When a Guy Writes a Take About Girls, Prepare For Feminist Lawfare

[martyfellow]

Whenever anyone, girl or guy, writes about 'girls' or 'guys' or a subset thereof, such as 'players' or 'virgins', they are generalizing. Not every 'guy' or 'girl' has the same outlook or behavior pattern, and ditto every 'player' or 'virgin.'

No problem, so long as a girl writes the Take.

But if, as a guy, you write about 'girls' or a subset of them, such as 'girl who wears glasses' or 'girls who say stupid things about NIce Guys', to cite just two recent examples, you will get a group of more or less closeted feminists who will write in that 'not every girl', or 'not every girl with glasses'. is like what was described in the Take, and you will be accused of using stereotypes, etc. etc.

This is completely dishonest since everyone is aware that Take authors are speaking generally. For example, in these two cases, we know not every nice guy is bitter, nor does every girl wear glasses because she's low maintenance and smart.

The feminists don't discuss the overall tenor of the Take, they just dwell on the exceptions, to change the subject and denigrate the Take.

You will notice this sort of attack rarely (I didn't say never!) happens when girls write about girls in general, or a certain group of girls, in a Take. Never a mention of the exceptions to what they describe, never an allegation they are 'stereotyping' by speaking generally.

I've come to recognize the difference between honest disagreement and disguised anti-male hysteria, and block the relevant Fembots immediately. They aren't there to engage in an exchange of ideas, they are just there to attack the male.

[Anotherdumbblonde]

K. I'm going to just be honest with you and guys like you on this site. You are the male equivalent of this woman-towards women.
67.media.tumblr.com/.../...rrNT5g1sek2a3o1_500.gif

And do you know why no one takes that woman seriously? Because no one wants to deal with people like that. No one wants to discuss serious issues with someone like that. No one wants to waste their time on someone who has already made up their mind, who just spouts out hate all of the time for their own selfish reasons. No one wants to have a conversation with someone who refuses to listen or with someone who only favors one gender over another.

You're going to continue to receive that type of attention because honestly you've turned into and act just like that woman does. You act just like the one thing that you're complaining about.

You and the crazy feminist included are only getting hate because you're giving out hate. It's impossible to talk to you because you all have your own personal agendas, you just want to argue, you just want to be right.

[martyfellow]

You aren't addressing one WORD of what I said in this Take.

My point was that every My Take that discusses girls and is written by a guy gets this wave of dishonest accusations about 'stereotyping', when every My Take GENERALIZES, since we can' t have a discussion without generalizing to some extent.

Naturally, you duck my point and of course, won't say a word against your sisters.

I don't remember EVER having a discussion with you about anything, including My Takes

Thanks for posting that video, though. I was going to post it on the Take, but chose this one instead! No reason not to have both.

[martyfellow]

I see you have only BEENhere since July 13.

You don't know much about what I write, so if you aren't spewing anti male rhetoric, how else could you be making this reference-free judgment against me

[Anotherdumbblonde]

Well first of all "Naturally, you duck my point and of course, won't say a word against your sisters." Actually yes I did. I linked a photo of a crazy feminazi, who unreasonably favors her own gender and continued to explain why no one takes her seriously.

I also understand what you. I just don't agree with you, you're under the assumption that every woman who disagrees with you is some insane feminist who is one sided towards her gender and that's simply not true. Some women don't agree with you because what you're saying is simply not always true and it's full of generalizations and negatively, which is why you get the that same type of attention back.

Also, I see lots of women getting hell for generalizing men also.

[Anotherdumbblonde]

I also understand what you said*

[Anotherdumbblonde]

Because you have a profile, which includes all your previous takes lol. It's not that difficult to find them.

[martyfellow]

Hey, for the umpteenth time, how can you discuss guys and girls, or even subgroups of guys and girls, without generalizing?

It's dishonest to make that comment without backing it up with an example. I could say that about almost any take, on any subject, since the authors almost ALWAYS generalize. Are we supposed to list every lesbian in the US as an exception, by name, before we discuss dating in general, which by convention is about heterosexuals?

