
Yes, I believe they can
No they can't
Other/It depends (left opinion below)
Select gender and age to cast your vote:
Please select your age
Girl's Behavior
Guy's Behavior
Flirting
Dating
Relationships
Fashion & Beauty
Health & Fitness
Marriage & Weddings
Shopping & Gifts
Technology & Internet
Break Up & Divorce
Education & Career
Entertainment & Arts
Family & Friends
Food & Beverage
Hobbies & Leisure
Other
Religion & Spirituality
Society & Politics
Sports
Travel
Trending & News 
Of course. They just find women who agree with them. Many women have no issues with the "trade". It depends on the society you are in. I know in many societies women trade their rights for imagined protection or status. They may not have access to every right or liberty. But they have some insulation from other issues in society that may or may not be real.
I think the funny thing is, western societies are so backwards and nonsensical about women's rights. You have men who are angry about women moving up in society, when it was the assault on the family that caused this in the first place. If we had only guaranteed that a man could support an entire family on a working man's salary alone. . . . WOMEN WOULD HAVE NEVER HAD TO SEEK CAREERS.
It is just so stupid to hear men whine about this crap. But our society is so racist and sexist, it is too irrational to seek common sense solutions. We wouldn't have a society full of broken marriages, single parent families, etc.
I am a firm believer in traditional values. But I am also a realist. We are much too stupid to figure the way out of this jungle we created. We are failing in moral/ethical values, education, common sense, science, democratic principles, freedoms, rights,. . . every thing is falling apart.
Yes. When we say "sexist", it tends to have a negative connotation, but that is a skewed view. Sexism is simply prejudice in regards to gender. Prejudice is simply categorizing an entire demographic and attributing certain traits or behaviors to that group. The traits don't necessarily need to be negative, abusive, etc.
It could be:
"All women are caring, nurturing and loving beings, that deserve love and respect."
"All men are protective of those they love."
While I don't think even positive sexism is a good thing, I do see how sexist people could have healthy relationships. The reason being they have a strong sense of roles: what the man is expected to do, what the woman is expected to do. Everyone has their place, their role, their duties, and it makes it simple. I would even venture to say for more simple minded people, having prejudices and roles makes their lives a bit easier to manage, since they won't have to do any higher thinking, processing all the "what ifs" that are present when one is more open minded. A narrow perspective makes things more cut and dry; what is right and wrong laid out like black and white.
Again, while this might not be objectively actually "right and wrong", within the framework of a relationship, it allows the participants to be more secure and clearly define their roles/expectations.
But even "positive" prejudice is unhealthy because not all women
" are caring, nurturing and loving beings, that deserve love and respect."
And not all men are protective of their families...
@Brainsbeforebeauty true, but when that is the expectation, it can set a healthy boundary (or also an unreasonable expectation that will never be fulfilled, YMMV). For example, a woman who believes that about men will seek out men that fit her ideal, and any man who doesn't "isn't a real man". And in the relationship, if he doesn't fill his role/expectation, she is more likely to break up rather than tolerate "bad" behavior that doesn't fit her prejudice.
I'm not saying the prejudice is healthy, I'm saying "people with sexist views... can sustain happy, healthy relationships" , technically, as per the question.
I think they can. What came to my mind when I saw this question is if they can raise children of the opposite sex more then have a healthy happy relationship.
For example, a father who is sexist and talks to his daughter saying sexist things against women. Or the opposite, with a mother and a son.
Most of the time, those people don't have bad intentions. They are just their opinions and points of view.
Sexist people are used to always be "on guard" about the opposite gender, but if they have children of the opposite gender, is the real test for them.
Most of the time they are just scared people.
I've actually asked that in the past as well because I don't think they realize the damage they can do to their children if they show nothing but hate to the gender that child is..
No. I don't think they can, personally. You need to have respect for your partner, and if you have sexist views of whatever sex you are in a relationship with, you obviously don't respect that person in some regard either.
Someone in this relationship is going to be unhappy.
I agree💯
Opinion
77Opinion
If both parties have them then yes.
If it's one-sided, not really. It can hobble along but probably won't be that fulfilling for the other.
Do you mean if both parties are prejudiced against the other gender? Or if both parties are prejudiced against the same gender? Or both the man and the woman are prejudiced against men? Or both the man and the woman are prejudiced against women?
