Thoughts about a relationship with a pansexual person?

[Anonymous]

Should I be worried about the person being firm in the relationship, would the person likely change or is it more of personality?

[rxm_bxl]

I think it would be great to be in a relationship with myself.

People always think that a person is only to be attracted to one kind of person eg. Gay -men only or lesbian- female only or straight- opposite gender only. And any person who deviates from the aforementioned is to be a difficult spouse in terms of relationship. This is simply false. Being gender fluid and pansexual in particular means only that you don't car about a persons gender or whatever they identify as. Apart from that. everything else is pretty usual. Same standard rules that apply to heterosexual or gay relationships, also apply to relationships that involve bisexuals and pansexuals.

When you say "change" it's quite offence and very incorrect. Sexuality is not something that you just "change" to whatever you feel want. Same laws that apply to heterosexual, attraction, applies to Pansexual attraction too, only difference is, that it can be felt to either gender. So you don't change this. It's rather correct to say that people who are not ascertained in their sexual identity, are the ones who may "change" but it's rather exploring and finding out what one is actually attracted to. Hence if the pansexual individual who you could potentially have a relationship with is affirmed within their sexuality then there's no need to worry of "change".

And sexually fluid persons are literally normal individuals. Whatever "firmness you are referring to, is to be determined in the exact same way as in other kinds of relationships.

[Smoke-n-Growls]

Technically I can be considered pansexual, but I prefer to refer to myself as bisexual.

I'd be fine with this if the person has demonstrated to me they line up with what I value.

I'm mostly monogamous (open to rare threesomes, but with many conditions and lots of communication), and faithful. I have values I uphold and values I expect my partner to uphold.

If our values and expectations align, I'd date anyone - gender doesn't matter.

To me, it's the person and not the body/form they take. I love with my heart, not just with my eyes.

[Itsok2behapp-e]

Saucepansexual or frying pansexual?

With or without lids?

With a steam vent or not?

Maybe she just likes to be in the kitchen? No doubt she has blendersexual and hobsexual as her two best friends, right?

The possibilities are endless. Hmph! Glad I don't have to worry about all this.

[Itsok2behapp-e]

Thank you for MHO :-)

[BCA6010]

Pansexual is just another word for bisexual, but made more PC because it doesn't recognize the binary/biological limit of genders.

People who need weird labels to call themselves are universally fruity and usually very full of themselves despite being abnormally shallow people.

[hahahmm]

Attention whores.

[rxm_bxl]

@hahahmm or you could just be a demonic imbecile

[Apple1996]

I'm pansexual and would be pretty upset if someone chose not to be with me just cause there's a stereotype that bi/pan are more likely to cheat. I've been in a realtionship for 7 years and have never even thought about being with someone else.

[Anonymous]

There is a difference between being pan and being a cheater. The likelihood of them cheating is the same as if you were with a straight person. Just because there is a larger number of people they are capable of being attracted to doesn't mean they will cheat

[Tiffanyloves2swallow]

So... Why the fuck would you use a stupid word like Pansexual that has a retarted definition that basically means... Bisexual the word Pansexual is unnecessary the word Bisexual which was always used before was 100 percent adequate in using to answer the question at had.

[tiredofdis]

word

[MCheetah]

"Bisexuals" aren't even a thing. 99% of the world is straight; the rest are just gay ("queer"). Just call yourself gay if you're not straight.

[Anonymous]

Being Bi/Pan doesn't mean that they crave the other gender, it just means that they have a wider horizon of potential partners! I'm bi, and I've only dated men my entire life. That doesn't mean that I miss being with a woman, or feel like I'm missing out on anything. To me, the option of dating a man or woman is like the option of dating someone with blond or brown hair. Just because I'm dating a blond doesn't mean I miss being with a brown haired person. Sorry, English isn't my first language

[hahahmm]

Yeah, they’re at least twice as likely to cheat/leave.


When you kiss them, the odds that you’re tasting the juices of multiple other people is astronomical.

[rxm_bxl]

"twice as likely to cheat" is complete nonsense sir.

