When your link starts out with a religious bias that shouldn't be considered exactly reliable for example would you trust a oil company who sponsored a study about climate change? I would hope not. Also if you say theirs no such thing as atheist then theirs no such a theist for you guys don't know if theirs a god.
Actually no we don't, their is no evidence that the other religious groups couldn't claim them selfs, the only thing you can say is that you feel like a genocidal lackey of a god is watching you but here's the thing I don't give a damn what you feel unless your a patient of mine, if you can prove anything then your belief is worth anyone's time
Well for starters you don't have evidence, face it your argument is the equivalent of a skitsofrantic saying he has a little green friend. Now that friend may feel real to him/you but just like in a court room your/his feelings aren't worth a damn, and thus must be seen as imaginary. Now you could say "oh we can't know something 100%, we can only be 99% sure' and to that I say that argument is about as weak as my mom when she gets back from chemo and if this was a betting flour which would you vote for
Of course sense its unknown and has no evidence then it should be just as dismissed as the silly idea of a flying tea pot flying around earth or a dragon that controls time, you see these two examples of a flying tea pot and a time dragon may sound silly but they are just as believable as your god making it very dismissive. However something's we can be fairly sure over like say something as simple as your phone Turing on when you hit the button assuming the battery is charged and it's in working order. Now with this phone example we can never be 100% it will turn on again but given past experiences with the device we can be at least 99%sure it will work next time you hit the on button, unlike the 1% change of your god being a thing given their are no reliable sources just silly feelings that wouldn't hold up in a court room
God - has no evidence that it exist -only observed in stories with no backing -people believe in it because of faith/feelings All other myths has no evidence that it exist -only observed in stories with no backing -people believe in it because of faith/feelings And you claim gods and unicorns are different.
Yeah we don't debate that though at the end of the day it has the same merit as your hate boner of a belief so why don't we.
And it's a question because we don't have evidence that a god exist and we do have evidence the universe came about more naturally
We have no evidence that God was not a necessity for the universe.
No. Some things have more reasoning to existing than other things. It is more reasonable that there is an unconditionally independence by which all things are dependent upon than there is that a blue fire dragon with 7 heads is living in another universe.
And your assuming because of your feelings that a god was needed to make a universe but don't you see your just throwing unnecessary steps into things. Your like those anti vaxxers who instead of giving kids life saving shots they take the kids to sickness spreading partys in Hope's of getting the kids immune for that further sickness.
As for your 2nd no those are both fucken retarded and have no evidence to back them.
Your kids are gonna die man, you do understand what started this nonsense anti vax shit was a study that had a small sample size which isn't good If your conducting studies and the samples were cheery picked so much it honestly makes sense that a cherry picker like yourself would identify with it
Also sense I know you won't believe me and I want your life to be worth something before you die, go to Africa and build some homes or water purification stations. This way you may be able to provide a point and I win by you most likely dying of a sickness that a shot could have fixed and the people get some fresh water
What Girls & Guys Said
Opinion
43Opinion
I am an atheist.
I just wonder why people have such stigma against atheism.
No such thing as an atheist.
www.crossway.org/.../
People can believe in what they like. No one should force religion upon anyone.
Gag Has a small army of religious people who try and force their crap.
Not my belief, but I respect those who choose it as theirs.
They’re annoying and are always looking for arguments
Oh are we really. thanks for telling me I thought I just kept to myself
I'm an atheist so... For me it seems like the only thing that makes sense.
Atheists can't and don't exist.
@God-vs-Satan... Well... That's stupid.
I have proved it many times.
@God-vs-Satan Please (try to) do (it).
Statements made are always made using fleshly merits and not spiritual merits.
If you say no God, your flesh is used to say it. Therefore, your flesh is your god of belief.
Whatever. It’s their kind of religion; just like being christian or being a muslim.
I don't get it. It doesn't make sense to me.
What doesn't make sense?
I don't get not believing in God. God is everywhere.
Fairly positive sense I am a atheist
There is no such thing as an atheist.
www.crossway.org/.../
When your link starts out with a religious bias that shouldn't be considered exactly reliable for example would you trust a oil company who sponsored a study about climate change? I would hope not.
Also if you say theirs no such thing as atheist then theirs no such a theist for you guys don't know if theirs a god.
All people know God exists.
Doesn't matter the source if the evidence is true.
Actually no we don't, their is no evidence that the other religious groups couldn't claim them selfs, the only thing you can say is that you feel like a genocidal lackey of a god is watching you but here's the thing I don't give a damn what you feel unless your a patient of mine, if you can prove anything then your belief is worth anyone's time
I have the Holy Ghost to teach me. You have society to teach you.
