FCK NO!! Women should KNOW that they are at least EQUAL!! Why should she be 'submissive', and dominated? What kind of crap is that? OH, Bible crap, and 2,000 years ago, and how does that make any sense now? Society has changed and people have changed. Site the Bible, and I couldn't care less what you say, as it has no relevance to today!! Some of the teachings are still valid, about respect, and doing right, and living with good values, but too many site specific things to make their case that women should be submissive! BULLSHIT!!!
@heythere3xx I am almost always disappointed by my gender's responses to women's questions, and I often get a lot of sht from some of the Knuckle-draggers that just don't understand, when I post something supportive, and loving, caring!! I sometimes can't believe the crap that some post, like they still believe, even in this century!!
Not submissive. I love women who I can rely on and independent women ( not the fucking feminist picture of independence) mutual care, mutual love and most importantly mutual respect
Clearly you haven’t read male and female opinions on G@G, compared them and objectively analyzed them. If you still think women are more biased there’s something seriously wrong with you!
Okay, fair enough. However by that reasoning, its cruel and oppressive to demand men be assertive. Its cruel and oppressive to demand men act in a traditionally masculine way, to pay for dates to persue the woman, to take all the risks of rejection, to expect him to protect you etc.
The fact is you cannot have it both ways, if you want a non traditional relationship go for it, more power to you. HOWEVER that does mean that you cannot hold him to traditional roles either (and lets make no mistake, you absolutely will as every woman does). So which is it? Do you wish to be his equal and persue him as much as he does you, for you to pick up the check, for you to pamper him, for you to protect him as he will you, you doing the heavy lifting half the time, 50/50 straight down the middle no exceptions? OR do you want a traditional man?
Like I said you can go either way, you can be equal (you don't want that, no woman does no matter how much they claim otherwise (words mean little, actions however, they say everything a woman won't and what it tells people is that women want traditional men (confident, assertive, strong))), OR you can have a traditional man BUT that means you must be a traditional woman. Anything else, and I do mean anything, is you being a hypocrite, its you making excuses for not giving as you receive.
Now for me personally, yes I want a submissive woman. Now obviously a woman should not be submissive to any man, that is weakness, but she should be submissive to the right man. That's why she picks a man who leads, that is why she picks a man who is assertive, because her job is not to lead, her job is to nurture, to provide emotionally, the counter point to him providing for your physical needs. So she should be assertive to men who are not HER man because she is not choosing them to be her leader, she chose him, her man to be her leader.
For me I want a feminine woman, I don't care what you may say, you are not as strong as I am you cannot protect me, you cannot provide for me, I don't want things by and large, you cannot compete against me I am tougher then you and stronger then you. BUT you, women, can provide me love, that is not something I can provide for myself, she can provide me with a nurturing environment, I cannot provide that for myself, she can give me purpose a reason to be invested in this world, again, not something I provide for myself (a man lives for his family to provide and protect, you take that away you take away his reason for being). So she does in fact submit to me, but she does so of her own choosing because she believes in me, believes that I can lead her, protect her, that makes her an equal.
Wives, submit to your own husbands, as to the Lord. For the husband is the head of the wife even as Christ is the head of the church, his body, and is himself its Savior. Now as the church submits to Christ, so also wives should submit in everything to their husbands.
Likewise, wives, be subject to your own husbands, so that even if some do not obey the word, they may be won without a word by the conduct of their wives, when they see your respectful and pure conduct. Do not let your adorning be external—the braiding of hair and the putting on of gold jewelry, or the clothing you wear— but let your adorning be the hidden person of the heart with the imperishable beauty of a gentle and quiet spirit, which in God's sight is very precious. For this is how the holy women who hoped in God used to adorn themselves, by submitting to their own husbands.
Let a woman learn quietly with all submissiveness. I do not permit a woman to teach or to exercise authority over a man; rather, she is to remain quiet.
To be self-controlled, pure, working at home, kind, and submissive to their own husbands, that the word of God may not be reviled.
