5.7K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. What would you like to know about it?
It is very real.
Global warming, which is really what is happening, is really basic physics and any junior or senior undergraduate in physics would understand why global warming is occurring.
In fact, it was first predicted in 1896 - that's 1896, not 1996 - by Nobel Prize-winning Swedish physical chemist Svante Arrhenius. (You learn about him in high school chemistry class; Google Arrhenius Number.).
You can read more about Svante Arrhenius here:
His 1896 paper was :
On the Influence of Carbonic Acid in the Air upon the Temperature of the Ground
Svante Arrhenius
Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science
Series 5, Volume 41, April 1896, pages 237-276.(Carbonic acid results from mixing carbon dioxide with water.)
You can read that paper here:
https://www.rsc.org/images/Arrhenius1896_tcm18-173546.pdf
This video explains it:
https://www.youtube.com/embed/Le0n4mCRkzY================
So, it's no "cult" or a liberal American plot - Svante Arrhenius predicted global warming in Sweden almost 130 years ago; he did not give a shit about Americans or liberals. He was simply an excellent scientist.
Global warming / climate change is not a trivial issue. Yes, climate does evolve over time - geological time - but what is happening now in the past 200+ years is not over geological time. What is happening now is that human activities since the dawn of the Industrial Revolution have resulted in greenhouse gases entering the atmosphere at rates beyond which the natural world can remove them from the atmosphere.
(*) A greenhouse gas is any gas molecule with 3 or more atoms... like CO2. Most of the atmosphere is filled with 2-atom molecules like nitrogen N2 and oxygen O2 or the 1-atom-only noble gas argon.
Unfortunately, this is exactly what happened to Venus albeit over geological time. This is why Venus is the hottest planet in the solar system - even more so than Mercury which is much closer to the Sun.
22 Reply
Most Helpful Opinions
+1 yQuite a bit- anything in particular you'd like to know?
As a broad-spectrum rundown- manifestly, the climate changes, and frequently, in geological terms. Note the lack of glaciers covering three quarters of the planet, or a Precambrian-style ice shell encasing it. We also know that human activity can have serious effects on the climate, as seen with the rise of acid rain and the entire center of Australia (it didn't used to be a desert).
Unfortunately, the modern mainstream obsession is with a completely disproven model of the Greenhouse Effect. I'm IN Florida, right now, and I can tell you that we're NOT ten feet underwater. Now, that doesn't mean that the Greenhouse Effect isn't real, or that there's no danger in messing with the ecosystem by pumping out vast quantities of greenhouse gases, but you need to be able to admit when you were wrong, even if it was something as simple as "the numbers were off". As it stands, the environmentalist industry (and make no mistake, it's an INDUSTRY, not a movement) is akin to people stubbornly insisting, in the face of all the evidence, that the world is going to end in 1989.
Such people are most easily identified by their obsession with carbon dioxide as an existential threat. CO2 is a greenhouse gas, yes, but it's a minor one. Methane (especially in frozen hydrate form, if the clathrate hypothesis is true) is a much bigger one- but the great current threat is a looming massive spike in the production of sulfur hexafluoride- which is the single most potent greenhouse gas known to man. The primary source of emissions of it? The manufacturing of solar cells. Every produced cell (not panel, cell) releases a tiny amount of it. Given the insane (and rapidly rising) energy needs of the world, the amount of solar panels we'd have to produce to meet even just our electrical needs would leave us worse off from a Greenhouse perspective than sticking with oil.
That may change with time and research, but it's decades of heavy research (especially in the area of recycling them) away from being a viable replacement. Currently, if you want to get off of fossil fuels, you have three options:
1. go nuclear.
2. go geothermal.
3. fail.
10 Reply
+1 yIf they really want to stop climate change we would have to change our whole way of living. It’s either that or have every country have the same regulations that we here in the states have. We have the clean air act which basically says that to eliminate carbon emissions then all power plants have to have a scrubber in place. If not they are subject to close. I know one, maybe two that are still open that don’t have scrubbers in my state. We are shutting down coal mines and power plants because of who’s in the office. I mean it’s mostly coming from china. Trust me I know a lot about the clean air act and what countries are the worst for technically polluting our air and climate as a whole.
00 Reply
Anonymous(25-29)+1 yNo such thing. It’s BS. Made-up.
A pole shift happens every 2,160 years.
it naturally melts the pole and antártica. And it’ll flood everything like how it happened with Noah’s Ark.
Never believe everything you hear on TV and keep an open eye 👁️.
We are entering a new age. The Age of Aquarius. And you can confirm this by studying the stars. This means we are entering the new “2,160 years”. And for the next 2,160 years we will be in the age of Aquarius.
The only climate change. Is when you see chemtrails in the sky and that’s for weather manipulation. That’s for you to believe the weather man, and for you to believe that there are satélites floating outside the earth. 🤦🏻♀️
223 Reply
Opinion Owner+1 y
This is so that it could “rain tomorrow” like the weather man said. 🤡🤡🤡
And so that you’d believe him 🤡🤡🤡- +1 y
That is so they can dump poisonous chemicals on you and in your water supplies..
Opinion Owner+1 y@FunkyMonkee
Next time you see a chemtrail. Just wait and watch how your weather changes.
I made a whole video on this.
Yes it does affect your health but its purpose is weather manipulation.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/02oblN4C6zVA/- +1 y
That's what HAARP is for.
- +1 y
@Ptrmbrs88 Yeah, right!! Because condensation stays in the air for hours! Just like when you produce some with your mouth in the winter! That cloud from your breath just sits there in mid hair for hours, doesn't it?
