Everyone has their preference. But you are right that people shouldn't be such a dick about it. The only thing we can do is be better than that and hope to be on the good side.
Some girls do date older guys. Some guys date older girls. It really depends, there are 40 something both men and women who look incredible hot!
0
0 Reply
Anonymous
(25-29)
+1 y
I don't think most guys believe their looks don't matter. But we also know that other things such as money and status are far more important to women than they are to men.
believe it or not, generally if a woman makes decent income, she is no where near as desperate to marry a guy just for money. I'm just talking from experience.
Successful women who can make their own money want a guy who matches or is above their level. Its not money which they are after, it is his intelligence or potential. Only women who can't make any money are desperate to date rich guys
Studies have shown that a man's income has a direct affect on how physically and sexually attractive women perceive him to be. It's a scientifically proven fact, but a man who has lived in this world doesn't need science to tell him what he already knows from experience.
Well I am not looking for a man who makes more than me. Because I can make decent income and I will only have more money making potential in the upcoming future. I am looking for a guy who matches or has a similar earning potential, not necessarily exceed it. This itself contradict these generalizing "studies" that you so adamantly believe in.
When I was younger, it has came across my mind that I wouldn't date a guy under a certain income level. But it has changed now since that I realized I can support myself so well or even better in the future
Well you are one woman, and clearly there are exceptions to every rule. I think it's great you are not typical, and I realize there are women out there who are not typical, but that still leaves the majority of women who ARE typical and they are the ones who set the expectations men have about women.
And by the way, you argument that women who earn their own money don't seek men who earn a lot of money... also not true of the majority...
I work with a lot of other women in finance who are rich. Many of us do not think money is the biggest factor when it comes to marrying the "right guy". We can afford to not have his income as our first priority. We focus more on things such as how attracted we are to his personality, character. Only after that , we begin to take his leadership, career status, earning potential into consideration. I have also seen many other women online say that money is not their biggest factor too because they can make their own money. You need to realize that these studies are extremely generalizing. As most women in general make far less than men in the workforce.
I'm a girl who grew up under poverty but now a self made woman through many years of hard work. Back in the ghettos, girls would do anything to get with a guy with money regardless of whatever they have to do to get his attention or how nasty he may be.
Its not complete BS. its a very well known fact. Men hold leadership positions more than women. Women also tend to work in fields such as marketing, education, nursing while men tend to work in science , tech fields that make much more money. Most lucrative fields such as surgery, tech, finance fields are all predominately male. Women DO make less than men. And its very well known fact.
Its also very much recently known due to a poll that a man would go out on a first date with a man just to try out the restaurant that she could never afford to eat at.
Its also very much known due to a recent poll that a woman would go out on a first date with a man just to try out the restaurant that she could never afford to eat at.
You are correct in the sense that women earn less than men because they CHOOSE to. Unlike men, women choose to go into lower paying fields, they choose to work fewer hours than men, and they choose to prioritize other things like flexible hours and pleasant working environment higher than pay. Why do women choose those things? Because they can. They know they can afford to earn less than men because they expect men to earn more than them so they can pay for things like dates so women don't have to. And that is why a man's money is such an important factor in women's attraction to men.
Men are more often in leadership positions because they are more often willing to make the sacrifices, put in the extra hours and take on the more difficult assignments than women are. That is your CHOICE.
Women did NOT choose to enter lower paying professions. Math and science fields make the most money. Men typically are better at science and math than women. Women typically are better at language and writing. This explains why most doctors are men while more lawyer's are women. Most people finance or tech are men nowadays. Men also tend to be more aggressive and to be overconfident or overrate their abilities which more likely will lead them to be included in leadership positions. Do some more real research before you go on looking for excuse to hate on women
"You are correct in the sense that women earn less than men because they CHOOSE to. "
You just INSISTED that women don't make more than men. You called it complete BS. Now you've changed your mind? Clearly you're absolutely clueless about everything and just talking out of your ass. Why should I believe the so called fake "Facts" that you're presenting to me now?
All your comments sound more like hate rants which you insist to be facts. Meanwhile its proven to me that you are absolutely clueless about everything. You're just here to hate on women and defend men.
