Why We Need A Matriarchy

Matriarchy is the norm in human society, but you might not have noticed if you've been living through the patriarchal nightmare of the past several thousand years.

Q. What is a Matriarchy?

A community or country ruled by Women. Patriarchy likewise is a society ruled by men.

Q. Would matriarchy therefore be exactly like patriarchy except it would be women ruling instead of men?

No, because men and women are different physically, mentally and emotionally. So a female dominated government would therefore, be very different to a male dominated government.

Why We Need A Matriarchy

Q. Then do you believe that men are basically evil?

Personally, I distrust this concept because what is good and evil is a matter of opinion. Unfortunately, the concept of evil has been used to dehumanise people. That is to say; by claiming certain people are evil has become the justification for genocide.

Men create a world of violence and chaos because they are driven by their basic animal instincts.

We have a choice in this, history shows that men can be trained and brutalised into being vicious and brutal killers, or can be taught to be loving and caring people. Unfortunately, patriarchy has preferred to teach men to be violent killers as this is the only way patriarchal countries can protect itself from conquest by other patriarchal countries.

This then is the problem when men rule our world, men will compete with each other for power and wealth and use war and violence to do this. If we were to live in a world ruled by women then men can then be taught to be caring and loving people. But this doesn't mean that men are evil and women are good. It means both sexes are driven by different instincts, men are destructive because of their instincts and women are very constructive again because of their basic instincts.

Q. Is Matriarchy all about women vs. men?

No, because some of the strongest supporters of patriarchy are women. While in the Matriarchal movement at present, more men support Matriarchy than women. Also, patriarchy only benefits a minority of men and women. The small number of alpha men that rule our world, and their female relations and wives. The majority of men do not benefit from patriarchy as most find themselves living in poverty or being used as 'cannon folder' in wars created by the ruling elite.

Matriarchy is more likely to benefit the majority of men as well as women. This is because a Matriarchal government will work harder at eliminating poverty than any patriarchal government, which will benefit both men and women. Men will no longer be used as 'cannon folder' in the many insane wars that patriarchal governments fight. It is true men will no longer get the chance to rule countries or large corporations, but the vast majority of men don't get this chance anyway, under patriarchy.

Q. So, if you are recommending that women should rule the world how can this be achieved?

This can only be achieved by democratic means. It is completely unlikely that a great Amazon army will set out to conquer the world, like the Greeks under Alexander the Great, or the Roman Empire. Women can only gain power by being elected into office. This means women will have to take over existing political parties which is what is happening in Scandinavian countries. Or create their own matriarchal political party, and be bold enough to say, "Women can rule our country better than what men can".

Why We Need A Matriarchy

Q. Yes but, Margaret Thatcher become Prime Minister of Britain in the 1980s, and she didn't show any of sign of being a caring and compassionate leader.

A female leader of a patriarchal government is NOT matriarchy. What is notable about Margaret Thatcher is that she acted and behaved like a man. It would be impossible for a feminine, caring, and compassionate women to become a leader of a patriarchal political party and go on to be the leader of a patriarchal government. This is, unfortunately, true of many female politicians, businesswomen and professional women competing in a patriarchal society for wealth, status and power, they are forced to act and behave like men.

This is why we cannot get the full benefit of the feminine nurturing instincts in governments, of both men and women. The men will continue to compete with the women for power and status and the women will have to do likewise to hold their own. The sad fact is that in a patriarchal society the feminine virtues of nurturing, caring and compassion become weaknesses. This means that the government has to be totally dominated by women to allow women to express their maternal instincts for the benefit of the whole of society.

Q. Do you think men would fight and die for a Matriarchal government?

There is no reason why men shouldn't do this because a Matriarchal government can only come into being through democratic means, so the Matriarchal government's rule will be the will of the people. Patriarchy v. Matriarchy is not the same as men v. women. Many women today still strongly support patriarchal rule and in the future, many men will support Matriarchal rule.