Contrails evaporate almost immediately, chemtrails don't!! Learn the difference, kid!
How many planes make U-turns in mid air? The only ones I've seen were those pumping out chemtrails! - +1 y
@FunkyMonkee There are many reasons why what comes out of your mouth doesn't behave the way condensation trails that are caused by aircraft do, and I would encourage you to actually look into this rather than just spouting off and embarrassing yourself online, KID!
- +1 y
@Ptrmbrs88 I already have, years ago!! Back when you were busy filling up your diapers! Your turn!!
- +1 y
@FunkyMonkee Oh really? You were researching this topic when you also were wearing nappies then, because we're actually the same age - 55.
(I botched the date when I signed up. Shame we can't change it once it's already done. Oh well) - +1 y
@Ptrmbrs88 It's, obviously, not the first time you botched.
Opinion Owner+1 y@ptrmbrs88
What an idiot you are. Let me guess you also believe everything said on TV? Huh SHEEP 🐑?
Bet you that you also believe that C—19 was real 🤡 Bet you that you got the magic cure as soon as it came out 🤡
I made two whole videos on this. CHEM vs CON
https://youtu.be/fubbhE9uXGk
https://youtu.be/T8ki8DBH-2s
https://youtu.be/gAO3fcrn-t8
Observe the Chemtrail. And Observe how the weather changes within HOURS of the spray.- +1 y
@FunkyMonkee Speaking of botching, you've placed two commas within a sentence that didn't need even one :)
We can't correct mistakes like that either, which is a shame. A person has to be an "editor" to do it. Why? I have no idea. - +1 y
'YouTube' conspiracy videos.
"Observe how the weather changes within HOURS of the spray" - Oh God Almighty! Really? Where I live the weather changes ALL the time, constantly, and it has nothing to do with "chemtrails" and everything to do with the weather just being what it does naturally, due to (among other things) topography, geography, weather patterns, currents, the time of day, the time of year, El Nino & and El Nina... et cetera. - +1 y
"What an idiot you are. Let me guess you also believe everything said on TV? Huh SHEEP?"
Oh right, because insulting someone is a surefire way to get that person on your side, to get them to see the validity of the point you're trying (and in your case here, failing miserably) to make. Well done! :D - +1 y
@Ptrmbrs88 www.youtube.com/watch
Opinion Owner+1 y@razelove
They even tell you about the pole shift THEMSELVES. Low-key. Look it up.
Brad Pitt. 800+ body count Brad Pitt 🖕- +1 y
Hmm, depending on your lifestyle high numbers can be easy to rack up, I think if you get over 500 with statistical proof you should be able to petition planned parenthood for sample kits and on demand blood pathogen/antibiotics, Plan B if you're a woman, Plan C is you're a guy (fake ID). At that point it's more of a service to the community rather than the person.
Even if I had gotten to that quantity though, I highly doubt the quality would be the same lol
Opinion Owner+1 y@razelove
Still.. your wife had to ABSORB your std-ridden d-k. Poor woman. And the worst part is that you look undesirable and average af.
- +1 y
Everyone has their own preferences. You are most certainly entitled to your own opinion, as my wife is entitled to hers. She wouldn't have married me if it was negative...
Anyway, if CO2 was such a big deal on the global warming/climate change front, then exothermic reactions would have collapsed the planet long before the industrial revolution. Even if there was some delicate balance with endothermic reactions, you can only take back heat from enthalpy, not entropy
A balance ultimately doesn't matter by that logic if you go by lechatlier's principle, the harder you push on one side of an equation, the less yield you get. If there is any balance, it would auto correct.
Opinion Owner+1 y@razelove
Wow now you’re a nerd geek too. Your wife probably an undesirable.
I bet you that you lied about the 500+ women you apparently f-ked.
Liar 🤥.
You’re an undesirable who never got his d-k wet and your own wife is probably the one with 800+ body count. 😂😂😂- +1 y
I said I didn't have 500+... it would have required different choices where I'm not married and existed solely for poon hounding. It's just too formulaic after about a year or two living like that. Anyway, anything I say will be trolled out, and on this thread is getting boring.
If it's another topic the verbal sparring would be fun, but this well is dry.
Opinion Owner+1 y@razelove
You’re probably one of these geek average Toms, Average Lemmings walking around.
Your body count is 4 🫵😆
What Girls & Guys Said
Opinion
78Opinion
895 opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. Mostly that it's a cult, how many computer models for "the end" have we already passed through? I seem to remember that being one of the premises Al Gore ran against George Bush on in 2000. Though unlike other cult ideologies, say Y2K, hale bop comet, cthulu, what have you, you can keep suspending climate change as a sword of damocles with new science.
Sure, the climate will change, it's why we have variations in storm seasons, crop yields, so on and so forth. We have had mass extinction events, and it's not like anyone was alive to record them regardless of our hypothesis. Looking forwards with climate change is the same thing, especially if we aren't willing to invest in nuclear power.611 Reply- +1 y
Y2K wasn't a disaster because a lot of people put a lot of effort into ensuring it wasn't. I was one of them. The Ozone layer was saved by countries coming together to ban CFCs. Acid rain that was destroying our forests was stopped by international agreements.
In all cases, we didn't just sit around and hope for the best. - +1 y
@goaded So you were one of the workers from office space... It wasn't like that was going to hit at the 2000 switch off for most terminals anyway, going by hex it would have been what, 2256 or something?
You would have had to specify in the code that only 0-9 rather than 0-f go in, ff is a totally acceptable input unless int is specified. If it's that rigid though, it's unlikely that it would only be two digits, or lacking in a support team. The ozone layer could have been a mass extinction event though.