[Anotherdumbblonde]

Honestly it's just really unnecessary most of the time. What is the point in taking something, that only some of the population does and spouting off about it, in a judgmental take? You put people on the defense when you do things like that. They are not going to listen to you or take you seriously. They're just going to give you these sarcastic little remarks or go on the defense because what you said doesn't include them/everyone. And completely ignore your point because that is what happens when you generalize.

[martyfellow]

You're a good example of the Fembot dishonesty I discuss here. I haven't written all that many Takes, and only a couple of them are focused on feminism... so you're just spewing close man hating , the worst kind.

Please read Belgie's comment, below. He's right, so I won't waste more time here.

[martyfellow]

For the umpteenth time, nearly every Take generalizes, especially about 'guys' and 'girls'. This is lawyer, dishonest rhetoric, of the Fembot kind, since you never criticize girl written takes for generalizing!

[Anotherdumbblonde]

And you're the perfect example of what I described in my initial answer. You do exactly as all of those other men who generalize and who write takes like you do. The number that you wrote doesn't change the fact of what you've said. You are the male equivalent of a feminazi and until you stop acting like that, then you're going to continue to get hate because that's what you give out when you say things like that.

[Anotherdumbblonde]

First you said that I don't "insult my sisters" after I wrote an entire response explaining why no one takes feminazis seriously. Then you tell me that I don't criticize other women when they are wrong. So here ya go.
www.girlsaskguys.com/.../a29823-wgtow-movement-reasons-you-don-t-need-a-man-in-your-life
www.girlsaskguys.com/.../a29670-why-i-am-not-an-equalitarian
www.girlsaskguys.com/.../q2068467-do-you-think-we-should-lower-the-standard-of-evidence-required-for-a
www.girlsaskguys.com/.../q2065783-in-general-do-attractive-women-get-treated-bad-by-other-women-in-the
www.girlsaskguys.com/.../q2065276-my-boyfriend-won-t-pay-for-food-should-i-dump-him

And those are just the ones closest to the top.

[Anotherdumbblonde]

You're basically yelling that i'm a one sided feminist just because I disagree with you. You know there are women out there, like me, who happen to love men and who wants equal/better rights for men also. Disagreeing with you, doesn't make me a biased feminist, you need to get those assumptions out of your head. I've proven you wrong in both of your claims, yet you still are convinced that i'm this way for simply disagreeing with you.

[martyfellow]

Discussion over, since you've never addressed a WRD of my Take, you just, like all of you, howl about 'generalization.' JBut gee, you never make this comment on girl written Takes.

So you're a sneaky, lawyer Fembot... not the screaming kind.

I take Belige's advice from now on and don't respond to
ANY of you, you all echo each other.

Ny

[Anotherdumbblonde]

Yeah, I would stop a discussion to if I was proven wrong for every single accusation that I made about someone.

[martyfellow]

Let's stop talking to dumb blonde, so we'll named, and just look at the girl written take that just hot posted, 5 Weird Things about guys that Turn Me OFF

Obviously the whole take is one long series of the broadest possible generalizations about guys.

Thee must be at last 20 response from girls. Some like it, some do not, but guess how many take the author to task for 'stereotypng' and 'generalizing?'

If you guessed zero, go to the had of the class.

[YourFutureEx]

The simple fact he was making is that when someone talks generally, feminists come and pick holes that not ALL women are like that even tho it must be understood that he was just talking generally.

And see what you just did? You validated it.

[martyfellow]

@YourFutureEx She doesn't bother to answer that point; it's clear she doesn't listen to ANYTHING a man says.

Well, maybe if we were Don Trump or a gay,, she would listen...

[YourFutureEx]

myTake Owner - Certainly!

[Anotherdumbblonde]

"The simple fact he was making is that when someone talks generally, feminists come and pick holes that not ALL women are like that even tho it must be understood that he was just talking generally."

I still can't figure out why either of you are under the impression that I don't understand what he is saying. My point is, he's literally calling anyone, for any reason who doesn't agree with him a feminist. So of course he thinks that "feminist" are always having an issue with him because first of all he thinks anyone with a pair of boobs, who disagrees with him, is a raging feminist and that's simply not true.

