
I’m against a multicultural society – does that genuinely shock you?


So, the Asker wants to go for cultural assimilation, which, sociologically speaking, expects foreigners to give up their culture of origin and replace it with local culture. It's a conservative+ POV and I get why you're reacting to that, @NathanDavis with your bicultural background.
What I'm going for is integration instead...
Let's have a sociological chart, also to remind Asker of the fact that assimilation is JUST ONE way, for local cultures to deal with foreign cultures. It's not even the way our immigration office works, naturalization works with integration, not assimilation.

Legally, I'm french because this is where I'm born.
Culturally, I'm french because I have been raised in that culture.
But what is that culture exactly?

Now that culture is only pure and neatly defined for those who imagine it is, we can find such imagination in the mind of most countries on the globe maybe, legends say there's even some in USA, a slogan comes to mind... Make America gre----? I forgot it, sorry.
Back to our past then, what is it, Gaulish druids? Maybe in Brittany yes, not much in Marseille or Strasbourg, right? Speaking of Brittany, north west region, they often feel more Breton than they feel French, they even preserved their own language to this day, Breton. I can say the same for south west border, French basque country. What about Strasbourg, close to Germany, with some roads featuring german names. What about all these dialects and regional cultures.
What is French, bébé don't hurt me?
What about these arab, german, Spanish, English and italian words incorporated in our language. What about cuisine, I bought couscous and canned vegetables labeled "for couscous" on a generic supermarket shelf, alongside pasta, merguez, canned raviolis, beans, tiramisu and chipolatas. Neither of them as sold as foreign food. What about my friend bearing an italian name, she's born in France from pieds-noirs parents born in Algeria when it was still a colony. Did I talk about invasions, who are the Franks from Prussia again? Maybe the Roman empire never conquered this territory we live on?
So stand against multiculturalism, Julie, stand against me, you and this country in the process because this country is already multicultural in essence, historically and contemporarily.
You lost me at 'canned ravioli' ...
Sorry, that was glib. I don't mind the salad bowl instead of melting pot objective. But it needs to work as a dish. I do think societies need social capital and there are limits to how fast you can integrate very different philosophies, religions, expectations etc. and still have the whole thing work well.
The foreign born share of the population in France is significantly lower than it is in Australia.
When it comes to the regions of France, you’re forgetting what the republican school system has done to them...🤣
Where your analysis goes wrong, sociologically and politically, is that you’re confusing cultural influences with the multiculturalist societal model.
When I talk about assimilation, I’m not saying that people should be brainwashed or deny their past.
Historically, assimilation à la française has been a process of translation. You arrive with your own background, but you adopt the norms, customs, language and overarching national narrative of your host country so that we have common ground.
Your examples (the Italian woman who is the daughter of Pieds-Noirs, words of Arabic or Italian origin) are precisely examples of successful assimilation: these elements have been
I recommend reading Pierre Milza, for example, on the number of Italian immigrants who were sent back to their home country
assimilated, Frenchified, and are now part of the common core. They do not form a separate counter-society.
"I am what is known as an ‘assimilated Jew’," wrote Raymond Aron in 1967. "As a child, I wept for France’s misfortunes at Waterloo or Sedan, not when hearing the tale of the destruction of the Temple. No flag other than the tricolour, no anthem other than the Marseillaise, will ever bring tears to my eyes."
Raymond Aron
I have Spanish roots, but like Raymond Aron, I haven’t learnt to lament the misfortunes of Spanish history, but rather those of French history
I’ve never lived the Spanish way; I wasn’t even taught Spanish
Multiculturalism isn’t just about having pizzerias and couscous restaurants on every street corner.
Multiculturalism is the coexistence of communities that are legally or culturally insular, which hold on to values that are sometimes incompatible with the social contract of the host country (regarding gender equality, secularism, or the relationship with the law).
The danger I am pointing out is not the diversity of backgrounds, but the fact that people no longer mix and remain confined within their communities of origin.
@MrChinaski
🔷 "there are limits to how fast we can integrate very different philosophies, religions, expectations etc. and still have the whole thing work well."
There are big time limits, as soon as the cultural gap is too wide, creating a cultural shock between local culture and foreign culture, it's going to be messy. And it is messy in practice
@julie07
🔷 "When I talk about assimilation, I’m not saying that people should be brainwashed or deny their past."
Then don't use the term assimilation if it's not what you're saying, because in this sociological context, assimilation means replacing culture of origin with local culture.