The solution to global warming, if it was serious would be a switch over to nuclear infrastructures, city vehicles with power to only run a couple miles off a grid, with prohibitively expensive fuel.
It isn't too much of a stretch to partner the oil producing countries to make that happen. It isn't happening because it's just a cause for virtue signaling even for those who "take it seriously".
Electric vehicle iterations right now are a joke, and our entire supply logistics depend on diesel from tankers to trains to trucks. - +1 y
It was never a question of "just" replacing years with 4 digits or bodging in hexadecimal in a database because all the code that uses it needed changing. Which means you need to find any code, no matter how old, that deals with dates and times.
What I don't get about the oil producing countries is why they're not making the switch to solar. Most of them have an awful lot of sun, and sand they could use to store energy as heat.
It's been a while since I've seen the term "virtue signaling" used to pretend that people don't actually care about the subject at hand.
"our entire supply logistics depend on diesel from tankers to trains to trucks."
Germany's railways are mostly electrified and use renewables. They also shift a hell of a lot of freight (over 17%) by rail. A good proportion of delivery vehicles are electric as well, and Siemens is working on hydrogen powered locomotives for the non-electrified lines.
A year ago, Germany was dependent on Russian gas. Things change, if you work to change them. - +1 y
@goaded A good reason solar panels haven't taken off (as a primary power source, compared to wind) is the only ones worth investing in are cadmium telluride cells, they simply don't break down over time. Silicon does after about 20 years, and over that lifetime doesn't produce enough energy to replace itself. Germany switching to electrified rail is a good example of putting your money where your mouth is.
Modern rail is using diesel to power generators that push the motors. If the rails were powered they'd be lighter with less components to break or maintain. I still believe in nuclear more, solar may be better for Germany, but the US is much larger, same thing for tankers, though how would you power that? It's not like they can drop a hook onto the DC lines that run across the ocean, those have such high voltage and amperage anyway the boat would probably just light on fire.
I don't mind change, and would not resist it as long as the proposal is realistic. I take it as progress though, and do not believe global warming to be the threat it is made out to be. If we take moves that make us regress, it's pointless and I'd make biofuels to ride my 4 mile to the gallon 460 big block just for shits and giggles. - +1 y
I think you might be going on old information wrt solar panels; they're generally expected to last far more than 25 years (still producing about 90% of the energy they did when new after 20 years), and if they didn't generate net positive energy businesses wouldn't install them.
www.forbes.com/.../
www.consumeraffairs.com/.../...ar-panels-last.html - +1 y
@goaded Ok, I trust forbes, and technology does advance, or why would research exist. Hmm, now I kind of want to get some myself, though with a battery bank before an inverter, it would be less trouble than a generator. The break point is also much shorter than I remember it last time I looked into them.
- +1 y
I know, right? It used to be something like 15 years before break-even, now it's just 6 or 7. I imagine you can get insurance to cover the possibility of accidental damage.
You can buy some here in a DIY that you just plug into a power socket. I really have to get my round tuit and get some panels installed. There used to be a tree overshadowing the roof, but it's been gone for a couple of years now. - +1 y
@goaded Well, I stand by wanting nuclear for the primary power generation, fusion as secondary, then solar on a community level, like if you outfitted substations with solar/wind that would be ideal.
I only want it for my house because of how often we have storms blow through, I already have two breaker patterns I run depending on whether I'm running off the grid or my generator, my washboard, clothesline, so on and so forth. It's pretty common to lose power here for a day up to a couple weeks if it's a big storm. - +1 y
I can see arguments both ways on nuclear, but there was a day not long ago (yes, it was only one day) where solar power in Germany produced 22 GW, or about the same as 20 nuclear plants.
There are areas of America that have sunny days like that one almost all the time. OK, daytime, but it would power an awful lot of air conditioners! - +1 y
I was thinking more of using deserts and roofs than arable land. There are a lot of flat roofs on malls and the like, aren't there?
Last I heard, which was a few years ago now, it looked like we'd reached peak births, but that still meant the population would continue to expand for a while, yet, to 11 billion, iirc.
5.3K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. That its proper name is Global Warming, which is because of basic physics of greenhouse gasses in the atmosphere, known since the 19th century. There was a short period around the 1970s where it wasn't clear whether cooling factors would turn out to be more important, but that was quickly discounted.
A Republican advisor recommended using the term "climate change" around the turn of the century because it sounds less scary. He now regrets doing so. https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/frank-luntz-the-man-who-came-up-with-climate-change-and-regrets-it-6v6pp00pc ("[Luntz] coined the emotive term “death tax” to replace “inheritance tax”, used the words “energy exploration” to replace “offshore drilling”... He now “absolutely” regrets creating the term “climate change”. “Not only did I get it wrong, but I then needed to seek to repair it.” He is working with Republicans in Congress, “providing them a new messaging for an issue that I now recognise is seriously significant”.". It doesn't seem he had much luck.)
There is no doubt that it is happening, there is no doubt that it's man-made, and there is no doubt that the fossil fuel industry took a leaf out of the tobacco industry's play-book to push the lie of scientific doubt for decades. Their own internal documents show they knew the climate science was accurate.
23 Reply- +1 y
Climate change is just a politically correct term for snowflakes who are in denial of how fast they're melting.
- +1 y
To the lying coward who bravely insulted and blocked me: the ozone layer was definitely affected by what we did. www.bbc.com/.../20220321-what-happened-to-the-worlds-ozone-hole
+1 ySigh, no one's opinion is going to be changed here. Climate science is complicated -as is all science. Very few people can read the original papers, so they have to rely on what other people tell them.
