Pretty much. Masculinity, as you see it, and its glorification of violence is nothing more than misogyny. It's violent and perilous and impossible and it harms. It's evil. (Btw, there are definitely more pieces of sh*t like you than there are what you call 'p******')
hahah wow you are SO stupid. Masculinity is what gave you the computer you are typing on, the car you drive, the medicine you take for granted.. hell everything you use. Fighting is natural in ALL animals, that's why puppies do it to every other mammal. As I already said (but you're too stupid to comprehend) the most mentally healthy human beings on this planet engage in ritualistic fighting. No they don't kill each other, but they get their aggression out in a healthy way.There's nothing evil about
it at all, unless you're calling all of nature evil? Also.. how in the f*** is violence misgyny? That sh*t doesn't even make sense.. fighting = hating women huh? You are quite the airhead
Like no, dude, you don't understand. I'm pro-violence. I'm all about violence. I'm a futurist, man. SPEED. VIOLENCE. ORGASM. But it's different than your violence. Masculinity violence implies, in a big way, the forcible seizing of women. Taking women through violence. That sh*t has to stop.
Also: No. The computer was pretty much developed by women. Cars were not entirely developed by men, the medicine *I* use was made by women. Etc. You men are not responsible for everything around here---
And I engage in ritualistic fighting, by the way, I'm a celtic revivalist, goddamnit, we do ritualistic fighting.
But YOUR violence is reactionary nonsense. I have literal proof you support violence against women, here: link you're violent as hell towards vulnerable people, in a way that isn't healthy. Violence is used for social upheavel, by the oppressed over their oppressed, violence is---
taking Dublin from the British, violence is Futurist gathering ending in orgiastic fighting, violence is beautiful and enormous and powerful, violence is a gorgeous display of theater and guts and ecstasy. Violence is not piling on the most vulnerable levels of society, violence is not oppressing the downtrodden, violence is not 'getting laid'. You're a reactionary, you glorify violence, you do not celebrate it. Your violence does nothing but uphold the status quo. Your violence is nothing.
LOL. Wow, you just dug yourself into a hole.. you are so stupid. That answer to the transgender is an obvious joke.. slow witted? I don't know where to start. Everything about computers, and that means literally everyting.. was invented by men. There is not one single women who helped develop transistors to logic gates and processors. Jesus christ you are dumb. Cars were entirely invented by men, as was almost all medicine. Look up the facts this time and stop making a fool of yourself. There is
no such thing as "masculinity violence" . You're dumping your idiotic preconceptions about things as if they are something real. Rather than listen to your pseuo-philosophical babble, lets just look at simple ideas: ritualistic fighting, which is what I originally was referring to is normal and healthy, yet our culture represses it unhealthily. You tell me I'm reactionary, yet you're the idiot who misunderstood me, are now telling me that this "masculinity violence" is what is was refering to etc
says the imbecile who makes up a term "masculinity violence" Oh , please tell me the women inventors of the first microprocessor will you? You surely know what you're saying right now : D
realistic I guess you're too slow to notice that I was referring to MEN being the creators of it. This dumb feminist tried to say women mostly came up with it..lmao.. they didn't do ANYTHING at all and she just makes up pure bullsh*t on the spot. You are nothing but a brainwashed anti violence sheep Laura
If you NEED me to prove it to you. Here are a few starting links: linklink like look at that and tell me the computer could exist today without pretty much all of that. And if you still need more:
See these women? All of them? They took up arms, out of nowhere, and are currently at war with their government. Could YOU do that sh*t? You and your obsession with boyish bullying? Could you DO that? No, man. You couldn't hold a candle to these Maoist women.
By the way, are you a Libertarian? I bet you are. And if you are, you realize that was invented by a woman? Ayn Rand? And like, she's a bad person, she's not someone I ever want associated with me. But sh*t man. Come ON.
ok one thing at a time. Lets focus on the computers first. The only thing you showed there, was someone who helped develop COBOL, which was never very popular anyways. Fortran is what dominated that era, which of course was invented by a man(even COBOL's team was mostly male). The second lady was a GRAPHIC DESIGNER. So you think a little bit of help "was the majority" .. So if invented a car headlight, I'm on the same level as the guy that invented the engine? Try to stop being the stereotypical
irrational woman. The actual hardware design of computers had zero women involved. Helping develop a single programming language in no way is a major contribution. The only other woman on that page helped one thing on ethernet technology.. wow.. hardly anything to be considered a major part.