Why We Need A Matriarchy

Q. Do you seriously think that people will vote for a Matriarchal political party?

If a Matriarchal political party was created, then at first, the people would not take it seriously. Yet this was also true of the Women's Liberation Movement in the 1960s where it become the target of jokes by male comedians. Yet when people began to listen to what they said, then public opinion changed in favour of the Feminists. Admittedly it is going to be very hard at the beginning because we all have been brainwashed into believing that only men can rule the world, so any idea of Women ruling the world would be unthinkable.

Yet I believe that the case for Women ruling the world is very strong, and once this message gets out to the common people then there will be support for this idea. In politics today there is a 'power vacuum', this is because in Western countries there is disillusion with all politicians, as many people don't vote because they don't trust any of the main political parties. All types of political philosophy have been discredited; few people now believe in communism or fascism, while socialist political parties have, sold out throughout the world and are now conservative parties. While the conservatives themselves have followed through with policies that has made the gap between rich and poor even wider than before. So it is no wonder the people find they cannot trust any political party. People have tried all sorts of political systems except for Matriarchy; every other political system can only offer more of the same failed policies of the past. Matriarchy can offer something new.

Q. Feminism advocated sexual equality, would Feminists be opposed to Matriarchy?

Yes, more than likely they will be very opposed to the whole concept of Matriarchy. Feminists have claimed that it is wrong for one sex to rule the world, so they would see Matriarchy as being as bad as patriarchy. Sexual equality may make sense to women but it clearly doesn't make any sense to men. Men have ruled this planet for the last five thousand years and in that time they have completely failed to create an equal society. Even when men set out with the deliberate purpose of creating equality as in the French Revolution and with communism they still completely failed.

It is men's completive instincts that make any society ruled by men unequal. Men will compete with each other for wealth, status and power and the winners get the lot and the losers get nothing. So even in a government of half men and half women, the men with compete with the women for power, forcing the women to be as completive as men or lose power altogether. This means that even if it was possible to create a society of sexual equality the nature of the society will still be patriarchal because women will be forced to act like men and be very competitive to retain equal share of power and wealth. This is why sexual equality is very difficult, if not impossible.

A Matriarchal society stands a far better chance in creating a fairly equal society. Women being less competitive than men won't have the same winner/loser mentality and so allow a more equilibrium society, but it won't be completely equal as men will have to be kept away from all positions of power and influence.

Why We Need A Matriarchy

Q. If tomorrow a Matriarchal political party was voted into power what would they do that would be different to a patriarchal political party?

I have to admit, that at first they will carry on more or less the same as any other patriarchal party. All women today have been brought up in a patriarchal society so patriarchy is all that they know, and so they will at first do everything the patriarchal way. But in time things will change; the new female rulers will have a far greater concern for children, old people and the disabled than a patriarchal party, so more attention and resources will be pushed in this direction. In so doing they will eliminate poverty in the country they rule and the gap between rich and poor will decrease. As poverty is the main cause of crime then the crime rate will slowly go down. Over many years of Matriarchal government, the whole of society will change, but it may take a few generations of Matriarchal rule before we have a true Matriarchal society.

Q. If we did have a world wide Matriarchal revolution and it did create a caring and compassionate world wouldn't this be a very boring world?

You don't need violence, war and conflict to make life interesting. Sport has been shown to be a good substitute for war, for men. So men can still continue to compete against each other through sports. Also modern technology has given us the means to better explore and understand the universe we live in. It would be far better for all of us to put our resources into understanding the world we live in, than into military spending.

Q. How will women treat men in a Matriarchal society?

A lot better than men have treated women in patriarchal societies. It would be understandable for women to want; "payback time". That is to say, to treat men as badly as men have treated women over thousands of years of patriarchal rule. Yet many women claim they don't want to do this. Yes, there are many angry women, who understandably feel they very aggrieved by the way they have been treated by men. Yet, at the same time many women claim they don't want to feel hatred for men.

