If you don’t want to spend much or anything on an engagement ring; are you also fine with her and your kids not taking your last name?
I don't really see there being an apt comparison between a last name and a ring. That's like saying something like it's unfair that you have to eat the same boring home cooked food your mom makes when you also have to accept your boring dad's last name too. You get what I mean?
Personally, I'm the sort of person who doesn't really care if his wife keeps her maiden last name, as long as my kids keep mine. Call it a cultural thing. And as for rings, I don't know if you said this to shit on men or something, implying that men purposely buy a cheap ring to save up, which really isn't the case if that's what you think.
Out of all the married guys I've known personally, there hasn't been ONE man who bought his fiance a cheap ring on purpose, because as us men, we too want our future wives to be wearing good looking rings which make them stand out from the other girls and they can show it off to their friends (because they WILL and they SHOULD). So just bear in mind that if you see a guy getting his fiance a slightly smaller ring that isn't as big as her overinflated ego, chances are he's probably broke and he tried his best to get whatever he could afford for her.01 Reply
Asker+1 yHuh?
Most Helpful Opinions
+1 yIs this a committed relationship or a business partnership? What you're asking for is "quid pro quo", i. e. "you give me a ring and I'll take your last name." Both arrangements are perfectly acceptable, but they're also very distinct.
How is that? Well, in a committed relationship, the terms of engagement are verbally agreed upon but subject to change and/or immediate termination, while business partnerships are expressly transactional, concisely agreed upon (usually in writing, to maintain a paper trail) and legally binding with harsh penalties for failure to comply, and necessarily beneficial--which does mean keeping score of who gets what. It sounds like you want the idea of the former but desire the function of the latter.Also, "decent ring", you mean "3 months' salary?" Are you aware that this "tradition" is/was manufactured by the De Beers Group, in order to artificially increase the value of diamond rings (which are naturally abundant), who campaigned to make them some sort of "rite of passage" for marriage ceremonies. Yeah, it's not a time-honored tradition going back Millenia, it's marketing from the 1900s that people have since taken as gospel and now demand as demonstration of commitment, even though it is rather perfunctory act.
If you intend to marry, keeping a checklist of all the things other people got is the best way to signal the worst kind of intent. It's supposed to be a nice gesture from the partner among many to come, not an opportunity to figure out just how much you're getting screwed.00 Reply
+1 yWhat does one have to do with the other… you take your husbands last name and give your children his name as you are now a family unit… and by decent, do you mean expensive? A ring was only ever meant to be a symbol, not for the cost to be a determination of how much someone loves you…
10 Reply
Anonymous(18-24)+1 yThe thing about engagement rings is that you want a good one but you've also got to consider that say a 20 thousand dollar engagement ring is the price of a car, deposit on a house and so on. You got to think of your future. No use having an expensive ring if the repo man takes it.
32 Reply
Asker+1 yI agree, I want one that’s decent enough to stand the test of time, but not so nice I’ll get murdered for it!
What Girls & Guys Said
Opinion
58Opinion
+1 yIf all you measure love in is a material object you have problems. Because you’re not entitled and men don’t like entitled women the same as women don’t like entitled men.
As far as last names go. This is a serious conversation that two people getting married need to talk about and find what’s best for them. She doesn’t have to give her last name up if she doesn’t want to. It’s just a tradition.
Some people also don’t have the budget to buy some fancy ring. All you want is material objects. This isn’t love. If you want something so bad you’re free to go out and buy it your own self.
30 Reply534 opinions shared on Marriage & Weddings topic. RUN!!, who would get engaged to a disrespectful guy like this?
Clouding "taking his name" Marriage values with proper engagement ring purchase is counterproductive. Clearly this guy's priorities are skewed if he is willing to do this to his potential wife. How can a spouse expect such an individual to maintain wife, children, and /or household itself?
11 Reply
Asker+1 yLuckily my man isn’t like that! 😂 I just realized a lot of double standards are shown here on gag and with men I know in general. “Why should I even have to get her a ring?” While in the same breath, “of course she needs to take my last name” it’s pretty cruel in my opinion
+1 yYou either believe in that one aspect of traditional marriage or you don't. You wanting a decent ring should have nothing to do with your name. You tell him hey I am going to be wearing this the rest of my life so I want it to be a good one.
26 Reply- +1 y
😂 this is actually a good answer. Its telling her to be honest. And if she doesn't believe in traditional marriage, that's her choice, the kids can get a hyphenated name and she can buy the man an expensive engagement ring too.
Asker+1 y@LovingLoverReturned I never said I didn’t want to change my last name, I believe in both 🤷♀️ That’s my point
- +1 y
No you are just holding your last name hostage for an expensive ring when you should just ask him for a ring that you'll be happy with for the rest of your life.
- +1 y
I said "if"
Asker+1 yI’m not even getting married, I was talking about self centered guys without perception 🤣
- +1 y
Ok no problem
- 622 opinions shared on Marriage & Weddings topic.
+1 yI do not know a single woman who changed her last name that did it because she felt pressure to do so. They wanted to change the last name cause it made them feel more united in marriage to the husband.