What I meant was that men don't earn more than women in the same jobs or due to some kind of sexism. Women earn less than men because they choose to earn less than men. It is 100% in their control to earn as much as men if they choose to.
You should take your own advice about doing research because, like most of the other things you've said here, you are wrong about doctors and lawyers. The truth is just the opposite of what you said. Women now represent the majority of doctors whereas the majority of lawyers are still men, although the majority of law students are now women. DO yourself a favor and educate yourself before making silly claims on the internet.
I don't hate women, but I do hate ignorance and false victims.
what is the validity of your so called "facts" if you've proven yourself to just be on here to defend men and attack women? How do you insist that what you're saying is correct when you have absolutely no clue it is correct? Sexism.
So are men not hypocrites? I'm asking this question because i was outraged how men don't think age applies to them too. If you're gonna be disrespectful, dont cry if you get disrespected back
Be mindful that you are grouping all men together and then attacking a specific demographic, all of which likely had no part in the (appropriate) outrage that you're hearing. I am not disagreeing with you for your views, I am disagreeing in the way that you are going about expressing yourself as a result.
We don't solve problems by bringing each other down; we solve them by nuanced discussions born of mutual respect. You saw one grizzled individual, whom you do not know the age of, ask an inappropriate and entitled question that upset you. Your response to this is to ask a perfectly valid question but include a disrespectful comment attacking 35-year old men. Why? This does nothing to help anyone; in fact, it will undoubtedly stick with some casual reader to be used as fuel to spread hate somewhere else.
Tit-for-tat is something best reserved for and abandoned at the playground. If only politics would follow suit. The inconsiderate will continue to be inconsiderate, and to that end we must target our outrage appropriately in a way that leads to respectful discussion.
In response to your last sentence, calling out hypocrisy is not inherently disrespectful, nor was it intended as such. To both your point and mine, I don't even think physical primes should even be considered a thing, on either side. You aren't likely to see me asking the prime ages for women but you also aren't likely to see me ask 'who would want a 35 yr old [woman] who is gonna look like crap in 5 years anyways'.
So you're offended by this question right? why wouldn't you acknowledge that the guy who asked the outrageous question I was complaining about in the first place? why is it your first instinct to attack me? You're obviously just out to defend men.
I have not been offended by anything you have said. I might disagree with your approach but that does not mean I do not respect you as an individual. These polarized generalization questions are all over the Internet and can be about basically anything: generational differences, politics, Ford vs Chevy, here is no different.
What are you are seeking is a response from me that your reason for asking this question was justified, but I don't think that the way you have gone about being upset is appropriate.
The question that was asked was whether the community agreed about the prime physical age for women. You are upset that this individual felt that they were permitted to ask this question and I'm inclined to agree, but this is a public forum and people ask silly questions like this all the time. Your response, however, was to then provide your opinion on the prime physical age for men, the exact same thing that upset you and then subsequently attack men ages 35+. That is hypocrisy, you are failing to conform to the moral standards by which you are holding others accountable to.
You certainly do sound upset by my question. But you don't solve anything either by simply attacking on someone's outrage rather than the real cause of the outrage at hand. And yes, I do believe that disrespecting the arrogant assholes back can truly give them a taste of their own medicine. Its actually a very common response. Be disrespectful, don't expect smiles back.
And actually more so, the real purpose of asking this question to remind men that their "hitting the wall" is around the corner too so they shouldn't even feel entitled to brag about such a thing. It might sound like hypocrisy if you only care about mens feelings. But in a woman's perspective, it is simply a reminder to men that we WOMEN DO NOT EXIST TO CATER TO MEN. We need to fuck too.
You are deflecting now. My reply was highlighting that you are being a hypocrite by complaining about defining a prime age and then defining a prime age. That is, by definition, being hypocritical. It has nothing to do with caring about anyone's feelings.
"And yes, I do believe that disrespecting the arrogant assholes back can truly give them a taste of their own medicine."
This is the problem. It was one person's ask, but instead you took it upon yourself to give more than just them "as of their own medicine". In doing so, you're targeting the wrong people while simultaneously doing the exact thing you were upset against.