We are putting a lot of CO2 in the atmosphere by burning fossil fuels. We are also putting extra methane in the atmosphere from natural gas leaks and other sources
CO2 levels are rising as measured directly on on the Mona Loa observatory and as seen in ice cores.
CO2 is a greenhouse gas - the greenhouse effect is well undestood. Methane is even stronger, but there is a lot less of it - but both contribute.
The effect of global warming is not easy to calculate, or even measure, but sea levels are rising as measured using satellites (nothing to do with land rising or sinking) and ice area is decreasing.
I don't expect the end of the world but it will be disruptive.
We have the technology to fix it and improve our standard of living if there were fewer idiots in the world
Sadly there are a lot of idiots
04 Reply- +1 y
@Ptrmbrs88 sealevel.nasa.gov/.../global-mean-sea-level has a lot of graphs
- +1 y
I asked for a specific example. You know, like how some people are panicking because they think that certain Pacific Island nations are going under (but they're actually not). Your link provides a definition of terms, but nothing else, and states that "Global sea levels have been rising for decades in response to a warming climate", without providing ANY evidence whatsoever to back up that claim. If sea levels have risen, then why hasn't this "fact" been reflected in changes to maps over the decades?
- +1 y
@Ptrmbrs88 There is a graph showing average sea level rise and a map showing rise by location.
https://sealevel.nasa.gov/internal_resources/443 shows more detail of the rise, over the entire globe. Parts of polynesia show 10-15cm rise. Not sure what you are looking for.
These are measurements from satellite data.
+1 yThe earth is 4.4 billion years old.
We have only been keeping accurate records of the weather for around 150 years.
Earths climate always ebbs and flows.
Are humans effecting it some, yes.
Look at how nature is recovering from the Chernobyl nuclear disaster.
The reason humans exist is because of all the drastic and cataclysmic events that occurred long before us and will continue long after we fall victim to that huge extinction event similar to what wiped out dominant species before us.
It is always a possibility that after humans are extinct, that future intelligent life will be using what is left of us to fuel their forms of transportation. They also will fight their own World Wars for the resources they need to survive.
There are too many geological events that aren’t even visible to us that have been happening for billions of years that have a much bigger effect than any amount of our carbon emissions.
How many nukes were detonated above ground in the 1940’s and 1950’s. We haven’t gone extinct from all that destruction either.
We continue to flush all of our freshwater down our toilets. That water goes to sewage plants. That treated water is discharged into creeks, streams and rivers that mostly all empty into the world’s oceans.
Floods and droughts have been affecting humans for thousands of years. Long before the Industrial Revolution.
Can you tell me that the weather forecast is going to play out as forecasted over the next 10 days where you live?
How about if it is going to rain on March 30th, 2150?00 Reply1.3K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. scientists seem to think that they can tell things from looking at 100 years of data and can tell why something has happened.
Mother nature does not move that fast at all.
!0,000 years isn't even a blink of her eye.
A lot of the US was covered by glaciers 2.58 million years ago.
Man was not around then yet they melted and came back. The last ice age was 20,000 years ago. So, is what is happening with the ice the same as back then? History has shown that is has come and gone multiple times before, again long before humans were around. With the ice melting it could still be from the last time the ice melted. No one knows. Then it became political, and we all know how well that works out for us. Mother nature will do what she pleases when she pleases. We have found out that when we try to mess with that it never works out well, yet we never take the blame for what we screw up. Put levees up to control a river, yet they break and flood and area then the finger pointing begins. Fill in all of the wetlands and build on them, yet wetlands are part of flood control, they give excess water a place to go.
Sadly many things that have been done over the years have not worked out very well for us in the long run. Mother nature simply goes here hold my beer and watch this.02 Reply- +1 y
"Mother nature does not move that fast at all."
Apparently she does, if you pump millions of years of carbon that had been stored under the surface and put it into the atmosphere over a century or so.
If you think we couldn't possibly be affecting the globe, go and look at CFCs and the Ozone layer and, on a more local level, acid rain. They're less of a problem now because the world came together to stop creating the problem. - +1 y
@goaded I'm old enough that I lived through all of that, so I was there first hand and listened to all of that rhetoric before.
And after a while the scientists decided that the hole was there long before CFCs and what we did or didn't do had no effect on it.
We didn't all burn up, we didn't all die, all of the gloom and doom over the years just hasn't happened.
The planet has burn itself up multiple times creating way more carbon that we ever have, yet here we are. All we are is a tiny insignificant blip on mother nature's radar.
As long as we don't try to fix things everything seems to work itself out.
The planet was here long before us, and it will be here long after the last surviving human is worm chow.
But feel free to quote the tasty tid bits that you have been spoon fed buy those with the agendas.
Others will feel free to move about the cabin.
But I will bid you goodbye. My parents taught me never have a battle of wits with an unarmed person.
1.8K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. it's cyclic.
there's no proof that humans are responsible for the current state of things.
the "experts" DO NOT KNOW AND CAN'T PROVE that if we spend $50 TRILLION to be carbon neutral by 2050 how many degrees the world's temperature will drop.
and since the US only makes up 13% of the world's industrial economies there's no guarantee that bankrupting the US economy and throwing our nation into utter chaos will make any positive impact on the world's climate.
scientists are now bought and paid for. the science data available to the public is rigged in support of an agenda.
the climate disciples and prophets are doing nothing but propagating a new religion that is no less diabolic or shameful than the Spanish Inquisition.
cleopatra's palace, Nero's summer palace, there's a city of the southern tip of India... all are about 60' below the surface of the ocean. which means ocean levels have been rising for 2,000 years plus.