Being a voluntarily submissive wife, or girlfriend, is simply about serving your husband, or boyfriend, in a way that benefits you and the entire relationship. It takes a strong and confident woman to be a submissive wife, or girlfriend. It does not mean that you don't have an opinion or that you let your husband, or boyfriend, control every aspect of your life.
Some guys prefer to serve in an inferior roll, that is ok as well if both are happy that way.
Some prefer to be equal, but if a relationship is absent a leader, that can sometimes leave a void.
From a Biblical perspective, the leader is actually the one who's supposed to serve the submissive person, not the other way around. See Matt 20:25-28, Eph 5:20-30, & Phil 2:3-4.
If it is a matter of being forced, NO. If it is a choice sure. Unfortunately tumbler has given real feminists a bad name, however the original idea was equality and the right to choose. If a woman wants to be a housewife, then they can be as long as it is her choice. I prefer working equal partnerships in how things are decided rather than one person having more power, everything from financial decisions to rules of the bedroom... it is a modern age, everyone should have the right to choose
"Demanding for a Woman to be Submissive is cruel and repressive"
Um, the majority of women are *voluntarily* submissive, so much so that every love story they write and publish revolves around the idea of being completely and utterly dominated and subjugated by a violent, aggressive, and domineering man, and this is a billion dollar industry.
Guys would much prefer if women were simply equals to us but it's women who keep regressing to their base level instincts and desires for submissiveness and inferiority.
1
0 Reply
Anonymous
(30-35)
+1 y
When it comes to this, as with most things, people think in black and white terms. Here what you're thinking is that submissive means treating her like a doormat, having her completely wait on the guy hand and foot, while having no voice at all.
That's not what people usually mean by submissive. Dominant and submissive is basically about one person taking the lead vs another following. It doesn't mean that the submissive one has zero input, or that the dominant one is free to act in a selfish manner. It just means that they make more of the decisions.
In general if you ask most women, while they'll usually deny that they want to be submissive or that they want the man to be dominant, will say that they prefer a guy who can take the lead. Really as above that's just about a misunderstanding of the meanings of those words and as I say looking at it in these extreme black and white terms.
If you are correct, women's wants and desires are cruel and repressive, men are just the instrument. From sexual desire to who the majority of women see an as good potential partner. Being taken and controlled is exciting and stimulating for a large majority of the female population. If a woman didn't feel challenged by a man, she wouldn't find him attractive. Like so, if a man didn't find a women, malleable, he wouldn't be has interested.
The desire to be "taken" is a submissive act, acknowledging the strength a man has over you to facilitate that desire.
Women tend to tell themselves it's the man thats lost control when he follows his inclination to dominate women sexually. When the reality is he is chasing his own gratification, for most these two characteristics of women and men match perfectly.
Only if she wants to be. Do what turns you on. Maybe you're dominant one night and the next you're submissive. Don't ever be dependant on a guy for your happiness
They should both love each other and respect each other equally, but if anyone's gonna be submissive, I rather it be me than him. Nobody should be a slave to anyone but I'd want him to be more dominant.
not only no, but hell no should a woman be submissive to men... Both people in a relationship should be submissive to its (the relationship's needs) I should do nice things for a girl when with her and she things for me. Never one way or the other.
Submission must be voluntary to be an act of Love, by design. And exercising authority over those submitting out of Love can only ever be a kindness when done in an understanding and self-sacrificing way.
If the woman wants to then sure, but they should have an equal power dynamic unless one party wants more or less power and the other also likes the difference.
No. Some men may want a submissive girlfriend but I've never wanted one. Submissiveness can be okay to an extent, i. e in the bedroom, but outside of that I want someone who chooses me for me and not out of obligation
I don’t know if they should be but the ones that stay with me long term are and they treat me good. Otherwise, with the doms it only lasts about 1-2 weeks and only when the sex is mind blowing.
Most Helpful Opinions