Second, he's literally the equivalent of a raging male feminist to us. So I was explaining why you're almost always going to attract negative attention when you're saying shit like that.

[Anotherdumbblonde]

"She doesn't bother to answer that point; it's clear she doesn't listen to ANYTHING a man says."

I would listen to one who had a valid point, that is not you.

[martyfellow]

@YourFutureEx They can be intelligent, in a backstabbing lawyer way, dwelling on exceptions instead of admitting the validity of or point. This dumb blonde isn't one of the screaming kind, she's one of the corporate climber kind.

[YourFutureEx]

I think you should just wait for her to fall asleep and leave you alone.

[martyfellow]

@YourFutureEx Interesting that no other woman is willing to defend her at this point. Given Fembot solidarity, you know that shows how obviously she is lying.

[YourFutureEx]

Nobody will because no one wants to be humiliated 😂

[Anotherdumbblonde]

Yeah because I need other people to validate me, oh wait that's you two. You obviously can't exist without the other high fiving you for every reply you make.

[anhur]

I hate western feminism as much as the next guy because it accomplishes almost nothing and the things it does do are almost completely negative; but you honestly just seem to be circlejerking with each other about hating women.

"They can be intelligent, in a backstabbing lawyer way, dwelling on exceptions instead of admitting the validity of or point." Shit like this like come on man, if you want to hate on women or feminisst at least pick some valid points. Complain about social justice or political correctness or how they use systematic oppression as a ghost to push their entitled agenda. Which is of course to be superior to men.

What you're complaining about doesn't seem to be an issue at all, a pet-peeve if anything and I understand where you're coming from it can be annoying. You make yourself sound like some entitled feminist/minority yourself though talking about "disguised anti-male hysteria".

[anhur]

If you want to get mad at disguised anti-male hysteria you could talk about how sitcoms in America always display the man as an overweight, unintelligent blue collar worker who gets bossed around by his attractive intelligent wife or girlfriend. Or how masculinity is portrayed in a poor light these days because everybody attributes it to things that it doesn't even encompass. Like being a violent asshole, abusive, or abrasive to people and women. Those are things that western culture/feminist does and do that are harmful to people's views and men in general. This shit just seems so unimportant, and doesn't actually show any proof of this bias against you with feminists. You're just defaulting to it, or at least it looks that way.

[YourFutureEx]

@anhur duplicate accounts? 😂

[Anotherdumbblonde]

Boyfriend. Unlike you, people of the opposite sex actually want to be around me.

[Anotherdumbblonde]

zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

[Anotherdumbblonde]

And this is why you have issues. It's easier for you to go through life calling everyone who disagrees with you a "corporate climbing feminist" or a "troll." Without actually listening or taking into consideration anything that was actually said to you.

I blocked you because I got sick of seeing you and your suck up friend, talking trash around me, in my own post, like I don't exist. I don't need you two congratulating and high fiving yourselves because you managed to spout out some copy and pasted bullshit responses that you've already used towards 500 other women on this site who have disagreed with you also.

[martyfellow]

My fried is not a suck-up! What a generalized, generalization, and what a way to stereotype people in a stereotypical way.

Me I never say anything about bitch Gil's who always block you when you hit them with reality.

[Belgie]

Personally, I ignore feminists. Especially when they're just being c-nts. You know the ones I mean - burning down shelters, sending death threats, the same sort of useless scandal-seeking-morons who made Joss Whedon quit twitter because they got on his back and said he was a misogynist.

They aren't just man-haters. They actively seek out bullshit arguments just to gnaw at some illusory patriarchy like a rabidly insane little chihuahua.

[martyfellow]

Even worse than the screaming feminist are the deceitful lawyer type like dumb blonde, who pretend to be opposed to the loud ones, but [practice even worse man hating, and attack anything true men say with rhetoric about 'genralizing', when they don't say a peep about takes like 'The 5 weird things that men do that turn me off.'