@Jamie05rhs hahaha. I meant if the man has sexist views about women, and the woman has sexist views about men. Those types have rigid ideas of gender, do 'strict adherence to rigid gender roles' and they actually tend to get along decently well. Even though, to others, more progressive and egalitarian types, they are comparatively very sexist.
@AmandaYVR Good point; yes. I definitely see what you mean there. (Those relationships still make me puke, though.)
@Cherry234 Thanks, Cherry 🤗
Yw Amanda 😊 @AmandaYVR
what she may have meant was, do you think people with virtues can have a healthy relationship.. People call me sexist when I prefer women who don't sleep around.. the failure is I AM not judging people.. if you feel judgement maybe you shouldn't be into virtuous guys who don't sleep around and likewise don't want to sleep around. I think that its realistic to look at the reality of the sexes.. NOT sexist. the reality of the sexes is both men and women want kids, (in general) and biology kinda cucked women on a time limit.. thats fairly brief , I think 27 ,28 ,29 , 30 year old women are intelligent. depending on the women I might go for it. but basic bio , is the reason I don't , and thats for most men. The odds are someone thinks well i am objectifying women.. when I know the reality.. I am expected to have a decent to high paying job and the longer I wait the higher paying job I can have, and the higher the pay the less likely a women is making more than me, and there is nothing wrong with that, except evolution to women says the women is not dating up if she dates someone with less pay.. THAT is not sexist. that is literally the functionality of men in the world to provide. so men who wait tend to have better women , not just attractive. If you lived in Louisiana you would be a sexist too , they had very attractive 26+ year old women asking where are all the men.. I did my whoring around in my early 20's.. oh.. they are fucking the whores in Louisiana with 20+ counts at the age of 19 . Thats where they are.. , but I digress even my ex said that the average female was gullible and believes all kinds of bullshit.. like the pronoun shit.. She was Bi , pro lgBT type shit.. BUT she was WAY an anti feminist. Fuck yeah i loved her brain. . I like a little realism in my life. I dated a women who said... you can't talk about this or that.. i was like.. uh bye. its simple.. I am a very real minded person.. I am soft with the people I love, but I am still gonna be down right honest. If im not allowed to be honest.. then there is no reason for me to be here. SO you should be specific with your question then.. Because what some people call sexist is sexist and what some people call sexist is just base reality , 50% of Louisiana women are whores.. and if you disagree with that.. you would be offending them.. they are whores. they love dick they say it all the time.. infact fuck you for not being a whore is the attitude they would have. . my God my sister admits to raping her husband. . jokingly. and she has a high count. so I am happy finding something genuine somewhere else.. and I suppose its gonna be like 10% of women that i would actually care to like.. Mainly the ones who are passed up because some dumbass saw a big ass and thought that was better than love. and there's nothing wrong with beauty.
Yes if they love the person and are moved for a change.
But it depends on the quality level of the individual.
A valuable woman knows that to sustain a valuable man in their life, they must continue maintaining the value worth, and must bring such value to the table.
And a invaluable man likewise also knows they must maintain a valuable masculine frame, that sustains and maintains a woman who is worth it.
But people of low value don't understand this and also can't attract anyone valuable in their life. There are some exceptions. But for the most part they attract who they are and they will stay stuck in a bad view of the opposite sex and it will affect their relationship.
But no matter what value a person is, something that cannot be measured with any value measure stick, which is love, love will change an individual and take them to the destination they need to go to maintain that love. Some people may be mature enough to manage that love while others are trying to learn how to be valuable people so that they can maintain such beautiful love they're experiencing.
This is just my opinion, but my opinion will hit deep because a lot of people know exactly what I'm talking about.
Just because someone messes up it doesn't mean that they haven't loved the person. They just don't know how to manage the love burning inside them.
Everyone can agree that sexist views are not healthy and are toxic though. But a person can change if they are in love. But if they are not in love but still care about their partner, then, there is a possibility for Change and compromise. However if there's no connection whatsoever in an emotional level, physical level, and a mental level, then they will begin to destroy their relationship.
Healthy? No.
But I suppose if might be possible for two people to be happy in a sick kind of way if one of them had low self esteem and didn't mind being treated as inferior. In that case, though, the dominant one might be happy, but I don't think a person who thinks they are inferior is happy with themselves in general. So it wouldn't be what I would call a happy relationship. It would be more like two people satisfying some need.
A happy, healthy relationship is an equal partnership in which two people respect each other.
