Why are most males threatened by the SJW (Social Justice Warriors) movement/ideology?

[Anonymous]

I find it hilarious how most guys who have everything going for them in terms of financial, asthetics, pretty much the epitome of what a successful make should obtain in the west get offended with females having some power whether it be in films, video games,

like I've stated above
Im not the most attractive, strongest, wealthiest guy & yet I have 0 issues with females getting the limelight in movies or in video games

how is it that a guy like me with 0 talents in the mating game have no issues with the SJW movement/ideology but most guys here who have "GAME" are too offended by the SJW'S?

Updates

+1 y

but most of you got "Game" to be able to manipulate the females with your charms,$$$,& manliness

[YeetMama]

Bro, people aren't threatened when SJWs put women in lead roles in movies or video games.
I like my stories to feel natural, rather than forced just so a woman could be the main focus. Women can be great as lead roles, but the writer needs to be talented, and not just try to force and agenda.
Also the SJWs who claim to stick up for my people are doing nothing than being what they hate. They are basically saying "your people are too weak to stand up for yourselfs, we have to do it for you", not to mention they are offended for us for something that happened a LONG ASS TIME AGO. I'd rather be seen as a normal human than a protected class

[JMghow]

Awww... you forgot faking shit to stir up issues to protest like James Polite, or the inevitable mob violence that follows like we saw at Evergreen where teacher's were chased off campus or even held hostage because white is racist.

[YeetMama]

I didn't include that just because I'm sure everyone holds that as common knowledge. I was just reasons I can't support it as both a woman and a First Nations Canadian. SJWs aren't promoting equality like they think they are, all they are doing is working towards segregation and protected classes

[JMghow]

Funny you mention that since we have black only graduations at Harvard, black only dorms at Cal State Los Angeles, and whites blocked from access to campus at both Berkley and Evergreen... It's not being worked towards, it's been achieved. Soon we'll be full Jim Crow south in the name of fighting racism. Also, love how the OP calls women females and goes on about being a practical incel who is ok with going belly up full "nice" guy style. I always kinda figured most leftie men are genetic rejects who try to buy feminazi brownie points instead of focusing on self-improvement and getting out of their mother's basement...

[YeetMama]

Yep, I fully understand that. I can get special treatment if I want it too. It's pretty dumb.

I doubt he's a genetic reject, probably just a misguided person. The really crazy ones always seem to be the true sexists. The famous male SJWs on Twitter and YouTube or in the media keep getting outed for assaulting or acting EXTREMELY inappropriate towards women.

[JMghow]

Yeah, it's an effective smoke screen. As long as they virtue signal, it provides cover. Add a sense of entitlement for being a "nice guy" and... well, it's not pretty. As to not being genetic rejects, I'll let these faces speak for themselves, and you tell me which one doesn't make you queasy:

[YeetMama]

The first guy and third guy aren't inheritanly unattractive. In the second picture you can see the guy from a the first picture in a slightly more natural pose and expression, and he has a nice jaw line. He actually kinda reminds me of a YouTuber who I think is ridiculously attractive. The third guy might appeal to me if his fashion sense fell in line with mine, since he looks like he has an attractive face under the weird hair. I'm just not into the second dude though.

[JMghow]

Well, first guy is pretty normal when he's not doing anything. Weirds me out in the video, though... Now, I won't deny that (like I said before) if they got out of their mother's basement and focused on self-improvement instead of whining they might be decent, but they don't and won't. You don't get them cleaned up and normal, you get them crazy, weird and ranting with a little bag of roofies for the "females". That leaves them eternally genetic rejects even if their preferred mates didn't seek empowerment at a planned parenthood clinic. Works for me, though. I like my problems self-correcting. Makes life easy.

