) look up dr riegers work as well, look up female sexual fluidity. There is no antithesis to this work, so there is actually no professional in the appropriate field saying women are straight.

[cipher42]

It is a definition. It's a quick and easy explanation of the APA's definition of sexual orientation, one which they repeat and reinforce in several other places as well.

Find me a major official organization in one of those sciences that uses that definition then. I gave an actual major group of credible experts backing up my claims, why are you incapable of doing the same?

[fuuuark]

Find me any professional saying women are straight, there are tons saying women aren't!

[cipher42]

Lmao nah, that ain't how this works. You're making the claim, you haven't provided evidence, so burden of proof is on you

[fuuuark]

indiana.edu/.../Chivers_Seto_Blanchard_2007.pdf I have! type in female sexual fluidity and look up Dr reigers research as well , it has a bigger sample group. The fact is there is a lot of scientific research saying all women are bisexual, but non saying they are straight. If you can't trust all the PHDs saying all women are bisexual while non say they are straight then... well.

[cipher42]

That ain't what we're talking about. I don't want studies on how female sexuality works, I want an actual major and credible organization agreeing that sexuality is defined the way you say it is.

[fuuuark]

But if scientists agree that all women are bisexual, then we don't need to define it as the original question is if women are bisexual for having sexual acts with other women. With all women being bisexual the definition becomes superfluous.

[cipher42]

You haven't provided a source for that though? Like you've given no evidence that a significant and credible scientific organization actually defines sexuality the way you say they do.

[fuuuark]

Ahhh i have provided sources that universities consider all women bisexual, while nobody opposes this view.

[cipher42]

No, you really haven't. Again, major and credible organization. And provide an actual link to their website and where they define sexuality how you say they do.

[fuuuark]

If nobody apposes them, and they are all experienced PHD professors. Then this is the most authority source in the world for the subject. The anthropology and cognitive science department in all universities agree, as they haven't opposed the view in over a decade (2007 for the main research). Universities get the most grants, so the top wigs stay there. As i said, there is no antithesis, as far as the world is concerned, all women are bisexual! There is no official argument against it!!! It is considered fact at the moment! So you have to bring research to say women are straight, as of this moment, straight women is an oxymoron!

[cipher42]

Cite your sources. You are making the claim, so you have to support it. As I said, provide a link to the evidence you're citing.

[fuuuark]

indiana.edu/.../Chivers_Seto_Blanchard_2007.pdf this is the third time i think i posting this. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26501187 www.researchgate.net/.../publications

[fuuuark]

file:///C:/Users/Aidan1/Downloads/Watts%20et%20al.,%202016. pdf The study by Dr Rieger The research has been accepted for publication in the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.

[fuuuark]

file:///C:/Users/Aidan1/Downloads/Watts%20et%20al.,%202016. pdf

[fuuuark]

Copy and paste it into you browser, or search the previous link.

[cipher42]

Orrr you could just link the site you got those from?

[cipher42]

Also if those are both just studies, then neither are actually what I asked form

[fuuuark]

It's the pdf and it's easier that way, read the other link, you are trying to avoid it. It's accepted by all professionals in the accepted fields, It's published and accepted in a social psychology journal, which is accepted by psychologists like you posted earlier. It seems like you don't understand the importance certain research and content holds. If you think a vague description by a web designer on a psychology website (that doesn't even contradict the research and conclusions i have put forth) is on a higher level than peer reviewed scientific research with no antithesis, then i don't think you have any place arguing against me.

[cipher42]

Those are both individual studies, not major organizations. And they're both studies about how human sexuality works, not statements on how it is to be defined. The APA's statement is a statement from a major scientific organization with authority on this subject about how sexuality is to be defined. As such, it's far, far more relevant to the topic than the studies you provided. Provide me with the evidence I'm asking for or go away.

[cipher42]

Also can I just point out that your own sources contradict you? From the Chivers study: "The reliable observation that heterosexual women’s sexual responses
do not distinguish between depictions of female targets or
depictions of male targets does not mean heterosexual women are
bisexual in orientation. Heterosexual women do not identify as
bisexual, and they clearly do not make symmetrical choices regarding
the gender of their sex partners, as evidenced by their
much greater involvement with men than with women and by their
reported preference for men in their sexual thoughts, fantasies, and
attractions. To conclude that women are bisexual on the basis of
their sexual responding overlooks the complexity and multidimensionality
of female sexuality."