Well said friend... Agree💯brrr☃️😅
Or winter😂
This gets my vote. 👏
If by sexist, you mean a man who thinks women are useless, then yeah he can't maintain a good relationship, since that thought will cloud his judgement on what to do, and always assuming the worst. However, if you mean "sexist" as in believing that gender roles are good and that men and women are different and they are better at certain things, and compliment each other without having to compete for the same stuff, then that person is not sexist, he just doesn't follow feminism and is a traditional masculine provider who can maintain a healthy relationship.
maybe?
many of them just want a "weak-minded" person by their side that doesn't confront them and submits to the way they see things and that's probably their idea of happiness
and then yes, you see couples around that fall into that kind of dynamic... I guess it's their version of happiness
Good point
one thing is for sure though... here at G@G, all of the sexist people are bitter AF
never seen any shade of happiness or healthy, lmao
Exactly! So how could they even be in a healthy happy relationship,?
well, for my comment, I focused on some way older people I know... that are a bit sexist in a more old fashioned and traditional way but they're not so extreme...
and in being more measured about their views well, they can be happier... but here at G@G, some people seem to take it to the extremes, so I am assume some are happier but not the bitterfucks around here... lol
Lol..
What society thinks is sexist, others think is normal or desirable.
A classmate of mine expressed that she'd like to be a stay at home mom and "stay in the kitchen." If her boyfriend holds the sexist view that women should be forced to do that, then it won't impact their relationship. In fact, it may be a net positive, because it aligns their view of what each other should be doing.
Now sexism that creates only negative feelings about the opposite sex will cause the relationship to fail, because you'll just end up hating the other person too. It's kind of like adopting a dog despite hating dogs.
Depends on the sexism
Depends on the people
Even as a feminist, I would say yes, because if they have the same beliefs and are truly happy with the assigned role they're in then yes. It also depends on what you call healthy. I think it's a subjective term. If healthy means consentual and both parties feel fulfilled and happy, then yes I think it can even be healthy.
I would say though that this is extremely rare. You would have to find a woman being completely content with being subjected and being inferior to her husband. I don't think many women would subject to that if they knew better.
Absolutely not. There wouldn’t be a balance or respect for each other I mean it’s 2021 almost 2022 we’re practically living in the future. Sexism, misogyny, chauvinism, just wouldn’t work I mean our beliefs have changed within time and it’d just be too difficult to sustain a relationship with someone who just doesn’t have the same views as you (toxicity). Plus, that person would forcefully have to change because the algorithm of our own society is evolving every single day.. unless he time traveled to the past to find a partner (which that would be CLEARLY impossible) .
Why would you try to apply your own 2 cents on my comment that I perfectly combined for others to read. I am trying to create a positive understanding. That word simply does not “fit” with what I was trying to come across.
Obviously feminism is chauvinistic and every woman is practically a feminist in the west. Hence they can't sustain a relationship and initiate 8 or 9/10 breakups
Smart men would time travel by going to other countries to find partners
@AddictofLove Oh get out of here with that bullshit.. Don't confuse female with feminist... And uh I sustained my relationship for 20 years... But thanks for showing a prime example of the sexist bullshit😊
I've not met one woman who didn't at some point say sexist bullshit about the men they chose to marry
The men they choose to marry aren't even good enough to not hate. Hilarious. Mgtow is the way.
@AddictofLove Then go already, bye now😊
I would apply my two cents, because I'm calling you both a sexist and hypocrite. The OP used gender neutral words ("people", "opposite sex") to ask people their opinion on sexism.
Your reply however is gendered, using both "misogyny" and "he", while not adding the other side of the coin there being "misandry" or "she" (or better yet, leave "he" and "she" out of it). You are a sexist.
@David_Kek Every female is a sexist. Thats why every pimp uses the B word and would rather use girls for money than pleasure.
Imagine being a pimp and girls giving you the money of random guys they banged. Youd never look at females the same. If you did youd be insane.
@David_Kek Find me a woman who isn't and lets have a Skype investigation of her. Just to show you how fucking deceived you are. All women are sexists, period.
@David_Kek See you talk like a woman. You're a mothers boy.
No.
I've met two kinds of Feminists: Rational and irrational.
Rational Feminists are absolutely lovely people to be around. Logical, reasonable, recognize the struggles that men go through and don't try to diminish them while also still not minimizing their own in the same breath and recognizing that every man was a little boy once and was likely hurt just as badly by just as many hurtful women in his life.
Irrational feminists... aren't.