[Anotherdumbblonde]

Dude, you have some serious issues and I guarantee they didn't start with me. So go get that shit fixed and leave me out of it from now on.

[martyfellow]

@Anotherdumbblonde by blocking me, you sowed you were a troll.

[ThisDudeHere]

The same way whenever women post something that makes men tick off like, say, a woman saying size matters or that status matters, she gets barraged with hate from the guys here.
Or when a woman asks others how she looks, there's always that one lowly asshole who posts the "one free bag of attention to you", indicating that he has nothing better to do than to make light of her plea for positive feedback.

Dude, men are no different. Really. Men and women are equally scummy and pathetic - we just express it for different reasons.

[99percentangel]

This!!

[kaylaS91]

'I've come to recognize the difference between honest disagreement and disguised anti-male hysteria, and block the relevant Fembots immediately. '
... So in your opinion, the best way to achieve gender equality is to just shut the women up and let the men reign?

[martyfellow]

are our feminists women? Or are they corporate androids? An open question. I any case, you can't possibly confuse the feminists with ordinary working women.

[kaylaS91]

corporate androids? Of all things you could compare a modern-day 'feminist', that's what you'd compare them to? lol

[martyfellow]

In any case, they aren't women.!

[kaylaS91]

awe. Sounds like you can't really create any sort of logical counterargument, hence you resort to insults.

[martyfellow]

Not going to argue with someone who equates feminists with women. The vast majority of women these days want nothing to do with the feminists. As you well know.

[kaylaS91]

lol k go talk to the Thai chick who's got you wrapper around her finger like a 'real woman' and have fun with that.

[martyfellow]

Er... well... you've got me there Kayla. But now I'm being berated by BOTH of you!

[kaylaS91]

I'm not 'berating' YOU. All I did was challenge something you said. I wouldn't say this crazy Thai chick is berating you either. You're perfectly able to get yourself out of that situation but are choosing otherwise.

[martyfellow]

Well sure but she AND other women threaten me with legal actin and as a man, it's the kid of thing where you are guilty if they say so...

[kaylaS91]

How can the 'other women' or staff members be threatening to sue if you whatever you did was only involving the crazy Thai chick, though?

[JRICHARDS1996]

Pretty much. I have written MyTakes about women covering every topic imaginable, yet every time I have received more negative feedback from the female commenters than I have positive. I even wrote one about the five things I love most about women, as a celebration of femininity, and I was still shamed for it. There are just some topics where you are going to offend sensibilities no matter what you say, women being one of them along with religion and politics.

[PT1911]

My oh my, someone is triggered.

scontent-ord1-1.xx.fbcdn.net/.../...42281264_n.jpg

[YourFutureEx]

Thank you!

If they had some sort of intelligence and understanding, they would not be a feminist in the first place.

[martyfellow]

I took the time, wasted the time, to look up the references she listed, supposedly to show she criticized feminists. Ta da! Not one of them contains any criticism of fembottery.

Chuckle, so dishonest, this dumb blonde, it's a wonder her nose doesn't get in the way of her typing. A lawyer-sneaky Fembot, disguising this by criticizing the STYLE of the shrill, screaming kind. Same agenda, different style.

What a classic Fembot display we have seen here. OF course I'm posting this here on your answer because, finally exposed,. s he blocked me.

[YourFutureEx]

I knew that you're just wasting your time on her.

[YourFutureEx]

Oh! She's saying that we want to be around them 😂 such a hypocrite.

[anonman32]

if people cannot see by the context that someone is speaking generally or not not then they are just stupid people. yeah i have to agree with this take.

[MissMc3]

Just commenting so I don't lose this utter bullshit

[Noxifer626]

Well, excuse me for not letting mysoginistic and generalizing takes slip by unnoticed!

[Hidden_P]

You've clearly never read my posts.

[martyfellow]

Plenty of yours, which ones dou have in mind? I don't remember you commenting on guys' My Takes

[Hidden_P]

I steer clear from takes because I find them enraging. Eithe gender.

[martyfellow]

So what point are you making/