14 Reply
Asker+1 yExactly; I agree. I mean it’ll be really hard for me to do, but I’ll do it out of love.
I know a lot of men who expect that out of women though, who also would be happy not to get her an engagement ring at all- +1 y
@Emmit78 I have 4 trolls that create hundreds of accounts each year to troll me with fake profiles so I block profiles when I’m suspicious. Sometimes I make a mistake and the person is not a troll.
- 1.2K opinions shared on Marriage & Weddings topic.
u +1 yWhy are the cost of the ring and the last name matter tied together? Sounds like you are trying to bargain to get the best financial deal out of this, instead of just marrying for love.
613 Reply
Asker+1 yI don’t think you understood my point
- +1 y
Perhaps I didn't. But I read everything you wrote.
- +1 y
Response to update: how's that attitude working out for you?
Asker+1 yFantastic
Asker+1 y@msc545 yeah and kids cost a lot but are worth more than you invest into them. Things have value beyond money
Asker+1 y@msc545 nope, it’s this nifty thing called an analogy. People use them when thought processing skills aren’t strong enough
- +1 y
Precisely
- +1 y
If you ask me, I did rather give the wife something more practical like a small apartment or a car 🚗 or I don't know something similar to that.
Ring, I mean I can give a ring but what good is it other than showing off to other girls and giggle, look look my hubby gave me this ring lol. It's bigger than your wedding he he he. - +1 y
@AmeerX For some girls, it's about making their fantasies come true. They have dreamed about getting engaged and getting some humongous damond ring so they want you to make it come true. To some extent, that's okay but if this is what she expects repeatedly. . . we're not a good match!
I would say that she should expect whatever is within reason, and she can keep her name, but the kids will take mine.
Absolulety now hyphened or double last names for the kids.04 Reply
Asker+1 yI agree what’s within reason, my issue is when men would want her and the kids to take the last name; but then spend 10$ on the ring while spending thousands on video games or guns or stuff that pertains to him individually. It’s a big selfish red flag
- +1 y
I heard you, but price the ring should be the least important thing. Equating the cost ring to taking his name or not... seems completely unrelated issues to me.
Spending, savings and finances and how those are managed is very relevant.
Honestly you sound pissed about the ring, you don't want his name, and you feel like you don't agree with his spending habits.
Honestly, you probably shouldn't be marrying this guy. You don't sound to be in the right head space.
Asker+1 yI do want the name lmao. Why does everyone assume this is about me and my boyfriend? 🤣 I’m talking about hypocritical self focused guys who spend thousands on video games without perception, I wouldn’t date that guy.
- +1 y
Oh, my bad... lol. Hypothetically speaking, I would not marry this guy this I was a girl, and if I was that guy, I would not be interested in that women.
Let the eomen start talking about price of the ring being cheap... fuck your marrying me, not ring... I am the prize.
Just take ring our of it... everything else seems legit concern.
Anonymous(30-35)+1 yHow is it unfair to ask you to change your last name when you are asking him to enter into marriage with you knowing that there is a 40% chance you will divorce him and take his children?
Half of marriages end in divorce and women initiate 80% of divorces. A little basic math shows that 4 out of 10 men who get married today will be divorced by their wives (50% x 80% = 40%). And when women divorce their husbands, men get screwed in divorce court and child custody arrangements.
You women need to stop focusing on petty, selfish things like a ring and your last name and start trying to mend the damage you have caused to the institution of marriage. Men are already saying no to marriage at the highest rate in history, by far, and that trend shows no sign of reversing. Making an issue of your last name and a ring seems very petty in the context of the bigger picture, doesn't it?
If you women start keeping your last names, you're taking away one of the few remaining benefits of marriage to men, and that may be the final nail in the coffin for western marriage.
20 Reply
+1 yI got her what she wanted, within reason and thankfully, she is very reasonable!
picking an unreasonable mate is a yellow flag. you get to decide what is reasonable.
It does seem unfair women have to change their name, but that is deeply embedded in cultures. Maybe we should have merged names instead of disposing of one.
Jimmy Joe Doolittle marries Mary Snoodles.
The become Mr and Mrs Jimmy Joe Snoodles Doolittle
Eventually, they have to truncate names into acronyms.
15 Reply
Asker+1 yOf course! I completely agree with being reasonable on it. Honestly I’d be happy with a ring that just cost two weeks of salary. Just something he had to save for and maybe pick up some overtime. It’s just about the sacrifice and the hard work put into it. I want to give up my last name, I have no qualms with it. It will be very hard because I love my name, but I know what’s expected of me. So I figure the very least a dude could drop a grand on a pretty piece of jewelry that I can look at and smile without it rusting the moment it hits water. I’d love an heirloom and you can’t really do that with a ten dollar ring 🤷♀️
- +1 y
you sound reasonable. not sure what's going on if he isn't willing to spend that. Probably fear...
if you really like your name, work it into the kids names:)
Asker+1 yNo no it’s not about me and my relationship. There were some guys I talked to who were stupid about it; as well as a lot of guys on gag who still are.