I greatly enjoy the company of the first type.
I would say it depends on the two people but I would also say no if you notice on here there are many guys that just hate women I don't care what the girls say to them do for them they still hate women and that's just sucks because if it wasn't for women we would all still be cavemen wearing no underwear with the chicken bone in our hand and scratching our ass with the other hand s a y i n g dude have you seen my car
This answer😂😂😂I thought you said scratching your ass with the chicken bone LMAO
😂😂😂 although now don't know as I'll ever eat chicken again lolol
I think it depends on what they are. Someone who thinks "Women are happier in the home than in the workplace" will probably be okay with someone who feels similarly; someone who thinks "Women are intellectually stunted, overgrown children" is going to have a harder time of it.
Good point...
I don't believe they can. If they have negative views of the opposite sex then they would be a drain on their future partners and they wouldn't want to deal with that and would just eventually break up.
I agree
People can do what they want in their relationships. As many people have said here, depending on its use, something that feels sexist to one person does not bother another. I generally call it sexism if something is applied to an entire gender and has the potential to discriminate if incorporated into the framework of our society. It has afflict everyone as a generalization.
So, if you and your partner prefer to live in traditional roles, I am 100% on your side, as it is your right to choose and I don’t see your happiness threatening anyone. People are allowed to be different.
Only if you meet me (a stranger) and expect me to be like your partner or go as far as demand I change, will I call it sexism.
I say to each their own, so if you’re not hurting anyone, you can choose to live as you want.
There's a whole pile of stuff that could be unpacked here, most of it unnecessarily so.
Key to the problem is the notion that the differences between the two sexes are inherently sexist, useless and harmful. They are none of these.
Let's look at those nice little washroom signs. For years, people clamoring for "equality" , "equity", whatever, demanded "unisex" bathrooms. Well, that is what they had for centuries- unisex, as in ONE sex. What they wanted in their little "reality" was PAN-sex or OMNI-sex bathrooms. And just as many can't discern the difference between unisex bathrooms and omni-sex bathrooms, I doubt that many could even give a decently understandable discourse on sexual differences vs sexist "views". But , you knew that.
A very good question @Brainsbeforebeauty. I think we have to first look at word sexist. The truth is feminism has overhyped the word. I'll be the first person to say women DESERVE equality. Equality doesn't mean just the advantageous parts lol. But the problem with equality comes the reality that there will be certain things that men and women will likely NEVER be equal at. Men have their tendencies just as women do. To ignore that is to ignore reality.
I could elaborate but some might call me sexist.
Well only if their partner or potential partner somehow agrees with their sexist views - also I truly think what some people might view as utterly sexist might be viewed as normal or "okay.." by a partner that really likes the person - Especially when dudes don't practice what they preach and I'm glad they don't (Like he says girls are not logical then asks his girlfriend for advice and likes having intellectual conversations with her) - Same goes for girls (all guys are jerks and liars and pigs then she falls in love and truly loves him).. That's the only way I see this happening - Imagine how non existent these people's romantic lives would be if they practiced literally what they preached..
- Sometimes their sexist views comes later in the relationship.
- Sometimes it's not like they express sexist opinions and enforce them on you. Rather they keep it to themselves.
What I am saying is that it depends but that is true for everything.
It's not always apparent who is what.. I think this question is posed in regards to the way sexists push their opinions online. Online arguments are not indicative of how sexist men behave IRL, very few things said online are a true reflections of who they are in reality.
I think it heavily depends on your definition of sexism and the amount of it.
There is sexism that effects a relationship less than other. Sexism that involves hobbies or activities would cause less harm than sexism in aspects of personality or character.
Therefore it can be said in general from my point of view that people with sexists view can´t have healthy, happy relationships.
Depends how strongly they adhere to their own views in how they carry themselves. Regardless of how anybody feels about it, the communication between men and women is first and foremost sexual in nature. That is primary
If he understands that and upholds his side of things, then his woman is going to be attracted to him regardless of how ever sexist some of his views may be.
People seem to conflate sexism and misogyny. They're not the same. I'd actually argue that there are more sexist people with healthy relationships that last than others that are careful not to be sexist.