As a man, I do feel that women have the right to treat men as badly as what men have done in the patriarchal age. Men have no right to say; "yes, we have abused women for thousands of years but women shouldn't want to revenge for this". But I am also aware that hatred and anger are not nice feelings to have and I can understand any woman who does not want to experience these feelings.

This can create a real problem for men, because if women do not take revenge on men when they have to power to do this.

Then it shows up men, and proves that women are far nicer people than what men are. For this reason many men will feel they owe a karma debt to women for the thousands of years of abuse they have inflicted on women. Yet, men cannot force women to abuse them if women don't wish to do this. So the only way men can pay back their karma debt will be through devoted service towards women.

Why We Need A Matriarchy

5|2
1663

Most Helpful Girl

  • Imma say let he or she whom is most qualified rule, regardless of thine naughty bits.

    10|35
    0|0
    THIS IS NOT RELEVANT ANYMORE
    • I'm sorry but i have to disagree, did you not agree with anything i said?

    • Show All
    • @spnsfi I know. My opinion remains unchanged.
      My point was that the government is a large scale mafia in itself. They can declare war to anyone and send us - the citizens - to kill each other. Plus they collect taxes and aren't really minding about us much.

      @applesandoranges22 Indeed. I know that.

    • I very much agree!

Most Helpful Guy

  • 'What is notable about Margaret Thatcher is that she acted and behaved like a man.'
    No, Margaret Thatcher didn't act like a Man, she acted like Margaret Thatcher.
    Women are no more or less violent than men, you know the serial killer with the highest body count is a woman?
    You know that Queens have been as bloody as kings.
    man or woman, doesn't matter

    0|12
    2|1
    THIS IS NOT RELEVANT ANYMORE

Recommended myTakes

Join the discussion

What Girls Said 15

  • I don't agree with installing a matriarchy, but you make some interesting points. I'm a feminist, I don't believe any one type of person should rule over all others. I think our governments and our financial systems should reflect the real population with more or less egalitarian representation for everyone.

    0|1
    0|1
  • But what the heck are men going to be doing if they can't pursue positions of power? Isn't that unfair to take that opportunity away from them? Also are men really that hopeless that they can't be compassionate and just leaders?
    I think women should rule the country at least some of the time, but I can't imagine keeping men as a gender away from power completely. That is a form of oppression.

    0|10
    1|0
  • We don't need a society governed by gender.
    We need a society governed by competence.
    We need a matriarchal society like we need rusted, tetanus coated saw blades shoved up our collective assholes.

    0|15
    0|0
    • Couldn't agree more. You forgot the salt and the vinegar on the swablades though.

  • What if guys get more lazy? I like this idea, but what if guys take over all the roles of being paid for on dates, and saying @ home, and other cool things? Of course people and relationships are more varied these days, but what if new stereotypes are made, or guys pick the ones they like that women used to have and it gets to be common...

    0|1
    1|4
    • I'm glad you like it :) and guys have been getting lazier already without the influence of a matriarchy, we can see this in education, not just in education but in relationships too. I personally think that men taking on the Traditional female role would be a great thing since it wouldn't be done in a sexist way. I think everyone would be happier this way. But back to your question, that is inevitable to happen eventually and it wouldn't be a shock to men since it would happen gradually and not just at once.

  • Now this is the idealistic in me speaking but I think the perfect society is not where one sex rules over the other, but where we strive to live in harmony. That would take a lot of work and compromise on both sides. But the question remains, are we willing?

    0|6
    0|0
  • More from Girls
    10

What Guys Said 62

  • "Oh I will try and have a healthy discussion with OP and see if he can't be convinced otherwise."

    *looks at username*

    "oh..."

    0|13
    0|0
  • https://cdn.meme.am/instances/63295482.jpg
    The most capable must lead. Man or woman. That's all there's to it.

    0|10
    0|1
  • Yeah ok buddy, keep jerking off to your femdom cuckold porn

    scontent-ord1-1.xx.fbcdn.net/.../...08155722_n.jpg

    0|19
    0|1
  • In other news: Why We Need Vengeance Instead Of Justice
    "No, because men and women are different physically, mentally and emotionally. So a female dominated government would therefore, be very different to a male dominated government."