[cipher42]

And the second study is from the APA, and actually says jack shit about how bisexuality is to be defined. Since the APA published the study and still does not agree that sexuality is defined how you say it is, I have to conclude that the study proves absolutely nothing anywhere close to what you claim it does.

[fuuuark]

It's only more important because you say so, it has no references for fucks sake, and ill search the APA publication journal, the site is giving me a run time error, dr reigers work is there. And the APA isn't saying women aren't bisexual anyway, it isn't contradicting the reserch, show me were the APA appose this view! I an honours degree in cognitive science and anthropology and even universities across Africa accept that women have fluid sexuality and thus can't be straight.

[fuuuark]

*I have an honours

[cipher42]

Do you actually understand how we categorize things? Like, at all? Straight, bisexual, and gay, aren't absolute categories, they're general ones. Sexuality is a spectrum. It's pretty damn rare for anyone to be 100% any one thing. Like how there can be multiple different shades of red. But just because one shade is slightly paler than another doesn't make it pink. Maybe by your definition it's pink, but sure as fuck not by mine, and certainly not according to the majority of the world, nor according to professional artists. So since neither the colloquial nor the popular professional definitions match up with your own, your own is by no means the objectively correct one.

[fuuuark]

Look up the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, it's from the APA and it published Dr chivers work which says all women are bisexual

[fuuuark]

If it's a spectrum then it can't be heterosexual or homosexual, even the kisney scale acknowledges that, if you aren't a 0 or 6 on the scale you are bisexual.

[cipher42]

Again, link me the source. It's your job to do the work, not mine. And then if something being a spectrum means the ends don't exist, I guess there's no such thing as red or blue. Or black, or white for that matter. Good to know.

[fuuuark]

https://psycnet.apa.org/journals/psp/93/6/1108/ found it, the study is published and endorsed by the APA the big organization you wax lyrical about, checkmate.

[cipher42]

Not checkmate? The opposite of checkmate? Again, if they published the study and still define sexuality how they do, clearly they disagree on what the study actually proves. And since they published it, and since they're the authority, I think they'd know. Also, if psychology isn't the field that has expertise on this, as you claim, why are you citing a psychological study?

Also, the study says: "An unexpected result was that homosexual women responded more to nude female targets exercising and masturbating than to nude male targets, whereas heterosexual women responded about the same to both sexes at each activity level."

So clearly it defines women who are aroused by both sexes as heterosexual, meaning that no, they don't define bisexuality how they do. Jesus christ, learn to fucking read.

[fuuuark]

You really just are a devils advocate. Read the study, it says women aren't straight and dr reiger says "Most women are either bisexual or gay but never straight" Show me in detail how your definition with no references contradicts the research they published, as being aroused by similar content over and over fulfills your definition (that i don't know how you have got me to follow for so long). You were the one that brought the argument here, i have tried to sing your tune here, so psychology is the way we are going.

[cipher42]

Repost the link to the study, because the one you posted sure as fuck doesn't say that. Amd again, the fact that an individual study says something like that in no way means that that single study is widely accepted. Contradictory studies come out all the time, even from a single source. Find me actual evidence that your definition of sexuality is actually widely accepted or fuck off.

[fuuuark]

Type in sexual orientation, look at the dictionary (ALL OF THEM), look at wikipedia (not a trusted source but still has references unlike your definition) It is widely accepted more so than your definition. "Contradictory studies come out all the time," over a decade later and it hasn't come out yet but a study has come out supporting it journals.plos.org/.../journal.pone.0040256 And hey, they could change the definition on a single web page tomorrow (the apa webpage). And as i said, SHOW IN DETAIL HOW YOUR DEFINITION CONTRADICTS THE RESEARCH.

