Yes I do believe it would. MRA's and MGTOW are only a reaction to radical feminism and feminism in itself is a purely sexist hate movement against men. I think all of society would have been better off had feminism never existed.
And before anyone gives me any stupid BS, just know MOST of the world never had the feminist movement happen, including most of Asia, and they still had female CEOs, world leaders, and presidents before the United States or Canada ever had, so shut your mouth and don't speak any crap you're once again going to be wrong about. Feminism does not have a monopoly on women's rights; they don't even respect women.
As for MGTOW... That would likely always be a thing; though it'd be very small and minor in a world without feminism and 'toxic females' in it. MRA's probably wouldn't be a thing though, since this would be a world where more women actually cared about men and didn't agree with the hatred and double standards of feminism merely cause it's convenient for them.
So in short, yes, we'd all be better off with MRA's and *especially* without third/fourth wave feminism.
Most Helpful Opinions
Yes. Looking at only one gender too much instead of trying to make them equal together is backwards and only for crazy people
What Girls & Guys Said
Opinion
9Opinion
- u
Would the world be a better place if we did not have free speech?
Feminism is all about equality. It's not about raising women above men. It's about achieving social, economic, and political equality for women.
MGTOW is kinda just for incels 🥱 and they think that "modern women are beyond repair". It's pretty much just anti-woman, not actually trying to achieve anything for men like raising awareness for the issues toxic masculinity creates. Or raising support for issues that some see as women only, when they're not, like sexual violence, mental health, intimate partner abuse, or child abuse + lack of personal support system (friends to rely on).
Though even though I'm strongly against MGTOW, I don't think it should be banned. I certainly would encourage social platforms to discourage the crazy beliefs it spreads. But if it's written in the post or there's a protest, technically freedom of speech protects that. I think we just really should strongly encourage negative social consequences for hateful speech.No. Who would be in charge of "banning"? And once banning was accepted, where would it lead? What else would wind up being banned by the "banners"?
I believe in liberty, freedom of speech and expression. People can do what they want as long as they don't physically harm others.No. The world would be a better place if we couldn't perceive extreme suffering. Of course, we'd need just enough pain in order to function in a sustainable way. But I think we could live without the extreme & unnecessary pain.
Who would ban them and who would enforce that.
Another purposeless snowflake who believes in "banning"The answer to this question is clearly yes. The only thing feminism and MRA/MGTOW actually accomplish today is to spread sexism and gender hatred and divide the sexes.
Probably, most are basically just dividing us further.
No I don't
I think conservatives toting guns around like it's nilly willy. Are fucking idiots- s
I'm sensing someone was inspired by my post lol
Yes. No more gender wars
MGTOW is not a movement, is a philosophy
Learn more
Most Helpful Opinions