🔷 "the fact that people no longer mix and remain confined within their communities of origin"
I'm not going to defend the good sides of ghettoization because I see no good sides associated, just a "repli identitaire" you know very much about already. Which clashes with and reinforce another "repli identitaire" for the locals, especially for those believing in the Great Replacement conspiracy theory... If you know what I mean. But I hope you're not going in this direction, aren't you?
In France, assimilation has a specific political history. It means that, in the public sphere, citizenship and a shared culture take precedence over one’s ethnic background.
Read what Raymond Aron had to say on the matter. Or we might also quote Romain Gary. Read Fernand Bordel as well.
As I said, I am of Spanish origin and the culture of my ancestors has faded away to make way for that of France.
My stance is not a retreat into identity politics; quite the opposite: it is a refusal to see France turn into a mosaic of communities that view one another with suspicion. I prefer a model in which the son of an immigrant and a native-born child share the same points of reference, the same values and the same culture
Then you prefer assimilation instead of integration, whereas I believe that assimilation doesn't work anymore, because zeigeist changed, except for those pushing cultural purity. I think people aren't willing to give up their culture to fit in. And I understand them.
Some of them reject the local culture, going the ghetto way, I think they're wrong.
And some of them integrate.
*zeitgeist
It's not as if any of us were really in control of the situation, or needed to find a solution to problems we don't get to manage, until we're part of the national assembly.
On the other hand, I believe we have a concrete impact, on people and on ourselves, when we follow the path that seems just to us. So, more concretely, how does your POV manifest in terms of actions and interactions with people?
It is always interesting to discuss political ideas, even if we are not in the Assembly
When I meet someone, whether their name is Arthur, Mamadou or Chang, I address them as a fellow citizen, as my equal, without condescension or victimisation. I won’t talk to them about ‘their roots’ or ‘their community’, nor will I adapt what I say based on what I assume to be their culture of origin. That is what universal respect is all about: treating the other person as a fully-fledged individual, not as a representative of their tribe.
I agree that it's a good idea to not assume people are acting representative, on the other hand I believe we're constantly representing tribes and cultures, willingly or not, you and me included
No, I'm not a citizen of the world.
I can verify that once I reach any country borders without authorization. I can also test that anytime I meet someone from a different social class than me, having different political opinions, different musical tastes, different clothes. I belong to the tribes I chose and the ones that chose me
At the least there must be complete assimilation in terms of accepting the political structure and the laws of the host country. Not optional.
That is more pervasive than you might immediately think. It is difficult to be functional unless you accept the national language and language is quite cultured.
@julie07
It doesn't mean something clear to me, in a vacuum. When I hear of cultures and philosophies in the US though, due to the time I spend on this platform, I get a clearer idea of what France is. Through comparisons.
I'm tied to french language, enormously. I have ties to my river city, very strong ties, because this is my story there.
No, US are not attractive to me, especially not under ICE lol. Thailand, India, Japan and everything Asia feels like a far away and unwelcoming galaxy to me. UK, DE or IT felt okay but not overwhelmingly okay.
There's a single place in Spain I felt very close to, one city, which really surprised me.
I guess if that's what makes your boat float but I see a lot of holes in it people have been on this planet for 1000 of years and weather you believe in God or not
He made it so.. or since he said he is within each each one of us either it was him or us our body's will adapt to protect us weather it is in the harsh climate or elements that we live in are pigment will change to protect us
Our digestive systems will Adapt To our surroundings
And if you believe anything that has been written there are other entities that came to this planet and had sex with women and they were from different places not from Earth
So in saying All the Above
Here we are today
With all the above people can either accepted or not
People can either get along or not
If you can't get along then that causes drama drama is negative and you're always fighting against yourself maybe that's what makes the holes in the boat
Or maybe you could get along And be happy And pick somebody up from a desert island that knows how to fix the holes in the boat
But no matter what the choice is you're either going to fight yourself or you're going to be happy and let life be the way that it is and get along because one day we are all going to need each other
Because the world has gone evil And evil wants to take over I personally don't want that to happen and we'll do anything in my power to make it not happen and I need all the people on my side to help me to believe in the same things I believe in so it doesn't matter who you are where you're from I need you because I don't want my kids growing up in a drama filled fucked up evil world
Because that's not who I raised them to be I raise them to give of themselves you can help somebody help them and be the best that you can be not evil non-caring selfish human beings
So I don't know this for a fact but I'm pretty sure that this was just a question and that truly Who You Are because I see you as a good guy and the one who hates evil as much as I do
It doesn’t shock me, but it does disappoint me.