I wanna change my name even if it’s hard, I was just trying to place it into perspective since women are called gold digger bitches as if everything is one sided- +1 y
guys may be becomming more cheap as the concept of commitment and marriage is cheapened. interesting...
Asker+1 yThey probably shouldn’t marry those kinds of women then 🤷♀️ And men are naturally in the leading role in a relationship. If they want a valuable woman they need to treat her as valuable. If they treat her cheap, she’ll lose self esteem and feel cheap.
I think women are entirely happy to give up their maiden name and there is no trade for a ring as implied.
Whilst we might think it is universal for women to use Ms, it is entirely untrue. I know this because I have checked it in commercial cutomer databases. In fact only about 15% of women chose Ms as their salutation title, another 15% choose Miss, and 60% chose good old fashioned Mrs. A few Drs and other titles round out the rest plus there are always some variations to those number.
I was curious enough to ask around about this. It seems that the Mrs and name changed are taken as part of the Big Day and happily done as much of a part of it as much as the wedding gown and wedding breakfast.
In fact I think, if you didn't want your wife to take on your surname, you would fight a losing battle. A girlfriend made a strong unwanted push to take mine.
It depends on what you regard as a decent ring. It should be affordable not stupidly expensive needing a ten year bank loan.
It is unfair, unreasonable and over demanding if that is what you are asking for.
02 Reply
Asker+1 yThey’re happy to, but you realize it’s very hard right? It connects you to your heritage, your father, it’s been with you all your life. Plus it’s unlikely the new name will sound as good with your full name as the last one. That’s not even mentioning all the paperwork.
I was just pointing out a double standard- +1 y
I just struggle to see a double standard or the relationship between two of the many social conventions of marriage other than being part of the process of marrying.
Instead of double standards, I see a lot of hypocrisy in weddings instead. Notably it's the brides big day whilst the bridegroom has only a bit part.
I can see that it could be a hassle to inform various bodies of your change of name/address and some women reasonably retain their name professionally if they have built repute under their maiden name.
+1 yOkay your not going to like this. If she has any problems with any part of any of this, dump her. If she has problems with changing her last name, she only cares about the wedding and doesn't care at all about the man she claims to love. If she truly loves him, she would marry him with no question ask or requirement. She wound care about the ring, changing her last name or any thing else. My wife's ring cost 300 dollars when we was married. Our wedding cost 25 dollars. She didn't care at all. We been married for 45 years now. Guys, if she puts a bunch of requirements on you before she will marry you, dump her on the spot, it's the wedding she in love with and you have absolutely nothing to do with it. After we was married for several years, I got her a real nice ring. She was 17 and I was 18, I didn't have a great job, I was making 3.50 an hour. If she not willing to help you build a good life from the bottom, don't take her in after you put in all the hard work to get to the top. Requirements means she she just after the money, love is no where in this.
07 Reply
Asker+1 yNot what I said?
- +1 y
I said what I said. If a woman doesn't help the man save money for their future! Dump her on the spot. She not wife material.
Asker+1 yHow would she do that if she’s raising the kids at home
- +1 y
That went over your head. I'm talking about her making do with little things and helping save money Instead of spending it every chance she gets, like on Starbucks. They both make sacrifice for the better of their kids and family. Driving a car after it get paid off instead of wanting a new car every 3 years. Stuff like that. We driver our cars until we get every penny out of them.
Asker+1 yTbh you buying her one that was 300$ when you were only 18 is plenty. I’m talking about guys that spend thousands on video games or material things for themselves; while not wanting to spend anything on their woman if they can get away with it. I’m simply pointing out the hypocrisy of those kinds of men who also demand she take his name. He views her as cheap and disposable. 🤷♀️ or as An object
- +1 y
Why are you even considering marrying any man that still plays games, those are not men, they are still little boys. Go find one that has grown up. Games are for children.
Asker+1 yI’m not lmao. I’m complaining about those kinda men. My guys great!
To be honest, you make it sound like you guys are making some kind of deal. You buy me an expensive ring and I'll give up my surname. That's not what you're supposed to do. See, you should be happy with whatever gifts and the kind of ring he got for you. He did the best he could. If you don't want to change your surname, you just let him know that. Maybe he'll understand. Marriage is about making many good memories, growing old together. Being there for each other through thick and thin. Appreciating each other. Doing things for your partner to make him/her happy and they should do the same. Don't think of it as a deal.
00 Reply
+1 yThe idea of selling off your name for a ring is rather abhorrent if you ask me. A couple can decide whose name or hyphenate or whatever with the kids. That's not even an issue. They aren't born yet. Talk about it after the wedding or before even...
The point is, no one should have to spend several thousand dollars to "collar" or "brand" a woman as theirs! What century are we living in? Maybe ask him to give the girl's family some horses or blankets? Cows? How about a dowry?