[YeetMama]

I mean there genes actually made two of the three look probably at least of average attractiveness, I don't see how they are genetic rejects. Why insult people that just clearly don't know any better. I would think trying to have a human conversation with someone is better than calling them a reject and moving on. To me, that's on their level. Please, do what you want, I just don't understand it. There are many people out there that have potential for a lot of things, but have just wasted their efforts in the wrong places, for a bunch of different reasons

[JMghow]

Genetic rejects in that 1) their genes are rejected and will not be passed along to future generations, and 2) they may well be genetically flawed to the point that they have a genetic propensity to be as such, given the effects of genetics in relation to evolutionary psychology and what this could mean to susceptibility to liberalism. Also, accuracy means far more to me than inoffensiveness. There is nothing wrong with insults. They are either meaningless, so toughen up and move on, or meaningful, so fix your shit and fly right. Pulling punches solves nothing, and worrying about the feels is what got us here in the first place. My reaction of removing all filters might be extreme, but it lets people know where everything really stands so we can move forward from there. White lies and coddling create false ideologies which are far more damaging. Trust me, having grown up under liberals, I know just how damaging...

[YeetMama]

I have nothing wrong with insults, but if you want people to actually listen to you and take you seriously, insults should not be how it's done. That's part of the reason the majority of people don't take SJWs seriously. They can't insult, but can't actually support their opinions. You can do as you please, I just know I try to shine light on why I feel a certain way instead of jumping to insults. If I can help a person improve, I'll take the chance. Also I don't think liberalism is wrong at all, the majority of liberals aren't SJWs but like the majority of conservatives aren't racists. Both sides have made EXTREMELY important contributions to society, but both sides are know recognised for their worst instead of their best

[JMghow]

I don't expect them to listen. I know better after seeing what they have done, and I wouldn't care to have them anyway for much the same reason. This will only end one way: Force. They don't listen to reason, they use force, and they escalate. Continuing to play nice won't do anything, never did anything but lose ground, and they've made their position VERY clear. They can push this to a civil war and we'll fight it out, or they can die off naturally due to their own unsustainability. I won't have kids for them to cannibalize anyway, so I really don't have a dog in that fight, but I do hate them for making that future impossible for my ilk, so I'm fully open to the former option. Given their aforementioned constant violence and escalation, they seem of a like mind. If you want to keep playing nice while they literally kill your comrades off one by one, though, be my guest. Like I said, I got no dog in this fight. It's your kids they'll be scalping on facebook or beating with flagpoles.

[YeetMama]

You've got some weird views of the people you don't agree with lol

[YeetMama]

Change isn't initiated with violence in the modern world. It's initiated by ideas and the nerve to stand up to others peacefully. By showing your worth, you quickly and effectively take away the power of the oppressors and show them in a new light. Many famous leaders and figureheads of the black rights movement operated calmly and lived their lives as normal decent folk. Viola Desmond sat in a seat, like people do. When she was thrown out of the theater, the brought light to the situation that level headed and sceptical people could see. Kill them with kindness isn't just a dumb phrase

[JMghow]

and if others don't change, refuse to listen to reason, set hypocritical standards and get violent when you disagree? Removing the opposing team from existence has been the historical standard by which disagreements were settled, and it has only developed recently that we formed peaceful democratic standards and governing ethics... What is left of that in the face of violent terrorism, harassment and destruction of one's social existence on par with a banishment without the option to leave? Don Lemon said scalping a white kid wasn't evil since it was fighting racism, and James Polite manufactured fake white hate crimes to justify similar violence. Where did the left stand? Where does it stand? Tell a leftie, see what response you get. It won't be egalitarian, it will be the same hypocritical "but it's ok when we do it" that they always give BECAUSE THEY CAN, because people will just continue to reason and be polite while they are killed off piece by piece. Like I said, I don't care.

[YeetMama]

I consider myself more left leaning but you (obviously) know how I feel about SJWs. Like I stated before not all people on the left are SJWs and not all people on the right are racists.

