I personally think that people shouldn't decide on these things so early, as many people claim they be LGBTQ during school n just stop. No teenager nowerdays is mature in the slightest, especially not enough for this kind of choice
Its not sex being taught it's classes on how people were and still are being discriminated agenst for something thats different than what most deem as sick or amoral but proplem is back then everything is blurred between what was gay history and what is transgender history because the group's were all lumped together
Which isn't Black history or LGBTQ history? Both parties have had the shit end of the stick in the past. The point of it is to make sure it doesn't happen again, and that we don't repeat past mistakes like "Separate but Equal" We have morons trying to tell Transgender girls that they have to use the bathroom of their birth gender. Yeah that's a good Idea let's send a "Boy" wearing a dress and high heels into the men's room. Who are you going to blame when they get physically or sexually attacked? Should we have 4 sets of bathrooms? Male, Female, MTF Trans,, and FTM trans?
It is a good thing it should be a class that is offered like an elective. It would help students who identify as LGBT understand and be more comfortable with theirselves.
Bad thing. Sorry but there are other things we should be teaching and we need to find actual ways to improve the education system. That is just another SJW propaganda. Why should we teach young kids this?
Sexual education at schools is very very important.
Not sure if teaching the story of lgbt is that relevant, iy might be, but I'm against teaching them to children because is the wrong time to teach them that.
No it's just educational brainwashing. To push a belief or agenda. This hole trans gender , gender confused is just crap. If you are born with a penis your a male if you're born with a vagina you're female Other genders are just people playing Dr. Frankenstein and that's just messed up. Both the Bible and evalotion teach that there is only male and female. Science and Dr's trying to change someone's sex using drugs , hormones and operations is wrong and gross
Here's some undisputed LGBT history: Alan Turing solved the German Enigma code. He was gay and later prosecuted by the British government for homosexual activity. He committed suicide. Oscar Wilde was gay and also prosecuted for it. Kids can handle that sort of truth.
As someone who works in the British educational system I can assure you the lessons are no more provocative than the history of our kings, the civil rights movement or the battle of 1066.
It's a little too... targeted, I guess? Like LGBTQ history is wrapped into a ton of different things, but making it center point of a single lecture is to miss the forest among the trees.
@sissyDj Firstly, I don't understand what you're trying to say in the first comment because of the grammar or possible missing punctuation. Come again?
Secondly, I'm not talking about the duration of its existence, man😂😂 I'm talking about what you can possibly teach is a term/semester/year length subject of its own. You can't without stretching it out awfully and pointlessly. It should be taught under history and also under sex education.
Your trying to limit it like how we have black history month or Asian history month? When the advancement of humanity has been done by gays who have had that part already ommited from establish history
Wait, you're saying the very advancement of humanity was done by gays? In other words implying no straight person has contributed to the advancement of humanity? That's a stretch, to put it kindly. I am bisexual so you can relax. LGBT+ history isn't as extensive in content, I'm not trying to limit it, I'm saying stretching it out is doing is no justice, it's wasting valuable time. You're acting like I'm a straight person that's trying to hinder LGBT+ community, but maybe if you climbed off my back, you'd see I'm not trying to do what you're so passive-aggressively pretending that I am. As a future teacher, I know how hard it is to combine so many important lessons into such short lessons, and LGBT+ history can easily be put under sex-ed and history, also giving room for other important information not related to sexuality. Creating a syllabus with accurate planning and timing with APPROPRIATE duration of content is important. You have to space and balance EVERYTHIIING out, not just LGBT+ history.
Unless you want LGBT+ history to be an OPTIONAL elective (that not everyone will take), you should be thanking the idea of putting it under compulsory history and sex-ed.
I am just saying include that some of the famous people who helped who are gay should let the kids know when or if they ask why they didn't have children of their own
Which can easily be covered in lessons under already-existing lessons such as...(take a guess). It doesn't do anything to stretch that out to a whole subject of its own.
What Girls & Guys Said
Opinion
68Opinion
Teaching the history of bigotry is a good way to make sure it doesn't happen again.
Knowing that, you can decide what you want about the people who think it's a bad idea.
I personally think that people shouldn't decide on these things so early, as many people claim they be LGBTQ during school n just stop. No teenager nowerdays is mature in the slightest, especially not enough for this kind of choice
They want to spread this epidemic disease through our new generation.
Its not sex being taught it's classes on how people were and still are being discriminated agenst for something thats different than what most deem as sick or amoral but proplem is back then everything is blurred between what was gay history and what is transgender history because the group's were all lumped together
If we can teach Black history in school why not LGBTQ history?
Not as important
Which isn't Black history or LGBTQ history? Both parties have had the shit end of the stick in the past. The point of it is to make sure it doesn't happen again, and that we don't repeat past mistakes like "Separate but Equal" We have morons trying to tell Transgender girls that they have to use the bathroom of their birth gender. Yeah that's a good Idea let's send a "Boy" wearing a dress and high heels into the men's room. Who are you going to blame when they get physically or sexually attacked? Should we have 4 sets of bathrooms? Male, Female, MTF Trans,, and FTM trans?
