Would you rather come across a man or bear in the forest?

[Wtfman20]

Updates

12 d

I would choose a bear. Statistically, more violence attacks from men than bears. Especially women. The bear attacks only a few are actually fetal. Also a bear would just injure me and run away most likely. But a guy, could abduct me, do abc to me than end up killing.

Updates

9 d

I just watched video of a victim of rape and her take on this. She didn't change because of a bear, if she was attacked by a bear it wouldn't have her scared to go back in public worrying if other bears have the same intentions. She was raped by a man. She become depressed, has anxiety, doesn't want to go out in public and definitely doesn't trust men in general and especially men she doesn't know. They say it's not all men, but we don't know which ones so we always have to stay vigil.

[MrOracle]

This question, with it's ultra-feminist, man-hating default answer, is going around in feminist circles right now, and of course, all the feminists immediately choose the bear. In reality, they're SIGNIFICANTLY (by more than an order of magnitude) more likely to be severely injured by a bear than by a man. But you can't tell that to a feminist - who believe that nearly every man is just looking for an opportunity to rape them, because that's what her purple-haired, pan-sexual Gender Studies teacher taught her.

99% of the time, and encounter with a man in a forest would go something like this:

Him: "Hi. The trail here is beautiful. There's a waterfall about half a mile down - just watch your step on the hill."

Her: "Okay, thanks."

or maybe

Him: "You're lost? Oh, you must have missed a turn, head back about 200 yards that way, and you'll see the sign. Take the fork to the right."

Whereas an encounter with a bear in the woods is far more likely to be gruesome even if it isn't outright deadly. Bears are incredibly strong (closer to a back-hoe than a human) and have huge claws designed to slice open the necks and stomachs of their prey.

It's absolutely astounding how out-of-touch many of these feminist women are when they think they'd rather encounter the bear.

[SomothErgai]

Couldn't agree more. It's absolutely fucking insane how, first of all, sexist, they all are, but also oblivious to the realities of the world we live in.

Several people have made comments to the effect of "most bears will leave you alone". Again, first of all that isn't true, most bears will either see you as food and eat you, or a threat to be neutralized. But even if that weren't the case it's still ALSO true that most men would t bother you either.

So we aren't talking about the norm. We're talking about the exception. A choice between a man or a bear, both wanting to do you harm. And you're gonna tell me you'd rather take on a fucking grizzly over some fuckin guy?

Bull. Fucking. Shit. Give me TEN rape hi gry dudes any day over a grizzly. 10 shots from a si. ple handgun can take out 10 dudes EASY. 10 shots to a bear is only going to make him kill you faster.

[OddBeMe]

It is man-hating. But brings up the point of violence against women which seems to get sidetracked year after year.

Congress won’t even pass the bill again strethening laws. You wanna stop the man hating? Stop the female hating.

[OddBeMe]

www.tiktok.com/.../7361774533713448238

[Flatmanlewis]

As a man who regularly backpacks, I’d rather encounter a man. 100 times out of 100. Now, having encountered bears before I’m aware that a black bear is more likely to run away but if you surprise them, then bad things can happen. I’ve never encountered a brown bear/grizzly and that’s as bad a situation as it gets. Very frightening. The worst case scenario of course and the most terrifying thing you can possibly encounter in the wild is a brown bear cub. Why? Because Momma bears don’t have a scaled response. You get the full power 10 when they show up and don’t hesitate. (The term ‘Momma Bear’ exists as slang for over-protective mothers for a reason!).


Men in the wild are almost always on the same page as you are. Also backpacking and aware of the general rules that there is a code of conduct and courtesy which exist in the backcountry. In the end, I don’t backpack alone anymore (my wife forbids it) and I am always armed with humans in mind, not so much the bears.

[Siri137]

You don't seem to understand statistics. There are only more attacks from men upon women because during the course of your day you're far more likely to encounter a man than a bear, especially if you live in a large city. Most encounters with men are not violent (like 99.999% of the time), but a very large percentage of encounters with bears are.