no its that none of the other entries have anything to do with actual computer engineering. A game designer? Get real. Feminists like you have to exaggerate SMALL contributions made by women way out of proportion to argue that women have made "equal" advances.. I guess you're illogical brain can't look at things in a practical way? The second link you posted is just a collection of women professors, why don't you look at the list of male professors in the same categories? There are astronomically
Like, no. First of all: women don't ever get to that level because institutions are male run and unless you're gonna deny ALL sexism, it pretty much sorts itself out why there are a hell of a lot more men than women. Second of all: what kind of bullsh*t Great Man theory are you operating under? Nobody invents a whole thing. You have lots and lots of people doing pretty small stuff. That's how invention works. Theory is different, you have big heads in theory (like Hegel or Marx, or Einstein or--
whater.) But when you're developing something it's a hell of a lot of people.
I mean, you could make the same argument you're making for 'Rich people have invented everything, what have poor people ever invented?' or 'Why don't you look at the list of middle-class or rich professors in the same categories [as poor professors]?' You must acknowledge that poor people do not have access to the medium the way the bourgeoisie does. So the woman-class, similar to the working class, has the same---
more of them. No I'm not libertarian and I could definitely take up arms if I needed to. You, like most feminists love to exaggerate the contributions women have made. Even in Alexandria there were exceptions of women being astronomers and mathematicians, but in all cases including today men by far dominate every science, engineering and medical field. You are burying your head in the sand trying to claim otherwise.
tremendous disadvantage and thus the same low figures. Working class women, forget about it. So when someone does manage to break though, against all odds, and accomplish something really great and important - and those things ARE important, even if they aren't the majority, or if they aren't huge - it's a big thing and should be considered as such.
And even if you don't think of it as a big thing (you'd be wrong) don't suddenly attribute it to manhood being naturally superior and more---
lmao and here we go.. the "victimizing" bullsh*t excuses to justify and defend your irrational belief of women being equal contributors. This conspiracy theory bullsh*t has never had any proof other than vague theory and yet many delusional people seem to buy into it. Also, the analogy to rich vs poor has no merrit because for every rich man there has always been women in his life that had access to the same resources as him.
Yes teams of engineers and scientists work together, but they are st
ill dominated by, and probably always will be by men. Why are engineering majors 95% men in TODAYS world where you can't argue the stupid victimizing theory anymore? Because men do much better in these fields. There are some exceptions, but that's all they are, exceptions. No I'm sorry but trying to say a small contribution is large because of economic factors is bullsh*t arguing. There have been many poor under-advantaged male inventors in history.
The last radical thing I've done was protesting at university where we occupied the administration building until the cops came. I didn't say I've don't violent things I said that I would if I needed to. In this culture, as I originally alluded to, we have a very anti violent policy that ends up creating many more problems than it solves. People build up anger, resentment and tension and in more simple cultures it would be cured by having some small aggressive outlet. Here you get school shootings,
and serial killers because of our stupid brainwashing on the subject. "oh no fighting is all bad! even though every species of animal similar to ours does it!"There's good reason why men love watching boxing and uFC fighting and why idiotic women like yourself don't understand. Women instead gossip and talk sh*t instead of getting their issues out of themselves
Why are you sexist, then? And transphobic? Like. Like what why. Who are you even talking about? What are your ideal men who were tough guys? Castro? Bakunin? I bet you're a Brocialist.
im not sexist. I'm just against this stupid victimizing crap that a lot of women use as excuses. Men and women have different drives in life which is why things are the way they are. The reason 95% of engineering students are male is because women are not interested in it. Are they intellectually just as capable? Probably but women learn from an early age that they can just get men to do things for them. Also, that transgender answer was a joke, I was mocking them for being insecure.
What Girls & Guys Said
Opinion
13Opinion
I sure as hell hope so.
wait wait.. what? why would you WANT men to be p******?
Because otherwise there are people like you? Who attack women?
lol wow, so either guys are total p******, or they are people who hit women? You're super smart obviously
Pretty much. Masculinity, as you see it, and its glorification of violence is nothing more than misogyny. It's violent and perilous and impossible and it harms. It's evil. (Btw, there are definitely more pieces of sh*t like you than there are what you call 'p******')
hahah wow you are SO stupid. Masculinity is what gave you the computer you are typing on, the car you drive, the medicine you take for granted.. hell everything you use. Fighting is natural in ALL animals, that's why puppies do it to every other mammal. As I already said (but you're too stupid to comprehend) the most mentally healthy human beings on this planet engage in ritualistic fighting. No they don't kill each other, but they get their aggression out in a healthy way.There's nothing evil about
it at all, unless you're calling all of nature evil? Also.. how in the f*** is violence misgyny? That sh*t doesn't even make sense.. fighting = hating women huh? You are quite the airhead
Like no, dude, you don't understand. I'm pro-violence. I'm all about violence. I'm a futurist, man. SPEED. VIOLENCE. ORGASM. But it's different than your violence. Masculinity violence implies, in a big way, the forcible seizing of women. Taking women through violence. That sh*t has to stop.