[fuuuark]

indiana.edu/.../Chivers_Seto_Blanchard_2007.pdf the first study in a better link if the problem was it not opening or something

[cipher42]

I already covered why the dictionary doesn't fucking matter. And I've already looked at wikipedia and it in fact supports my definition, not yours. And still none of your sources are a major and credible organization. The fact that you think any of the sources you provided rival the largest psychological organization in the world is laughable honestly, and your attempts to discredit said organization (an organization which published several of the studies you are attempting to use as evidence) is even more so. As such, you get one last chance to actually give me the evidence I asked for, or you get blocked. And again, is red not red as soon as it is even the slightest bit lighter than the brightest red possible? You never actually addressed that analogy, I suspect because you can't.

[cipher42]

And again, that study in fact says the exact opposite of what you claim. What it says on the matter is: "The reliable observation that heterosexual women’s sexual responses
do not distinguish between depictions of female targets or
depictions of male targets does not mean heterosexual women are
bisexual in orientation"

In other words, you're 100% mistaken in how you define heterosexuality and bisexuality.

[fuuuark]

You cheeky cunt, did you change that? it was changed to the APA defintion, i can change it again to suit me wikipedia can be changed by anyone. AND AGAIN SHOW/EXPLAIN IN DETAIL HOW YOUR DEFINITION CONTRADICTS THE RESEARCH. i have asked you 3 times.

[fuuuark]

The study says they are "ostensibly straight" and in the conclusionary paragraph it says "The results of the present study add to a growing body of
research on the greater flexibility of women’s sexuality with
regard to sexual identity, same-sex attraction, and same-sex behavior"

[cipher42]

The research doesn't change the definition. Research showing that there's multiple shades of red doesn't show that all but the brightest are pink. Come on, at least tell me how you think definitions can be so strict as to mean that a broad category such as sexuality could be defined to be as narrow as you seem to think. No one actually thinks that. No one with a brain thinks that ever so slightly reddish blue is always purple.

[fuuuark]

How does you definition mean women are straight? especially since research says they aren't. The research shows "an enduring pattern of sexual attraction", which is your definition. Heterosexuality and homosexuality has to be rigid, otherwise it's not those orientations. Male sexuality has proven to be rigid, only female sexuality is fluid.

[fuuuark]

As i said even the kisney scale agrees if you aren't a 0 or 6 you are bisexual they believe in a spectrum, but still classify things properly

[cipher42]

Who says homosexuality and Heterosexuality must be rigid? The same people who say any color slightly lighter than the brightest red is pink I suppose.

[cipher42]

Also the kinsey scale is outdated and oversimplified, if you knew anything about this topic you'd understand that.

[fuuuark]

If it isn't rigid then you have sexual attraction to the same and/or other gender (s), which means it isn't homo or hetero. "Enduring sexual attraction" your definition, agrees, it says nothing about the degree of that sexual attraction, to do so would be confusing preference and orientation.

[fuuuark]

Ill post it again If it isn't rigid then you have sexual attraction to the same and/or other gender (s), which means it isn't homo or hetero. "Enduring sexual attraction" your definition, agrees, it says nothing about the degree of that sexual attraction, to do so would be confusing preference and orientation. Can't you adhere to the definition you shoved down my throat?

[cipher42]

Again, the color analogy. Are you seriously this dense? You're argument is literally "it's not rigid because it can't be rigid". It's a circular argument. One more chance to not give a completely useless argument or I'm done.

[fuuuark]

Read my last post again, are you being deliberately obtuse? Must i spoon feed you? You say it's not rigid, so what makes it fluid like you claim? it must be a degree of sexual attraction to both genders rather than having attraction to solely one sex (if that's not why it isn't rigid, please explain why it isn't rigid) , which fits the definition you gave and have based your entire argument on "Enduring sexual attraction" is a definition you accepted for sexual orientation right? What makes it non rigid is enduring sexual attraction to both genders right? You are actually agreeing with me, but you don't know enough to realize it.

