If Russia attacks Poland, do you think that the Polish government would invoke NATO article 5?

[Ad_Quid_Orator]

Lets say Russia attacks a supply convoy headed for Ukraine in Polish territory, do you think that they'll invoke article 5 or do you think they'll intervene in the war themselves?

I mean article 5 invokes some terrifying consequences (i. e. nuclear Armageddon) and with all the footage of piss poor Russian vehicle maintenance and armored warfare tactics, the crews of the freshly upgraded Leopard 2PL tanks have probably spent the past +4 months drooling in front of their computer screen.

Oh you Americans, if it wasn't bad enough you're sacrificing Ukraine, now you want Poland to fight Russia for you too!

Actually, it was Putin who solicited Poland's aid in his misguided recidivist/imperialist ambitions.

Include a caption for your image…

Yes

No

[ChrisMaster69]

There would likely be instant response on launch site.

Chances are they would come from the Puppet country.

Also Sky Sabre is operational in Poland since March.

It also has latest block Patriots operational

One of the scenarios practiced is an air exclusion zone along NATO borders and air space, similar to splash zones for carrier groups.

it would escalate quickly of the Russians tried pushing the battle space towards NATO.

TBH the greatest threat is Iran closing the Straits.

[Stoner710]

I think they should but then again that means World War III of course World War III would be all of Joe Biden‘s fault because he pulled out of Afghanistan for absolutely no reason giving the Russians and the Chinese the Believe and they would be correct in this that the United States is weak Joe Biden is weak I won’t do anything about it. I swear the reemergence of the USSR is all Joe Biden‘s fault no one that should be voting for Joe Biden or the Democratic Party ever again if you do you are a fool and frankly you should not be voting in the first place

[DryGermanGuy]

JFC… Joe Biden pulled out of Afghanistan, because Donald Trump originally ordered it! It’s called „continuation of policy“ and pretty much the norm during administration change.

[Stoner710]

@DryGermanGuy no trump administration made a CONDITIONAL agreement that America would pull out if they met the agreements. They did not met the agreements so trump wouldn’t have pulled out. Biden made it seem like it was either pull out or get back into a full blown war with the Taliban. The other option because the media pushed this narrative that was never discussed it was why not just leave it as the status quo? We had 2500 trips in Afghanistan which was preventing the Taliban from doing what they’re doing now which is killing women who can read subjugating every single woman to staying at home only being uncombined out by their husbands or a blood family relative. Or in the case of a lot of little 9 to 13-year-old daughters in Afghanistan now being this old and sex slavery that is all of Joe Biden‘s fault. That has nothing to do with Trump Joe Biden decided to disregard all the trauma policies once he got into office why didn’t he disregard this one either he’s a fool or a coward or actually does not really care about women’s rights especially when it comes to handing over a foreign power to the most dictatorial terrorist regime outside of China and North Korea. That is all of Joe Biden‘s fault every single man and woman who’s been killed in Ukraine is all of Joe Biden’s fault the inflationary policy is all Joe Biden‘s fault the very fact that we’re dealing with this and Joe Biden said that if Russia did a minor encouraging into Ukraine the United States would do nothing and now thousands if not hundreds of thousands I haven’t checked the death count recently people have died in Ukraine and this is all Joe Biden‘s fault. Joe Biden could have prevented all of this he didn’t sell for every single war crime the Russians and Vladimir Putin commit in Ukraine should Joe Biden is responsible for don’t get me wrong the Russians and Vladimir Putin are responsible as well but Joe Biden should be held to just as high account as Putin and the Russian soldiers.

[BCA6010]

As in Russia striking targets on Polish soil?

Poland absolutely would. They're one of the most rabid attack dogs in all of NATO, and have been pretty much as long as they've been in it, not unlike Australia in the Pacific. That's part of the reason Trump wanted to move a lot of forward deployed US personnel from Germany to Poland, both to calm them down and reward them for being more amicable to US interests than Germany.

[Guy13]

I think it will mean USA direct involvement. The 82nd Airborne are in Poland now. It will likely also be the means for USA going back into Ukrainian theatre

[WindAtMyBack]

If they didn't actually invade Poland, I don't know if NATO would attack. I kinda doubt it. If it became a regular thing then NATO might jump in.

[Erron_Black]

nobody helps. especially america uses others. sends other soldiers to help. America wants to wear out Russia without firing a single bullet and uses such countries for this.

[jimmy2]

They do 300,000 are on reactional first strike so let him

[StevieNix]

No. Putin can do whatever China wants.

[TwoToTooTutu2]

Um yes definitely.