Rude people are the cause of a lot of the civilized world’s problems. Especially if we are talking about rude people in authoritarian positions who abuse their power and show no sympathy. Think about Rude people who are
Law enforcement (including the pinko feds)
Bouncers
Courthouse security
TSA
Judges
prosecutors
psych ward staff
What if a dictator were to rise that would specifically target rude people and give speeches that scapegoat rude people. I’m not saying to go einsatzgruppen SS on rude people but give rude people hefty fines and bar rude people from obtaining authoritarian positions. Would the dictator be considered a hero?
The hypothetical national anthem of this regime would use the melody of Argonnerwaldlied but with these lyrics I wrote. Here is the first stanza.
🎶Within our lands there shall be peace. No more rudeness shall torment us. (2x) For once there is a guardian here, at last we can enjoy our daily lives (2x)🎶
Hero
Tyrant
You must really hate rude people
Select gender and age to cast your vote:
Please select your age
Updates
1 y
Rudeness is not subjective, it’s unprovoked verbal hostility which can sometimes lead to unprovoked physical hostility.
Updates
1 y
I also never said this hypothetical dictator would exterminate rude people, I only said this hypothetical dictator would prohibit rude people from acquiring authoritarian positions and also would fine them.
If a dictator were to rise in the near future that only targeted rude people, would the dictator be considered a hero or a tyrant?
He'd be a tyrant and need to have a bullet put between his eyes. Especially if you think THOSE people are commonly "rude people."
"Rude" is subjective. "The road to hell is paved with good intentions." Should I be targeted because I think this post is stupid? Or should I be targeted because I don't want to use some tranny's pronouns' and call him a "she/her" because it's degrading to lie to myself and my own eyes?
And here's the plot twist, OP: *I* would be the one, out of literally anyone else on GAG, to become this dictator. So everything is now "hate speech" and anyone who says mean nasty words to me on the internet will be hunted down through their IP address, brought in, and executed by firing squad. Because nothing less than total submission is "rudeness" to me.
You want Communist China? Cause that's how you get Communist China.
For example, you go to jury duty and you try to be nice to everyone in the court. You say “hi good morning” to the security guards and they just give you a mean look and say “Move along idiot” with a nasty tone. That’s rudeness right there. Unprovoked verbal hostility.
And what you find to be "hostile" or "unprovoked" is subjective.
It isn't my job, nor anyone else's, to look after the emotions of grown adults. Offense is taken, not given. I've laughed at women who have said "rude" things to me, because I sometimes think it's true. They sometimes don't know how to respond after that.
I didn't type this, because I didn't think I needed to. But going back to your courtroom story... What if the guy in jury duty was the Mister that slept with the guard's wife? What if he was his brother-in-law who gets arrested every single month on dumb charges like public urination? What if he was the town asshole who everyone hated? Just because YOU don't know what provoked his response of calling him an idiot, doesn't make it unprovoked. People don't need to explain their reasonings to you.
Now getting to the new nonsense you wrote... 1) You don't know their reason, nor do you know their emotional state. They don't need to explain themselves to you. 2) If someone is holding his hand in his jacket pocket and is about to rob a bank. Or it's the guy who ran over your dog. Or it's a guy who just said he'd f*ck your 16 year old daughter... Then a sucker punch would be justified to the one throwing it, regardless of you or anyone else knowing the intent behind it or not.
3) What constitutes "a simple question" is also subjective. I could ask "Are you SURE you're not a homosexual who likes to juggle cum?" in a (false) polite manner, and then proceed to do so six more times in a row. If you show any signs of annoyance or irritation to me, I could then deem you as "rude" and proceed to sucker punch you or shoot you in the face by your own irrational and arbitrary logic you've said in this post.
4) See the previous examples above.
You are not a mind reader, nor an experienced psychologist. "Rudeness" is always subjective. You're objectively wrong. That's all I have to say about it.
I also didn't even bring up things like mental illness, or Tourette's, or fear causing someone to "act rudely" to another, such a 5'2" woman not speaking to a friendly 6'8" man who wanted to ask her out on a date while she's walking home from the gym or grocery store at 9pm at night.
It is a foolish notion to suggest people are arbitrarily rude without a reason for it, just because you as an individual cannot comprehend that reason or think it's "good enough." This is why the premise of this post is horrible on so many levels and operates on sheer ignorance. And no, I'm not judging.
If someone is rude to me and I never met that person, I’m going to tell that person to go f*ck themselves. And rightly so. You can’t go around being an asshole and expect everyone to just give you the other cheek. It’s common sense, not rocket science pal.
I find it funny how you are trying to justify rude behavior using all kinds of fallacious reasoning. Ironically rude people are usually the bad guys in all of your examples, guess your critical thinking failed you there.
@MCheetah It’s actually you who is wrong, it’s not my fault you have faulty logic and reasoning. Every example you mentioned are simply about teaching rude people lessons in humility. But again your logic is too faulty to understand.