    All governments are equally intrusive, equally authoritarian in intent. You can acknowledge that and limit it's growth or you can make excuses and keep repeating the same mistake.

    "Men create a world of violence and chaos because they are driven by their basic animal instincts."

    "This then is the problem when men rule our world, men will compete with each other for power and wealth and use war and violence to do this. If we were to live in a world ruled by women then men can then be taught to be caring and loving people. But this doesn't mean that men are evil and women are good. It means both sexes are driven by different instincts, men are destructive because of their instincts and women are very constructive again because of their basic instincts."

    Get off your high horse. Female instincts are reproductive and frequently are not caring. All you're showing are HUMAN defects and putting them as male defects. You're not saying men are evil, you're "just" naming everything bad about the world after us. Don complain when you get called a feminazi.

    "This is because a Matriarchal government will work harder at eliminating poverty than any patriarchal government, which will benefit both men and women."

    The govenrment is the least effective way of reducin poverty. Want ot reduce poverty. Take the government faway from the economy. Nobody needs a matriarchy for that.

    "Men will no longer be used as 'cannon folder' in the many insane wars that patriarchal governments fight. It is true men will no longer get the chance to rule countries or large corporations, but the vast majority of men don't get this chance anyway, under patriarchy."

    Will women be used as canno fodder then, or are you seriously so dumb as to think women won't start wars equally disastrous as the ones started by men?

    Oh, ok, you'll "just" eliminate meritocracy entirely and pretend women are better for these positions because of some 'natural' compassion you are not proving in your text.

    0|1
    0|0
    • "All types of political philosophy have been discredited; few people now believe in communism or fascism, while socialist political parties have, sold out throughout the world and are now conservative parties. While the conservatives themselves have followed through with policies that has made the gap between rich and poor even wider than before."

      I was going to ask if you're some kind of idiotic illiterate bigot, but I got my answer right here.

      "Feminists have claimed that it is wrong for one sex to rule the world, so they would see Matriarchy as being as bad as patriarchy."

      Sure. We've all seen the feminist outrage over divorce laws, false rape allegations and sexual inequality in low-income physical jobs, right? /s

      "It is men's completive instincts that make any society ruled by men unequal. Men will compete with each other for wealth, status and power and the winners get the lot and the losers get nothing."

      I'll stop complaining, because you can't possibly be this dumb.

    • Show All
    • Let me give you some rational answers then.
      1-The government isn't the solution. It's the problem. A small group of individuals presumably elected by millions have no authority to disrespect my rights and define ever-higher taxes to help the poor, even tough that usually means that the money destined for it will be spent on welfare and extensive bureaucracy, none of which are helpful in the long-run. Economic liberalism has always been the best way of letting people enrich themselves. You complained about unequality, but you dont grasp that capitalism is not a zero-sum equation where someone has to lose in order for another to win. Stop this activism, and pick a book on Mises, Friedman or Hayek.
      2-All you showed were human defects. Women compete just as much, and frequently even harder than men. You're selecting a few characteristics of the human race, putting them on men, pretending that's the problem with the world, and saying that you dont hate men. That's absurd.

    • 3-You're trying to define leadership and rule by feelings and empathy. They are incompatible by definition. Ruling implies in lack of empathy. Pushing it to the other direction won't change it, just aggravate it. You dont liberate people by meddling ever more in their lives.
      4-Female monarchs are more prone than male moarchs to start wars. Here: nymag.com/.../...s-waged-more-wars-than-kings.html
      5-You dont know anything about economy, so you dont know anything about politics. Dont pretend to be different than this. Again, study. Hard. You dont know how small you really are.
      6-Feminism isn't about equality. Too long for me to even write a single book on it. Watch the Red Pill, then we can discuss it a bit.

  • More from Guys
    57

Recommended Questions

Loading...