A lot of women don't seem to know what they are talking about when it comes to a man's height. I know lots of women that think any guy under under six feet tall is short. The average height of a man in the united states is five foot ten. Fifty percent of men are shorter than that, yet these women think that a guy has to be above average in order to be average. I have had several women add a couple of inches to my height when they were trying to guess it as well. Maybe this is because so many guys lie about their height.
You stoooolllle my pic. Damn.
But as far as I know, you've to nitpick if you really want to see the two inch difference. 5'11 and anything over is tall, from 6' its only a matter of taller. 6' is a good height to be, everything fits just right. To actually notice a significant height difference, I thing 6'4 guy can compare but 6'2 is really within range.
I think that it's more difficult to guess the exact height. I know my partner's 6'0 because I've been there when he's been measured, but I doubt I'd have known exactly how tall he was unless I'd seen it myself. I would have said he was a few inches shorter because he slouches, so when he stands up to his full height, it kinda surprises me. I think that the difference between an inch in height isn't necessarily an obvious thing, y'know? Especially if the man carries himself very straight-backed or very slouched over.
Oops I clicked wrong. I thought "no" meant "not able to see a difference.
Maybe we are able to see it when they're next to each other and we do see if the guy is taller than us or not, but then still, who cares. It's not like either of them is a midget. *no offence to midgets*
Yes, there's definitely a difference. Whether that difference is SIGNIFICANT or not depends solely on the woman's outlook/preferences. Some women will be more attracted to those extra 2 inches, whereas a woman who doesn't really care isn't going to pay much attention to it.
Opinion
9Opinion
Ok... the REAL truth is women can't tell the difference. Why? Because guys have been telling girls all throughout history that this is 6" (holding thumb and forefinger an actual 3"apart). Women, being the trusting, caring souls they are, have believed this. Therefore, women have an enormously impossible time when it comes to judging ANY distance. That's my story and I'm sticking to it!
Honestly I don't think the difference is that significant but if you compare the thickness of the soles of their shoes you will notice that the "shorter" one is working with tricks to appear taller than he is 😂
Lol the vote answers are very cleverly worded in relation to the question.
There is a visible difference between 6 and 6'2, mainly at the eye line. An ugly 6'2 is never going to beat an attractive 6 though.
I'm 6'4" and I don't ever remember having any conversation that touches on this.
Perhaps after a certain height the point becomes moot, and you just say "My boyfriend is really tall".
If she's short, it's not much difference. If she's 5'8" and likes to slap on 4" heels, she's gonna notice big time.
This whole obsession with height is ridiculous…you know what’s more important than height? Strength, Reach, Speed, Athleticism, etc…
statistically 3.6 inches would be minimum for there to be a significant difference. ifically
I can tell the difference, I have a few friends who are like 6'4 and I'm 6'2. As to what you're talking about, um I don't know.
Left guy's footwear's one inch longer than right guy's... dat's why difference looks smaller...
Well, yes, there's a 2 inch difference.
Technically there's a 2 inch difference.
2 inches, about 5 cm
You can also add your opinion below!
Most Helpful Opinions