[Anonymous]

That's ridiculous.
Frome all the studies, men experienced more sexual experiences with same sex than women do (though it doesn't make them bisexual)
Like, if there's a woman who wanna kiss to another woman, that would not always make her a bisexual
And, i never thought i could love women aka i am a heterosexual

[Asker]

Thank you for your response:) I agree my claim was very bold and was prompted largely due to curiosity rather then fact.
However i have 2 more questions i would be interested in hearing from you.
1. Do you know many bisexual women in your day to day life?
2. What do you think the reasoning for lesbian porn being the apex of sexual preferences for women equates/ means in terms of female sexuality? Does this signify bisexual nature or?

[Opinion Owner]

1. I know one lesbian woman and haven't seen bisexual

2. Porns are for men mostly. they are violent and focus on penetration. Even some soft porns are not for women from my view (and i know a lot of women who say samething) i guess that's why. And women also enjoy gay porns too (i think it's because they don't have to see violent sex toward women) and not every women enjoy lesbian porn. I don't enjoy them at all.

[Asker]

When you say gay porn do you mean guy on guy? so women can be sexually attracted to a guy's physicality?

[Opinion Owner]

Though I don't enjoy lesbian porns at all, i do understand women who enjoy them some what. A friend of mine once told me that as a heterosexual she'd rather watch lesbian porns instead of porns for male where she only can see unattractive abusive guys with huge belly lol

and my guy friend told me that he couldn't be hard by watching gay porn, i think that can be the second reason women to watch lesbian porns. Women can masterbate to anything because rubbing clits always works.

[Opinion Owner]

Yes guy on guy.
And of course. What are you talking about lol? Women are attracted to a guys physicality. Absolutely.

[fuuuark]

"Women can masterbate to anything because rubbing clits always works." Recuse they aren't attracted to one thing, you think a guy sucking another guys dick doesn't work physically? women have fluid sexuality and are bisexual.

[SarahsSummer]

Is the reason most men are bi-curious because they can’t suck their own dick? ↗

[BillieJean1070]

Good point!!

[SarahsSummer]

@BillieJean1070 I’m just having a little fun.

[BillieJean1070]

@SarahsSummer I know :)

[ZohraKhan1995]

when can be more attractive than men aesthetically, but not sexualy. you can acknowledge that a woman is beautiful without feeling desires towards her. I have girl crushes on many of my female friends, but I was never attracted to them. I'm personally more attracted to men. the desire is more animalistic than purely aesthetic, though I'm more attracted to good-looking men.

[Asker]

So your completely straight? I mean i find many guys VERY attractive and can sometimes even get man crushes purely based off their looks and i get what you mean, i have no sexual attractionn at the slightest.
Also do you really feel women are more aesthetically attractive then men or do you mean women on average are more so then the average man? Cheers:)

[ZohraKhan1995]

I'm men on average. but there are many men who are drop dead gorgeous and I prefer males.
I'm 100% straight.

[ZohraKhan1995]

* the first sentence was "I mean on average".

[Asker]

So a man you deem to be very attractive and a female you deem very attractive, the male would ultimately be your choosing regarding pure aesthetic attractivness retracting sexual urges/ nature from the equation? Also ty again:)

[ZohraKhan1995]

yup. welcome.

[john335]

True, I've worked with fat slobs that drink beer and smoke cigarettes all day when I've been on the job.

[HorrorFan]

Granted, I'm not a woman, but from everything I've read on the subject, it sounds like most women are various levels of bisexual.

It's already been tested and shown that 'straight' women are the only sexuality/gender combo that regularly becomes aroused by both homosexual/lesbian and heterosexual visual stimuli.

[Asker]

I don't think that equates to their sexuality tho. I think it just means the act of something sexual by nature replicates the same affects as it would for a man they want, to be fair these women also had the same effect from viewing animals having sexual activities as well as other women/ men so i dont feel this is an acurate way to judge female bisexuality.
Overall i dont think the study claimed straight women were aroused by said viewings but on a deeper subconscious level had replicated an aroused state but not on a knowing level.

[HorrorFan]

Then why wouldn't it have the same effect on lesbians or 'straight' men or gay men? This was unique to women that considered themselves 'straight'

If sexuality is on a sliding scale, it tends to be all over the place for women identifying as straight.