I trust the Holy Ghost over society.
You have a imagery friend just like a depressed high schooler.
I have all the logic and scientific advances like not dieing of the common flu.
He isn't an imaginary friend.
You claim He is so prove He is. Otherwise, you can't claim it.
Well for starters you don't have evidence, face it your argument is the equivalent of a skitsofrantic saying he has a little green friend. Now that friend may feel real to him/you but just like in a court room your/his feelings aren't worth a damn, and thus must be seen as imaginary. Now you could say "oh we can't know something 100%, we can only be 99% sure' and to that I say that argument is about as weak as my mom when she gets back from chemo and if this was a betting flour which would you vote for
Correct. God's existence or non existence is unknown. One shouldn't be assumed over the other.
In math, we don't have a default or null position. We don't assume a solution will eventually be found nor assume it won't never yield a solution.
Of course sense its unknown and has no evidence then it should be just as dismissed as the silly idea of a flying tea pot flying around earth or a dragon that controls time, you see these two examples of a flying tea pot and a time dragon may sound silly but they are just as believable as your god making it very dismissive. However something's we can be fairly sure over like say something as simple as your phone Turing on when you hit the button assuming the battery is charged and it's in working order. Now with this phone example we can never be 100% it will turn on again but given past experiences with the device we can be at least 99%sure it will work next time you hit the on button, unlike the 1% change of your god being a thing given their are no reliable sources just silly feelings that wouldn't hold up in a court room
Wrong. Not all unproven claim hold equal merit.
We can't prove many things but we don't assume it is false until proven true.
So do you believe its reasonable to think that a green dragon controls all time and it lives in another galaxy
God and unicorns don't hold equal merits. Wise people understand this.
We don't debate unicorns like we do for God.
I don't understand why God's existence us even questionable to some.
God
- has no evidence that it exist
-only observed in stories with no backing
-people believe in it because of faith/feelings
All other myths
has no evidence that it exist
-only observed in stories with no backing
-people believe in it because of faith/feelings
And you claim gods and unicorns are different.
Yeah we don't debate that though at the end of the day it has the same merit as your hate boner of a belief so why don't we.
And it's a question because we don't have evidence that a god exist and we do have evidence the universe came about more naturally
We have no evidence that God was not a necessity for the universe.
No. Some things have more reasoning to existing than other things. It is more reasonable that there is an unconditionally independence by which all things are dependent upon than there is that a blue fire dragon with 7 heads is living in another universe.
And your assuming because of your feelings that a god was needed to make a universe but don't you see your just throwing unnecessary steps into things. Your like those anti vaxxers who instead of giving kids life saving shots they take the kids to sickness spreading partys in Hope's of getting the kids immune for that further sickness.
As for your 2nd no those are both fucken retarded and have no evidence to back them.
You're the wuss who more dangerously assumes.
I'm anti vaccines. People who trust in God don't need medicine. Also, it is unhealthy to put toxins in your body. Vaccines are toxic.
The only time I dangerously assume is when I play poker and considering I won 250k today playing 3 card poker I'd say my assumptions are spot on.
And wow I hope you don't reproduce, so your kids don't end up dying a horrible death. But when that happens google gets you https://www.memorials.com/child-caskets.php
Also their are no toxins in those for the love of science read a fucken book that doesn't promote genocide by drowning or feeding kids to bears
https://www.stopmandatoryvaccination.com/
Healthy people don't need to vaccinate. I don't trust vaccines. I don't vaccinate my son or daughters.
Your kids are gonna die man, you do understand what started this nonsense anti vax shit was a study that had a small sample size which isn't good If your conducting studies and the samples were cheery picked so much it honestly makes sense that a cherry picker like yourself would identify with it
Also sense I know you won't believe me and I want your life to be worth something before you die, go to Africa and build some homes or water purification stations. This way you may be able to provide a point and I win by you most likely dying of a sickness that a shot could have fixed and the people get some fresh water
Great, let us get communism into it too.
I am pro Atheism and anti Theism
No such thing as an atheist.
www.crossway.org/.../
I am one, agnostic to be more specific
Wonderful.
Bunch of fuckin’ communist pussies.
How does me not believing in God make me a communist?
Hahaha the 2nd meme
They going to hell
It's logical
Let me clarify. I'm an agnostic atheist. Since no one has proof for either argument I withhold judgement
eDgY
Not a fan
"It's only logical"