It's a tradition that can be done or dispensed with. The man deserves as much of a gift from the woman as the woman deserves from the man. Why not have each give the other something lovely like a ring, a bracelet that's engraved in gold or silver with precious or semi-precious stones. A pearl necklace for the lady. There are so many alternatives to a diamond ring that don't cost a fortune and are lovely engagement presents that both parties should give to each other.
00 Reply
+1 yThere is no real purpose in having a stupid expensive ring except to show it off. Getting one that you like, and one that is quality is a good idea, but people shouldn't be spending 10s of thousands of dollars on a bit of gold and a small rock. There's absolutely no correlation between the ring and the last name, except that they are typically associated with marriage. The last names being the same is helpful when it comes to registering kids for school, activities, doctors. Many people would see it as a red flag if a dad comes to pick up his kids and they have different last names. However that's just a conversation to have with your partner about what you both want and would like to do.
00 Replyi would have to agree that there is no excuse to be cheap with a ring. i also think it must also be within the affordable bounds of the financial means of the man you're trying to marry. if you're marrying a broke asshole who can't afford a stay at home wife, i wouldn't expect a extroadinary ring.
10 ReplyCompletely different things. The price of a ring is just greed and materialism. If you don't have his last name, maybe he doesn't really see you as part of his family so if a violent intruder even breaks in the house, he only needs to protect himself and his kids, but not you since you aren't part of his family without his last name.
Greed and materialism is one of the MAIN ways you will lose a good quality man. Just FYI.
211 Reply
Asker+1 yMaybe she doesn’t feel valued by him when he’ll spend thousands on videogames and computers but not even 20$ on getting her something that’s also symbolic 🤷♀️
- +1 y
I'd limit to $300 myself. Real gold, but a Zircon stone that looks exactly like a diamond. Even jewelers can't tell the difference without a special tool.
I hope she is willing to sign a prenuptial agreement to show that she values HIM and not financial benefits in the relationship.
Asker+1 yIf you’re limiting it to 300$, I doubt you make more than her or enough where she’ll be out to get you For your money 😭🤷♀️😂
Asker+1 ySee, my point. You buy things you like and want without any hesitation for the costs. But when it comes to getting something that would make her happy and symbolizes her agreeing to commit herself to you; you want to search for a good deal to get the cheapest thing possible, even when you could afford better with likely little effect on your budget. If you respect her, treat her like you treat yourself at the very least. Men and women are different, they like and value different things. You don’t have to understand it to respect it.
Asker+1 yThat’s my point, think outside of yourself for five seconds and realize not everyone wants the same things you want. People are different, men and women being even more so as a whole. It’s not about what YOU want or would like in that situation.
Asker+1 y….. that was the point of this entire post! 😂😂 she’s giving up her name! Jeez.
But if you want someone who likes all the same things you do and wants all the same practical things, just marry a dude and be gay it’s not that hard
Asker+1 yCool story bro
+1 yThese two things are unrelated.
It's not a situation of trade-offs.
Keep your maiden name if that's something important to you. But it's got nothing whatever to do with the cost of a ring.
Something you might be overlooking: Marriage is not an economic marketplace exchange. It's a ceremony to affirm your love and commitment in a public and officially recognized way.
If the cost of the ring is an issue, you're getting married for the wrong reasons.01 Reply
Asker+1 yYou really think women are getting married only for a decent ring? The delusion 😂
I’m simply pointing out the double standard was all, how one is often expected while the other is shamed for expecting… even though giving up your name is a lot harder to do.
If a man gives you a 15$ ring from Claire’s while he has thousands of dollars worth of video games; it kinda shows that he doesn’t respect or value you, and that he’s a selfish person.
Anonymous(36-45)+1 yI don't like the idea of valuing love based on the ring, but I totally see your point.
They don't understand how women lose their self taking the name and becoming Mrs whatever, his wife, etc and never again called her first name. They lose their individuality.
Yes, you become a unit but the husband doesn't lose himself in that sense.
This ring is worn forever, no one wants one that's ugly.. over 2k is extreme but she is the one wearing it.. forever.
10 Reply
+1 yIt's not about physical possessions it's about love sure he can work on the best he can get but the decision over who takes what name is a separate issue.
My girlfriend has already said she wants to keep her own but add mine mainly because she has a son already and wants to it to be recognised that she is his mother. I see the logic and I'm fine with it. I'm also fine with this because my surname begins with T and it puts me to the bottom of lists where as J gets me closer to the top👍00 ReplyI think the reason the answers are not what you were expecting or wanting is that I do not think most people see these two things as being tied together, although I think it's OK if a couple does see it that way and decides to negotiate them that way. For most people it's two totally separate decisions that have nothing to do w each other. JMO!
00 Reply
+1 yIf this is how you see marriages thats fine and good luck finding a partner who thinks alike, however there are plenty of other opinions and ways to handle things like that.
Eg my girlfriend will gladly give up her maiden name as it teminds her of her toxic father, or a friend of mine will be taking his wifes maiden name, or you can take on a double name or each partner can simply keep their maiden name...
