What do you think of this diet?
What is your daily calorie intake? And are you overweight?
Lol, you don't watch the Discovery channel, do you? Most animals either spend all day eating, or all day looking for food. Nice try on the "we're the only fat shits" though ;)
As for your other questions, a ~2000 calorie diet is a diet to maintain your current level of metabolism and energy needs. What YOU eat or don't eat is what affects YOU, not human kind in general. It also seems like YOU have not stopped to figure out if that weight loss if from a calorie deficit and is similar to cutting weight (which isn't the same as losing weight). And lastly, YOU have not figured out if your lack of a consistent diet caused you to hold at 10 pounds overweight.
When your metabolism slows, your body stores away as much glycogen and fat as it can (if you've done this before, it stores away a slight bit more). So with you eating 1 meal a day, you may lose the weight but it will come straight back as soon as you start eating normally again. Your steak and veggie diet may be keeping you alive, but you are well into what is called ketosis- the glycogen in your body is depleted and you're now burning fat reserves. This is the part that is replaced once food starts coming back in ;)
So again, nice try but your info is a bit off. Why do some humans, with the amazing ability of higher level thinking, choose not to use it on proper research?
And I eat anywhere from 3-5 meals a day due to a bulking surplus diet, along with very frequent exercise. I'm packing on lean muscle and maintaining an already low amount of body fat.
When you lose weight in the starvation process, you lose both muscle and fat. When you start eating consistently again, you gain back the fat but the muscle must be built up again with physical training or activity. So you're only short changing yourself, man.
Am I supposed to be jacking off to it or something?
That's fine. I'm not trying to convince you to do anything other than realize how silly it makes you seem coming on here spouting off with very wrong information. It's like you bypassed Google and the entire vast knowledge that sits on the internet...all just to post up here with this stuff. You do realize that, right?
I mean, you're talking like you're proud of losing 10 pounds in LESS than a month like that's a good thing? Anybody with a bit of knowledge in dieting and exercise will tell you that 10 pounds in that short of time is very unhealthy and should be avoided. But nooooo, this guy is convinced that humans eat too much lol
Yeah, as soon as you start eating normally again. How far up your ass is your head, really? Because I must have said this about 4 or 5 times already. Please tell me you're trolling?
To put it this way: I train with some MMA guys at the gym that do amateur MMA fights. If you know anything about boxing and MMA, competition is determined by weight class. So in order to make proper weight before a fight, fighters will forego most (if not all) food, and gradually cut down on water intake (so they don't end up in the hospital from lack of water). They will lose anywhere from 5-10 pounds in a matter of DAYS in order to make weight.
But take a wild guess as to what happens once they eat their first lean meal after that? You guess it! That weight immediately shows right back up in as equally short of time as it left them.
But you got this all figured out, right?
Lol alrighty man. You eat your 1 steak a day and rock on with your muscle gain diet ;)
And you keep spending thousands of extra dollars paying for unnecessary calories that the food industry has everyone convinced they need. And when you hit 30years old and have a spare tire around your waist you can come back to this conversation and hopefully pull your head out of your fat ass.
Says the ignorant 41 year old that chooses to ignore countless amounts of information regarding nutrition. I think I'll play it safe and not listen to the moronic conspiracy theorist ;)
Why do you keep posting pictures and wanting me to "enjoy" them? lol Like a short, fluffy guy with no brain is going to turn me into your #1 fan or something
If I wanted to get into this pissing contest with you, I'd show you my gym progress over the course of 3 months and how much I changed. Or my best friend's weight loss from proper dieting over 6 months (losing something like 50 pounds and keeping it off).
By the way, since you seem to think nutrition is some conspiracy from the food industry and not years of study by the medical and sports community... Where do you think the suggested weight for your height came from? You seem to have no problem accepting that, but reject everything else like you've discovered some revolutionary new idea?
Regardless of what scale you follow by, do you know where those scales come from?
I think it just really varies from person to person, but I have to say that 2000 calories a day isn't that hard to hit even if you eat say 2 meals a day on average with some snacks here and there like me. And professional athletes can eat up to around 5-7thousand calories a day, depending on the sport, also eating very little a day can cause your body to freak out and conserve energy and absorb as many calories as possible when you do eat, which can actually result in you gaining weight or cause unhealthy fluctuations in your weight. But some people can eat and eat and not gain a pound, others will diet and exercise and do all sorts of healthy things and not shed a pound, things like genetics and metabolism and such make things like this very difficult, which is why there is never a one-size fits all diet.
First you can still be unhealthy even if you appear healthy.
We eat 3 meals because people needed calories when they were being active, but as a culture we are becoming less active.
I personally need about 2000 calories, as I work out 3 to 4 hours a day, I'm not a professional athlete and I'm 20. But it depends more on age, weight, and activity level, as if your doing more physical activity, you need more calories.
Losing too much weight too fast can be dangerous, also too few calories can be dangerous, as the body requires so many to even perform the most basic things, it may seem fine now, but in the long run, it is not sustainable.
I happily eat 3 meals a day and I'm still underweight. I often even snack on something during the day, or a while after dinner.
When you eat a lot less food than you're supposed to, your body goes into starvation mode. After a while, you'll start losing weight much slower than you would if you had a healthy diet and exercised well. Your diet is similar to that of someone who's becoming anorexic. When you lose weight this way, you'll gain it all back once you start eating normally again. And you can't eat that little forever either. You simply won't look good. So ditch the starving method.
