Yes
No
Select gender and age to cast your vote:
Please select your age
Girl's Behavior
Guy's Behavior
Flirting
Dating
Relationships
Fashion & Beauty
Health & Fitness
Marriage & Weddings
Shopping & Gifts
Technology & Internet
Break Up & Divorce
Education & Career
Entertainment & Arts
Family & Friends
Food & Beverage
Hobbies & Leisure
Other
Religion & Spirituality
Society & Politics
Sports
Travel
Trending & News I realize this is an issue about HOMELESSNESS and everyone should have a safe place to live. But, if the place someone is choosing to squat in and on belongs to someone else and is NOT a safe place, people don't belong living there.
In addition, squatters do not pay for electricity or sewerage services to take care of their human needs for cooking, cleaning and defecating. So, they pose a health risk to others.
Most of the people who are breaking in and entering boarded homes are drug and alcohol-addicted with mental illness problems. When it's cold, as it is now even in New Orleans, squatters build fires and burn down houses as happens regularly here. Sometimes they're just cooking something and cause these issues.
The same issues occur when these folk are living beneath bridges or in public parks. Many are sick because of constant exposure to elements and the fact that few, if any, get medical care.
This all happened in the '80s when Reagan closed most of the mental health institutions because of abuses that occurred there. But this was no solution and has lead to people who refuse to live indoors because of their hallucinations/lack of medical intervention for their problems. Or with addicted people, they refuse shelters because they can't drink and smoke cigarettes or weed or whatever else they regularly use/abuse.
I know people who went to bat for homeless people only to learn a day after they were housed, they were back on the streets because of "rules" they refused to follow when living indoors.
Finally, there is the housing crisis where home prices have risen too fast for average people and families to afford them AND because of the high prices of homes, few are being built because those few can't be easily sold. Older homes are fetching top dollar, and investors and homeowners want top dollar for rentals. It's a vicious cycle.
Some of this has to do with the fact that our government isn't prioritizing mental health institutions. Those old institutions are long gone, but new ones need to take their places with staff vetted carefully and re-vetted regularly. This was never done in the past, and if it had been many if not most of these abuses would never have occurred.
Not that mental health institutions for states were properly funded, either... This has been a longstanding problem. Once ill people were put away, they were put away in the hear no, see no, speak no evil manner.
So, much has to be done on several fronts to solve these issues. And it will take years and concerted efforts with multiple agencies.
Good points.
Best opinion right here. Well said @Screenwriter šÆ
@HawkPerception I do try my best.
Think squatters rights is bullshit. I personally was affected by this very thing, having squatters in our rental, & due to California having very pro-renters/anti-landlord laws, found this out the hard way. We were informed by the police, that Due to the fact that this bitch lived at the location for over a year, this degenerate & trespasser now effectively has ārightsā & weād have to go through the courts, to officially evict her. So that bitch got to stay an additional 3-4 months & cost us $2,200 to have the sheriff kick her out.
couldn't you have just gone straight to the sheriff for help?
Iāve been squatting in the same house here in New York because there are not enough affordable homes nearby. Iām part of the anti-work movement because itās my right not to have to go work for a privileged male and contribute to the consumerism thatās causing high housing prices. Itās not as easy as people think. I canāt get a job because, if the people who claim to own the house come back when Iām not there, then I have to go somewhere else to live and I cannot get a job due to my convictions about consumerism and some prior felony convictions. The most stressful thing is having to call the city when the people who claim to own the house Iām in donāt pay their electric or water bill and I have to go to the housing authority and spend hours of my valuable time getting them turned back on because water is a human right as well. I get my food delivered using my benefits card and itās getting very stressful because of how expensive food has gotten and uber and instacart charge so much now and my benefits havenāt kept up with inflation. Itās really unfair how my rights are violated.
Absolutely not! If I worked and saved and finally had enough for a downpayment on a home, BY WHAT CONCEIVABLE RIGHT does some scumbag claim to simply take it over and say, "I'm not going anywhere"? What about MY rights? Your right to swing your fist through the air ENDS where my nose BEGINS!
Opinion
26Opinion
Exactly what rights are those? Hell, who wouldn't want to live in a house and not pay a dime? No! They deserve no rights! More like charge them with trespassing and illegal entry and make them pay back rent and community service, like painting the house and cleaning up the yard of the house they squatted in. If these people squatted in the police chief's house, just wait for them to get kicked out in a jiffy.
Squatters generate costs for the owner, that's why the owner should have the right to get rid of them. It's easy in my country, just don't pay power bills three months in a row and electricity company will block power counter to the flat or house. It cost around 150$ the get the blockade away but it's always better than squatters or ex tenant who doesn't want to pay rent. Without power squatters disappear because they are parasites and want to exploit the owner. I guess it works in regions where air conditioning is necessary with taking away AC heat exchanger outside the house. I'm sure parasites don't want to sweat.