As for the price for a ring there are also countless opinions, some will they the thought and symbol is what matters so any ring will do, even if its just a piece of tinfoil, others will demand a ring that will put a lot of debt on the couple...02 Reply
Asker+1 yLots of women also are very close to their father and heritage, so I don’t understand your point there.
And would you then be alright with taking her maiden name as well as naming your children that? See, it’s an expectation that is never fully expected from a man. The only thing is just not having her fulfill it; but everyone knows it’s not the same. Which I’m not saying it’s bad, I’m saying it’s good. To respect traditions and acts of affection and love. It’s the same thing as with a ring.
If you’re a liberal progressive couple, then don’t do either, great! But if you are; then how can you as a third party not understand that it’s a fair if not sometimes uneven exchange.
If I could go back in history and change the tradition so my kids and husband will hold my name, I’d do that if it meant I’d have to buy a 5k ring! But that’s not the way the cards fall. And maybe a man who hates his father feels the same as I do, but there’s people on both other sides who like it how it is.- +1 y
Boy way to take a stand and give such a strong opinion lmao.
You be surprised how many people call it off over it.
"Whats in a name? That in which we call a rose by any other name name would smell as sweet"
-Romeo and Juliet.
12 Reply
Asker+1 yI’m not too surprised. I mean it’s fine if people wanna not do rings or names, but if a guy wants a girl to do all that paperwork and give up something that connects her to her family and heritage; he shouldn’t get outraged if she’d like a ring that was durable enough to withstand longer than a month of wear.
Then don't get married. You don't deserve a decent ring, not with that entitlement.
The whole concept of marriage is honoring your vows, not a stupid shiny ring. It's about commitment and duty, something that you don't seem to understand.
No, you don't have to give up your maiden name either, you have the option to merge yours with his. Wow, shocking right? Women like yourself are exactly why most marriages end in divorce.
00 Reply- 429 opinions shared on Marriage & Weddings topic.
+1 y£1,000 is decent these day
Good thing about a recession I suppose
I had that figure set between £5k-£10k, lower rings generally get parted when I get them through
Seen rings worth a million before frankly pointless because they are either the size of candy rings or so clean they look like cubic zirconia00 Reply
+1 yI never took my husbands last name perhaps its cuz I knew we would never last LOL And I lost my wedding ring a year into the marriage he never bought a new one, It was only 500 pounds so no big deal xD
07 Reply
Asker+1 y500 pounds is an irrational amount to a lot of dudes tbh 😭
But yeah if you have that feeling you shouldn’t have said yes, I’m sure he had the same. But we all make mistakes in love, hopefully you’ve learnt from them 🙏- +1 y
Yeah I learned a lot from him and I grew so much in this last year since being alone... finally getting myself sorted and learning to love myself and get things done.
Asker+1 yThat’s good, it’s always best to learn from even the worst situations and to grow. Too many people wanna dwell on them and just keep making the same mistakes. I’ve been there too at times, so I empathize. Just have to aspire to wisdom.
- +1 y
Oh why didn't you tell us you got in a bad wedding. So sorry to hear you got hurt Anemone978.
And no, wedding things expensive or not must be kept like they are bonded to your bone. They are like heirlooms you give from parents to offspring to grand offsprings till the heroic act takes place like in those movies where Mongolian Horde tried to steal the wives and the wives rather take their own lives then to be slaves. May be I am thinking too romantically tragic things - +1 y
@AmeerX Ah the marriage was horrible it was just tough.. but I got through it LOL
As for the wedding ring he said I could pick whatever I wanted and went with his mom but his mom basically picked it and I never liked it so when I lost it, it wasn't a big deal. We just both didn't have wedding rings no biggie lol - +1 y
*wasn't horrible
+1 yThis question is so wrong.
I have to be blunt, I think some women need to stop thinking of relationships in such a materialistic way.
and... why would any man particularly want to divest a woman of her birth name... I never got that.
00 Reply
+1 y"None of those latter men are self aware and fair enough to compromise on giving up both traditions the other values."
A wedding ring a tradition. A very new and very stupid tradition. Women never got anything for a marriage until around the 1930's. They were happy just to get married. You'll get nothing and like it or stay single and buy a bunch of cats.
00 ReplyNeither one is required for the person to love each other. I voted Option C:
"I’ll get her the best within reason, and we can compromise on the last name." I hate my mother anyway, so I don't care about the last name.20 Reply
+1 yTalk to your boyfriend. this is based on the two of you. We don’t know your situation. How much money you both have. What are your future goals for both.
02 Reply
Asker+1 yIt’s not my boyfriend lmao he’s great. I’m talking about cheap incels
- +1 y
Why do you care about other guys when you have someone great!
Anonymous(36-45)+1 yI gave a very nice ring and I STILL had to deal with the name bullshit! lol! Sometimes you just can't win!
11 Reply
Asker+1 ySorry 😭 my point is more to put it into perspective rather than to say one is exchanging for the other
Anonymous(45 Plus)+1 yLol the price of the ring has nothing to do w his last name. Either you willingly take his last name or I’d advise him to find someone else who is willing to have his last name. Same goes for you. If you want a bigger ring find a man who is willing to give that to you not cause his fiancé made him feel bad about the ring he got her. Chances are though your marriage won’t last that long.