Obama spent about $9 MILLION on a new mansion on Martha's Vineyard. With an elevation of about 12 inches. so THAT lying piece of sh! t is not really concerned about rising seal levels.
it doesn't matter who said it, it's still relevant.
the weaponizing of climate change has become a cult of power. because if you look at the changes demanded... who will benefit and who will suffer in the long run? the rich will get richer and the poor will continue to suffer and the middle class will disappear.
01 Reply6K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. It's a total scam, just like covid. It's an excuse to impose control over populations via "emergency measures". It's also a scheme for giant corporations to monopolize Earth's resources and make shit tons of money.
Pollution is a huge problem. But the idea of global warming due to excessive CO2 levels is absurd. The planet feasts on CO2. It gobbles it up. Plants, in particular, thrive on it. Therefore, food production increases with higher levels of CO2.
And, when looking at CO2 levels throughout Earth's history, we are at an all time low.31 Reply- 7.4K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
+1 yIt's always changing,
Humans look like we've impacted it to change faster/more eraticallly.
We're in for some trouble as change increases and we should make some changes in how we live.
What we are doing looks uniwise... electric cars, electric everything. The war (s) are doing great damage, and china and india are not cooperative to help.
Change your lifestyle as best you can, be as wise as you can in how you live. plant some trees.
Try not to become a victim of it... and enjoy the additional heat as it sometimes produces better crops... it may as well contribute to starvation. So enjoy eating and living while you can.
00 Reply - 1K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
+1 yWhat I can say is that it is far more a form of political manipulation than a scientific concern. The left uses it as a tool of manipulation to create a fake crisis in order to induce you to give up your freedom in return for a promise of protection from a threat that doesn't exist. The earth has gone through phases of climate change since it was formed. The process is very very slow. Human beings are adaptable. There will be plenty of time for the human species to adapt to any changes. It's not a crisis except in the minds of those who fall for the scam.
I would be far more concerned that Biden and the Democrats have the world on the brink of nuclear war with China and Russia because of their weak handling of foreign policy, or the threat of terrorists and drug gangs infiltrating the country over the Democrat's open borders, than a change of a couple of degrees in the weather over the next 100 years.
10 Reply
+1 yThe earth is getting hotter each year. The sun's carbon takes 8 minutes to reach the earth and it's killing ocean life because of the intensity. Certain species are having trouble adapting. The bee population is shrinking and if the bees become extinct, we won't survive.
The bees pollinate the flowers and help things grow. The earth growing hotter will eventually wipe out existence. Not because of the heat, but because of the after-effects it plays in the ecosystem. A lot of politicians don't care about it and some even say it's nothing, especially Republicans for some reason. It's a major problem and is already affecting certain species.
There are people working on this problem right now. Hopefully, the scientists working on it come up with a solution.
03 Reply- +1 y
People would stop killing bees if they'd stop stinging us for no reason!!
I was sitting on the porch steps one sunny afternoon playing my bass player's bass (unplugged, only I could hear it). A bee landed on my arm and I let it crawl up my arm. I figured, it won't bother me if I don't bother it. Then the little fucker stung me!!
A bee that stings loses it's stomach and, therefore, commits suicide!! If bees are so scared to die, why do they keep committing suicide by stinging people that aren't bothering them? - +1 y
@FunkyMonkee Lol, right! This time of year, they are out in swarms. Bees don't die a lot of times when they sting. That's an old wise tale parents used to tell kids when they stepped on them in the backyard. It really has nothing to do with the stinger. Sometimes they die because someone actually stepped on them and squashed them or swatted them and smashed them in the process. If the bee does die after it stings, it probably has something to do with the way it stung.
Killing one or two won't really mess with the population. I'm allergic to them and when it comes down to him or me, bam! lol.
The bee wanted to start a war with you. The return of the killer bees 2.0! - +1 y
No old wives tale, they actually lose their stomachs. That's where the venom comes from.
Well, that was in the mid `80's when I got stung so, we still had killer bees, back then.
12.1K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. The climate always changes. It is controlled by a confluence of a number of factors, including..
*The brightness of the sun and sunspot activity.
*The various movements of the earth in it orbit, axis, etc.
*Plate tectonics.
*Volcanic activity.
*Agricultural and land clearing activities.
*Industrial and automotive emissions.
*Glacial cycles.The global warming movement is a strategy to control the lifestyles of people, more power and more money for self proclaimed elites. It is the greatest scam in history.
10 Reply- 324 opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
+1 yJust this. The climate changes. It's what it does. It's changed thousands of times throughout Earth's existance. There's been a thousand cataclysms that have wreaked havoc on the Earth across the 3.7 billion years that life has been on this planet. Meteors, supervolcanoes, meteors again, Ice ages, solar flares, cosmic radiation, etc and life is still flourishing and thriving. I don't believe that the 200 year blip that we've been burning gasoline was enough to permanantly damage the ecosystem.
Is pollution real? Yes. Is it a problem? Yes. Should we deal with said problem? Absolutely. But is not even close to the end of the world. Not by a longshot.
00 Reply If it was real and the oceans were rising no bank in the world would finance buying ocean front property. As it would all be under water in 20 years. Think about that for a minute. Also islands wouldn't be inhabited. Hawaii would be under water, England and the rest of the UK would be under water. Australia would be gone. If it was the case governments would be moving everyone away from the coast lines everywhere around the world. It's a made up myth for governments to take more control.
Now to natural climate change that is real. Its happened several times over the years. The planet will always change.15 Reply- +1 y
AND, if it's real, why do people that push it HAVE ocean-front homes? Barry Soetoro just bought a $10,000,000 ocean-front home in the north east!