Let's try another, more extreme scenario. An ex slashes your car's tires. The equivalent retaliation that you are evoking here is that the proper discourse is to go slash his tires as well as the tires of his friends, even though they were never a part of the discussion or issue to begin with. That's the problem.
Both genders age, that's part of life. I'll reiterate that the purpose of your message, that asking the question that they did is objectifying, is sound; I don't think any reasonable person would debate that. Just be mindful that when in the moment and responding, that you should do so tactfully and in an way that doesn't detract from your message and unnecessarily attack others who are not directly involved.
Well now Im confidently sure that you know how women feel when men constantly brag about stuff like this. Think about what comes out of your mouth next time. I have no regrets asking this question. This is how I teach people a lesson and from my experience, it works
Your replies are getting increasingly confusing. What fact on life are you reminding me about, exactly? I can't explain what hypocrisy is any more clearly. Complaining about something, then "fighting fire with fire", is hypocritical. I can't define this any more clearly for you.
Because I do not support your ideal of attacking an entire group for the actions of a single person, you assume I am solely defending men. Rather than respond my comments with substance, you choose to preach to yourself that your cause is "just".
If you want inspire change in people, you must do so in a way that is focused enough for people to rally behind. Progress is rarely made through hypocrisy and destruction, tit-for-tat is not justification for your actions when you also want to push for change at the same time. When you hopefully discuss this topic with others in the future, I hope that you'll be respectful enough to hear and reply specifically to what they have to say, rather than close your mind solely because what you are doing is justified. Failing to do so hurts your argument and makes for poor debate.
You may have the last word if you so desire, and I will read your reply is you happen to do so. However, this marks my last reply to this thread, as there's nothing more I have to add. Take care.
I can see through you like glass. You're just offended by this question. You only have regard for the feelings of men but not women. I haven't got any respect for you either simply due to this.
@Alex_988_2 There is no wrong or right in this chain of thread. Its just an offended male looking for excuses to attack me due to his butt hurt ass. He can't get over it.
I think its due to sexism. Women are cast as sexual objects in our society. A woman's self worth is all based on her appearance which i believe is just another way that women are EXPECTED TO CATER to men. Its a partriarchal sexist thing.
Men expect to get all the sexual attraction they want. Women can't expect to have any sexual attraction. Men can sleep around with a million women but women also can't enjoy sex otherwise she will be cast as a $lut.
by the way. the only women who would date a guy for money is only if she can't make any money. Girls with decent careers aren't as desperate for guys with money.
Yeah that's why i don't judge, I've seen attractive 50 year olds, I've seen ugly as fuck 20 year olds it's all about your mental age and how you present yourself. And the last thing i want is to be some cranky bitter old man, with a raisin face smoking a pack a day.
Not really. How one ages doesn't necessary go any better for people deemed by society as beautiful than the rest of us average people. I've seen people who were considered very attractive in their 20s not age well. As someone who is average I'd say I get more attention now than when I was young because I've maintained a slimmer body weight and haven't aged as rapidly as some of my peers. Being beautiful just isn't a guarantee. It takes good eating and healthy lifestyle and some luck that one doesn't get really sick in one's life.
@sejla yeah thats more my situation, I knew i had good looks i just never maintained them and i wanted to fix that. Now i honestly look and feel better now then i did in my early 20s
good you caught it before you hit 30. It is easier to correct poor eating or lifestyle when you are young then try to catch up at 40 or 50 when it is harder.
Yes you did luck out. What older women complain about with older men is they let themselves go to the point they can't keep up and it isn't just physical but people have to keep developing mentally and not have closed minds.
Its not the fact that men prefer younger women that bothers me. Its the fact that you ask this question with such a deluded pride that you don't think young women prefer younger men too. Young women like older guys like around 2-5 years older, not 10 years older.
Young women also prefer guys over 6 feet tall. Should any guy that 5'11 or below stop trying? Young women prefers guys with chiseled jaws. Should any guy with a round face stop trying?
In fact, young women are all pretty much attracted to the same top 10% of guys. Yet some less than ideal guys get girlfriend because they keep trying. Its not impossible for an older guy to score a girl 10+ years younger, so why not at least give it a try, right?
