For years I have always thought marriage today was always a silly concept unless you were both religious, same as valentines day. Why do I need a day, or an event to affirm that I love or am 'officially' with a person, it just seemed like a lot of money that would be better spent on things that actually did something.
Recently though, related to your question (hence the context) I changed my mind. I think both people should change their last name, I see marriage now as more of a ceremony that you're now both recognised as a joined family.
So in light of that, I think you should both take on each others names - you could also create a new name which is a mix of the two.
So in short, I think it makes sense to marry if the woman AND the man both change their names to encompass the two - to signify you're part of those respective families.
Most Helpful Opinions
I think you have the question wrong !! It's not should a women change her last name it's. Will she change her last name? Cause in the age of choices we choose to be apart of our husbands life and we take on that with the name change. If your marrying him out of love and wanting to live with him your whole life that means you want to share his life and bear his children. (Talked about before marriage) incase he does not want a child and you do.
You take on his last name as being a part of him now. Does that explain it
Its not mandatory but I think its a smart idea. If you and your husband have the same last name - people will be more likely to see you two as living in harmony with one another and agreeing with one another and happy with the relationship and have no intention of severing your bond. I know two people who could not change their last name because there sister in law had the same first name as the wife so if she changed her last name she would have the exact same name as her sister in law but before I learned this reason - I assumed the wife and husband argued a lot cause they had different last names.
For me changing last names makes no sense and it's a weird custom that haven't existed in my country since medieval times, and therefore I don't understand why other countries keep it. In any case it's an offense to the woman's family to be erased that way. Plus seems a bit messy when it comes to identification documents.
However if you belong to a country where this is the custom, it's expected for you to do so, and if you don't follow the custom you would be seen as not enaugh in love or not able to commit.
I think it is up to them. if they want to great, if they don't great.
Personally I would keep my maiden name as a middle name and get a new last name, this is what my mom did. I see marriage as binding yourself to another, sharing yourself completely. So it makes sense to me to also share in their name.
What Girls & Guys Said
Opinion
89Opinion
I say only if she wants to. I was trying to find a more scholarly find but I don’t have enough point to post an article lol.
Back in the day, woman were required to change names because it was a law and woman were seen as one with their hubbys. Kinda like they were owned/ property is how I kinda looked at it which isn’t cool.
I feel anyone should feel free to choose whatever name they want. I do see how sharing the same last name as a family could bring closeness and I would agree that I would like that. but no one should changed their identities just because of silly tradition. Be you, talk with your partners and see if you could come up with a compromise and or, they may not care.You don't have to, your choice really. But I personally will take my fiancé's last name when we get married because I love him and want to officially be his forever and ever :) and have our kids have his name too so everyone knows we are a big family :)
Women should continue to change their last name if they want marriage to not disappear completely. It's one of the last remaining benefits of marriage for men. Over the last 40 years most of the benefits of marriage for men have disappeared while the risks and costs of marriage for men have continued to rise. Take away this last remaining benefit and most men will just say fuck it.
Another consideration is the mindset of a woman who wants to keep her last name. Personally, I would never marry a woman who wouldn't enthusiastically choose to take my last name. That decision on her part would tell me everything I need to know about her mindset, her priorities and her worldview to know with certainty that she is not someone I would want to commit my life to.Change it... maybe... take it- definitely. When I was younger I would have definitely changed my name for a man. ( say in my 20s) Now that I am older, and have achieved a lot by my name, I am quite attached to it. I think if I did get married I would attach his name to mine.
It's traditional, however the couple themselves can choose how they want to do the whole surname arrangement thing... does the guy take her surname... does she take his surname... do they join both surnames... endless possibilities. I don't mind either way.
If he's the primary provider, then yes, because she's entering his household because he's the one paying for it. But if they want an egalitarian relationship in which the woman provides equally, then there's no more justification for the woman to take the man's last name, because it's equally her own household.
I mean, why not get it hyphenated? That way everyone wins!!! Though if he didn't like that, then id expect him to comprise with the name of our son if we had one. Where i could pick his middle name to be my dads name. Since thats the tradition in my family with boys getting the mothers fathers name as their middle one. Then id be happy.
I don't think so. I don't get why anyone should be changing their last name after marriage, like what the heck. When I first heard that such a thing exists somewhere on this planet and not only have people taken it as a norm but also some people living here think imitating that stupid thing is somehow cool... I never got it and I'll never get it. I'm not changing my surname after marriage.
Not really.. Generally people marry around the age of 30. By this age, each one has its own identity formed in the society. So it may get affected after sudden change.
But it's upto that woman. If she wants to she can change her name.
She should not be pressurized.It really, truly does not matter to me. It is entirely up to the individual woman whether she wants to or not. My ex-wife did take my last name when we got married, mainly because she had bad relations with her family and wanted to do so. I would have been happy either way. She is now remarried and has taken her new husband's last name, which is totally fine as well.
I'm going to do this when I marry.
I love tradition and taking his last name really makes me feel like I'm his woman. That's something special.
But if a woman desires not to have her surname changed, she could just add on to the original. It's what my mom did.It's up to her. Likewise for the husband. Thing is, if she doesn't she'll just stick with her father's name - one way or another she's receiving a surname from a man.
Unless we have a new pattern of girls getting their surname from their mother... but then the mother will have got it from her father, and so on.It's her wish. She may change or not. It's ok if she changes but it's wonderful when she adds both surname just like "Aishwarya Rai Bachan". It would be more pleasing and happy to a husband to have both the names than just changing her name.
To be Frank my mother uses her father's surname even today after 30+ years of marriage than her husband's. Even in every legal paper.It is best to be one family, including the kids. She only has her father’s name anyway. the male name can be traced back using dna as Y DNA can be traced through recent generations and a common name helps. Midoconrial dna cannot be traced in recent generations.
This is definitely one of those things that as a guy it's a good idea to get a sense of how strongly she feels about this early on. Because it's probably not a great indicator of a harmonious life for you to come if she's super rigid about refusing to take your name. Even worse if she's insisting on something different for the kids.
It’s always optional it’s never should you or should you not. It’s whatever you want. Nobody really cares what your name is unless it’s a super weird awkward name or a really cool one.
I always prefer whatever sounds better together... or added.Of the the cultural stuff we do, this one kinda makes sense... keeps it simple for the kids. Some women like their lengthy hyphenated names, and that's cool, but expecting your kid to go by Brayden Shexnater-Dombrosky is pretty crazy.
For sure. It is a nice tradition to signify the two marrying and starting a new life together! I am going to take his name when I get married - I want him to know that I am his.
No, they don't have to. I plan on keeping my last name because it's a family name going back hundreds of years and if I have any children, they will have it too.
Its a personal choice. I would change my name if I got married because I don't like the idea of my child having two last names and its tradition. But if my husband had a stupid name like "pooface" or something, I would want him to change his name.
Learn more
We're glad to see you liked this post.
You can also add your opinion below!
Most Helpful Opinions