Bcause they have the important stuff that actually matters most in check. People who actually care about sexist ideas are usually kind of a puss. Just saying
Depends on the situation e. g. if during there upbringing someone has had very specific ideals impressed upon them and they need with someone who renforces them ideals then it might work
Or in a same sex relationship the couple might share the same sexist opinions... Or not as them opinions might not have any impact on there relationship!
if they are willing to change and work on them yeah. if both people hold the save views and live their lives tht way then yes. if one likes the feeling then yeh probs. sometimes its not a core value but a way to handle insecurities. if its understood and the care is there then yeah. id recommend against it tho
It depends on whether the views are sound or not, I suppose. But generally yes. In fact, I don't think you can have a truly stable relationship if both parties don't understand appreciate the innate differences between them.
Sexist people don't understand, respect our appreciate differences...
Would you really want to be with a woman who says all men are rapists? Or all men are perverts who will cheat?
I know I wouldn't be with a man who spoke negatively about my whole gender...
No, I wouldn't want to be with a woman who thought those things. I wouldn't be compatible with a senseless misandrist. That's why I qualified with "if those views are sound." I do want to be with a women who believes that men are have a stronger affinity for confrontation, and physicality, while women are more social and nurturing. There are countless important true facts that are technically "sexist." That's totally acceptable.
I guess it's what people consider sexist... To me acknowledging differences isn't sexist... Putting someone down, judging their abilities, or intellect, or excusing behavior for one gender while criticizing the other for the same thing is what I consider sexist
I mean when men excuse men who cheat, but women who cheat are worthless slurs.. ANYONE who cheats is wrong... You don't get a pass to cheat just cuz you have a penis... And to say all men are smarter than all women, that's not true... Someone's intelligence and capabilities isn't gender specific
Cheating is bad no matter who does it. A double standard there would be bad, in my opinion. But what do you say to someone who believes that men are generally more suited to things like math and engineering than women? Does that count as sexist to you? Not claiming that ALL men are smarter than ALL women, but that men are more often better at certain rational tasks than the average women. Do you have a problem with that?
My younger daughter is really good at math, while I suck at math... I don't think all men are better at math then all women, I think some people are better at math than others. My husband, her dad for example wasn't very good at math either
Yeah but I believe they should be more individual specific not gender specific...
Is it that hard to treat a person based off their own personal behavior then too lump all women as the same? Do you want to be treated but your own personal behavior or by how other men behave? Because not all men think our behave the same anymore than all women do...
And you keep bringing up math skills.. I more mean the "all women lie" all women are gold diggers, all women want a man to provide for them, etc etc
I always treat people according to their individual merit (progressives hate it when I do that, but that's besides the point). But that doesn't make tendencies or averages irrelevant. They are very informative for predicting things, or making guesses when individual status has not yet been made clear. Math skills are just an easy example. We could be talking about any stereotype that has factual basis. But to to explain the usefulness of accepting averages: Do you think STEM fields should be more gender balanced? If you accept that there are actual differences in male and female math aptitude, then the answer is no. A gender imbalance is entirely appropriate. It is both expected and desirable. But if you reject gender differences totally, then you might wish for programs that try to guide the balance of men and women in STEM. This issue would not be a matter of individuals. It's a matter of your diagnoses and responses to high profile statistical facts of the world we live in. You can't just brush gender differences under the rug because you "don't want to judge." You're making a judgement either way, and that decision can have wide reaching consequences.
This was about relationships not STEM your making points that don't even apply to this question... But okay🤷 It's quite simple.. If you're a man that treats women disrespectfully how do you expect to maintain a healthy happy relationship with a woman.. If you're a woman that treats all men disrespectfully,... You just went off on a tangent
I'm aware that this conversation has gone off on a tangent from the original question, but I have found it interesting. It isn't uncommon to find people who are uncomfortable even acknowledging the possibility of broad differences between groups. I've often wondered where that block comes from. You seem to understand that some general beliefs are okay and some are not. But you're also resistant to admitting that some stereotypes are totally fine to believe. I'm just trying to find out where you draw the line and why.
The ultimate remain back to the question is that I don't believe it's disrespectful to women to believe (for example) that more often than not, they are happiest with a man who provides for them. I don't see how that belief is either incorrect or disrespectful, and I'd like to be with a woman who agrees. But you imply that that's an idea that's no good, and I'm curious why.
Because you should be with someone because you love them, respect them not just for what they can provide for you.
And no I don't go by stereotypes because too many times you miss out on the people that don't fit those stereotypes and by falsely stereotyping someone, you don't get to truly know them that way... You can base your decisions off stereotypes I go by real facts and real behavior not gender assumptions or stereotypes
Individual realities always take precedence over stereotypes and assumptions. I've been consistent about that this whole time. But it's possible to accept that, and even to be perfectly open to new information, while still accepting the reality of relevant statistical tendencies. I even gave you an example of a situation where individual state isn't even part of the equation.