I don't think there's anything wrong with a guy saying I prefer quality x and reject girls with quality y. If you girls can do it, so can we.
I really don't understand why you care anyways. You're a young girl who can get pretty much any guy she wants. If some older guy is interested in you, just reject him, like you would you do a short, ugly guy your own age.
my point is: don't think that age doesn't apply to you. I was just completely outraged how men only focus on womens looks Cuz I hate older guys too. I've had them ask me for my number or developed crushes on me too. But there's honestly no way I would ever say yes.
I'm sorry but you're weird af. I'm a young guy and if a older woman asked me out, I would just politely decline. I wouldn't hate her or think less of her.
I really don't see it being any different than a person your own age, that you don't find attractive, asking you out. So you reject and thats it
You seem to be angry about the idea of an ugly. Whether he's ugly because of his age, height, weight, jawline etc. only pursuing young, beautiful women and only disregarding women others view closer to his level. I don't quite understand that.
I'll give you an example. If I say a fat, ugly, 40 something woman saying I only want a 6'2, muscular, chiseled stud, even though I don't measure up to that. I don't care, because I'm not interested in dating her. I don't lose out on anything.
Tell that to the brainwashing media where you can find love at bars, single people have more sex than married people, or that you can get a girlfriend by handing out business cards with your name on it at the corner of the block. These DO NOT work. You're simply being brainwashed by fake BS
As long as you love them and aren’t attracted to them for their materialistic things. Or unless that’s yours and his thing I guess that fine. Some people prefer love tho.
You need to realizes that dating someone who is mentally way under qualified just for her looks says a lot about you. From experience, only losers would date girls way too young for them. The cool successful guys look for someone similar to them.
Why are you calling them losers? Guys who date young broads only want to blow a nut. They don't give two shits about her. They are just using her. If they want to, he would probably settle down with someone more level headed similar to himself.
What Girls & Guys Said
Opinion
43Opinion
Everyone has their preference. But you are right that people shouldn't be such a dick about it. The only thing we can do is be better than that and hope to be on the good side.
Some girls do date older guys. Some guys date older girls.
It really depends, there are 40 something both men and women who look incredible hot!
I don't think most guys believe their looks don't matter. But we also know that other things such as money and status are far more important to women than they are to men.
believe it or not, generally if a woman makes decent income, she is no where near as desperate to marry a guy just for money. I'm just talking from experience.
Successful women who can make their own money want a guy who matches or is above their level. Its not money which they are after, it is his intelligence or potential. Only women who can't make any money are desperate to date rich guys
Studies have shown that a man's income has a direct affect on how physically and sexually attractive women perceive him to be. It's a scientifically proven fact, but a man who has lived in this world doesn't need science to tell him what he already knows from experience.
www.inc.com/.../...es-earnings-education-jobs.html
"Research Shows Today's Single Men Don't Meet Single Women's Expectations. Potential husbands earn less than the women who date them may be hoping."
Well I am not looking for a man who makes more than me. Because I can make decent income and I will only have more money making potential in the upcoming future. I am looking for a guy who matches or has a similar earning potential, not necessarily exceed it.
This itself contradict these generalizing "studies" that you so adamantly believe in.
When I was younger, it has came across my mind that I wouldn't date a guy under a certain income level. But it has changed now since that I realized I can support myself so well or even better in the future
Well you are one woman, and clearly there are exceptions to every rule. I think it's great you are not typical, and I realize there are women out there who are not typical, but that still leaves the majority of women who ARE typical and they are the ones who set the expectations men have about women.
And by the way, you argument that women who earn their own money don't seek men who earn a lot of money... also not true of the majority...
ifstudies.org/.../better-educated-women-still-prefer-higher-earning-husbands
I work with a lot of other women in finance who are rich. Many of us do not think money is the biggest factor when it comes to marrying the "right guy". We can afford to not have his income as our first priority. We focus more on things such as how attracted we are to his personality, character. Only after that , we begin to take his leadership, career status, earning potential into consideration. I have also seen many other women online say that money is not their biggest factor too because they can make their own money. You need to realize that these studies are extremely generalizing. As most women in general make far less than men in the workforce.