[JMghow]

I have no further stake in this future, only a grim satisfaction which will be fulfilled no matter what happens because no parasite survives without the generosity of it's host. Whatever you do to yourself is on you at this point... but those black rights movements which you quote weren't going up against the left, and they were still backed by violence. The peaceful ones were the counterpoint to the bombings of Mandela (who sung of killing whites), and the violence of Malcolm X. When the lights went out in Selma, and the Camera's were gone... So, too, vanished kings words. We made this mess by feeding exactly that, by responding to violence with compromise, and now they have learned that violence begets compromise. They know you will be polite, be civil, be peaceful, and give some ground to settle things down. They will come back, inch by inch, until you have nothing left... and then they will come again.

[YeetMama]

I win in either situation lol. Either I get my way and have a normal society or have a society where I can do nothing wrong. Plus Mandela didn't achieve peace, the state of race relations in South Africa is a fucking mess. Believe what you want, but in reality most people will react with decency, and the ones who make the news on both sides are the vocal minority.

[JMghow]

"I win in either situation lol. Either I get my way and have a normal society or have a society where I can do nothing wrong."
Doing right or wrong isn't decided by society, it is decided by the mechanical nature of reality. If you don't believe me, ask a Venezuelan how the animals at the zoo taste, or a Haitian how the dirt cookies fill their children's stomachs, or those in Zimbabwe what happened after they seized the farms. Fact is, you don't win. Not in this. Men are bigger, and stronger, and you will be on the losing team. Women do not fair well after wars outside the west, and the west just isn't the west anymore. Food, shelter, clean water, security... These things all come from somewhere, and it isn't genetic rejects playing victim to parasitically feed off of the compassionate morons who tolerate them. They win, the west dies. Not even Haiti will compare. We subsidize the fuck out of Haiti. Best case, you end up in Chinese labor camp. They'll at least keep you alive for parts.

[YeetMama]

At this point I'm just talking out of my ass to keep up with you. I must say that this has been one of the most interesting conversations on here. Thanks!

[YeetMama]

But at this moment I need to tend to homework and real life stuff. Take care and live well friend!!!

[JMghow]

Best of luck, and good on you for keeping up with your studies.

[YeetMama]

Thanks! It slightly drives me mad though. Good luck with your job (I assume)

[JMghow]

Construction. No point being useless while I wait. I want to go out with a clean conscience knowing I tried. Not sure why, but I always loved the horse from animal farm. Don't think he had kids, either...

[YeetMama]

I've never read it, haven't had the chance yet. I don't plan on having kids either, but I can't say for sure. I have a long time before I'd even be ready for that

[ChronicThinker]

They're not threatened. No one is threatened by SJW's, they're pussies.

[CHARismatic110]

Real nice.

[JMghow]

Look up James Polite, the mob violence and the terrorist act like those we saw against Tucker Carlson's family. They create problems to have something to protest to feel important, than get violent to demand other people fix the problems they imagined. Oh, and their hypocrites. Just look at how they defend Don Lemon saying it's not evil for blacks to scalp a mentally challenged white boy, or calling for racial tolerance in the same sentence that he said whites males are a terrorist threat that need to be "dealt with".

[SkipStop]

SJW are a hate group. No one enjoys being hated on. And it's worse when they grab attention of others to spread their hatred. Feminists are the best example. They are man-haters and complain about everything that's good for men or equally good for both genders. They are a threat.

[Chaz269]

I'm not the least bit put off by seeing more media empowering and inspiring women. I do, however, prefer original content. The Ghostbusters reboot was decent, but unnecessary and didn't hold a candle to the original in my opinion. The all female "Ocean's" flick, wasn't even a little interested.
The SJWs that concern me are the ones getting people kicked out of college for using pronouns that hurt their feelings, or don't mind ruining the lives of good men with false rape allegations as long as it's empowering to women.
People should be able to do whatever they want as long as they're not hurting someone or taking something from someone else. Freedom is actually pretty simple and easy. It takes a bunch of idiots and assholes to fuck it up the way we have.