Logically, this would point to the general idea that most women are attracted to women. There is an obvious correlation between who you find attractive and what your sexuality is.

[Asker]

That is a good point, i am very curious to see the responses from the female demographic of this site.

[OlderAndWiser]

I am curious about how it feels to die from a lingering illness. That does not mean that I want to die from a lingering illness.

I am curious about how people in a serious relationship have a threesome and then handle the jealousies and insecurities that would follow. That doesn't mean that I want my girlfriend and me to have a threesome.

Etc.

[Asker]

Thats actually a good point, however i feel its a little different because being bicurious goes beyond imaging same sex relations to actually wanting to experiment which means even slight attraction would have to be there.

[OlderAndWiser]

Yes, but for most women, the curiosity is not strong enough to lead them in to actually trying it, so does that mean that they "really" want to try a lesbian experience?

[GoldCobra]

I actually think that most girls are bisexual deep down. I heard it one time done on a survey and it made news, but I was like "okay whatever." But then even on this website later on I kinda could tell that a lot of these girls actually are bisexual. So then I was like, "huh."

[Asker]

Ye man i'm kind of the same, it was something i heard but never thought much about it and it was just some exaggerated media bullshit etc... I come on to this site where people speak their mind's without censoring themselves and most girls seem to have some sexual interest and attraction to some extent

[Anonymous]

We've all asked this man and the propaganda that's always coming out will do this to you. Many guys don't believe straight women exist but then again it was mostly male scientist that made these reports and even if most women are really bisexual you can't say all are.

[ladsin]

Sexuality is on a continuum, almost no one is exclusively Hetero or homo, that's more of a socially contrived notion.

[Asker]

That is a very good point:) however more women seem inclined/ curious as opposed to their male counterparts.
Do you feel that it is actually equal but seems skewed due to social norms and conditioning?

[ladsin]

Yes, it's socially more acceptable for women, and as such women are more likely to be open about it. I'd actually wager that men are more likely to have same sex thoughts than females just because we tend to think about sex more.

But that's just an assumption of mine.

[Asker]

I can see that assumption having some truth to it, cheers for the reply

[ladsin]

Yeah bud. Thanks

[shadowlegend]

Nope. Never been interested in it because I've always been attracted to males.

[Asker]

Thank you for your response:) do you know many girls around you who are bisexual?

[shadowlegend]

Nope. I know many girls who have have "messed around" with another girl to appear "cool" or so she can say "I experimented so that makes me more wordly", and a lot of women do it for the shock-factor or the reaction they get from because they think it makes them more appealing to say they had a lesbian experience. But very have I known who were genuinely struggling with their sexuality, and it wasn't something they broadcast, it was something they wanted to find clarity about so they could be at peace with themselves.

[shadowlegend]

from men* because

[shadowlegend]

but very few* have I known

[fuuuark]

If they wanted to find clarity on it they obviously have some degree of sexual attraction toward their own gender and are thus by definition bisexual, otherwise they wouldn't have had the want to experiment in the first place. Don't confuse preference and orientation, just because they prefer men doesn't mean they don't have some attraction to girls.

[shadowlegend]

@fuuuark The act doesn't make them bisexual, their feelings do. I could physically have sex with a woman but it doesn't make me bisexual because I'm not confused about what gender I am naturally sexually attracted to, and I can also say that in general women are far more physically appealing but I am still attracted to men. The individual defines their sexual orientation and no, not all women are "deep down" lesbian or bisexual, just like not all men are.

[fuuuark]

You seem to be agreeing with me, you are pretty much saying you are bisexual, and you certainly aren't something just because you claim it. Your feelings have nothing to do with sexual orientation. Why would you have sex with a women if you were straight? that makes no sense.

[shadowlegend]

@fuuuark I'm not bisexual, and you're emotions are exactly what define your sexuality. If a lesbian is raped by a man that doesn't then make her straight or bi, and if I chose to kiss a woman knowing I wasn't attracted to her, that doesn't then make me a lesbian, because I'm only sexually attracted to men and I only want physical relationships with people I'm attracted to because that's the only way it would be satisfying, but my emotions don't physically restrict me from having sex with a woman do they? It's absurd, not to mention completely inaccurate to say that pur sexuality is defined by who we have sex with. Our sexuality develops from our emotions, and we self-identify with what feels most natural or "right" for us.