I'm a girl who grew up under poverty but now a self made woman through many years of hard work. Back in the ghettos, girls would do anything to get with a guy with money regardless of whatever they have to do to get his attention or how nasty he may be.
In what country do you live?
United States nyc
"... most women in general make far less than men in the workforce"
If you live in the US then this statement ^^ is complete bullshit.
Its not complete BS. its a very well known fact. Men hold leadership positions more than women. Women also tend to work in fields such as marketing, education, nursing while men tend to work in science , tech fields that make much more money. Most lucrative fields such as surgery, tech, finance fields are all predominately male. Women DO make less than men. And its very well known fact.
Its also very much recently known due to a poll that a man would go out on a first date with a man just to try out the restaurant that she could never afford to eat at.
Its also very much known due to a recent poll that a woman would go out on a first date with a man just to try out the restaurant that she could never afford to eat at.
You are correct in the sense that women earn less than men because they CHOOSE to. Unlike men, women choose to go into lower paying fields, they choose to work fewer hours than men, and they choose to prioritize other things like flexible hours and pleasant working environment higher than pay. Why do women choose those things? Because they can. They know they can afford to earn less than men because they expect men to earn more than them so they can pay for things like dates so women don't have to. And that is why a man's money is such an important factor in women's attraction to men.
Men are more often in leadership positions because they are more often willing to make the sacrifices, put in the extra hours and take on the more difficult assignments than women are. That is your CHOICE.
Women did NOT choose to enter lower paying professions. Math and science fields make the most money. Men typically are better at science and math than women. Women typically are better at language and writing. This explains why most doctors are men while more lawyer's are women. Most people finance or tech are men nowadays. Men also tend to be more aggressive and to be overconfident or overrate their abilities which more likely will lead them to be included in leadership positions. Do some more real research before you go on looking for excuse to hate on women
"You are correct in the sense that women earn less than men because they CHOOSE to. "
You just INSISTED that women don't make more than men. You called it complete BS. Now you've changed your mind? Clearly you're absolutely clueless about everything and just talking out of your ass. Why should I believe the so called fake "Facts" that you're presenting to me now?
typo: You just INSISTED that women don't make less than men.
All your comments sound more like hate rants which you insist to be facts. Meanwhile its proven to me that you are absolutely clueless about everything. You're just here to hate on women and defend men.
What I meant was that men don't earn more than women in the same jobs or due to some kind of sexism. Women earn less than men because they choose to earn less than men. It is 100% in their control to earn as much as men if they choose to.
You should take your own advice about doing research because, like most of the other things you've said here, you are wrong about doctors and lawyers. The truth is just the opposite of what you said. Women now represent the majority of doctors whereas the majority of lawyers are still men, although the majority of law students are now women. DO yourself a favor and educate yourself before making silly claims on the internet.
I don't hate women, but I do hate ignorance and false victims.
what is the validity of your so called "facts" if you've proven yourself to just be on here to defend men and attack women? How do you insist that what you're saying is correct when you have absolutely no clue it is correct? Sexism.
Google it, moron.
"... but why do they think they have right to ask such a question?"
"But who wants 35 yr old man who is gonna look like crap in 5 years anyways?"
The hypocrisy is astounding.
So are men not hypocrites? I'm asking this question because i was outraged how men don't think age applies to them too. If you're gonna be disrespectful, dont cry if you get disrespected back
Be mindful that you are grouping all men together and then attacking a specific demographic, all of which likely had no part in the (appropriate) outrage that you're hearing. I am not disagreeing with you for your views, I am disagreeing in the way that you are going about expressing yourself as a result.
We don't solve problems by bringing each other down; we solve them by nuanced discussions born of mutual respect. You saw one grizzled individual, whom you do not know the age of, ask an inappropriate and entitled question that upset you. Your response to this is to ask a perfectly valid question but include a disrespectful comment attacking 35-year old men. Why? This does nothing to help anyone; in fact, it will undoubtedly stick with some casual reader to be used as fuel to spread hate somewhere else.
Tit-for-tat is something best reserved for and abandoned at the playground. If only politics would follow suit. The inconsiderate will continue to be inconsiderate, and to that end we must target our outrage appropriately in a way that leads to respectful discussion.