[Jackblue]

It isn't primarily men who are successful who are threatened. Besides it is not just a matter of being threatened it is a matter of political disagreement. Social Justice Warriors are baby killers, rioters, thieves, and parasites, and have the nerve to lecture us about right and wrong.

[Jackblue]

Note, I do not object to women or people of color being given more roles in movies. I like the new star wars films, Rey was a good character. The new Ghostbusters was good as well. I object to Social Justice Warriors and their plot to overturn the social order and how they support abortion.

[Jackblue]

may god have mercy on sjw people

[nylonmoocher]

I don't feel threatened by them. I'm fucked off that they think they have the right to contact someone's employer constantly, to the point they give in and fire someone's ass because of something someone may have said on social media, that would In no way bring the company into disrepute

[Chaz269]

If an employer decides to fire someone that's on the employer alone. We are all responsible for our own choices. It's a cop-out to blame someone else, nothing more and nothing less.

[CHARismatic110]

Depends on what your definition of a SJW is. In general I don't think most people are threatened by them. I'm not sure exactly what you're going on about tho tbh.

[Cookie8888]

You are painfully unaware of the real world impact of these morons. Go watch Sargon of Akkad on youtube.

[Asker]

im aware of MY own world such as paying my bills, staying healthy, managing my $, making sure im not traversing into the wrong neighborhoods

so what's up with all the weight lifting & acting hard in public when at the very end most males are threatened by the SJW'S
. are you telling me that my broke, unattractive, thin as a rail self has more "Heart" than most guys who pump iron court the most naive & gullible females?

[Cookie8888]

The SJWs are threatening men's legal rights directly. They are openly sexist towards men, racist toward white people, and the mainstream does not challenge them.

[Asker]

you Angelo's have caused a lot if destruction in this world
if the SJW'S are fighting against my enemy then im all for the SJW'S

you stupid white motherfuckers are stereotypes for the WORST shit
closet homosexuals
undercover racists & faggots who get off on interracial pornography
WEAK RECCESIVE genetics
physically weaker than other races
highest rated in pedophilia

im Eurasian by the way so don't assume im black because most of you undercover racists always go that route when you're challenged

[Calzone2018]

Because you have no idea what you are talking about SJWs lie and cause chaos that is why we don't like them

[Asker]

this is more about fear of them taking control then right? as if men haven't tried to opress females since day 1

i find it odd though
how can such powerful, succesful,"alpha" males be threatened by an organization that won't prevail in the long run

[Calzone2018]

Nobody is threatened but look at what they did to Judge Kavanaugh with no evidence and all witnesses supporting his story saying believe all women and you don't think innocent guys are going to be put through hell after that?

[JMghow]

Nobody cares who has power. Most of us are just working fucks trying to get through the day... and shutting down roads to tell us our race makes us evil because racism is in our DNA, or how privileged we are to be working poor and barred from getting the same benefits as other races while we pay for said benefit makes getting through that day so much harder. Also, what the fuck is with Don Lemon, James Polite and all those other racist fuckheads trying to fake problems and stir up racist sentiments? How can you support that, or what happened to Tucker Carlson's FAMILY? No him, but his wife and kids?

[Calzone2018]

@JMghow Don Lemon is such a bitch ass I hate him

[JMghow]

Agreed. Saying that it's not evil to torture a mentally challenged boy and then scalp him for his race, and then calling for racial tolerance in the same breath as he says white males are the biggest terrorist threat in the US that needs to be "dealt with". He and Sarah Jong should be put on trial for inciting violence and hate crimes, but are instead promoted for far less than would get others fired for saying of any other race. Shows how morally bankrupt the left really is.

[Mexicoman101]

Because it was designed to spite them.

[outside_Toronto]

They're not. Most dgaf

[kreamykraemez]

hay man you doing okay?

[ScottSummers]

lol weirdo