[hahahmm]

The fact lgbt divorce rates are higher than heterosexual rates suggests otherwise in my opinion. Yeah, it’s debatable but let’s agree to disagree

[rxm_bxl]

agreed

[MCheetah]

I would never date someone like that. Being in a successful heterosexual relationship is bad enough. Why make things worse by dating a mentally ill crazy person?

[s2firestar]

I really don't like people who have their ways with pans.

[tiredofdis]

yeah man

i don’t wanna start cooking eggs and then find a nasty white semanal surprise splattered all across the pan

[jasco]

Pansexual just means they date anyone, they aren't always gonna be the types to have lots of hook ups and stuff they can be. Depending how the person is like and who he/she attracts, they could be like that or they could be like the average joe

[007kingifrit]

its a cult is what it is. there is no such thing as pansexual and mark my words yes they will change whenever the hell they want and probably even when they don't want, its going to be total instability

[HowAwkwardToBeAlive]

If I like you then I like you, that’s all there is to it for me. It doesn’t matter what you’re into as long as you like me too.

[Marilynjuana]

Who cares what they are. If you two click, you click. I don't understand why people put so much weight on what -sexual someone is.

[DreamCatchcer]

I still can't comprehend what pansexual is.

I am attracted to women who know who and what they are. Plus what low known what they want from a man.

[igaveyouanickname]

Yes, love pan-, cis women; always have, always will. :)

Open relationship also helps.

[jabberwocky00]

What is it?

[007kingifrit]

that's not a real thing, and you can't have always loved them those words are only 3 or 5 years old

[El_Dorado]

Tbh I wouldn't worry about it. A straight person could also cheat on you

[offendedsorbet]

I'm pansexual. Being faithful in a monogamous relationship has nothing to do with your sexuality

[SarahsSummer]

I think it would help to be very secure in who you are and not the jealous type

[The_unknown_memer]

I mean everyone has their fetish but I don't understand what's sexually attractive about a pan , their just used to cook food

[tiredofdis]

lmao yea

[WorkFFS]

Yeah here's your answer. If they're trans gender they're clearly a melodramatic bitch with nothing else going on in there life other than worrying about labels and other gay shit. Fuck a real guy.

[Anonymous]

You can’t really change someone especially their sexuality

[Asker]

apologies for the misunderstanding.

I meant to say: To stay firm in the relationship

[mrArcher]

That's not a real thing, but yes I can be with them as long as they're monogamous.

[tiredofdis]

I don't know, jus keep the frying pans away from them

[joeldalton]

It's like being in a relationship with a unicorn. Because neither actually exists.

[OddBeMe]

A person’s sexual orientation doesn’t determine who “loose” they’d be.

[007kingifrit]

but belief in pseudoscience is a bad sign

[OddBeMe]

@007kingifrit yes, belief you can choose or change your sexual orientation is bad.

[007kingifrit]

that's not what pansexual is, pansexual says "i am attracted to all genders" implying there are more than 2... but there aren't more than 2

[OddBeMe]

@007kingifrit Didn’t say it was the definition. I just think we don’t choose who we’re attracted to. But whatever labels we come up with for “social genders” doesn’t bother me as much as you, apparently.

[007kingifrit]

its a big deal with serious consequences. labels divide us and force people to conform to labels via social pressure

[OddBeMe]

@007kingifrit sure but so does religion. Doesn’t mean I think we should outlaw it

[007kingifrit]

exactly; this is a religion. so it shouldn't be allowed to be taught in schools

[OddBeMe]

@007kingifrit someone’s identity should be theirs to define. If schools want to teach what religion is and what sexual orientations there are, good. Just don’t endorse anything.

[007kingifrit]

that statement shows a complete lack of understanding of human nature; you can't define yourself. you don't know yourself because you're human. humans are built to lie to themselves

[OddBeMe]

@007kingifrit To others humans can define ourselves however we want. They don’t have to listen but they can’t take it away.

[jimmy2]

I sonewhat agree with you. I think they would and will play around

[Bandit74]

Probably wouldn't be a good fit for me.

