Women, you'd be giving up a lot of freedoms, including bodily autonomy, and would be expected to keep a tidy home and tend to your man, but would be provided for.
Men, you'd get all the sex you wanted, and a hot meal waiting for you, but you have to be able to provide for your family.
This would obviously have to limit male applicants to only those who can support a family of 3, and women who can prove they can maintain a house and pass cooking classes.
And of course it would all be voluntary.
Nope. You don't live in the 1950s anymore. The Federal Reserve Note has been purposely devalued by Globalist. Salaries have increased much more slowly than inflation over that same time. It's a different economy. Those days are gone. Get a job and help support your family and work toward the destruction of the federal reserve and the reestablishment of the gold standard to stabilize your currency. What you want as a woman isn't possible anymore.
It already exists. It's called eHarmony and it is very popular. There are others too.
Your characterization of traditional relationships is very narrow and not very accurate though.
Opinion
5Opinion
That only works with a cohesive culture. We have a modern culture that is incompatible with traditional culture. This wouldn’t solve the root cause of any of the issues in society.
I like the idea but it would require extreme vetting to keep out women with feminist tendencies and the hoes who are conveniently "born-again" right when they are hitting the wall. No baby mommas, fatties, or trans allowed either.
What do you think dating sites are? Or you could try something like Christian Mingle.
I want this life but without registry, this ain't no god damn company or a contract, this is marriage, in a traditional marriage that's what happens! A woman is a woman and a man is a man...
The women on the registry would be run-through single mothers who are post-wall and want a man as a retirement plan.
It's called E-harmony!
You can also add your opinion below!