Also: No. The computer was pretty much developed by women. Cars were not entirely developed by men, the medicine *I* use was made by women. Etc. You men are not responsible for everything around here---
And I engage in ritualistic fighting, by the way, I'm a celtic revivalist, goddamnit, we do ritualistic fighting.
But YOUR violence is reactionary nonsense. I have literal proof you support violence against women, here: link you're violent as hell towards vulnerable people, in a way that isn't healthy. Violence is used for social upheavel, by the oppressed over their oppressed, violence is---
taking Dublin from the British, violence is Futurist gathering ending in orgiastic fighting, violence is beautiful and enormous and powerful, violence is a gorgeous display of theater and guts and ecstasy. Violence is not piling on the most vulnerable levels of society, violence is not oppressing the downtrodden, violence is not 'getting laid'. You're a reactionary, you glorify violence, you do not celebrate it. Your violence does nothing but uphold the status quo. Your violence is nothing.
LOL. Wow, you just dug yourself into a hole.. you are so stupid. That answer to the transgender is an obvious joke.. slow witted? I don't know where to start. Everything about computers, and that means literally everyting.. was invented by men. There is not one single women who helped develop transistors to logic gates and processors. Jesus christ you are dumb. Cars were entirely invented by men, as was almost all medicine. Look up the facts this time and stop making a fool of yourself. There is
no such thing as "masculinity violence" . You're dumping your idiotic preconceptions about things as if they are something real. Rather than listen to your pseuo-philosophical babble, lets just look at simple ideas: ritualistic fighting, which is what I originally was referring to is normal and healthy, yet our culture represses it unhealthily. You tell me I'm reactionary, yet you're the idiot who misunderstood me, are now telling me that this "masculinity violence" is what is was refering to etc
lmao you don't even know what half of the sh*t you're saying means. Log off.
says the imbecile who makes up a term "masculinity violence" Oh , please tell me the women inventors of the first microprocessor will you? You surely know what you're saying right now : D
Don't even bother arguing with him. He's a complete idiot lol
"Masculinity is what gave you the computer" No intelligence on software programming and hardware engineering is what give us the computer and Interweb
yep, op definitely lost his marbles LOL!
lmao, what is the *point* of someone like you, QA?
Hehehe thanks boys =] yep
realistic I guess you're too slow to notice that I was referring to MEN being the creators of it. This dumb feminist tried to say women mostly came up with it..lmao.. they didn't do ANYTHING at all and she just makes up pure bullsh*t on the spot. You are nothing but a brainwashed anti violence sheep Laura
Lmao. Log Off.
If you NEED me to prove it to you. Here are a few starting links: link link like look at that and tell me the computer could exist today without pretty much all of that. And if you still need more:
link
Here's a huge list of random technology sh*t: link
here's a list of women in science: link
an entire exhibition of women in medicine: link
this total legend link and this total legend link (look for her invovlement with the behemothal Bourbeki group)
And what about women who are violent? Oh YEAH man come on lets look at that.
link link link
link
link link
See these women? All of them? They took up arms, out of nowhere, and are currently at war with their government. Could YOU do that sh*t? You and your obsession with boyish bullying? Could you DO that? No, man. You couldn't hold a candle to these Maoist women.
By the way, are you a Libertarian? I bet you are. And if you are, you realize that was invented by a woman? Ayn Rand? And like, she's a bad person, she's not someone I ever want associated with me. But sh*t man. Come ON.
ok one thing at a time. Lets focus on the computers first. The only thing you showed there, was someone who helped develop COBOL, which was never very popular anyways. Fortran is what dominated that era, which of course was invented by a man(even COBOL's team was mostly male). The second lady was a GRAPHIC DESIGNER. So you think a little bit of help "was the majority" .. So if invented a car headlight, I'm on the same level as the guy that invented the engine? Try to stop being the stereotypical
irrational woman. The actual hardware design of computers had zero women involved. Helping develop a single programming language in no way is a major contribution. The only other woman on that page helped one thing on ethernet technology.. wow.. hardly anything to be considered a major part.