[Agape93]

I don’t have an issue with it

[Dchrls78104]

My only thought on this is: EWWW! NO!

[taveuni]

Bisexual = pansexual?

[offendedsorbet]

Pansexual is being attracted to anyone, despite their gender or sexuality.

[taveuni]

But there are two genders so bisexual = pansexual?

[offendedsorbet]

A pansexual person can be attracted to someone who is gay, straight, bi, gender fluid, non conforming, transgender etc etc

Bisexual is simply being attracted to both male and female. Pansexuality goes more in-depth though a lot of pansexuals use the term, bisexual

[007kingifrit]

@offendedsorbet half of the things you just listed are fake. there is no such thing as gender non conforming; you are either male or female

stop spewing pseduoscience

[offendedsorbet]

There's no such thing as someone not wanting to conform to gender norms? Hm don't think so. Gender is a social construct. Its about how you dress and act not completely about your genitalia. Let people be who they want to be, how a person wants to dress or act doesn't concern you, is none of your business, if you don't like it don't comment on it. 🤦🏻‍♀️

[007kingifrit]

@offendedsorbet gender is not a social construct. it is a biological fact nobody gets to pick

Even monkeys show gender differences the same as humans do……good luck saying that’s a social construct since they existed before society www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2583786/

Across all cultures boys and girls draw differently at a young age, boys draw actions and weapons and girls draw faces www.sciencedirect.com/.../S0197455614000045

you are either male, or female. and that isn't a choice,

[offendedsorbet]

Gender is different to sex.

Gender: either of the two sexes (male and female), especially when considered with reference to social and cultural differences rather than biological ones. The term is also used more broadly to denote a range of identities that do not correspond to established ideas of male and female.

Sex: either of the two main categories (male and female) into which humans and most other living things are divided on the basis of their reproductive functions.

[007kingifrit]

@offendedsorbet nope sex and gender are synonyms; the definitions you were taught in school are fake science; they don't rely on empirical data methods and thus can never be proven or disproven so they aren't real science

its a religion to believe gender is different than sex; not science

you didn't respond to my post that gender isn't a social construct by the way =) i guess real science scares you

[offendedsorbet]

The monkey one literally says "sex differences". The definitions I provided are not made up 😂 gender has ALWAYS been mostly based on cultural and societal differences.

You don't have to agree but modern medicine and modern science say otherwise and I would rather follow that than some random dude with archaic ideas on the internet. Just let people be who they want to? Its really not that hard to stfu🤦🏻‍♀️

[007kingifrit]

@offendedsorbet so your only counter to the monkey study is a semantic argument? yes we use sex and gender as synonyms because... they are

if gender roles are present across all civilizations and species... they aren't social constructs

no modern medicine and science do not agree with you, fake pseudoscience activism is not science

[offendedsorbet]

Dude shut the fuck up move on

[007kingifrit]

@offendedsorbet as expected the pseudoscientist gets angry when questioned. unlike me, the real scientist who loves to argue and be questioned

no really let's see some of this "science" you claim is on your side, i'll show you specifically why its fake

[Sergian]

Love is love, no matter what the other say

[Dave31989]

more likely to cheat, in my opinion

[SunnyCaliGirl]

What’s a pansexual exactly

[El_Dorado]

Pansexual people describe themselves as being attracted to people based on personality, not gender.

[SunnyCaliGirl]

@El_Dorado thank you for educating me :)

[MCheetah]

They'll date any gender (which also implies there's more than two genders). Other than that, it also heavily implies they're attracted to transpeople.

[joedunn500]

what does pansexual mean

[LonewolfMeme]

They don't discriminate between sexes

[joedunn500]

@LonewolfMeme I’m so dumb lol. It’s not the same as bi?

[LonewolfMeme]

Idc.

[-Asca-]

Not different from a straight person

[Not_Average]

What is pan sexual?

[imanf7]

Double trouble I say

[hardrod]

Not really

[Iron_Man]

What is a pansexual?