[shadowlegend]

that our* sexuality

[fuuuark]

*Defined by whom you want to have sex with, which is sexual attraction, which is the definition of sexual attraction (read the dictionary). We covered this, then you said some bullshit about feelings.

[PiuBravoRagazzo]

It's all bullshit at the end Of the day, they want dick
They start watching porn, and are not comfortable looking at penises, so watch lesbian porn and think "I am bisexual"

It's societal brainwashing on many levels.

[SoloStarGazer]

I identify as bisexual but I do not think all women are, just as I don't think all men are bisexual.

[Asker]

Do tou know many guys/ girls around you who identify as bisexual?

[IvoirianGirl20]

Why finding another girl pretty means we're bicurious? 😂😂😂

[Asker]

Lol no haha the question was promted by the question i linked above where a large portion claimed they had been bicurious at one stage.
I

[IvoirianGirl20]

I'm not bicurious at all. I love me some men

[CT_CD]

yes.

[IvoirianGirl20]

@CT_CD Yes what?

[CT_CD]

Nothing

[IvoirianGirl20]

@CT_CD Liar

[fuuuark]

No being curious about doing sexual acts with them makes you bisexual.

[IvoirianGirl20]

@fuuuark I knew this

[GeekGirl_Josy]

I haven't once looked at a woman like "I want to do things with her"

[Asker]

Thank you I appreciate your response:) as a bonus question how many women first hand in your day to day life do you know who are bisexual?

[GeekGirl_Josy]

Only a few

[Asker]

So its in the minority?

[GeekGirl_Josy]

In my group yes

[TheOldMan59]

Regarding the last phase of your question I don't consider the population of GAG, including the so-called girls, a representative cross section of the world population.

[Anonymous]

There's a good take on that here as well because women love threesomes and are tactile?

[fauchelevent]

I mean... I wish, but no, I don't think so.

[Asker]

Thank you for your response:) do you know many girls around you who are bisexual?

[fauchelevent]

I used to know quite a lot, we kinda just grouped together but I don't know any at the minute.

[scooogy]

@fauchelevent you kinda sound like you were bisexual?

[fauchelevent]

@scooogy That would be because I am 😂

[scooogy]

Hm, lucky boyfriend then :)

[Eternal_Flame]

No, that's like saying ALL men are gay.

[Asker]

Thank you for your response:) However i do disagree about your statement.
Science claims on many levels there is no such thing as a straight female, however i'm willing to accept that women claim this isn't true.
However male sexuality is almost purely based on the female body being sexually attractive and drawing the male in where as the female sexuality seems more the way she turns the guy on which turns her on, meaning it isn't the male himself turning her on.

[Eternal_Flame]

You're basing this on science? Then I've proven that theory incorrect because I've never been sexually attracted to a woman... only a male.

Science can't always be depended on I'm tuned on by my boyfriends body. Before I knew him personally I was sexually attracted him him , at that time we weren't conversing and I had no idea he liked me. So how can I only be turned on by knowing I was turning him on when I didn't even know?

[TheOldMan59]

Science said that?

[Eternal_Flame]

To***

[Anonymous]

no females and men are both curious women just admit it

[jman46241]

You just wanted to stir the pot again.

[Anonymous]

Oh shit, not this again.

[john335]

Well it's hard for young men to understand when you have scientist and young women blabbing on about how every girl is bisexual. It doesn't hurt to say a yes I'm straight don't worry not women are because we are bisexual. We are not women and believe it or not men are very interested in what you have to say as scientific reports and other propaganda will continue to come out and it's helpful for women to set this straight.

[john335]

So yes this again and this for years until straight women stand up and say we exist!

[Opinion Owner]

Forget I was ever here!

[john335]

Nope you are entitled to your opinion and I respect it :)

[jacquesvol]

Men wanting a FFM threesome hope that.

[Anonymous]

No they are not.

[Asker]

Thank you for your response:) do you know many girls around you who are bisexual?