Arguments against multiculturalism often rely on the romanticized, yet historically inaccurate, notion that societies have ever been truly "monocultural" or static. To argue for homogeneity is to ignore the fundamental engine of human progress.
Historically, multiculturalism has been the primary architect of civilization. The most influential empires and periods of innovation were fueled by the cross-pollination of cultures. When diverse groups interact, they foster a "knowledge exchange" that is impossible in a closed society. We see this in our modern culinary landscapes, our scientific breakthroughs, and our globalized economies. Every time we enjoy a medical advancement, an architectural marvel, or a technological tool, we are benefiting from a lineage of global collaboration that could never have occurred in an isolated, monocultural vacuum.
To argue that a society must be monocultural to be "unified" is fundamentally absurd because it mistakes stagnation for stability. Human culture is not a fixed asset; it is a living, adaptive process. Suggesting that we should prioritize cultural purity over diversity is akin to suggesting a garden would be better off with only its weakest, most predictable weed.
Diversity acts as a social and intellectual "immune system"—it provides a wider array of perspectives to solve complex problems, fosters resilience against dogma, and drives economic dynamism.
Ultimately, fearing a multicultural society is a rejection of reality. We live in a world defined by interconnectedness, and the attempt to retreat into ethno-nationalist bubbles is not a return to a "better time," but amounts to going backwards.
Embracing multiculturalism isn't just a moral choice; it is a pragmatic recognition that when we pool our different histories and insights, we don't just survive—we innovate. It sounds cheesy, but together we really are stronger.
I know it's not really the point of this question, but can we talk about AI here?
I am not surprised that you are informed enough to oppose a multicultural society. People do well when on vacation in other cultures and even longer study abroad programs. However, living together can lead to conflict when values and customs differ. Living in different areas with separate schools and separate tax money vs. the same neighborhoods, common schools, and common tax money reduces conflict.
Baton Rouge is a good example. Blacks are a majority. They made the rules, controlled the schools, and the tax money. The whites live in a separate area. They wanted their own schools so their children could receive a good education that the blacks would not allow. Therefore, after a six-year battle that the blacks fought against tooth and nail because they wanted the whites' tax money, the whites created Saint George, a separate city.
Opinion
31Opinion
Yes, considering the fact that you live in the U. S. which is a land of immigrants who have done nothing but enrich our society. I mean, this isn't a homogeneous land of only white, Anglo-Saxon, Christian protestant immigrants.
We benefited from the fact that the western U. S. once belonged to Mexico and was populated by Mexicans. We benefited from all the waves of immigrants from Germans and Scandinavians, to Irish, to Chinese, to Italians, to SE Asians, and people from all around the world, not to mention blacks and Native Americans.
The U. S. is unique in that regard.
Just look at the wonderful variety of food alone.
However, immigrants from other countries need to learn English and assimilate. They can retain their culture and celebrate their cultural heritage. I mean, look at Italians, Chinese, Japanese, eastern European, and North African, for example. But they also have to fit in and become American. They can't impose their cultures or religions on others.
I don't think many other countries benefit from multiculturalism. Take European countries, for example whose populations are homogeneous with distinct cultures that developed over centuries.
Unfortunately, many countries have had their cultures eroded by colonialism. An many have been Americanized.
I believe she's in the wine region of France. At least she plays like she is. Maybe in her mind...
@lightbulb27
Are you saying I’m pretending to be French?
your profile says USA, but from all prior, thought you were French... Bourdeaux.
humm.. what question could I ask to confirm your real identity... only a French person would know that is not searchable on ai. nearly impossible anymore...
Why do French people use the term "oh la la" and what does it mean?
Here's a better question:
You are at a diner in the USA and the chef has prepared a wonderful Omelette for you. You are presented with salt, pepper, and picante sauce, and no bread. What do you do?
@lightbulb27
Because I signed up to the app using a VPN
And in France, we say that in various situations – ‘oh la la – for example, if something serious has happened, like a tree has fallen over, we’d say, ‘Oh la la , it’s a disaster’
Or also to criticise, for example
‘Oh la la , did you see the neighbour? She’s cheating on her husband’
I'm leaving the restaurant 🤣
@lightbulb27
And of course, whether or not bread is included, I’d refuse to tip in an American restaurant. 😎
oh la lah.. you must tip here, it's the culture!
what do you do with the Picante sauce... it's spicy sauce?