00 Reply
+1 yIf she is unhappy with the ring size she most be a gold digger. The ring should be about 1/2 his month salary. Maybe that is all he can afford. If she loves him she will except that. If the wife is already In a profession, i. e. like a Dr, then I would be ok with her not changing names, but my kids will bear my last name. Especially if it is a male.
00 Reply
+1 yI think the last name should be of whichever family is most supportive or accomplished with the man's name being default in a tiebreaker.
My family has for the most part been terrible to me so I happily took my wife's last name.02 Reply- +1 y
As for demanding a fancy ring that's beyond your mans means, that's the kind of foolishness that would make me reconsider my options lol
Asker+1 yWhen did I say that? 😂😂 you’re reaching and I doubt your that tall.
I said decent ring. Reasonable. Within his means.
What I’m complaining about is a guy who will spend thousands on videogames, demand you take his last name, then throw a 20$ ring at you if any at all
+1 yA woman isn't getting just the ring. She's also getting access to her man's resources. A ring is not a practical asset. It does not appreciate and it has no real use. Asking for a rock just because is asinine. Marriage is about the damn ring, and if that's your deal breaker then your fiancé needs to run for the hills.
00 Reply851 opinions shared on Marriage & Weddings topic. We were saving to buy a house. We had no engagement ring. We did buy gold wedding bands and ten or so years later I bought my wife a gold ring with inlaid diamonds. I heard that kids are not buying engagement rings anymore.
00 Reply
+1 yYou can keep your name nowadays. For instance, if a woman named Awesome with the last name of Ding marries a guy with a last name of Bat, she would go by the name of Awesome Ding Bat.
00 Reply
+1 yAre you really okay with not giving your children his name because you wanted an expensive ring? It just doesn’t sound like your priorities for a marriage are in the right order.
It shouldn’t be about the ring. It’s about building a life with someone you love and wanting to share their name, and becoming a family. (Spoken by someone who would love to have a special ring from the man who wants to share a life with me.)
03 Reply
Asker+1 yNot my point
- +1 y
Is your father willing to pay your suitor a lump sum of money or other dowry, such as property or livestock?
- +1 y
You just don’t want to hear the truth. Sometimes people say things that might upset you but it doesn’t mean that’s what’s intended.
495 opinions shared on Marriage & Weddings topic. And what exactly is your definition of decent because that term can vary quite a bit.
Also I don't really see why or how the two should be tied together?
02 Reply
Asker+1 yMy only point is that one is more expected, while the other is shamed for even asking. Both involve the early stages of marriage.
What does the word decent mean to you?- +1 y
Well one of those things segments you and your partner as married and hosts tax benefits and will last you the rest of your life.
The other is a ring that shows that your engaged and is a way for women to show off to their friends and family. And once your actually married the engagement ring comes off and the ring band goes on. But I get why women are the way they are about em so I try to be a little understanding about em.
Also decent for me would be I don't know probably around two to three thousand. I really don't see myself spending more then 3,000$ but I'd be willing to go up to that.
Though I might end up using a family ring instead I don't know since I like the sentimental value of it and passing something along through the family.
+1 yAssuming I would date or marry which I would never do either, only assuming. The last name issue has feminist written all over them, I would avoid.
28 Reply
Asker+1 yI agree, and men not wanting to give a ring or only a cheap one gives the same vibes as the parallel selfish incels who want everything tailored to their own convenience.
My main point is just that it’s a lot harder emotionally plus tons of stressful paperwork to change your name for the man you love than it is to pick up a bit of overtime and eat out a little less to get the woman you love something decent and durable.- +1 y
Feminist are literally adding their maiden name to everything everywhere including women from long marriages that already had their husbands last names also adding their mothers maiden names to their mothers head stones when their mothers pass away. So the cost argument is void.
Also what is your definition of incel? I ask because women seem to throw that term around at any and everyone they have a disagreement with.
Asker+1 yAs I said, parallel to feminist. The same as calling a guy a soy boy or a cuck if he is a feminist, the flip is a pickmegirl.
Incel used to mean one thing, but now it’s more for whiny men who want to blame everything on women and society rather than working on themselves. They prefer to be lazy and paint themselves as victims, just like most modern feminists do. While also still feeling entitled to the other gender to uphold traditional values that convenience him while not expecting the same to be done for ones he doesn’t like. Like a feminist who sleeps with guys casually, or doesn’t get dressed up or shaved; but still wants men to pay for the date.- +1 y
When you refer to those men as painting themselves as victims many of them are victims due to feminism and biased laws against men. Therefor we men are actual real victims. And that's exactly why I walked away from the idea of dating and marriage years ago I saw it back then. And now? Forget it no way would I ever consider either. I am thought of as a rapist a predator I don't even go around women anymore and children forget it I don't go near them. Men are victims.