Here's what's baffling me. Most of what you've been saying is stuff I agree with. Individuals are primary, always. But you keep evading what I'm trying to talk about. And you keep implying that the things you say are in disagreement with the things I say.
I'm asking you if average differences are ever important. You're responding by saying that when there are individual facts, those are more important. I agree, but that's not relevant to my inquiry. They're not at all in conflict. Yet you're resisting every attempt to say something as simple as "women are better at X" or "men prefer Y". Why? Those can be true while still accepting the primacy of the individual. So where does the resistance come from?
Oh and seeing you wanted to bring up math:
There are no gender differences in math ability, according to a study that examined the brain development of young boys and girls. There are no gender differences in math ability, according to a study that examined the brain development of young boys and girls. Nov 10, 2019
www.aauw.org/.../
Because that implies all men think the same or all women are good at the same thing and it's not true.. look at the poll on this post half the men voted one way, half the other, because men don't ask behave the same way, think the same way... This isn't just about differences in opposite sex. There's differences in the same gender...
You keep making this about the differences in gender.. First I never said men and women are the same. . But then why can you recognize men and women have differences but not get men also have differences from other men as do women... Not all women are good cooks, not all women are good mothers, not all women etc, etc
Not all men are good mechanics, not all men are logical thinkers, not all men like sports, blah blah
Tendencies can coexist with variations! No one is saying that every claim has to be universal!
Men are taller than women. That doesn't mean all men are taller than all woman. Nor does *that* mean that it's untrue or irrelevant that men are generally taller than women.
The exceptions to not disprove the rule.
It would make no sense to discard the belief "men are taller than women" just because some women are taller than other men. That's a huge nugget on information about the world and it makes no sense to discard it, and there absolutely no reason to.
It's trivially easy to say "Men are generally taller than women" and also say "but not always. Shiela is 6'3", which is taller than most guys."
Can you agree with me there? There is no conflict between acknowledging stereotype and accepting individual exception. What's the problem?
I think the confusion is what is considered sexist. Saying men are taller than women isn't a sexist remark... Saying all men are rapists would be... Saying only women can give birth isn't sexist... Saying women are only good for sex or reproducing would be🤷
So you're saying you'd be okay with being stereotyped as a rapist just because you're a man, 🤔
If men were usually rapists, yes. Since they are not, no.
I don't care about the label "sexist" or how negative a belief might be. All I care about is whether it's true or not. First generally, but more importantly individually.
If all men were rapists, why would I have a problem with being characterized as a rapist? Seriously, why would I have a problem with that assumption, if it was true (or near enough to true to be reasonable)?
But therein lies the point... Most sexist stereotypes aren't true... All women aren't gold diggers but are some? Yes. Does that mean me or any other woman should be labeled a gold digger just because there's "some" out there?
Don't negatively stereotype people just because of their gender
I don't care about most, I care about the true ones.
"just because of their ____" is always a strawman. Nobody believes a stereotype "just because of gender" or whatever. They believe it because they've seen a whole lot of women who are gold diggers, and very few men who are, so they've concluded (perhaps mistakenly, but based on their experience nonetheless) that most women are gold diggers. It's not baseless or stupid, even if it's totally incorrect. Confirmation bias, selection bias, and unfortunate sampling can cause misguided impressions, but that doesn't make it unreasonable to draw a conclusion based on the apparent data.
Believing something that's not correct isn't stupid? How's that? And men are said to be more logical thinkers 🤦
And there's way more women that aren't gold diggers so why not believe women aren't... Because the whole point of sexist people is to paint the opposite gender in a negative light whether it's true or not.. Sexism isn't about truth it's about hatred same as racism
If you know that something is not correct, then you don't believe it. Believing something that's based on evidence, but turns out to be false anyways, isn't necessarily stupid. Looking back in hindsight with knowledge of the result doesn't turn the conclusions made at the time with limited information into stupidity.
Someone believes something to be true, then that thing is labeled sexism or racism. That's how it always works. No one sets out to hate someone. Some things are true, and are called sexist. Some things are false, and are called sexist. The truth is important, not the label. The label just gets used to dismiss valid ideas because it's "mean" to have certain opinions. That's not a position that values truth. That's a position that values feelings.