@Tamera952 find me one country that absorbs competing cultures and succeeds. I’ll wait.
No, it doesn’t shock me at all. Everyone has different opinions about society, culture, and identity. Personally, though, I see multicultural society as something positive rather than negative. Of course, multicultural societies also work best when there is mutual respect, shared laws, and willingness to live together peacefully. But overall, I think cultural diversity can strengthen a society rather than weaken it.
Different cultures, languages, traditions, and perspectives can make a society more interesting, open-minded, and dynamic. People can learn from each other, experience different ways of thinking, and build connections beyond their own background. Diversity does not automatically erase identity — cultures can coexist while still keeping their own traditions and values.
Well, it means only that you don't belong to class that profits form immigration.
Elites need cheap wage slaves to maximize profits. As long your society attracts third world parasites as long you have to deal with them. Of course one option is to turn your country in a third world shithole, this makes your country unattractive for thirdies. Stop giving welfare checks and 80% will disappear, stop paying adequate living wages and remaining 20% disappears either.
Multiculti is doubtable price for economical success.
Nope, that's how all commie are. They try to take power and then ethnically cleanse everyone that doesn't fit the mold while robbing them of their belongings to support their socialist government. Then they start creating narratives to paint even the jello mold communist as dissidents so that they can parasitically rob the next person by sending them to a concentration camp for trumped up charges to continue to prop up their failed government system. It keeps going that way until either everyone is dead or the people become too demoralized and the entire system collapses. You can't be a socialist unless there is some other group (s) that you want to exploit and exterminate. There are finite resources and if you want to keep giving them away to party loyalist who produce nothing, then people have to die to sacrifice their belongings to serve the self proclaimed "elites". It's a parasitic system for human parasites like you.
Yea and no, since a lot capitalists disagree with it yet back capitalism which is for it so it's an irony. Capitalists make bank on the the ideals of cultures and immigrants to whatever else that makes wealth disparity worse, though I suppose you still support your own culture however you aren't supporting the thing that's most beneficial to capitalism.
But don't worry you'll also get weird lefts who've never bothered to understand how this works who will cause you racist somehow for expressing such opinion while them are unknowingly supporting capitalism via Multiculturism.
And of course most don't understand this at all.
don't know you well enough.
you mean pure French... that's sounding so..."Hitler". Or just some splash of people, but in general, same culture.
So what do you mean?
I might agree, I might not. I like some culture, but I don't want to live around it... I want my culture. My culture can have various colors and nations in it...
When I go to France, I want to see French culture. A splash of others is ok. Too much, ruins it...
Too much salt ruins the dish...
Too much butter... we'll... you can't ruin anything by adding more butter... lol.:)
This is taking to the ultimate inevitably is how I see your view point. It sucks. It's unsustainable.
I'm in alaska and it's the most dangerous state for women in the usa. it's majority of domestic violence. If you survive long enough to get out of that home there is only more violence in quiet pockets out of sight.
Back to the topic multiculturalism. It helps bring to light bad culture practices in a family environment together.
You know what? I believe you, because I was in Juneau for a week, and that place is sketchy as fuck! I know another guy who went there for work, and he straight up told me, he was more scared of the people then he was of the wildlife. I knew Anchorage was bad, but I wasn't expecting it in Juneau. I think all of Alaska is like this. It's promoted as this great tourist destination, but it's more dangerous then people realize.
@KostasKouvalis it's very domestic violence and with a lot of keep it hush hush because of how limited the bread winners are.
You've convicted your rapist but winter is coming and the bread winner is in jail good luck...
As much as any crime is reported it's 10x worse all around here because it's daily life.
People look at Chicago or New York city and expect open gun fire of gang violence or Mexicancartels. It's the domestic violence of pimping out daughters and trading drugs in trailer is more prominent.
That's becoming a very common point of view. There aren't many good reasons to advocate for them. The more diverse a community is the lower social trust is, the higher crime is. It's a tricky balancing act because it's the blending of cultures that moves us forward. You don't want to bar people from entering your community, but if you don't have a common culture then you don't have a community. For an example just look at Paris.
"the blending of cultures that moves us forward"
Depends which cultures
I feel like it depends on a lot of things. I have no problem with people from different cultures and backgrounds, but I do expect that they try to integrate if they decide to come here. Sadly many don't.
I also think that you can be against multiculturalism and unrestricted immigration and still respect other cultures. But again, also this is often not the case.