In response to your last sentence, calling out hypocrisy is not inherently disrespectful, nor was it intended as such. To both your point and mine, I don't even think physical primes should even be considered a thing, on either side. You aren't likely to see me asking the prime ages for women but you also aren't likely to see me ask 'who would want a 35 yr old [woman] who is gonna look like crap in 5 years anyways'.
So you're offended by this question right? why wouldn't you acknowledge that the guy who asked the outrageous question I was complaining about in the first place? why is it your first instinct to attack me? You're obviously just out to defend men.
I have not been offended by anything you have said. I might disagree with your approach but that does not mean I do not respect you as an individual. These polarized generalization questions are all over the Internet and can be about basically anything: generational differences, politics, Ford vs Chevy, here is no different.
What are you are seeking is a response from me that your reason for asking this question was justified, but I don't think that the way you have gone about being upset is appropriate.
The question that was asked was whether the community agreed about the prime physical age for women. You are upset that this individual felt that they were permitted to ask this question and I'm inclined to agree, but this is a public forum and people ask silly questions like this all the time. Your response, however, was to then provide your opinion on the prime physical age for men, the exact same thing that upset you and then subsequently attack men ages 35+. That is hypocrisy, you are failing to conform to the moral standards by which you are holding others accountable to.
You certainly do sound upset by my question. But you don't solve anything either by simply attacking on someone's outrage rather than the real cause of the outrage at hand. And yes, I do believe that disrespecting the arrogant assholes back can truly give them a taste of their own medicine.
Its actually a very common response. Be disrespectful, don't expect smiles back.
And actually more so, the real purpose of asking this question to remind men that their "hitting the wall" is around the corner too so they shouldn't even feel entitled to brag about such a thing. It might sound like hypocrisy if you only care about mens feelings. But in a woman's perspective, it is simply a reminder to men that we WOMEN DO NOT EXIST TO CATER TO MEN. We need to fuck too.
You are deflecting now. My reply was highlighting that you are being a hypocrite by complaining about defining a prime age and then defining a prime age. That is, by definition, being hypocritical. It has nothing to do with caring about anyone's feelings.
"And yes, I do believe that disrespecting the arrogant assholes back can truly give them a taste of their own medicine."
This is the problem. It was one person's ask, but instead you took it upon yourself to give more than just them "as of their own medicine". In doing so, you're targeting the wrong people while simultaneously doing the exact thing you were upset against.
Let's try another, more extreme scenario. An ex slashes your car's tires. The equivalent retaliation that you are evoking here is that the proper discourse is to go slash his tires as well as the tires of his friends, even though they were never a part of the discussion or issue to begin with. That's the problem.
Both genders age, that's part of life. I'll reiterate that the purpose of your message, that asking the question that they did is objectifying, is sound; I don't think any reasonable person would debate that. Just be mindful that when in the moment and responding, that you should do so tactfully and in an way that doesn't detract from your message and unnecessarily attack others who are not directly involved.
Big oof on that misquote, "a taste of their own medicine".
I wasn't being a hypocrite. Why would I be a hypocrite if im just reminding you a fact about life?
Someone like you who won't acknowledge the wrong doings of men but are quick to criticize and condemn women don't deserve any tact.
Well now Im confidently sure that you know how women feel when men constantly brag about stuff like this. Think about what comes out of your mouth next time. I have no regrets asking this question. This is how I teach people a lesson and from my experience, it works
Your replies are getting increasingly confusing. What fact on life are you reminding me about, exactly? I can't explain what hypocrisy is any more clearly. Complaining about something, then "fighting fire with fire", is hypocritical. I can't define this any more clearly for you.
Because I do not support your ideal of attacking an entire group for the actions of a single person, you assume I am solely defending men. Rather than respond my comments with substance, you choose to preach to yourself that your cause is "just".
If you want inspire change in people, you must do so in a way that is focused enough for people to rally behind. Progress is rarely made through hypocrisy and destruction, tit-for-tat is not justification for your actions when you also want to push for change at the same time. When you hopefully discuss this topic with others in the future, I hope that you'll be respectful enough to hear and reply specifically to what they have to say, rather than close your mind solely because what you are doing is justified. Failing to do so hurts your argument and makes for poor debate.