Asker+1 yAnd women and black people call themselves very real victims. How is yours different? Anybody can twist anything to make them look pathetic… but shit sucks for everyone! Maybe you dealt with some sexism, maybe a woman has been raped, maybe you lost your kids, maybe she was passed over for a job to a man.
Everybody has their own stuff, when men act pathetic and roll over to show their fat belly’s… it’s unnerving at the least- +1 y
I have done my homework that included sort of a OJT real life experiences. I also did the homework on the facts that coincide with my own experiences. I never relied on bogus statistics unless they added up to what I have seen with my very own eyes and they match up to reality. And I know women and blacks call themselves the real victims but are they really? Who is vilified by main stream media and unholy whorellywood and society the most men are and in particular white men.
And who was passed over for the job? Well that would be me in the year of 1984/85 when I applied for the jobs and was told they were only hiring women and minorities are strictly hiring women. Yes in deed that happened and I could easily prove it too.
And no I didn't lose any children because I am a straight white man and straight white men aren't allowed to adopt children because we are all assumed in part by feminist and society as villains and predators because we were born men. I can't even go near children without causing alarm and I TOOK CARE OF CHILDREN not my own wanted to adopt one that I had for months.
As far as marriage and dating when. I had two serious relationships and I regretted them both. One went around stating I was her temporary until something better came along always hinting at cheating and the second one was caught cheating and I saw back then how no one would have taken my side for anything hints why the last dating relationship was many years ago.
And as for the subject of rape all guys have to do is look at a girl the wrong way or in a way she considers offended and it's treated as rape. And should a guy accidentally brush against a girl he's had it he is done just refer to Metoo where millions of women cried rape. PART 1. - +1 y
And furthermore men are false witnessed against in order women can gain child custody and that is even advocated for and pushed by lawyers and the system a lot of it caught on video. Again if women would have done their homework they would have figured out that it's not women who are the victims it's men and all very easily provable. But then again men weren't worth the time and effort it took to figure that out.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/M-Dtcvqcjc8/
PART 2 - +1 y
Tons of paperwork? Stressful? Lol
I think they're pretty even there. If I marry a man, I'm keeping my last name. If it's "so important" that we have the same last name, he's free to take mine
00 Reply
+1 yI'd be fine with letting the women I marry keep her last name as for the ring I found a gold right with a 10k Dimond in it so I'll probably get a guy to refurbish it and give her that
03 Reply- +1 y
Ring not right
Asker+1 y10k tbh I’d probably be annoyed if he spent that much 😭 I more mean like 1k or so
- +1 y
I think 10k is just the Dimond rating it's not worth 10 thousand bucks
Would you want to be with a man so out of control with his money that he spends huge amounts on jewelry without the forethought to save that money to care for the needs of his family when hard times arrive. Not if they arrive, when they arrive.
03 Reply
Asker+1 yNot what I said. I’m talking about a reasonable amount. If he makes 60k a year, it shouldn’t be unreasonable to want a ring that cost more than 100$
Asker+1 yNope
+1 yA "decent ring" is one that has SENTIMENTAL value, NOT monetary value. In some,
countries, married women DON'T wear a ring at all.
In my country, women DON'T give up their maiden name and CAN take a married name as well or NOT!06 Reply
Asker+1 yDo they also give the kids her name?
- +1 y
Yes, they can if they want.
- +1 y
A LIT of people have a double name. In some cultures, you have 3 or 4 names!
- +1 y
LOT***
Asker+1 yI don’t mean double name I mean hers
- +1 y
Possible
If you see your relationship as purely transactional, I suppose you could call it fair to ask for a decent ring in return for taking their last name, though neither of you seem to actually care about each other or be a good fit if you have to compromise to make it work.
02 Reply
Asker+1 yI don’t think that’s how transactions work
+1 yUnless it’s an extremely expensive ring >$10K, it’s not unreasonable to ask for a decent ring that, you know, she gets to wear ‘til death do you part.
01 Reply
Asker+1 yThat’s all I’m saying. I feel like 1000 isn’t that much to ask and I was trying to put it into perspective with bringing up the fact she gives up her name 🤷♀️
That is a rather weird comparison. I know a lot of women who kept their name, usually because they have some sort of professional certifications in that name and don't want to bother changing it.
00 ReplyWho gives up their name these days? Most people keep their names and family names. The names of the kids depends on the parents' agreement.
00 Reply
+1 yWhy would either party agree to marriage at that point? The price of the ring doesn't actually matter, it's more so the quality of marriage expected. Our ancestors in the Great Depression weren't proposing with equivalent $5000 rings today.
Maiden name are symbolic and the only reason s woman should have to keep one is due to name prominence, such as if she is part of a family business/firm. Otherwise it's not worth keeping especially as far as traiftion is concerned.04 Reply
Asker+1 yWhy wouldn’t it be worth it? What if your last name sounds ugly with hers? Her last name connects her to her father, her heritage. Giving a nice ring is more about being selfless. Taking some time to stop spending so much money on yourself and to save for a few weeks to get her something of good quality.