No. We have discussed French views and Anglo views before. I think the French view of immigrants integrating into French culture is very reasonable. You mentioned your family was originally Spanish and their could be no prouder French girl than yourself.
Except there is a misunderstanding, in this page, over what assimilation and integration both mean.
There is no assimilation going on in France. When one wants to be naturalized French, there's a long and tedious path to become one, paper wise. A path that, nowhere in the process, denies culture of origin's existence. As long as this culture of origin is compatible, and when it's not it probably becomes a judiciary problem instead of one related to immigration office.
@Maybe_Maybe_not Basically, anyone who can stand a life beset by kafkaesque bureaucracy is good for French citizenship?
I didn't find the meaning of beset, as a noun @MrChinaski as for the rest, knowing Kafka is a plus but what really matters is:
- You must have legally and habitually resided in France for at least 5 years (with some exceptions, such as for refugees or French-speaking individuals).
- You must demonstrate a B2 level in both spoken and written French
- You must pass a civic exam (score ≥ 80%), which tests knowledge of French history, culture, society, and situational questions
- You must demonstrate respect for the values of the French Republic and a commitment to uphold French laws
- You must have sufficient financial resources to support yourself
No. It is being "tried" in UK with all these immigrants we are getting. It is obvious that there are so many differences in religion, culture, treatment of women etc that integration just cannot happen, no matter how much effort is put in.
I believe every culture and religion has its beauty and I am happy I was blessed with a chance to sample many of those cultures through my multi religious and multi racial schools and social circles. You do have pockets of unpleasant bias or racism in every large place in a mixed nation or group, but the good outweighs the bad when you choose to focus on the good.
Meh. You just lie about everything you post.
We're approaching 1 in 3 Australians born overseas, with 1 in 2 having a parent born overseas.
It's beginning to creak and there is a lot of push back against migration.
Multiculturalism brings a fantastic inflow of ideas, experiences and, most importantly, food. But you need to hold onto having something to bring foreign-born people into. I think we've reached that point.
Multicultural has most effect in food as you imply and sometimes some festivals.
What fantastic inflow of ideas has happened in Australia that has directly occurred? Yes there will be prominent people that have positively influenced like Jewish people after WWII.
Can you name a direct fantastic idea? I can't excluding food.
Well I guess the keyword here is "culture" and not race, so not really. I know a lot of French people are, and you seem like a French nationalist, even though you seem more progressive on some issues. So not really, no.
Contrary to what the mainstream Left wants you to believe, multi-culturalism is more often then not a WEAKNESS, and not a strength.
Yeah, I kind of figured that out. LOL
So you would only date/marry a "French" guy?
And you support deporting and not taking people who don't assimilate/act French?
So would you consider yourself a nationalist?
First of all, you don’t really choose who you fall in love with. But if I were to fall in love with a foreigner, well, that would raise some serious questions if we were to have children. Even if the child had dual nationality, you can only swear allegiance to one country... so yes, it would be better if he were French, lol. I’m not saying a naturalised Frenchman, because I consider a naturalised foreigner to be French, so I’m simply saying a Frenchman.
I seeeeeeeee. So a foreigner isn't off the table? In te res ting.
Yeah. lol
Yeah, but he can technically be naturalized and still not be French. "French" isn't just a nationality or ethnicity, it's a way mindset and way of life.
I mean, you're ethnically Spanish, but you're French as fuck! lol
Did you see my this question?
Do French and Polish make good couples? ↗
Also, you kind of CAN. You avoid or don't get to close to people you prefer not to fall in love with. LOL
I'm surprised. You usually don't miss French questions, and I'm curious what you think.
I see. But a lot of Africans are citizens and don't act French at all, and have more loyalty to their motherland.
Yeah, I kind of gathered that. Friendship is different.
How does your family feel about the matter? The same?
Hmmmmmmm.
Oh my God! I bet you two get along splendidly. lol
Have you ever had a boyfriend?
I see. Well yeah. At the end of the day, she is your sister, and I guess if you see her everyday, you sort of HAVE to. lol
Wow, you HAVE? :O I never knew this. You never talked about it. What was this? Was he a Frenchman? :p
Damn. Lucky HIM. What happened?
I want a French girlfriend. lol
True. lol
@KostasKouvalis if you want a french one, g@g is the last place you should visit to that end, we're like 10 french, at best, here lol
@Maybe_Maybe_not Who said I'm on GAG to look for a French girlfriend?