- +1 y
Yeah! A sanctuary city where they refused to take in any of the illegals that were bussed there!!
- +1 y
BIG TIME!!
We want you here!! (Just not in MY neighborhood!)
3.2K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. Overblown end time ideology similar to " you should be a good Christ otherwise god starts a new deluge"
It's good possible environmental pollution with chemicals and microplasitc will kill us due lack of biologically active soils and chemically clean water but surely not with greenhouse effect.20 Reply
+1 yI think the strangest one is that Lake Powell is drying up. I am a former employee at lake Powell and there has always been environmental problems because the dam in built in to sandstone. The thing you have to remember is that it is not actually a lake but a dammed reservoir for power and water. The water level is way above what it should be because it is the Colorodo river. The Colorodo used to flow in to the Pacific Ocean which it does not and has not for 30 years. This is the direct result of a man made Dam not climate change.
00 Reply2.5K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. The science of it is correct. Radiative forcing leads to climate change and human activity is causing an increase in that. We are already recording average temperature rises across the world.
The scary thing is that the cost of ameliorating this is very high and a lot of pur governments and institutions rely on the fossil fuel economy. This results in large and influential companies and people spreading misinformation and denial.
Unfortunately, it will be too late to act when the worst results are already upon us.
00 ReplyI trust the experts, i. e. climate scientists.
I don't trust random non-experts like Bjørn Lomborg, Jordan Peterson, or all the right-wing skeptics who seem to always take the most destructive position on every topic, whether it is a deadly pandemic, Russia's invasion of Ukraine, or climate change.10 Reply
Anonymous(45 Plus)+1 yConsider this;
The climate is in a state of constant flux,
We only started making a detailed record of Climate/Weather around 1880,
At which time we were coming out of what has been described as 'The Little Ice Age' (1300 to around 1850) actual temperature of the Earth before this time was at 'Best Guess' was approx 2deg C warmer than now.
Is it any wonder that the overall temperature of the planet is rising, coming as it does out of that prolonged cold period which it has been speculated to have been caused by large volcanic eruptions.
Climate is changing and will continue to change and to think that the human species will effect it to any great extent is the hight of arrogance.
00 Reply27.1K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. It is a hoax. Most people that are pushing for this either are invested in the industries that will get tax subsidies to get people to buy into them or have some other climate scam going like Al Gore. China can't build coal fired electric plants fast enough and they are laughing all the way to the bank. America has taken a giant step backwards by participating in this giant scam.
20 Reply717 opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. I'm really concerned. There is a huge difference on weather 20 years ago versus now. I miss how the weather was back then it was pleasant and bearable too during summer. Now it's almost unbearable and I'm just worried how our next to next future generation can deal with the horrible and sudden climatic changes. I try to make sure I don't contribute to making weather worse. That's all I can do.
02 Reply- +1 y
I remember in the '00s everyone was talking about how they were worried about "the future". As time passed over the past 2 years, the more and more that future feels like now.
m +1 y@Ad_Quid_Orator So true. It's scary.
This question is so dumb , why because you capitalist know better. You still buying that crap you buy on Amazon kill the environment
you know that the government will not fix it until it broken and if they do how the f they going to pay for it with 31 trillion in debt back by no oil or gold. Oh yea just keep printing money like Germanyback to your question you should focus more current state of earth core. Look like the solid iron and nickel has become a liquid. That’s recipe for disaster. Earth could lose its balance and turn sideways. The problem is that earth stops but everyone will be flying at one direction at almost 1000mph.
it like when you crash with your car , on impact the car stops but you don’t00 Reply3.7K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. Climate change is a real thing it’s 100% natural. There’s nothing humans can do about it. During one day of the Permian. More carbon was released in one day than within 100 years of burning fossil fuels. This. Was known as the great dying where nine out of 10 species died. So, even if we were all fossil fuels today went all green energy we would still be screwed. Because humans have nothing to do with climate change
00 Reply- 1.2K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
+1 yIt’s all bs.
The politicians that push that narrative are more than likely invested in green technology companies, so when they push legislation that ban anything that isn’t green, and as such forces people to buy the Green alternative the stock price for those said companies sky rockets. Then they cash out and become filthy rich.10 Reply
+1 yThere is really nothing we can do about it and everything we are currently doing ultimately doesn’t solve the problem and what happens next is ah…… Just enjoy life and do what you can, because this has spiraled so far out of control that what we are likely to do next will shock you.
03 Reply- +1 y
What's there to do about nothing?
- +1 y
@FunkyMonkee Not the right question.
- +1 y
Sounds like the right question, to me! There's no such thing as global warming so, there's nothing to BE done about it!
Anonymous(25-29)+1 yI’d say it’s real. It might not be entirely man made but we’re obviously contributing to it. A 30 year trend of higher increases in global temperatures in conjunction with higher levels of greenhouse gasses in the atmosphere is difficult to ignore. Ignoring science for political reasons will have dire consequences.
022 Reply- +1 y
And, ya know what? The same shit's going on on Uranus!! How is what WE'RE doing here effecting THAT planet millions of miles away?
Opinion Owner+1 yNo the same stuff is not happening on Uranus. The planet experiences dynamic periods of heating and cooling, most likely due to massive turbulent storms on the planet. Greenhouse gasses display properties of absorbing heat energy and reradiating that energy, some of it obviously back towards the earth. It’s entirely predictable that global temperatures rise along with a rise in greenhouse gasses. It’s just common sense and there’s decades of correlating data to back that up. Everyone has a right to be wrong though.
- +1 y
Thank you, Mr. Science! Problem is, we already know that it IS going up up there!
