I'd need to see video. But since Grossburger or whatever his name is confessed his homicidal intentions before Kyle shot in self-defense, and therefore the prosecution's key witness just indicted himself, I'd like to think most Team Trump members are at least smart enough not to do that. So I have a hard time seeing this scenario play out that way.
Many idolize Trump to a degree that is beyond absurd. But I haven't met any that are actively putting guns in the faces of children, nor trying to bludgeon children with skateboards.
Using DnD definitions and alignments, Trump supporters are, at worst, true neutral or chaotic neutral.
Antifa, however, is chaotic evil veering toward stupid evil and chaotic stupid. That many of them have infiltrated schools with their agenda undetected, and now have direct access to children, should legitimately worry everyone.
That Brandon labels parents who are legitimately concerned "domestic terrorists" should also be a cause for legitimate concern.
Most Helpful Opinions
We probably wouldn't even hear about it unless independent media caught wind of it.
And there most likely would have never been charges. Most people still have no idea that 32 people died in the summer riots of 2020. Some believe there were no deaths. Others know of a couple, maybe. But the tally is 32 at last count.
32 people dead from riots... That we know of.
Weeks after the Minneapolis riots, they found a corpse in one of the burned out stores. The proprietor is presumed the victim. 32 people died from those riots and the ONLY trial is this one? Why is that? There are 30 other victims, whose cases haven't even been investigated. Maybe David Dorn's has, I don't remember.
The real question is, after 32 people were killed in these riots, why is there only one trial? And it just so happens, that in this case the deceased were the rioters. But the rioters who killed people, who burned that woman alive in her store, where are their trials? Who is speaking for these dead? Why does their blood matter to no one?
It's a little funny, when all this crap was going on, the Wikipage keeping tally of the deaths, rose to 26. Then suddenly, the number dropped on the page, with the notation "As of October 2020" and only shows 25. When they were counting from June, it was already over 25.
Again the real question, where are the arrests and the justice for the other 30 people who were killed during this period? And most of them were black, why are their perps not facing trial? I guess your BL doesn't M if losing your L makes BLM looks bad.
My opinion would be the same either way. I can't speak for anyone else.
Your obsession with Blacks is very alarming and scary.
What Girls & Guys Said
Opinion
30Opinion
Some BLM losers did actually drag away a Trump supporter and execute him (I want to say in Portland but it may have been somewhere else), and it was in the news for all of about a weekend before it got swept away, not to mention the roughly 30 police officers and 50+ other bystanders who were killed by rioters who largely became nothing more than a number. There's a REALLY big difference between a kid being chased, struck by objects and a gun pulled on him and then shooting his attackers, versus a mob lynching. The political leanings of parties involved is irrelevant because nobody is being put on trial for having illegal beliefs, so if this exact scenario happened with the roles reversed, yes I would side with the person who acts in self-defense.
Depends. Is the case the same across the board with the only differences being Kyle's newly slapped hypothetical label of BLM and the two dead being Trump supporters that had the same criminal records as the ones who Kyle actually killed and did the exact same thing that these protestors did that night that got them killed? Assaulting him as he was running away?
Although I disagree with BLM and what it stands for, then yes. Self defense across the board. If someone tries to attack you or do harm to you regardless of political affiliation, I say self defense is justified. Wouldn't matter if it was a Trump supporter or BLM/ANTIFA person.Even if the characters were swapped in this situation the ending should be the same. But with what I see goin on, the trickery, the false statements, the statements from POS protus calling him a white supremacist, but yet gives aid and support to terrorists. This young man should be a hero and everyone condemns him for killing in self defense and Comrad biden gets our service members killed and arms the Taliban. What's wrong with people? When a 2nd civil war breaks out, don't cry like pussies, whimper cause the govt as you know it won't be sending anyone to help you.
I was inclined to believe his claim of self defense from the trickling down of cell phone videos on twitter and live streams as it was happening. Later someone took all those clips and put them all in order showing the sequence of events and I was more certain of it. When the NY Times agreed with my perspective, I would've placed bets.
Being the guy was 17, his political position made no difference to me since he couldn't even vote.
Disclaimer: I'm a Cuban descended American, BLM, as an organization, lost ALL credibility with me when they made their position very clear in regards to the situation in Cuba. I was "enlightened" one could say. I can absolutely support my Black-American brothers and sisters without BLM and their 2 faced BS.Funny how the DA files charges 48 hours after incident without looking at evidence... also funny how the media only showed bits and pieces of footage condemning the kid before trial, not the idiot survivor (Gaige) pointing a gun square in his face (lied in police statement about weapon, thank you video evidence) skateboard to back of the head, etc... worse off he's labeled a domestic terrorist and for some unknown reason white supremacist by our drooling president and his liberal media (surrounded by rioters looting, burning, and destroying property by the way) THANK GOD that prosecution team was so incompetent and the survivor was so pathetic on the stand
Yes. I remember a white ex-special forces guy was shot by a black guy at a park. The white guy was beating him up and threatened to kill him. The black guy protected himself and killed him. I support that even as a white ex-military guy. I hate to see the wasted life but that is that.
Those labels would suggest its not self defense at that point since BLM is known to hate Trump supporters and Trump supporters tend to be peaceful. So i am assuming that then they would see Rittenhouse as the attacker. If, however for some reason the Trump supporters attacked Rittenhouse and made him kill them in self defense then he would still be innocent.
Leftists have a hard time understanding that it's a matter of facts, not political ideology (which is how they decide everything). This is a clear case of self-defense, which wouldn't change if the political ideology of the people involved were reversed.
I mean I would. what kind of idiot goes after a dude with a loaded AR-15 in the first place? Darwin awards go toooooo...
...
Probably not, and nor would the other side hold the same views of his guilt.
If Conservatives were rioting and a Rittenhouse were a BLM advocate who was attacked, then he'd be innocent.
A generally good rule to follow: don't chase & attack someone with a gun.Obviously not! These little white boys get off and grabbing huge guns and killing people for no reason, its a pattern and these dumb ass conservatives keep trying to downplay it. He literally had his mom drive him and then he killed someone THEN called his friend to brag about it. I hope he rots in jail
that depends. Would there be clear-cut video evidence of him acting in self defense as there is now? Because unlike liberal Trump hating weirdos, I like to stick to the facts, and not base my determination of someone's guilt on their political affiliations. The problem with your scenario, is this will never happen because Trump supporters don't go around burning and looting towns to the ground, unlike BLM.
If republicians would chimp out just as much, yes, I would hold the same view.
A lot of them would. Some probably not. But trump supporters don't burn cities, so the case would simply not be the same.
Yes. You won't find that scenario as no one has the option of chasing and assailing a BLM terrorist and not be assailed first.
technically yes. but the left is so dishonest and fights so dirty we would lie and say he was guilty just to spite the assholes
Replace conservatives for liberals to correctly flip the dynamic and yes they would be wanting him to run for president as soon as possible
Yes, and the crooked fake news would want to pin a medal on him instead of the lynching they have planned.
Learn more
We're glad to see you liked this post.
You can also add your opinion below!