Also, 10 are actually good odds. Though I'm guessing 10 includes men too. Girls, there are only 2 I talk to. I think I might've seen a few others.
To meet one in France, I'd have to move their long term, and either go to school or get a job. I met one on Guadeloupe, but it didn't go beyond small talk. I was hoping she'd invite me to her friend's soccer game, but no. Only chance of getting a girlfriend in France is at work or school.
What's of interest to you about a french girlfriend though? Her culture?
Also. And their values/attitude. I've had good experiences with French people.
Do French and Polish make good couples? ↗
Yup, I remember answering that Q, you said you appreciated our multiculturalism lol
Also, they're romantic as fuck! I watch porn of French couples, and holy shit! I've never seen such sensuality! And I love their natural aura and confidence.
Okay... It gets weirder now 🤨
Watching porn is"weird?" That's coming from someone who's country has Cap d'Adge. LMAO
I'm sorry about this conversation Julie. HE started it.
It gets weirder because you assumed that watching random french in porn will inform you of anything about the women in france lol
Dude, the French are literally known for their romance culture.
But I've been talking to a French girl for like 9 years. So I don't need to get my info from porn. I can go straight to the source.
... I'm aware of that cliché yep, and I can verify, daily, that it's a cliché
But I watch porn of other nationalities/ethnicities too, and most of the couples aren't like that at all. So you can't deny there are cultural differences when it comes to love and intimacy. The French are literally known for their romance culture.
Now if you come from Chechnya or Victorian era, I guess we must look super kinky in comparison lol
Are you talking about the whole world or just your little corner of it? You only want to eat French food and listen to French music? How boring. I would have no Thai , Italian, Japanese, Chinese, Mediterranean, or Mexican food. No music from anywhere but here? That sounds like a bunch of bullshit, crazy lady. I know you have a tattoo of Napoleon on your right butt cheek but come on, this is unreasonable
I don't believe that. Everything you've said indicated that you have a rather leftist academic bubble world-view. Those are usually the types in favour of cultural suicide.
I can't remember.
I'm generally against mass migration/globalisation/islamification/destruction of Western values/the loss of national sovereignty (ie through supranational bodies such as the EU).
Why are you opposed to multiculturalism? And by that, do you mean you're against mass migration?
not at all... lol
and you would probably want every French that's not directly related to an old French word thrower... to be gone as well... lmao
so... to your standards and views
who's qualified as "true French" and who isn't?
A foreigner who becomes French is someone who has decided to embrace French culture, its norms and customs
Raymond Aron summed it all up in this beautiful sentence:
"I am what is known as an ‘assimilated Jew’. As a child, I wept for France’s misfortunes at Waterloo or Sedan, not whilst listening to the tale of the destruction of the Temple. No flag other than the tricolour, no anthem other than the Marseillaise, will ever bring tears to my eyes."
are foreigners qualified or disqualified?
so, from your point of view... there's "only one right way to be French?"
"assimilate to MY IDEA of what French is, or leave"
I mean, you are the French one, so... what's the "way to assimilate" for you?
yes... to what?
what does it mean to be "authentically French" ?
@Maybe_Maybe_not are you an authentic French? or pretending to be French?
oh wow you bring me into a Julie's post? Okay, let's read what happened in previous seasons lol
No, we are in America and America has its own culture. People from other countries can choose to immigrate here but they will adopt American culture as their own.
I don't know if I'm necessarily against it, but it might be time to accept that it's not the panacea it's been made out to be, either.
@julie07
it doesn’t surprise me at all
That would not work in Australia, we'd be fooled without our diversity , sht that nonsense left us in the 60s.
Unity is E pluribus unum. Multiculturalism is E unum pluribus.
No Infact I am having hard time understanding people who support multiculturalism.
I guess you just feel more comfortable with your own culture
Find me a country that thrives with competing cultures within its borders.
Not at all. I’m against it as well. I believe it actually worsens racism.
Nope because I agree that cultural relativism is retarded.
No. I don't know you but you seem to be very intelligent and mostly correct
No that's based. I am against it to.
That you are? No.
I'm in total dismay :O
Why? That’s sounds pretty racist
It's not racist indeed, it's ostracist instead
it actually doesn't shock me at all...
lololol
Not at all. I agree.
Of course not because you're a Trumpster.
Nope, because I am against it too.
You are not alone
Nope
Pretty rational take
Why?
You can also add your opinion below!