Also self defense isn’t synonymous with rudeness, “smart” one. Talk about a non sequitur fallacy. Self defense is simply a response to unprovoked physical hostility, while rudeness is unprovoked hostility.
Unlike every other person on this thread who I berated to help them understand what rude is…because apparently they’re confused, I have much respect for you and will state my point differently. I’ll simply say that no adult should need to explain to another adult what rude is.
We all know that the following is rude and disrespectful:
1. Name calling 2. Giving someone unprovoked attitude 3. Shit talking someone to their face…or behind their back. 5. Acting as if your superior 6. Making smart ass comments 7. Backhanded complements 8. More stuff I don’t feel like typing.
We all know doing any of this unprovoked and is not ok and that we should not need to explain this to adults.
Sorry but this is a rare instance I must respectfully disagree with your point of view.
Also take note I articulated my disagreement WITHOUT calling you an idiot or saying your stupid for your opinion…this seems to be a fine art these days. People seem unable to disagree often without having to result to slander.
I fully agree with @ronaldo75, rudeness isn’t subjective and as a society we used to know exactly what constituted rudeness.
Then the definition of "rude" would just be relentlessly attacked by everyone who wanted their opponents targeted. Any social system can work if everyone agrees - including a dictatorship. The problem is that will never happen. People will always disagree. Even if you rationalize just killing off everyone who disagrees with you, in a mere 20 years all your children will disagree anew, and you can't kill them off (or at least not rationally).
The only system that exists that works when everyone disagrees is democracy. Democracy is the idea that every law or policy must run the gauntlet of ensuing everyone it affects given a chance to weigh in before it becomes official. The main drawback is that it necissarily makes any work slow moving, but this is also the main feature as the longer it takes the better chance for everyone to weigh in. However, response to emergencies are not sometjing tjat can move slowly, by their nature, and so those systems of authority and resources must be established in advance.
to your update: you say "Rudeness is not subjective, it’s unprovoked verbal hostility which can sometimes lead to unprovoked physical hostility."
Assuming that is how it is defined, then rudeness is as subjective as unprovoked verbal hostility is subjective. Who is to say when someone feels others are being hostile towards them? If someone is feeling threatened by you, you can't just say "no you aren't because I didn't intend it that way." What is hostility is subjective. What is unprovoked is also subjective in much the same way. And, because these are both 'feelings,' it's almost impossible to separate the genuine from those who lie about feeling that way to cause grief for their enemies.
as to your other point, preventing rude people from gaining positions of authority doesn't make them any less rude. And "punishable by a fine" just means legal for a price. What do you do with a rude person that can't pay their fine? Take them to prison? How do you prevent the prison guards from being rude? If the prison is going to be anything but rude to the prisoners you're basically going to have to pay for the prisoners to stay in a luxury resort, which if the dictator had that kind of money to throw at poor people in the first place maybe he should have and they wouldn't have ended up so rude. It's cheaper to just march them all to a pit, shoot them en mass, and cover it with dirt - and that's exactly what dictators have been doing for at least a century.
I'm saying that's what would happen. And if you went for a fixed definition of rude, rude people would attack the words used in that definition. But to be clear I'm not defending this, I'm saying it is what would happen. Because such things have already happened. There's even a name for it called "arguing in bad faith." Under your proposed system when someone wants something that someone else has, they will not seek to earn it but rather bend all efforts towards figuring out how to call the other person rude and themselves their victim. And once they have decided to do that, there's not really a lowest low, as there is no one to ensure there be one.
There's a difference between being rude and being violent. Let the rude people simply get what's coming to them based on the consequences of their actions that the individual who receives their rudeness repays them with. As some will simply walk away from rude behavior while others will react to it because "today they had time." And whooping the rude person's ass would be one of them. HA!
Isn't targeting and confronting people by definition rude? So wouldn't he have to target and confront himself each time he targets and confronts someone else. Then he would have to target and confront himself for targeting and confronting himself. It would go exponentially bigger until the world imploded.
Just curious, do you also find it gravely concerning so many people on this post and in society are confused as to what defines rude?
I remember a time not so long ago when pretty much everyone was clear on what appropriate conduct is and what is considered rude and disrespectful. I remember a time when talking shit right to a persons face in a non joking way was probably going to result in an ass kicking. WTF happed?
Agreed. This seems to have started with the millennials. Generally speaking, with my generation and older ones proper conduct was taught and understood. Mocking someone, name calling, and insults of any type were understood to be a form of aggression. It was likewise understood that men are accountable for their words. That talking in such way unprovoked may result in a fight. As my father used to say: “never let your mouth write a check your ass can’t cash.”
Now it is acceptable to talk any kinda way. These younger sissies know it’s perfectly legal to be turd, and will run their mouths without checks and balances. They’ll simply sue you when they get their asses kicked.
People used to have duels over this kind of thing a and kill each other literally. Now it’s nearly considered acceptable.
Rudeness is selfish and aggressive. Aggression must not be unchecked.
This is what happens when you tell generations of people they’re special and important and likewise give them no real consequences for poor behavior. They grow up to be punks who have no honor and no virtue.