You may have the last word if you so desire, and I will read your reply is you happen to do so. However, this marks my last reply to this thread, as there's nothing more I have to add. Take care.
I can see through you like glass. You're just offended by this question. You only have regard for the feelings of men but not women. I haven't got any respect for you either simply due to this.
Once a wise human said, never argue with women. Mate that's what women do when they know they are wrong but aren't gonna admit
@Alex_988_2 There is no wrong or right in this chain of thread. Its just an offended male looking for excuses to attack me due to his butt hurt ass. He can't get over it.
Sometimes I really feel lucky to be born as a man...
Again just gonna say come with anything intelligent if you have...
@Alex_988_2 I'm much more intelligent than you.
But you never came with anything logical in our argument... so nope
Our society puts more pressure on women to be beautiful. But I think men care about their looks. The car industry is proof of that.
I think its due to sexism. Women are cast as sexual objects in our society. A woman's self worth is all based on her appearance which i believe is just another way that women are EXPECTED TO CATER to men. Its a partriarchal sexist thing.
Men expect to get all the sexual attraction they want. Women can't expect to have any sexual attraction. Men can sleep around with a million women but women also can't enjoy sex otherwise she will be cast as a $lut.
All true
The vast majority of men, as they age they get more beautiful
the vast majority of women are the opposit to men
I don’t think that’s true. I find guys above 33 to be increasingly less attractive
Beauty is subjective my lady.
how many 24 yr old women do you see dating 37 year old men? Pretty much slim to none.
Women's looks matter more because looks are the only thing women bring to the table in a relationship.
LMAO LOL HAHAHAHAH
That's only what the media wants you to believe. Its actually not true.
by the way. the only women who would date a guy for money is only if she can't make any money. Girls with decent careers aren't as desperate for guys with money.
Because they have been told this all the time. Girls say they dont like men for their looks, only personality, etc.
You can get laid while looking like absolute shit. Have no doubt about this.
You’re probably proof of this.
Careful woman thats gonna be you in about 10 years.
thats gonna be you in 10 years too
Yeah that's why i don't judge, I've seen attractive 50 year olds, I've seen ugly as fuck 20 year olds
it's all about your mental age and how you present yourself. And the last thing i want is to be some cranky bitter old man, with a raisin face smoking a pack a day.
how about the way you were born? Someone who is born with beautiful features is likely to stay beautiful for much longer than the average joe or jane
Dah well, can't all be blessed.
Not really. How one ages doesn't necessary go any better for people deemed by society as beautiful than the rest of us average people. I've seen people who were considered very attractive in their 20s not age well. As someone who is average I'd say I get more attention now than when I was young because I've maintained a slimmer body weight and haven't aged as rapidly as some of my peers. Being beautiful just isn't a guarantee. It takes good eating and healthy lifestyle and some luck that one doesn't get really sick in one's life.
@sejla yeah thats more my situation, I knew i had good looks i just never maintained them and i wanted to fix that. Now i honestly look and feel better now then i did in my early 20s
good you caught it before you hit 30. It is easier to correct poor eating or lifestyle when you are young then try to catch up at 40 or 50 when it is harder.
@sejla Yikes sounds like i really lucked out cause i just decided to get my shit together and change my eating habits and whatnot last year.
Yes you did luck out. What older women complain about with older men is they let themselves go to the point they can't keep up and it isn't just physical but people have to keep developing mentally and not have closed minds.
@sejla Huh funny how a simple decision of telling myself "I want to be better, stronger" Could make so much difference.
I guess as much right as you asking your questions.
Because women falsely insist that they don't care about looks
I've always been ugly to very plain. I just haven't aged a whole lot.
"But I don't do a direspectful poll on such a thing."
No, you post a disrespectful question instead.
Why are you anonymous? Are you afraid?
Well if you’re disrespectful to women, don’t cry when we disrespect you back
Lets say men prefer younger women, why do you even care? What's in it for you? Just find a man now and you won't have to care about this.