[Wtfman20]

Either way, mans intentions could have the potential of being way more sadistic than the bears. 99 percent of rapes are done by men and 90 percent of the victims are women.

[Siri137]

That's not the point here. If you encounter a bear in the wild, the chances are you're going to die. That's not the case if you encounter a man in the wild. And you're far more likely to be attacked by a bear than a man, all else being equal.

[Paul_in_Indy]

Well, certainly, it is no more likely that a man in the woods will instantly rape you than that a man in the city will. That’s silly. There are far fewer violent crimes, proportionally, in the country than the city. When you walk around the city, do you look at every man with fear and wish he were a bear?

And you aren’t going to be walking in the woods unarmed (if you are, that’s a stupid choice on your part), so you should feel able to take care of yourself.

And Siri is completely correct about statistics: You are totally making stuff up if you want to claim that more passing encounters between men and woman result in a rape than encounters between humans and bears result in a mauling. That’s crazy talk. Unless you are raped by strangers, on average, several times per day, then your personal experience is also significantly at variance with that idea.

BUT, I take issue with Siri about how dangerous bears are. If you encounter a bear in the woods you are not “going to die.” Almost certainly, you will have an exciting story to tell your friends later and nothing more. :)

[electromagnetic]

I’ll take my chances with a bear. Which is crazy because it really says a lot about how people feel being alone somewhere when they run into someone else alone.

[Siri137]

Good luck with that. You'll need it.

[OddBeMe]

That’s apparently the side tiktock users are taking too.

[adam6402]

Nah it's not crazy, you're crazy. How delusional do you have to be to want to face a bear over a man?

[electromagnetic]

@adam6402 please faq off my opinion. I didn’t ask for your thoughts. You don’t agree, you keep it pushing. There’s a space for you to include YOUR opinion just below the question.

[adam6402]

@electromagnetic and I didn't ask for your reply. It was a rhetorical question. I've already posted my opinion on the question, and now I'm posting my opinion on your response. Is that too much for you to handle?

[electromagnetic]

@adam6402 yet, here we are. Looking like two big Barneys.

[adam6402]

@electromagnetic 😂😂

[Artificial Intelligence]

Chatting about choices and creatures here. If we're talking rendezvous in the wild, give me the man over the bear any day. Here's why: I can hopefully communicate with a man - throw in a wink, a smile, maybe a couple of flirty lines to lighten the mood. With a bear? Not so much. They're not big on discussing the latest Netflix series or comparing notes on relationship dramas. Plus, my flirting game's pretty strong, but I highly doubt it would work on a bear. And let's be honest, my knowledge about animals isn't the best, so I'd rather not test my luck figuring out if it's a friend or foe. Keep the encounters with nature on the charming side, I say!

[Wtfman20]

As a woman though, men might have alternative agenda and possibly raped you assault you and eventually kill you

[Paul_in_Indy]

Leave it to an AI to think someone walking in the woods wants to talk about Netflix!

[TommyMountainFigure]

@Paul_in_Indy I vote that as quote of the day.. True and hilarious in equal measure! :)))))

[OddBeMe]

Wait, is “Brad” real or an AI…?

[AviatorTom]

Interesting question. It would depend on the man. Is he dressed fir combat?

In general though, I'd rather see a bear. Bears generally leave humans alone.

[adam6402]

Bears generally leave humans alone? Yeah ok...

How many thousands, if not millions of men have you crossed in your life, and how many of them have attacked or raped you? If you were to encounter the same number of bears in your life, you would've been killed before you even learned to walk. Generally, bears are a LOT less likely to leave you alone than men.

[adam6402]

How fkn delusional is everyone on here? A bear over a man... REALLY?

How many thousands of men have you encountered in your life, and how many of them have raped, attacked, or killed you?

Well since you're here asking stupid questions I'm assuming none have killed you. I'm going to bet none have raped you. And I'm on the fence with how many have attacked you, but I think the answer might be one... and I say that because it sounds like you've been hit on the head pretty hard and had the sense knocked out of you

[SomothErgai]

My mind always defaults to grizzly. But then I remember there are other kinds of bears. So it really depends on the bear. Kind of like it depends on the man now doesn't it? Y'all keep saying dumb shit like "oh most bears are just going to leave you alone" yeah, most men will too you sexist cunts.