You're still not getting it but okay.🤷
You are so miscomprehending, misconstruing things. I'll call a rapist a rapist, I'll call a gold digger a gold digger. .. I just won't falsely label and judge people based off their gender alone
And how is false stereotypes correct? It's not again that makes no damn sense🤷
Who determines what's considered "generally" true and 'exception though? Biased sexists? 😂
No, as they hold extreme high standards of the opposite sex and if one were to find the person that meets that person's standards they would probably take advantage of them. I think typically sexist people are narcissistic and will be toxic to whomever they get in a relationship with.
Yes. In fact I’d go a step further and say that they’re more likely to have happy relationships. If by sexist we mean someone who thinks that the idea of equality is ridiculous.
Men and women aren’t the same, other than effort put into the relationship everything doesn’t have to be equal or 50/50.
A big source of many people’s problems as I see it, in fact for the ones who hate the opposite sex the most especially, is the expectation that the opposite sex be like them. The man-hating feminist want a woman with a dick, a man who thinks and acts like a woman. MGTOW want a man with tits and a vagina. But naturally neither actually fond this attractive even if they find it, so they’re always miserable.
This isn't about men and women being the same... This is about thinking negatively of the opposite gender or labeling all men or all women as the same... Just like men and women have differences so are women different from one another as are men...
I personally wouldn't be in a relationship with a man who thinks all women are gold diggers after their wallets, or all women are looking for their next relationship while still in their current or all women are incapable of thinking rationally.. If you don't respect the opposite gender, how do you expect to be in a relationship with someone if the opposite gender?
People who hate the opposite sex obviously won’t do well, but neither will those who think that we’re the same. Your whole thing is pretending that everything’s random when it isn’t.
I'm not pretending anything... And random? I'd say more individual traits and characteristics...
Now me personally will not date someone who is sexist but some people are more nonchalant and understanding than I am and will see it as "We might not agree on things but as long as we respect each other and care for each other with no cheating or lies then we could always communicate about things and work it out". I don't know that's just how I see it.
I have been with my wife for 10 years and I know how women are. Most people call that sexist but it is simply an understanding of biology.
She has lived up to every concept and standard of female I have had.
I love her and I understand that her actions are biology and not malice.
Anyone who thinks that sexist people can maintain healthy happy relationships is a retard. And the only people who marry sexists tend to be other "sexist people".
👍👍
Sure, if they exclusively date people of their own gender.
😂😂😂 right!! LOL
The only way it could happen is if the non-sexist partner is submissive. So the sexist partner will be abusive for example a feminist who has a boyfriend or a husband: She will be abusive to him and he will put up with it because he is submissive and/or he is using her for money so he thinks it's worth the tradeoff. The converse is true if the man is a chauvenist.
It seems fairly unlikely. Though I do know some women who kind of like men like that. And you can argue what is or isn't healthy. But those are more edge cases. Generally speaking, I don't see it being a part of a vast majority of healthy relationships.
No, How you stereotype people is how you treat people. Men with sexist views are more likely to accept violence against women or interfere with women’s career advancement.
And women who think all men cheat will never give their partner the trust they deserve if they're not like that
The hold those views because they can't. Hence all their BS projection.
👍👍
I don't know, anything is possible, I personally couldn't. If the man is really sexist and he thinks that the woman should stay home and take care of the children, and that women are inferior (intellectually) to men, that will be a problem for me.
No, I could not date people who are prejudiced against Females or Males
Same, I can't even be friends with people like that... I mean you paint all men as bad, that's like saying my husband was bad, or my nephews or my great nephews or grandson will be... Yeah my father was a bad man, but not because he was a man because he was an evil "person".. Same for my first husband (ex husband) but that doesn't mean all men are like that and would be no justification to treat all men negatively for the bad actions of two
@Brainsbeforebeauty My dad has always been a mean person he is age 80
and still miserable but his Brother ( Uncle George) passed age 67 due to
Multiple Myeloma was a very sweet man you wouldn't know they were brothers
Yeah I have an ain't that's a real b*tch, but my mom's awesome... But then they half sisters, so🤷 lol
*aunt
@Brainsbeforebeauty Yes, I hear you on that one it's amazing how one could be different from the other
How can you be in a healthy relationship if you don't even respect her as a person?
Exactly!!! Thank you!!