Now we have a whole page full of people who think this type of thing is subjective.
Dictators do not target groups as you have suggested. This is pure fantasy, like what if you woke up tomorrow morning and you had a third arm growing out of the middle of your back?"
There are no consequences for being rude. Used to be people were held accountable for their words.
Now little punk bitches run their mouths unchecked. It’s completely legal to be a total A hole, but as soon as you pop them in the mouth they call the police and sue, resulting in you being considered a violent criminal. Bye bye guns. Bye bye job. Bye bye $.
We need to revert to the time when it was understood there are lines and if you cross them expect to fight.
Lol, you're the one in the wrong if the police and the courts are considering you a violent criminal.
Bruh, assault is a crime and it comes with consequences.
You being a criminal in response for people hurting your feelings with words is your own damn fault. How fragile are you that words send you into such an uncontrolled rage that you wind up charged with criminal activities such that you lose your gun rights and job?
You being an uncontrolled lunatic is not the fault of some mouthy teen. That's your own damn doing, lol.
Damn, the lack of personal accountability in you is ironic considering your first sentence.
Exactly my point. You can feel free to be an odious and deplorable cunt as evidenced by your reply because it’s perfectly legal to be a worthless cunt.
Not about hurt feelings. It’s about disrespect. Letting assholes disrespect you sends the message they can do to you as they please. Aggression, even verbal aggression must be checked or you have made it clear you are an easy target, and of course degenerate animals will size the opportunity to gratify their egos further at your expense. Little bitches feel comfortable disrespecting people because they know there are no real consequences. In fact that’s why you’re running your bitch mouth right now. No real consequences so no real reason to temper you speech.
The only thing that’s iconic here is your cunty behavior.
Also. I’m no criminal. I’ve never committed a crime and never will. My point is the law does not allow adequate means of ensuring little punk bitches keep their mouths shut. So they can feely diminish your character without a real reason not to.
Like I said baby. No real consequences for being a punk.
If only some politician with one hand tied to their balls would rewrite some legislation allowing assholes to experience consequences for being turds society would be immediately more respectful.
Not to many people are going to risk a physical altercation daily for being slack in controlling their mouth and their asshole tone of voice.
So what you're saying is you're a weak person and value oppression over liberty. Makes sense that you can't handle liberty and want to shred it.
Not sure if you're an American or not, but this is a perfect example why our Constitution is so important. You sir, are the true threat to liberty and freedom.
He would be killing MANY "UNSURE" as not to miss any...
First you will have to formulate the helix disposition... genetic make-up for said Determinant. The size of heads, German way,... or size of penis... or breast... or butt ETC will not suffice... :) Interesting post !!
People who are just rude aren't the kind of people I'd Target. Don't get me wrong I'm not totally against a tyrannical rule that sends the Gestapo on drunk drivers and people who drive without insurance but that's different from people who are just rude.
Like if a tyrannical regime were to aim for somebody there's a lot better they could aim at than some prick who handed out one too many traffic tickets.
A good example is child abusers and drunk drivers. I totally wouldn't mind if these two types of people got sent into labor camps to go work in unsanitary coal mines for the rest of their life.
All that would happen is the definition of rude would be changed by a well-paid and thus compliant media complex to reflect what the person in power’s political enemies looked like or said. There isn’t a political or legislative solution.
Rudeness is relative to interpretation. Some people may find simple hi as rude while other won't mind if you even called them as if you were friends for long. So how would justice be carried? Won't he eventually become a tyrant.
Also remember that in this world everything is relative and subjective. L
Here we go again. Another little cunt who thinks rudeness is relative to interpretation.
I guess you’re right though, in my interpretation of rudeness it’s fine to call you and idiot. Also stupid. Not only that but a deplorable and odious little faggot. Well I gotta go. Got no time to explain rudeness vs basic respect to a chicken shit little cocksuckers like you. Anyway, have a nice day and eat a bag of dicks asshole.
Interesting how in 3 years, the view count remained exactly the same. I also had trouble finding the video, even typing the exact title in the search bar showed nothing but joe Rogan.
I can see your point. Not that they’re separate issues though. Quality parenting can mitigate greed and ignorance in children, and the adults they become as a result.
@OddBeMe I don’t go to night clubs too many weirdos. But I have heard stories of bouncers causing trouble. It’s funny when they mess duty the wrong person.
Home > Society & Politics > Polls > If a dictator were to rise in the near future that only targeted rude people, would the dictator be considered a hero or a tyrant?
Girl's Behavior 
Guy's Behavior 
Flirting 
Dating 
Relationships 
Fashion & Beauty 
Health & Fitness 
Marriage & Weddings 
Shopping & Gifts 
Technology & Internet 
Break Up & Divorce 
Education & Career 
Entertainment & Arts 
Family & Friends 
Food & Beverage 
Hobbies & Leisure 
Other 
Religion & Spirituality 
Society & Politics 
Sports 
Travel 
Trending & News 