But your comment has already shown me you’re not really capable of looking beyond yourself so don’t bother 🤷♀️- +1 y
1. What do you think a Maiden name is for? The last name doesn't disappear after marriage it becomes the middle name and preserves it.
2. It isn't about selfless behavior but the opposite, one shouldn't be stingy and buy the cheapest ring but if truly wanting marriage that money could go towards wedding expenses, a home down payment, etc. Clearly you do not know how expensive a "good" engagement ring is and for most men it takes a few months, not weeks, to hit the "2 months salary" rule. So if you're already paying rent, for a car, etc. Now throw in a payment of 2 months your income in there on a ring not before deductions and taxes. For me that would be about a $15,000 engagement ring. Now does that sound reasonable at all vs say, a $5-6k ring? Obviously not, it's irrational and I make a lot more than the average man.
This is real life not a Hallmark movie. Marriage is a religious sacrament and things like how expensive an engagement ring are do not matter.
Asker+1 yWhy would I give up my middle name 🤨
Asker+1 yI’m just talking about a ring that’s 1k. My issue is how many guys wanna get away with a 50$ ring. It’s cheep and clear they just wanna spend money on themselves
+1 yI'll buy her a nice ring and take her maiden name because I don't like my last name.
00 Reply
+1 yI don't marry him just to get the "perfect" ring. I marry him for who he is and how he makes me feel.
I see no issue with giving up my maiden name (even though it's special) to have my husband's, whom I'd love wholeheartedly.22 Reply
Asker+1 yI’m talking about men who give a 10$ ring then demand the name be taken
- +1 y
God bless you, your man is lucky to have you 👍
+1 yI don't really understand the big deal about not wanting to take the mans name. Its traditional, and what is the alternative?
Rather than taking your husbands name, you are just keeping your father's name lmao
14 Reply
Asker+1 yThat’s not what I was saying
- +1 y
You said "are you also fine with her and your kids not taking your last name?" as if that's comparable. One is based on tradition, the other is based on where you are economically. Just because you take someones name doesn't mean you are entitled to a ring worth as much as your house
Asker+1 yYeah based on where you are economically. So if he’s making 60k a year and gives you a ten dollar ring that would be pretty disrespectful no? Who said that much lmaooooooooooooo
- +1 y
It's less about the price and more about what it represents and whether the woman simply likes how it looks. You can find beautiful rings for only a few hundred, nevermind getting a diamond or some other such rock that has inflated prices for thousands
The two are not comparable, kiddo.
You need to be worth the ring, your name is worthless if no one is willing to take you.
00 ReplyWow women really think guys are made of money.
What does it matter what kind of ring you have, you got a ring, you are going to get married, you found a guy that loves you and wants to marry you and all you can think of is you got a crappy ring.
If you don't want to change your name then dont03 Reply
Asker+1 yWhen he spends thousands on video games, he can save up a few hundred for a decent ring 🤨
Asker+1 yYou don’t have a system for your games?
If your last name ids more important than a ring then keep your last name and have someone else’s kids.
If the amount of money being spent on you is what is important to you then gold dig somewhere else.
A ring is important but love is more important.01 Reply
Asker+1 yA last name is more important than a ring lol
+1 yIt’s a ring. The important side of marriage needs to slip into focus.
00 ReplyDoes this mean that if my wife does not take my last name, I don't have to buy a ring?
03 Reply
Asker+1 yNo, I was just trying to place it into perspective
Asker+1 yI figured xD
+1 ySharing a last name is really nice when you have kids together. What people consider a decent ring can really vary in opinion.
00 Reply
Anonymous(30-35)+1 yWhat? The things some people care more about end up being the reason they divorce not years later.
03 Reply
Asker+1 yOr maybe it’s the fact that they both omit tradition and don’t care about what’s special to the other person is why divorce happens so much
Opinion Owner+1 yYeah, the point being one or both screw it up like willingly. A marriage does not dissolve by neither screwing anything up.
Asker+1 yExactly
- 414 opinions shared on Marriage & Weddings topic.
+1 yWhen it comes to names and marriage, let's just say feminism is not compatible with marriage.
01 Reply
Asker+1 yI agree
So basically you just want shiny useless "things" ? And what happened to keeping both your last names? Religious people are so bizzare..
00 Reply491 opinions shared on Marriage & Weddings topic. I don't care about the last name, and I'm not going broke for a ring.
04 Reply
Asker+1 yCool, then im not talking about you
Asker+1 yI’m not talking about that, if you wanna be a progressive modern liberal type then that’s fine. I’m talking about men who claim to want to be traditional and conservative but only when it comes to convenient standards to them.
- Show More (19)
Learn more
We're glad to see you liked this post.
You can also add your opinion below!
Girl's Behavior
Guy's Behavior
Flirting
Dating
Relationships
Fashion & Beauty
Health & Fitness
Marriage & Weddings
Shopping & Gifts
Technology & Internet
Break Up & Divorce
Education & Career
Entertainment & Arts
Family & Friends
Food & Beverage
Hobbies & Leisure
Other
Religion & Spirituality
Society & Politics
Sports
Travel
Trending & News