Yeah, because when you get into a relationship it's with an individual woman Not with the unwashed millions of man hating feminists and professional victims using their vagina as a crutch to keep from taking responsibility for their own failures.
In today's time with everyone being offended by something. Who is the judge or the jury that decides exactly what is sexist in the first place. It just seems these days anything you say is sexist racist or xenophobic etc. I guarantee you this statement will hurt somebody's feelings. Get over yourselves.
Not for a long time. The real asshole them comes out and if you’re psychologically weak, you’ll get stuck into this rut of a relationship, that’s the only way it’ll work, if your psychologically weak.
does being sexist mean "acknowledging that there's differences between men and women"?
No not to me
i feel like it does to many who use that word.
You think that, don't mean that's true
oh good xD you understood how "opinions" work then xD
Yep just making sure you do😁
what would make you think i don't?
Lol where did I say that😂
well you don't need to make sure of something that you don't doubt :P
i'm only saying this, cause people already call it "sexist", when you say that men on average prefer technical aspects of life, while women prefer interpersonal aspects of life. they call that sexist, even though litterally everyone can look at the statistics that show how women are more likely to go into care taking jobs, while men are more likely to go engineering.
so what i mean is: if it's sexist for acknowledging those things, then of course sexists can have a healthy relationship, cause they don't live in igonrance of the real world.
plain old facts and the reality of things is considered sexist now, so until we fix that there will be less getting along. I'd go into detail, but somebody will get triggered. I will go as far as to say as long as the affirmative action and the practice of making unlimited special accommodations in order for women to appear successful then claiming "see women are just as strong" is not going to end well
Women and men have different strengths and weaknesses.. Maybe if people stop trying to make this a competition about who's the "better" gender blah blah and just treat people with respect and learn that men and women should work together to make life better instead of trying to blame a whole gender for what's wrong in their lives...
I think that they can't because a person who is sexiest towards another person they are not likely to stay on
Right!! I couldn't even stay friends with someone who had very sexist, negative views about women, much less to have been in a relationship with someone like that...
No more than I'd be friends with a woman who spent her whole time trashing or bashing all men.
Yes they can spongy forehead...
I'm not sexist at all as you can see, i'm just an innocent man 😇
Sure sure you are
I don't know anyone who is sexist so I don't know how to answer this.
Well that's a good thing,
Only if they find someone that agrees with their views, and surprisingly they do exist
Yes, I do! I actually think it's an asset. Because you're armed with knowledge of how bad the worst of the opposite sex can be, so you're more likely to make a wise decision in choosing a partner.
@Jamie05rhs You make a good point. However, sexist people are a turn off to me and to a lot of other people too. I mean misogynists and misandrists.
@Cherry234 Thanks. And I see what you're saying as well.
Most people are sexist, and they manage. Maybe not the picture of health, but functioning. Everyone knows what they're allowed to say, or not say. Very few are completely 100% open, revealing all of their bad side as well. How could we not be sexist? We have no idea what life is really like through the eyes of the other. We advocate on behalf of what we know, first and foremost.
They just need to be on the same page, my aunts believe the woman should stay at home and man should provide because the Bible says so, but they are very happy in their relationships.
No absolutely not. That's a barrior that forbids a relationship period.
That's what I'd say
Right!!
No, because they start with a prejudiced mind that just causes troubles.
Agree💯
Definitely not with the opposite sex. How can it be healthy when there are sexist "things"?
Exactly
the definition of Sexism is blurred like the word Racism. if you mean being sexist is believing in old fashion gender roles then yes it can work if both the man and women agree with those values.
No that's not what I mean
possible, if the partner agrees or accepting of the other's beliefs
If they find someone that agrees and submits then yes it would work all be it a unhappy relationship.
We live in 2021.. going on 2022... That can't work anymore.. we all have to treat gender with equal rights no matter what the topic is.
I actually think they can if they are with someone with the same values. I wouldn't say thhey benefit society but their relationship and love for eachother can be very real.
Well, it what you call sexist
"Women/men ain't shit" -> no, they peobably won't have a very healthy relationship
"Women in the kitchen/men at work" -> yes, it's possible. As long both agree and are able to jeep their respective role.
Hell they can't even maintain a healthy thought
Haha right!!!
I don't know, maybe if the other person agrees with their views...
I've never been in a relationship, so I can't tell
Not all sexist views are bad. For example, it's sexist, though correct, to say that only women can give birth.
That's correct, that's not sexist🤷
You can also add your opinion below!