Well it depends. My parents had money problems because of health care for our grandma and if we didn't have the thing about not getting kicked off our land, we'd be homeless. What are we supposed to do with no health care let her die? And then a bank going to say you can take the trailer but get off the land and it's got no wheels. And then a company gets bought and shuts it all down all the jobs are gone and now your Daddy can't pay the bills? So we're supposed to go to the city and stay at a shelter with all those people? That's squatters rights too we'd a been raped or kidnaped and put on put on the street if we didn't have that law.
nope the homeowner should have every right to pull a gun on a squatter and drag them out of their house by force,
democrats promote things like squatter rights, and wonder why they can't win, it's their own fault but they're too retarded to even realize it
I feel VERY strongly about this! My girlfriend and I are both squirters and for too long society has had this stigma against our kind. So what if we squirt? Spray the sheets is on us as long as we do our own laundry. I say that squirters must unite and support each other.
How is it legal for someone to break into my home live there without permission but if he stays long enough without getting caught, he magically has a right to my house? Squatters rights are one of the dumbe4st laws ever made and should be abolished.
When my grandparents were in there 20s catholics couldn't get social housing. Local authorities in charge of 2 & 3 bedroom housing regularly gave housing to single women or men who were prodestant. My parents had one child and were living in a caravan by the dump. After getting turned down for a paticularly house which was going to a single woman who taught in the local prodestant school they decided to squat in it. After two or three months local authorities relented.
I think squatters are the scum of the earth. They're parasites and democratic cities gave them the ability to be.
yes. absolutely.
it's a not so cheap way for them to buy votes.
100% agree. It's just an extension of their identity politics. They spend way too much time giving special privileges to any group your average based and red-pilled person would flick off and spit on.
@d_bone_steak flick off and spit on? Talking about things @Love Doctor Brad catches What's your favorite meat substitute when pleasantly ŃŠ¾nsulting your relationship muscles? ā calls meat substitutes "catchy"?
@Rig_Stroll really? Does he catch it with his teeth? Because here he said he sinks his teeth into condoms:
Do you have a better relationship with your own throat or your back door? And what do you do to make the sausages not break while inside? ā
Nope. And if somebody tried that on my property they would get hauled out on day 1. If they tried the game of acting tough/violent they would end up regretting it.
No, letting illegal aliens live in private property is preposterous. I own firearms to protect my family and property from violators. I would consider squatters violators.
I believe they have a right to fines and jail cells.
Only insofar as that they are people and have basic human rights to things like decency. You can't have people doing wild shit like moving into someone else's property.
They're right within the American spirit.
Squatters take what they want from others that weren't able to defend their territory. That those owners didn't protect their properties better is on them. It's the American way.
You have to protect your property when it's up for sale and where you may have already moved? Preposterous! Maybe they should try and squat in the Library of Congress and see how fast they are kicked out of there.
If it is a truly abandoned property and the person is willing to repair it and live there, then I do not care. If it's some loser moving in while people are on vacation or that type of thing, no.
I felt I had to explain why I said, ānoā though 92% agree so I guess I donāt have to lol
In general no. But there are cases where buildings have been totally and genuinely abandoned where it best they get used for something
Nope. You squat on my land and don't leave that same day, you're never leaving again.
No. Unless the building has been publicly declared abandoned by the government officials for 20 years with a clear declaration posted every year on when the property becomes forfeit for public auction.
There may be a few cases I could get behind but as a whole, fuck squatters. Most are just a leach on society.
NO, not if the the property clearly shows that someone is living there.
I don't care if they are homeless, anyone who puts the rights of squatters above the rightful the owner of a property is an absolute fucking moron.
After my brutal experience with them absolutely not. If it was legal to shoot...
No! Those who do could lose there property then maybe they would see.
Isnāt it like twenty years? Or am I confusing that with something else?
When did squatting become a right? What I know is that there is right of ownership.
No I don't, I believe in using lethal force to get rid of them.
The only right they should have is the right to take a bullet from the owner.
They have a right to be shot dead trying their BS.
Only on toilets.
The 10% don't own property.
There is no such thing.
Pay your rent or get the f**k out.
Hell no!
I think it should be illegal
What are squatter's rights?
when someone who doesn't own something is given the rights to it because it would hurt their feelings to take it away from them since they've been using it
That's not legal
in some cases it had been considered very legal
How is that possible?
If a house is vacant for sometime yes
No. I do not.
Absolutely not
Vote has it
You can also add your opinion below!