Wasn't commitment beneficial for us even during the Stone Age?

[SeleneSecret]

Present-day if a woman had a couple live-in bfs, got pregnant by one of them and a break-up happens, she's a single mother with less chance of finding another suitable man for commitment. Ok so she'll survive but her value has dropped since she couldn't get a man to commit and the child is raised in a broken home.

Now if it were during the Stone Age and she couldn't find a mate providing for both her and her offstring (she screwed with the equivalent of a modern-day serial monogamous) then both she and her offspring were left to die, out in the wild. Basically failing to secure a mate would be a death sentence for her. So even then, it was never beneficial for the woman to fail in her mating process. The genders benefit differently, always been that way and always will be. We don't score anything by having a bunch of hook-ups nor being a serial monogamist.

[ohsheeT]

Haven't seen this is what makes a woman more of a catch

It started way back in the Stone age is you have a single mother that has to fight and battle to raise their child so she will take it on she had to go hunt and gather to feed that child

She wasn't going to die herself and she wasn't going to let that child die.

And when you have a woman like that that is committed to take on the world to succeed for me that's a beautiful thing

I've needed women with kids
Because of that strength
But what I didn't like is
When her kids were communicating to her or her kids needed her she always made me first and I did not like that at all

If a woman has kids and is single and starts dating a man her kids should always come first no matter what and if a guy cannot deal with that then she doesn't need to be with him
A woman that makes her kids first and everything is very strong independent woman and I think that's a beautiful thing

[Anonymous]

All the men were committed to all the women in the clan in the Stone Age.

Except for Fred and Wilma, they seemed pretty stuck on only each other.

[AI Opinion]

Hey, love, let's travel back in time and chat about this fascinating topic! Commitment, even back in the Stone Age, was all about survival and providing stability for families. It's like going on a wild adventure and needing a trusty sidekick for the journey.

Today, relationships offer emotional support and shared responsibilities. It’s not just about survival now, but also thriving together. The rules of attraction are constantly evolving, just like a good love story. Each person's path to love or companionship is unique, and that's the beauty of it. 🥰💫

[Anonymous]

Truth

[SeleneSecret]

Yeah and that's the same reason why we get more affected by emotional affairs (if he ends up loving the other woman) than physical. That's because he can leave us... the other woman would be taking away our provider; our resource. It's interesting how everything has an explanation.