Opinion Owner+1 y@FunkyMonkee That’s the problem with you science deniers. You think you know better than the educated folks who have spent a lifetime studying climate. It’s ok though. Someday things will deteriorate to a point that you won’t be able to
deny it any longer for political reasons.- +1 y
Sorry, I'm a science BELIEVER!! I don't just fall for every bit of bullshit the media tells me to believe!! I guess you believe in that hockey stick bullshit, too. THAT is all made-up bullshit FOR political reasons, you're just too dumb to understand that!!
"But, 93% of scientists say..." Yeah, 93% of the 3% that were asked who they already knew were GONNA say that!!
As I said elsewhere here, if climate change is real, why did Barry Soetoro just buy a $10,000,000 mansion ON THE OCEAN-FRONT?
And, why do all those climate change people fly in PRIVATE JETS to make all the climate change meetings? Haven't they ever heard of video conference calls? And, I'm SURE all the talking they do at these meeting contributes to their global warming!! All that hot air they emit when they talk!! I just saw 2 days ago a report of Joe Biden taking a 19 car convoy out from the white house just to buy a fucking ice cream cone!! No carbon foot print there, I guess!!
Opinion Owner+1 yDenying obvious science does not make you a science believer in any sense of the world. Your opposition is purely political and you don’t have a rational counter argument. For instance, are you disputing the documented scientific properties of greenhouse gasses? Are you disputing the way it’s measured in the atmosphere? Are you disputing global temperatures? If so, what evidence are you basing those opinions on? What you’re saying is politically motivated. You know it and I know it. You’ll all go down in history as present day flat earthers and your descendants will have to clean up your mess.
- +1 y
Your "obvious" science is BULLSHIT!! I believe in REAL science!!
Opinion Owner+1 y@FunkyMonkee That’s what I thought. You don’t have a rational argument for your belief. It’s pure politics and pure BS. Thank you for confirming.
- +1 y
You don't have one! I have better things to do with my time than look for stuff you can look for yourself, if you weren't so scared shitless of learning the truth!
Opinion Owner+1 y@FunkyMonkee That’s about as brainless a reply as I’d expect. Lol
- +1 y
Oh, well!! Why is it you have ALL THIS FREE TIME to delve into BULLSHIT "facts" but NONE to check out REAL facts? THAT'S pretty brainless!!
Opinion Owner+1 y@FunkyMonkee “Real” facts are documented and peer reviewed science. There are very few climatologists anywhere in the world who disagree with accepted science and those few that do usually have motives that aren’t scientific (like you). Those outlier opinions are bought and paid for by corporations who do not want to comply with environmental regulations……and you’re down on your knees helping their agenda even though it’s not in your best interest. Talk about brainless.
- +1 y
You mean, very few that are bought and paid for!!
www.youtube.com/watch
Opinion Owner+1 y……and you’re not at all concerned that this guy is a mechanical engineer and not a scientist? He has no formal education in climatology. We might as well ask my chiropractor what he thinks. Good god.
- +1 y
Nope! He's stated his credentials AND shown proof of what he's talking about!
Opinion Owner+1 yI looked the dude up. He has a degree in mechanical engineering and was involved in planning and testing missile defense systems and satellites. He has no expertise in climate science. I’m gonna go out on a limb and say a non-scientist probably has done no research of his own to refute accepted science. I realize why you latch onto these kooks, there aren’t actual scientists who will tell you what you want to hear.
- +1 y
Here, check out this guy!
https://youtu.be/LmmmgiPha_Y
Opinion Owner+1 y@FunkyMonkee No thanks. I’m not interested in any more YouTube kooks. I’ll look at real scientific research if you have any but not propaganda videos. Sorry.
- +1 y
Lol!! A kook that did loads of physical research by drilling several miles into the ice up north!! Okay, whatever!! The only kook here is you and anyone that still believes in climate change and global warming!!
Opinion Owner+1 y@FunkyMonkee You mean only me and 97% of climate scientists? There is always going to be a few opinions that are outliers for reasons unknown. I’ll stick with the overwhelming majority opinion. Greenhouse gas molecules absorb and reradiate heat in all directions. It’s common sense that some of that heat is directed back towards the earth. It would be miraculous if that didn’t happen. To say that more heat radiating molecules in atmosphere doesn’t cause a rise in temperature defies logic. It really does. Now, to say that climate change is completely man made is a leap of faith because there have been historical periods of climate change in the past. However, we are clearly contributing to it and it can be demonstrated how. Your opinion just doesn’t make sense.
- +1 y
Yeah, you and 97% of the 3% of the scientists that were asked about it.
Opinion Owner+1 yWhere does the heat from the molecules go, if not into the atmosphere? That’s a question that’s hard to get around. Do the Jewish space lasers neutralize it? What is the science that gives an alternate explanation? This isn’t even a complicated issue. It’s astoundingly simple. How does the heat not radiate into the atmosphere?
It has always, constantly and naturally changed since the beginning of time…. And it will continue to chance throughout our lifetimes / existence.
With that said though, the climate change portrayed today is all about control and investment (making money / receiving government subsidies / receiving government funding). It certainly isn’t the emergency portrayed.
00 Reply
+1 yIt’s all a load of rubbish to scare the zombies into compliance.
There’s no climate change it’s all a part of the WEF’s plan to make us all live in 15 minute cities, have no cars, not be able to travel anywhere and to be locked down over and over due to some fake pandemic or whatever they think necessary.
You’ll own nothing eat bugs and be happy.
People need to wake up before it’s to late or we’re all screwed.00 Reply- 1.2K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
+1 yIt always does, cars contribute a bit to it, but electric cars are not currently a solution as the mining for materials alone causes massive environmental damage and the electricity to charge the batteries will still be produced in large part by fossil fuels.