From what you said what do you think? Why are you acting slow?
I think it should be taught in schools. As far as I'm concerned it is a good thing.
Let the kids being kids and stop the political agenda indoctrination
It depends on what's taught about it. If it's taught as a means of tolerance, okay, but if its taught as a means of hatred or belittling, NOT okay!
It is a good thing it should be a class that is offered like an elective. It would help students who identify as LGBT understand and be more comfortable with theirselves.
I’d recommend that class if the student is gay, lesbian, bisexual, etc.
You can also take Gay alliance classes in highschool if you’re straight and want to know their issues of being who they are in our society.
Never heard of gay alliance classes
God Made Adam and Eve not Adam and Steve.
Seriously schools need to stay out of the bedroom.
Lmao my preacher says this every Sunday
It's an awesome thing!
Science, Technology, Engineering and Math are so overrated. I was just looking on "Indeed" and there are a ton of jobs for LGBTQ Historians.
It's a good thing to accept it and learn it. It's a bad thing to try force it in everyone's home and promote it in every possible way.
Bad thing. Sorry but there are other things we should be teaching and we need to find actual ways to improve the education system. That is just another SJW propaganda. Why should we teach young kids this?
I think that all aspects of history are important so... Yeah, it's important, in my eyes anyway but then again, I was a history student.
Sexual education at schools is very very important.
Not sure if teaching the story of lgbt is that relevant, iy might be, but I'm against teaching them to children because is the wrong time to teach them that.
Its taught as prophaganda, so I am against it.
Its important to show a full, balanced understanding, and you won't get that in this course
It's there truth. Kids can handle the truth. Some of their parents can't.
No it's just educational brainwashing. To push a belief or agenda. This hole trans gender , gender confused is just crap.
If you are born with a penis your a male if you're born with a vagina you're female
Other genders are just people playing Dr. Frankenstein and that's just messed up.
Both the Bible and evalotion teach that there is only male and female. Science and Dr's trying to change someone's sex using drugs , hormones and operations is wrong and gross
Here's some undisputed LGBT history: Alan Turing solved the German Enigma code. He was gay and later prosecuted by the British government for homosexual activity. He committed suicide. Oscar Wilde was gay and also prosecuted for it. Kids can handle that sort of truth.
@Chadnelson1973 RESPECT.
As someone who works in the British educational system I can assure you the lessons are no more provocative than the history of our kings, the civil rights movement or the battle of 1066.
It's a little too... targeted, I guess? Like LGBTQ history is wrapped into a ton of different things, but making it center point of a single lecture is to miss the forest among the trees.
Not as its own separate subject, becausr it's honestly not that long. Just vague references or sub topics under regular History.
Oh and not for little kids like on the pic. More so for middle schoolers/elder kids in primary school.
What where you taught in elementary history that Columbus 1492 discoveried America dispute this being wrong
LGBTQ history has been part of human history sense history existed
@sissyDj Firstly, I don't understand what you're trying to say in the first comment because of the grammar or possible missing punctuation. Come again?
Secondly, I'm not talking about the duration of its existence, man😂😂 I'm talking about what you can possibly teach is a term/semester/year length subject of its own. You can't without stretching it out awfully and pointlessly. It should be taught under history and also under sex education.
Your trying to limit it like how we have black history month or Asian history month? When the advancement of humanity has been done by gays who have had that part already ommited from establish history
Wait, you're saying the very advancement of humanity was done by gays? In other words implying no straight person has contributed to the advancement of humanity? That's a stretch, to put it kindly.
I am bisexual so you can relax. LGBT+ history isn't as extensive in content, I'm not trying to limit it, I'm saying stretching it out is doing is no justice, it's wasting valuable time. You're acting like I'm a straight person that's trying to hinder LGBT+ community, but maybe if you climbed off my back, you'd see I'm not trying to do what you're so passive-aggressively pretending that I am. As a future teacher, I know how hard it is to combine so many important lessons into such short lessons, and LGBT+ history can easily be put under sex-ed and history, also giving room for other important information not related to sexuality. Creating a syllabus with accurate planning and timing with APPROPRIATE duration of content is important. You have to space and balance EVERYTHIIING out, not just LGBT+ history.
Unless you want LGBT+ history to be an OPTIONAL elective (that not everyone will take), you should be thanking the idea of putting it under compulsory history and sex-ed.
I am not saying everything was invented by them just saying they help with them in some way
I am just saying include that some of the famous people who helped who are gay should let the kids know when or if they ask why they didn't have children of their own
Which can easily be covered in lessons under already-existing lessons such as...(take a guess). It doesn't do anything to stretch that out to a whole subject of its own.