Its not the fact that men prefer younger women that bothers me. Its the fact that you ask this question with such a deluded pride that you don't think young women prefer younger men too. Young women like older guys like around 2-5 years older, not 10 years older.
Sperm quality decrease with age too. Don't think you can just shit on women for everything
Young women also prefer guys over 6 feet tall. Should any guy that 5'11 or below stop trying?
Young women prefers guys with chiseled jaws. Should any guy with a round face stop trying?
In fact, young women are all pretty much attracted to the same top 10% of guys. Yet some less than ideal guys get girlfriend because they keep trying. Its not impossible for an older guy to score a girl 10+ years younger, so why not at least give it a try, right?
I don't think there's anything wrong with a guy saying I prefer quality x and reject girls with quality y. If you girls can do it, so can we.
I really don't understand why you care anyways. You're a young girl who can get pretty much any guy she wants. If some older guy is interested in you, just reject him, like you would you do a short, ugly guy your own age.
my point is: don't think that age doesn't apply to you. I was just completely outraged how men only focus on womens looks Cuz I hate older guys too. I've had them ask me for my number or developed crushes on me too. But there's honestly no way I would ever say yes.
I'm sorry but you're weird af. I'm a young guy and if a older woman asked me out, I would just politely decline. I wouldn't hate her or think less of her.
I really don't see it being any different than a person your own age, that you don't find attractive, asking you out. So you reject and thats it
I can still tell that you can't understand my point of asking this question.
You seem to be angry about the idea of an ugly. Whether he's ugly because of his age, height, weight, jawline etc. only pursuing young, beautiful women and only disregarding women others view closer to his level. I don't quite understand that.
I'll give you an example. If I say a fat, ugly, 40 something woman saying I only want a 6'2, muscular, chiseled stud, even though I don't measure up to that. I don't care, because I'm not interested in dating her. I don't lose out on anything.
My looks don't matter because I know gravity will always win!
Infact men are uglier than women and need more care and attention than women.
What's worse... grey chest hair in old men. And bald head
Yeah your kids are gonna come out stupid. If you ever have any perhaps, because it looks like ur gonna be single till u reach ur prime.
Maybe answering this way can make you feel better about feeling put down like men put down women all the time?
When did I put women down?
you need to understand
MEN LIKE LOOKS
WOMEN LIKE MONEY
two different objectives
That's actually not true for me.
I don't believe you
but ok lol
Well I can already tell you're not very experienced with women.
tell that to porn hub
Tell that to the brainwashing media where you can find love at bars, single people have more sex than married people, or that you can get a girlfriend by handing out business cards with your name on it at the corner of the block. These DO NOT work. You're simply being brainwashed by fake BS
You don't tell me what I like in a man either. I KNOW what I like in a man
im not speaking of just you
IM SPEAKING OF THE MAJORITY OF WOMEN
PORNHUB women selling their ass for money
Youtube
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LrjfD4GA8sk
love of money root of all evil
Ecclesiastes 7:28
while I was still searching but not finding-- I found one upright man among a thousand, but not one upright woman among them all
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6vwNcNOTVzY
Proverbs 6:26
For by means of a whorish woman a man is brought to a piece of bread: and the adulteress will hunt for the precious life
Maybe because women constantly lie and tell them that?
Ask yourself that in 10 years when it’s you.
I'd be married in 10 years cuz i know how to spot a quality guy. Only a 35 yr old loser would marry a 18 yr old girl.
As long as you love them and aren’t attracted to them for their materialistic things. Or unless that’s yours and his thing I guess that fine. Some people prefer love tho.
You need to realizes that dating someone who is mentally way under qualified just for her looks says a lot about you. From experience, only losers would date girls way too young for them. The cool successful guys look for someone similar to them.
When I was 20, I casually dated a 30 year old. When I was 23, I looked back and I realized I wasn't even mentally an adult but just a child.
Yeah no kidding I know what you mean I’m not saying that. I agree.
Why are you calling them losers? Guys who date young broads only want to blow a nut. They don't give two shits about her. They are just using her. If they want to, he would probably settle down with someone more level headed similar to himself.
@LeoElias well the 30 year old never had sex with me so there goes your answer