00 Reply 1.1K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. Writing a two hours essay would be just getting started.
And frankly I can't be bothered to argue with loonies on the internet.
Reality doesn't care about their feelings and the further it progresses the more silly they will look like.
Like flat earthers, except that flat earthers cause no harm.
00 Reply1K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. It is all cycles. In the united States a few years ago down south we had a bad storm witch they said was a hundred year storm. One like that comes every hundred years. In the west it was a two hundred year storm. Just as the earth spins and goes around the sun in a 365 and a 1/4 day cycle, so does everything else have it own cycles. Including climate... Even comets come and go in cycles. That is how they know when it will be back around.
00 ReplyIt used to be referred to as "global warming", but people began to realise that the Earth wasn't warming up, so they had to change the name of it to something both neutral and vague, so "climate change" it became.
It's one of the 21st century's fastest growing religions, along with the 'Simulation Hypothesis' cult.
00 Reply688 opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. It's a hoax. Always has been.
Sure the climate does change but it's not an extinction event. And even if it was we are powerless agaisnt it.
It's just a popular scare tactic that helps winning elections.00 Reply- 4.7K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
+1 yMan made climate change is already proved beyond a reasonable doubt.

Thank You Al Gore, you're super awesome! 10 Reply
+1 yThe climate is always changing. They’re usually wrong and they just want control and power. You can’t have a wood stove, can’t have a gas or diesel engine vehicle, you can’t do anything.
10 Reply
+1 yScience Fact: My state was under a mile thick slab of glacier ice just 10,000 years ago. It didn't disappear because cave dwellers were driving SUV's.
00 Reply- 4.8K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
+1 yi care that people suffer but as genius sheldon pointed out in big bang series, something unstable means always changing so for that a change is not changing.
00 Reply
+1 yIt’s real and it’s bad. But also the responsibility doesn’t entirely lie on us. It’s the governments and heads of states responsibility. Only they can make the big change. Nothing seems to come out of any COPs.
01 Reply- +1 y
Sure it is! That's why Barry Soetoro just bought a $10,000,000 ocean-front house! He's LAAAAAAUGHIN' his malada ass off as people like you for falling for this shit!!
+1 yIt's pretty much all fake and being used as an excuse for governments to control people.
30 ReplyThe climate has been changing for billions of year and with continue to change. There is nothing humans can do to prevent climate change.
10 Reply- 6.3K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
+1 yClimate change is inevitable. Our planet has gone through several major changes in climate over its billion year history. Sometimes, we humans help it happen.
00 Reply 3.6K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. It is not something I think about.
10 Reply3.6K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. climate change has been going on for billions of years and will continue so for billions of years after we're long gone
00 Reply
Anonymous(30-35)+1 yClimate change is a normal pattern in the history of the earth and it’s common for the earth to have freezing periods as well as warmer periods. But I do think human impact has increased how rapidly these patterns take place.
00 Reply- 685 opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
+1 yThanks for reminding me. While we're at it...
00 Reply - 3.5K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
+1 yWhat else can you say about it, besides its really bad and even worse no government actually do something about it, and many just make it even worse.
00 Reply - 345 opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
+1 yEver seen a picture of the continents from millions of years ago? I wonder if the cave men and dinosaurs called it climate change as the continents shifted and temperatures changed.
00 Reply That it's happening and we should probably be doing something to minimize our impact on the world
00 Reply- 1.7K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
+1 yAt this point I quit saying anything. Nobody listens and I won't be alive to see the endgame. I'm fortunate that the area I live in isn't subject to flooding.
00 Reply - 789 opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
+1 yI could now start writing a pages long essay here about every documentary I saw, IPCC reports I read and university lectures I attended, but its 11pm here and dont really have the spirit.
00 Reply - 1.5K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
+1 yI yearn for the days when doomsday alarmists were just Bible clenching retards.
00 Reply
+1 ydoesn't really matter much if the world is leading to destruction
00 Reply- 577 opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
+1 yThe climate changes 4 times a year. That's why we have spring, summer, winter and fall.
10 Reply 2.9K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. Global warming is good for life on the planet. As we are currently in an ice age. The last tropic age was when the dinosaurs were around. We are still living off their energy.
00 Reply1.6K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. Natural occurrence based on the cycle of ice ages. We're still on the uphill side from the last ice age so it'll be getting warmer regardless. Humans have just sped up things.
00 Reply
+1 ywell the climate is changing. I am not sure what do about it. people are trying to stop it.
00 Reply- 896 opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
+1 yThat it's bad and immediate steps must be taken.
00 Reply
+1 yBorn to be wild. With Hades God of the Underworld 🎸🎵😎
00 Reply- 6.6K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
+1 ybigger scam than covid vaccine will keep you from getting it or spreading it
10 Reply 4.5K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. Just stop creating useless buildings, and get rid of the buildings we don't need and we're all set
00 Reply
+1 yIt's a massive, ridiculous hoax designed so the leftist elites can control people and consolidate power.
00 Reply- Show More (32)
What’s your thoughts on climate change?
Learn more
We're glad to see you liked this post.
You can also add your opinion below!
Girl's Behavior
Guy's Behavior
Flirting
Dating
Relationships
Fashion & Beauty
Health & Fitness
Marriage & Weddings
Shopping & Gifts
Technology & Internet
Break Up & Divorce
Education & Career
Entertainment & Arts
Family & Friends
Food & Beverage
Hobbies & Leisure
Other
Religion & Spirituality
Society & Politics
Sports
Travel
Trending & News