Are most blonde people naturally slightly tanned with darker skin than brunettes or redheads on average, or is it just my personal experience?

Kind of like this skin color.
Kind of like this skin color.
Not trying to generalize, but it seems like about half of the blonde people I meet have slightly tanned skin. Significantly more than White people with dark hair (brown or brunette).

This kind of confuses me, because isn't blonde hair a result of less melanin? Why would a person with less melanin in the hair suddenly have more in the skin? It just doesn't quite add up. I know the genes for skin and hair color are different, but it doesn't quite add up...
So much melanin in the hair, but skin so pale...
So much melanin in the hair, but skin so pale...
On the contrary most brunette people I meet seem to naturally be pale as fuck, despite having so dark hair.
Makes sense... light hair, light skin with freckles...
Makes sense... light hair, light skin with freckles...
And then you got redhead people, with light hair, light skin, and freckles... it makes me wonder a bit though why brunette people don't usually have as much freckles, if they're about just as pale.
Three GORGEOUS ladies! Id love to be their friend!
Three GORGEOUS ladies! I'd love to be their friend!
So is my observation actually a thing, or just a coincidence?

Also, with the two of them next to each other, it seems the brunette is even MORE pale than the redhead... so why does she have ZERO freckles in comparison? Shouldn't she burn more easily?
Yes, most of them indeed are.
No, it's just your personal experience.
Select gender and age to cast your vote:
Are most blonde people naturally slightly tanned with darker skin than brunettes or redheads on average, or is it just my personal experience?
Post Opinion