Opinion
13Opinion
People are generally gullible that’s why. Especially when it comes to starvation mode. Your body only enters into that phase if there are insufficient calories for your body. This has nothing to do with meal frequency. People thinking that eating 5 times a day will prevent this but if they thought critically and realized that should those 5 meals still be severely deficient in calories, they will still be in starvation mode which will slow down their metabolism either way (as many proponents of these many small meals think that 5 meals will magically speed up their metabolism). This has been debunked so many times yet people still believe that. https://caliberstrong.com/blog/6-meals-a-day/
http://coachmikeblogs.com/the-many-meals-per-day-myth/
https://amp.smh.com.au/lifestyle/health-and-wellness/forget-the-food-rules-three-meals-a-day-is-not-the-only-way-20210216-p57304.html
Everyone is indeed different so no hate to those who eat at this frequency but it cannot be applied across the board. People should find what works for them. Something bad for you really isn’t for anyone else.
I don't no my over all calorie intake. And not all of is wives tale you don't need to eat 3 meals a day doctors and scientists say to eat small portions of food through out the day, and eating 3 meals a day is a good thing just as long as you are not eating unhealthy foods and not taking in those many calories, plus everybody works differently even if it is a little bit of a difference that little bit can make a big difference as well as taking into consideration if they have something genetic or a disease they might need to eat more or less.
Actually most animals spend pretty much all day eating or getting food, because they food they eat is not calorie dense.
Why we eat three times a day. Tradition. it has been that way for a while. If you think about it, it sure makes sense why we do too.
In the western world, we have been eating in that pattern for hundreds of years and we only just got obese, it's not the eating pattern, it's what we eat and how much. A fast food lunch can easily be 2000 calories just one meal
they still eat an average of 6 lbs a day, which is roughly 9% - 6% of their body weight. I don't know about you, but I don't eat 12 lbs of food a day.
Chimpanzees, spend about 80% of their waking time eating or looking for food. The same goes for most monkeys and apes. By far our closest living animal relatives
"We are the only ones in the animal kingdom who finds it necessary to put that much food in our diet." - Wrong.
"Then everyone wonders why we are so obese. A 2000 calorie a day intake is absolutely ridiculous unless you are under 20 years old or a professional athlete." - Some people ARE under 20 and Basal Metabolic Rate is different for everyone. 2,000 may be ridiculous FOR YOU but not for others.
I consume over 2,500 calories a day and I'm in great shape. What's the secret? Exercise.
It'd be incredibly difficult to have proper nutrition with so few calories. I don't think that's sustainable, nor does it seem very healthy.
My daily caloric intake is 1800 calories, and I have about 20 pounds left that I want to lose. I eat a mostly whole foods plant-based diet, and I try to eat raw where I can, and it's been incredibly successful for me.
It really depends on an individual's activity level and metabolism. I tend to only eat once a day because I have a very sedentary life but sometimes I forget to eat, go out walking around and end up woozy from low blood sugar :/ Ideally I think we're supposed to eat a series of small meals a day, I think the 3 meals a day thing is outdated tradition
We all have different metabolisms. Based off what you said you eat and your profile picture, I think if you ate more, you'd get fat as fuck. I think you're starving yourself by eating so little, so when you start eating normally, your body will take in everything it can and store it as fat.
Well if you eat so little, of course you're going to lose weight. That isn't necessarily a good thing though. You can be losing mostly muscle. You can lose weight eating hamburgers if you only eat one a day. The goal shouldn't be weight loss, it should be fat loss.
3 or more is good, I've seen it recommended in some fitness magazines that people eat up to 12 smaller meals. The spacing of meals carries a huge impact on metabolism; if you only eat one meal a day you risk slowing yours down.
Honestly, I'm the same way. I just finished my freshman year at college and I get so engrossed that I just don't want to get up to eat. In fact, I don't even really get hungry. As a result, I gained weight during my freshman year. You may see temporary weight drops, but I encourage you to continue eating on a regular schedule.
Also, I've found there are great mental benefits to eating regularly.
I started gaining weight when I ate 1-2x a day. I lose weight when I eat 6x a day small portions. Your metabolism slows down when you eat only 1x or 2x a day.
If that works for you then great! :)
in fact, breakfast is the most important meal of the day. they say that if a woman isn't eating breakfast, she's sexually active, not sure why that is
I eat a few times a day.. But not meals really. Just in small bits. And I'm technically a bit underweight
I eat more than 3 times a day. And I'm not on a diet. I just eat when I'm hungry. And no I'm not over weight.
you just need physical activity to use rather than surplus :D
You should be basing your diet on your BMR, and if you want to lose weight you need to create a deficit based on that number.
You're right and just FYI to lose 1 lb you will have to burn 3,500 calories.
Yep, been there done that.
I think I would be starving and have no energy to work out run or bike. I eat a lot and I'm not over weight, I just use the energy I eat.
I bike 40 miles some days, lift run a lot of miles and I need the carbs for energy. I need a larger calorie intake then that. I'm 157 lbs and 5'10 and I eat well over 2000 calories a day but like I said, I use them.
Im considered overweight and i dont know my caloric intake. probably less than 1200 right now
I've been eating about one meal a day if I eat some days I don't eat at all.
I would if I could but I can't afford to eat much more right now. Not really able to sleep much either.
Because Man is the only species whose diet is not predictable. The diet of all other animals is certain.
I think that's more the other way around.
I eat when im hungry, no more no less, some days i dont eat at all depends on my appetite i guess
Have you ever been around an animal? They may hunt once a day, but they nibble a lite throughout the day.
2600 kcal and losing 1kg a week.
Are you a manlet?
I'm 5'7" and 135 lbs, not sure if that matters in this conversation... I'm neither fat nor muscular, though.
You can also add your opinion below!
Most Helpful Opinions