Imagine thousands, if not, millions of employees and stockholders depending on you. Your life would be so restricted; your health would have to be constantly monitored, and you probably couldn't eat the food you love. I couldn't just travel to Southeast Asia and eat street food, for example. What if I catch a stomach virus and my company's stocks drop?
Oh yes. I have no intention of ever trying for wealth of that calibre. People look at the extremely rich and think it's all roses and rainbows and that they go anywhere and do whatever they want when they want, it's not the case at all. If you want that kind of money you have to sacrifice your time, completely. And the people who do get to those levels in career and income are those who are workaholics enough to put in grueling hours 24/7, they also often have very poor social skills, are the kind of people who are hard to get along with and disagreeable which they have to be as high profile chiefs in order to mentally survive managing such immense structures where everything is always on you, they have little to no meaningful relationships because they do not have the time, and depression even suicide is rife. Because it doesn't add up to much in the end when you build your life around money.
Balance is key. There's plenty of career options who generate very good money but also give plenty of free time.
Most Helpful Opinions
Well first of all if you're a CEO you probably don't give a damn about your employees. They're just another resource. But yes, you have a responsibility to your shareholders. Honestly most company executives are interchangeable. It's only pressure if you're a routinely bad one. Why would you eat poor people street food if you're a highly paid exec? And yes your time would be infringed upon a lot but you'd be highly compensated for it if you're any good.
If I have all that I need then money will not add to my happiness unless I'm so rich I can afford to have humongous gardens in my yard. I also do not want too much if it subtracts from what other people have so I would not want to be a CEO unless I believed my work helped the others who were there.
There’s a reason why those CEOs hired tons and tons and tons of employees in the first place and it’s so they can avoid all the work. Those people are making money not doing a ton of work while your lowest paid worker in the company are probably doing the most work.
What Girls & Guys Said
Opinion
11Opinion
I don't think you understand how little a CEO does in an established company. You could easily travel, get sick, and have a minimal impact on the company.
They don't care. A they care about is lining their own pockets.
9 times out of 10 they were a finance major and it's nothing but a numbers game at that point.
Nope. I'd be good at it and not sell out my company for woke ESG points.
I don't think it would suck. You could always cash out if you got tired of it.
the company doesn't depend in them. once they're gone they get replaced and stocks recover
Yes it would suck. If I did I would want to be the CEO right where the employees are getting my hands dirty and get feed back from them. Kind of like undercover boss.
Naw I’d like being that smart but I’m fine being dumb ol’ me whatev
Some CEOs are low life scum bags who get their jollies on by stepping on little people. So no sympathy for them.
Yeah, I would bounce after the first 100 mil.
Seems rather stressful.
It sucks a lot
Learn more
We're glad to see you liked this post.
You can also add your opinion below!