Primarily, a man loves you for you, and a woman loves you for what you do. True or False? (Page 2)
Click "Show More" for your mentions
Most Helpful Opinion(mho) Rate.
Learn more
Learn more
We're glad to see you liked this post.
You can also add your opinion below!
What Girls & Guys Said
Opinion
19Opinion
As I woman, I love you for you and hate you for what you do.
False. Love is an emotion you share. Lots of reasons for it. Stop driving wedges.
What do you mean by "share", and "driving wedges"?
Share means both people love each other. And it seems you’re trying to say men are right about love and women are shit.
I don't know that love is always necessarily reciprocal. But why do you think loving men for what they do/can do, would mean women are "shit"?
Jesus, you’re thick. You’re setting up a false dichotomy based on your hatred of women, I’m guessing. Get off the incel sites and actually talk to them.
But you are not explaining how you are making these conclusions of hating women. If you reason it out, then I might see where you are coming from. I don't follow how you can make such assertions based a question since a question is not a statement.
You’re creating an “us vs them” mentality about women, when we’re all just people. That’s the wedge.
It seems clear to many people that the sexes think and behave differently. At least the view that the sexes have differences that need to be acknowledged is valid, I think. I don't think we explore these differences enough anymore and it leads to a lot of misunderstanding about identity, purpose or generally what's what in my opinion.
It's not about competition, but understanding relations between sexes
“Seems clear” isn’t remotely scientific. But since we share 98% of genes with bananas I think gender is mostly bs. There’s the obvious differences, then we’re all the same.
What do you mean by "obvious differences"?
And hormones have a deep impact on thinking and behavior
Women have “hormones”, guys have testosterone. Besides the obvious genital differences, not sure there’s much else different.
If I recall, we all have the same hormones, but the difference is in their balance; we all know males have higher testosterone and we all know females have higher estrogen. Hormonal balance affects behavior and thus it must have influence on our thinking. You can even see the behavioral differences in boys and girls, even if you raised them the same way. In early and mid 20th century,
girls were thought of as "dumber" than boys in school. Then they implemented teaching strategies based on "female learning" in all or most schools in the nation. And now you see a new imbalance where boys and men are seen as dumber, with women and girls being most graduates in the world and with the best grades. In the most egalitarian societies in the world, we "paradoxically" happen to see the greatest gender differences in professional fields. hmmmm.
Pretty much. Men need affirmation the way women need security. We're all just using each other. Not even a bad thing
I don't agree with that statement at all. For one, you give men way too much credit. LOL
The results are a perfect representation of how bad women are at lying...
Lol srsly?
Are you a misogynist?
More like someone who has an idealistic vision of, say, monogamy through perhaps a realist lense
I use the word "idealistic" because I think monogamy itself is an ideal or is idealistic; our love hormones are shown to only last about 20 years for us biologically, not forever. And the vast majority of relationships don't make it that far. So I believe it's important to understand our differences and where our disconnects may be.
And this was your best understanding for a longer relationship?🤣
What do you mean
Could you elaborate?
I'm confused about what you mean, but my guess is that "understand our differences" sounds elementary, obvious and/or cliché in your opinion. But while I was being brief, "understanding our differences" takes on a whole different meaning when you consider the potentially innate psychological factors, given that so many of us were taught to ignore our differences all our lives.
Unless you were referring to my original question, which would make less sense, since a question is not declarative.
you are what you do.
Great comment. I can see why people think that, but it requires what you do to include that which no one can see unless either time, circumstances or you reveal it anyway.
I think it plays into the idea that for example, the smallest act of kindness is worth more than the world's greatest intentions. This saying isn't wrong necessarily, but I think we can fool ourselves into thinking that the invisible things like intention does not have value. It absolutely does, because parts of our being like thoughts, emotion primarily, and intention cause action in the first place.
But I've seen that it doesn't always translate into physical evidence for whatever reason like circumstances restrictions, barriers. We have words like procrastinator, or workaholic, etc. But if that's authentically who someone is, how do we explain change? In order to change, you'd have to actually be something else that can then take the shape of one image to another. And in that way, being is a verb, but personally I don't equate that to the soul.
We can certainly appreciate physical evidence and interpret what it means to us, but that doesn't mean we actually know the truth behind the evidence. So while there is a line, I think labeling people regardless of their humanity, circumstances and conditions have been part of what's justified so many atrocities and injustices that carry on to this day.
But all we can know about a person is what we can detect with our 5 senses. What I try to do is educate myself on the human condition and look at the little things about people, how they act when it doesn't cost much or anything. If it seems their consciousness is benign, I accept and value them.
People are individuals.
True.
True
It's both!
Women love the money
Yes and no