Im an emt and sometimes patients get combative so we restrain them but I hate doing it but in prisons for non violent offenders yes we use them too much
Yes and no depending on the background of the person and how they react to pain and conflict if they could potentially hurt themselves or others yes they should be restrained pure common sense.
So you think it's right to end people's lives just because someone else did something wrong? If ending lives in general speaking are wrong and people can end up in prison for that, then doing it in prison shouldn't be legal either. That would be double standard. It shouldn't matter which age the person are. Life is a life.
@weasley8, Prisons are sex separated which mean males and females goes to different prisons, so male prisoners impregnating female prisoners wouldn't be an issue. So sterilization isn't necessary. So forcing people to undergo an uncomfortable permanent procedure is unnecessary and going too far - especially when there's other solutions at the problem.
I know that. But there's no reason to abort babies either. It was a hypothetical question. The baby is usually taken away from the woman anyway once she gives birth. There's no reason to get rid of it. She's being punished more than enough by not being able to raise the kid from birth. Sterilization was just the closest comparison I could find, as men cannot get pregnant. I wanted to see how the asker would respond.
I'm pro-life; against abortion. I don't support self-determined abortions at all. I've never accepted it. I don't think children should be punished for something someone else have done. If children are raised in a good environment, there's a lower chance of them becoming criminals. Often children of criminals gets raised by their grandparents, aunts/uncles, friends of the criminal or gets adopted by someone else.
No. Just because you can take it away does not mean it's a privilege. It means that right should be protected. I don't know where you are but in the US it IS an undeniable right. Hence why murderers are in jail.
What Girls & Guys Said
Opinion
35Opinion
No. I live in Europe and this is a wild west for criminals. Prisons are like hotels and sentenses hardly even excists.
It is said that they are needed, but integrity is not a high trait anymore in the US.
Im an emt and sometimes patients get combative so we restrain them but I hate doing it but in prisons for non violent offenders yes we use them too much
Yes and no depending on the background of the person and how they react to pain and conflict if they could potentially hurt themselves or others yes they should be restrained pure common sense.
Not to me. Your example doesn't excuse that woman from being a danger to society.
Restraints are there for a reason, they're incarcerated for a reason.
They're not used in hospitals I can assure you of that.
In my country there was a woman who faked being pregnant and escaped
If the person is a suspect who got wounded in a shooting, no, if the person is in critical condition, yes.
I work in corrections we dont restraint them to a bed
It's not in my country but still it is other parts of the world
I live in iceland which has a pretty chill government.
maybe the people suck
Not that I’ve noticed. (USA)
They are in my bedroom (y)
Women should have their offspring aborted when they are in prison in my opinion.
Why?
So you think it's right to end people's lives just because someone else did something wrong? If ending lives in general speaking are wrong and people can end up in prison for that, then doing it in prison shouldn't be legal either. That would be double standard. It shouldn't matter which age the person are. Life is a life.
And how would you respond to the sterilization of male inmates?
Agreed @curiousorway
@weasley8, Prisons are sex separated which mean males and females goes to different prisons, so male prisoners impregnating female prisoners wouldn't be an issue. So sterilization isn't necessary. So forcing people to undergo an uncomfortable permanent procedure is unnecessary and going too far - especially when there's other solutions at the problem.
I know that. But there's no reason to abort babies either. It was a hypothetical question. The baby is usually taken away from the woman anyway once she gives birth. There's no reason to get rid of it. She's being punished more than enough by not being able to raise the kid from birth. Sterilization was just the closest comparison I could find, as men cannot get pregnant. I wanted to see how the asker would respond.
Criminals are undesirable and therefore should be discouraged from reproduction.
What about nonviolent criminals? Or people who shoplift due to not being able to afford food?
@weasley8 My country has a socialist system so everyone can afford food.
Where are you from?
@weasley8 West Europe.
I'm pro-life; against abortion. I don't support self-determined abortions at all. I've never accepted it. I don't think children should be punished for something someone else have done. If children are raised in a good environment, there's a lower chance of them becoming criminals. Often children of criminals gets raised by their grandparents, aunts/uncles, friends of the criminal or gets adopted by someone else.
Abortion is not a punishment and living is not a right, it is a privilege.
Not true. Living is a undeniable right.
@AquaBoo If you can have a right taken away easily (by getting killed for example) it is a natural given privilege, not a right.
No. Just because you can take it away does not mean it's a privilege. It means that right should be protected. I don't know where you are but in the US it IS an undeniable right. Hence why murderers are in jail.
@AquaBoo If a right has to be protected its not a right at all, its a privilege...
I disagree.
If you think ending life is okay, then why should people be sent to prison then?
They should be sent to reeducation camps instead.
I think I have never seen restraints
No, they’re not
That's harsh
What did you dooo?