Is the potential to grow human beings in incubators for 9 months like the baby lamb, something you would fully support? Is this going against your idea of God/Nature? Do you think this innovation would solve a lot of problems or create more of them? Thoughts?
100% against it. Have you ever heard of a term ""The road to hell is paved with good intentions""? I can give you so many examples where people were advertising and pushing something that looks Awesome on paper, something that they claimed would change the world for better and ones people ate the bait, years later it turned out to be a catastrophically Horrific idea, that benefited ONLY people at the very top of human pyramid. The problem is, 99% of population won't be able to afford such treatment (by design), meaning that Again, only top 1% who already at the top, would get their ""Elite Class"" Even Higher. They will be deliberately designing The best, The most strongest, The most smartest, The most handsome/beautiful boys (men when they grow up) and girls (women when they grow up) that would be sitting at the Very Top tear of humanity (Hollywood, politics, corporations, influencers, music industry etc...) With this technology Top 1% will become permanent gate keepers of ALL the wealth, ALL the power and ALL the fame, while they be abusing and using The rest of 99% of humanity for their pleasure and entertainment for ages to come.
Most Helpful Opinions
I think it would be terrible for the child and by extension for the future of the human race. It think it would be traumatizing. I have to believe that from the moment of conception until the baby exits the mother's body is perhaps the most important formative period of their life where their entire body and brain develop the senses and spirit that will shape them for the rest of their lives. To be surrounded, protected and nurtured by their mother's womb has to be a critical part of their development. Take that away and replace it with a machine and I think it would be dehumanizing for not only the child but for the entire human race.
The problem with medical science is there has to an experimental phase before something can become a standard. With organ transplants the idea was the benefit of living was better than dying by not having the organ such as with heart transplant. At this point could we prove the embryo would die or at least not be born to take such a risk? Medical scientist don’t know how to reimplant an embryo such as the case with an ectopic pregnancy as one example. So along with concerns that others have mentioned I have my doubts that it’s a good idea.
this just seems like it goes against nature but then again so does the society we live in now. I’m against it on the notion that it will not benefit me unless my baby is premature and even then, the hospitals already have equipment in place to help. This machine is nonsense.
The LGBTQ community might benefit from paying big pharma to make a baby for them with this dome.
What Girls & Guys Said
Opinion
21Opinion
Yes. The baby would develop physically but without a mother there would be so much lost. A mother might sing to her baby, talk to her baby, rock in a chair while pregnant… all this would be lost with a test tube baby. These are things that give an unborn baby comfort and a sense of love. A new born can recognize he mothers voice and that voice gives the new born comfort.
This is totally against mother nature. I do not support this. A fetus learns so much from its time in gestation, emotions, it's mother heart beat, familiar sounds etc. Babies need love, nurturing, comfort how can a machine do this? We aren't robots. Babies come naturally or not at all.
Read dune.. It reminds me too much of Axlotl Tanks... Creepy. 100% against it. Read the following, it gives a summary of it.
https://dune.fandom.com/wiki/Axlotl_TankMy baby will grow in my stomach not in some weird lab mashine. That's not natrual at all.. and can not be healthy. I will do it God's way.
I would be for it. I am scared of giving birth because the whole experience is full of nausea and pain but birth specifically is terrifying. Giving birth also makes a woman age faster which is horrible, I wish women wouldn't give birth but rather just simply impregnate a man and be done with it. But sadly that is not possible same like that machine will be used for humans. Surrogates are hella expencive so better prepare ourselves for the worst part of our life
This reminds me of the show KyleXY. A cloned boy was grown in an incubator for about 15 years and came out with all of these mental superpowers and was a genius because his brain was so developed.
https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/nulliparous#health-impact
Nature is pretty cruel.
They did in the the sci-fi movie "I Am Mother". To be fair, if the resulting people turn out as pretty as Clara Rugaard then it is worth considering.
I think it has potential to be a great option for those who cannot carry themselves and want to.
Wow that’s crazy. I’m sure some women would appreciate it though. Not everyone likes being pregnant and carrying a baby for months.
Depends. In a poluted world, it would be beneficial for our survival as species; but those babies would not be healthy as a naturally formed baby.
Sounds super dystopian. I could foresee a future where everyone is sterilized and only a select few are permitted to reproduce.
I am against it. Soon they will be disposable people as they are just grown with minimum effort. Its sad and dehumanizing but it will happen.
Against. I wouldn’t want a soulless child in my family. My family wouldn’t want me to have a soulless child.
I think the old fashioned way would be best.
pers would be for. if in the future we can have healthy babies without ever getting pregnant that would super cool
Those 9-months are crucial for bonding with your child. This is pretty much like pre-ordering Call of Duty and picking it up from GameStop….. and then having to feed and change its diapers every hour.
I don’t want kids myself. But, let’s say I do, this is a lot better than giving birth.
If that’s the only way you can have a child with then I see no problem. How is it any different than in vitro fertilization and a surrogate uterus?
I don’t have a child that needs that so I’m against it
Learn more
We're glad to see you liked this post.
You can also add your opinion below!