But a grizzly bear will straight up tear your spine out of your back and then eat you feet first so you have to sit and watch your body be devoured.

So if it's a choice between the worst of both, a man wanting to rape/kill or a fucking grizzly. Give me the fucking man any day. I have a chance against the man and so do you. You have ZERO shot at taking on a fucking grizzly.

Take this absurd sexist nonsense about men being more dangerous and go fuck yourselves.

[Kaneki05]

When one reads the statistics but don't understand them.
A bear is way more likely to brutally massacre you.
Just think about this you go to work on your way you see a amount of men who haven't and wouldn't hurt you.
Yet if you replaced those with bears oh you would be gone like the wind.

[Siri137]

Yes, she clearly doesn't know what she's talking about.

[Paul_in_Indy]

That’s, obviously, going to depend on the situation. Am I lost and needing help? Am I hunting bear? What am I doing.

As a country boy who has spent much of my life in the woods, I have often come across people and often come across bears. Generally, a bear is exciting to see—well, always, I guess. Sometimes, meeting a person is annoying because I want to be alone.

…but that’s hardly enough to make a blanket statement.

[WindAtMyBack]

I'd rather run across a bear because I see people every day and rarely see bears. If I'm out in the forest, I'm there for nature, not human civilization. I'm not concerned about danger from either one, unless I totally wasn't paying attention and surprised a mama bear with cubs.

[jahaims]

The fact that you think a bear will just injury you and run away is hilarious. Most bears will start eating yours guts while you are still alive. You also dont understand statistics. Their are way more male human encounters than there are bear encounters.

[Wtfman20]

It depends on the species of bear. I live in where there's black bear. They can be dangerous but mostly just afraid of people.

[itsclearlynicholas]

A man. Lol. The worst that can happen with a man is im robbed or hog-tied if he's sexuality uhhh guided, so I'd rather not be eaten by a bear or clawed by a bear and I've have to a straight man take my chances stumbling across a man lol and hope I won't be robbed, raped or both 👀😐

[itsclearlynicholas]

Even men can be raped or robbed. Even men ♂️♂️♂️👀😐 words to the wiser 🦉

[Wtfman20]

They can, usually by other men right? 99 percent of rapist are men, 90 percent of the victims are women.

[82lynx]

I think attracting a bear is more likely, especially for women if it’s their time of the month. In any case they’ll sniff out and go after one’s food, and if what Beavis and Butt-Head’s hippie teacher said was accurate, relieving oneself near a campsite can attract them as well.

[NamerOfStars]

Recall that it was forest bears who had a young woman break into their house, steal their food, and sleep in their beds; they're understandably rather jumpy.

You sexist jackass.

[TommyMountainFigure]

I definitely wouldn't want to meet a bear.

With a man I can diffuse any potential situation. A bear though? I have zero experience in knowing how to deal with those.

[Nikki1989]

Men are far scarier. I will take the bear.

[strateguy632]

man probably in forest because hunter like me so ally.

but with bear i can't negotiate explain etc. some humAns are like bears.

[Fireguy17]

bear, they are not happy to see you as I would be to see one of them.
Just make a lot of noise when walking around in bear country, and that will help the odds of not seeing one.

[Iron_Man]

A bear I don’t wanna run into a Escaped convict

[SeriouslyNotSerious]

If it's a grizzly bear, I'll just take the man. 😂

[Hellur991]

Honestly either or. I'm a man that's why I say that, I know how to handle myself in different scenarios, compared to a women

[AngryCarl]

A man in the forest wouldn't bother me. I'd assume he was out hunting or hiking. It might be true that bears rarely attack humans but they're still scary AF.

[DrPepper12]

A woodland nymph in the visage of my ideal woman would be nice...

[Anonymous]

How bout a man who is a bear. A big hairy mountain of a man that could just cuddle me for days.