lmao you read like two entries. Can't even read. Log off
no its that none of the other entries have anything to do with actual computer engineering. A game designer? Get real. Feminists like you have to exaggerate SMALL contributions made by women way out of proportion to argue that women have made "equal" advances.. I guess you're illogical brain can't look at things in a practical way? The second link you posted is just a collection of women professors, why don't you look at the list of male professors in the same categories? There are astronomically
Like, no. First of all: women don't ever get to that level because institutions are male run and unless you're gonna deny ALL sexism, it pretty much sorts itself out why there are a hell of a lot more men than women. Second of all: what kind of bullsh*t Great Man theory are you operating under? Nobody invents a whole thing. You have lots and lots of people doing pretty small stuff. That's how invention works. Theory is different, you have big heads in theory (like Hegel or Marx, or Einstein or--
whater.) But when you're developing something it's a hell of a lot of people.
I mean, you could make the same argument you're making for 'Rich people have invented everything, what have poor people ever invented?' or 'Why don't you look at the list of middle-class or rich professors in the same categories [as poor professors]?' You must acknowledge that poor people do not have access to the medium the way the bourgeoisie does. So the woman-class, similar to the working class, has the same---
more of them. No I'm not libertarian and I could definitely take up arms if I needed to. You, like most feminists love to exaggerate the contributions women have made. Even in Alexandria there were exceptions of women being astronomers and mathematicians, but in all cases including today men by far dominate every science, engineering and medical field. You are burying your head in the sand trying to claim otherwise.
tremendous disadvantage and thus the same low figures. Working class women, forget about it. So when someone does manage to break though, against all odds, and accomplish something really great and important - and those things ARE important, even if they aren't the majority, or if they aren't huge - it's a big thing and should be considered as such.
And even if you don't think of it as a big thing (you'd be wrong) don't suddenly attribute it to manhood being naturally superior and more---
violent. Which by the way- Oh, right. Yeah, sure. YOU could take up arms. Come on. What was the last radical thing you've done? Go on.
lmao and here we go.. the "victimizing" bullsh*t excuses to justify and defend your irrational belief of women being equal contributors. This conspiracy theory bullsh*t has never had any proof other than vague theory and yet many delusional people seem to buy into it. Also, the analogy to rich vs poor has no merrit because for every rich man there has always been women in his life that had access to the same resources as him.
Yes teams of engineers and scientists work together, but they are st
ill dominated by, and probably always will be by men. Why are engineering majors 95% men in TODAYS world where you can't argue the stupid victimizing theory anymore? Because men do much better in these fields. There are some exceptions, but that's all they are, exceptions. No I'm sorry but trying to say a small contribution is large because of economic factors is bullsh*t arguing. There have been many poor under-advantaged male inventors in history.
[sigh]
Log off. Just... Log off. Go and try and find some 'tribal' people and tell them you love how violent they are.
The last radical thing I've done was protesting at university where we occupied the administration building until the cops came. I didn't say I've don't violent things I said that I would if I needed to. In this culture, as I originally alluded to, we have a very anti violent policy that ends up creating many more problems than it solves. People build up anger, resentment and tension and in more simple cultures it would be cured by having some small aggressive outlet. Here you get school shootings,
and serial killers because of our stupid brainwashing on the subject. "oh no fighting is all bad! even though every species of animal similar to ours does it!"There's good reason why men love watching boxing and uFC fighting and why idiotic women like yourself don't understand. Women instead gossip and talk sh*t instead of getting their issues out of themselves
Dude. I've literally told you I'm pro-violence. I'm really pro-violence.
What did you occupy the building for?
The president got a fat raise while the faculty/classes got cut down and tuition increased.
Are you telling me you're a leftist!
yes, I'm far left on most topics
What! I- I can't breathe, man.
Why are you sexist, then? And transphobic? Like. Like what why. Who are you even talking about? What are your ideal men who were tough guys? Castro? Bakunin? I bet you're a Brocialist.
im not sexist. I'm just against this stupid victimizing crap that a lot of women use as excuses. Men and women have different drives in life which is why things are the way they are. The reason 95% of engineering students are male is because women are not interested in it. Are they intellectually just as capable? Probably but women learn from an early age that they can just get men to do things for them. Also, that transgender answer was a joke, I was mocking them for being insecure.
Cause contrary to popular belief, giving attention to someones self pity actually makes the problem worse.