Why We Need A Matriarchy

Matriarchy is the norm in human society, but you might not have noticed if you've been living through the patriarchal nightmare of the past several thousand years.

Q. What is a Matriarchy?

A community or country ruled by Women. Patriarchy likewise is a society ruled by men.

Q. Would matriarchy therefore be exactly like patriarchy except it would be women ruling instead of men?

No, because men and women are different physically, mentally and emotionally. So a female dominated government would therefore, be very different to a male dominated government.

Why We Need A Matriarchy

Q. Then do you believe that men are basically evil?

Personally, I distrust this concept because what is good and evil is a matter of opinion. Unfortunately, the concept of evil has been used to dehumanise people. That is to say; by claiming certain people are evil has become the justification for genocide.

Men create a world of violence and chaos because they are driven by their basic animal instincts.

We have a choice in this, history shows that men can be trained and brutalised into being vicious and brutal killers, or can be taught to be loving and caring people. Unfortunately, patriarchy has preferred to teach men to be violent killers as this is the only way patriarchal countries can protect itself from conquest by other patriarchal countries.

This then is the problem when men rule our world, men will compete with each other for power and wealth and use war and violence to do this. If we were to live in a world ruled by women then men can then be taught to be caring and loving people. But this doesn't mean that men are evil and women are good. It means both sexes are driven by different instincts, men are destructive because of their instincts and women are very constructive again because of their basic instincts.

Q. Is Matriarchy all about women vs. men?

No, because some of the strongest supporters of patriarchy are women. While in the Matriarchal movement at present, more men support Matriarchy than women. Also, patriarchy only benefits a minority of men and women. The small number of alpha men that rule our world, and their female relations and wives. The majority of men do not benefit from patriarchy as most find themselves living in poverty or being used as 'cannon folder' in wars created by the ruling elite.

Matriarchy is more likely to benefit the majority of men as well as women. This is because a Matriarchal government will work harder at eliminating poverty than any patriarchal government, which will benefit both men and women. Men will no longer be used as 'cannon folder' in the many insane wars that patriarchal governments fight. It is true men will no longer get the chance to rule countries or large corporations, but the vast majority of men don't get this chance anyway, under patriarchy.

Q. So, if you are recommending that women should rule the world how can this be achieved?

This can only be achieved by democratic means. It is completely unlikely that a great Amazon army will set out to conquer the world, like the Greeks under Alexander the Great, or the Roman Empire. Women can only gain power by being elected into office. This means women will have to take over existing political parties which is what is happening in Scandinavian countries. Or create their own matriarchal political party, and be bold enough to say, "Women can rule our country better than what men can".

Why We Need A Matriarchy

Q. Yes but, Margaret Thatcher become Prime Minister of Britain in the 1980s, and she didn't show any of sign of being a caring and compassionate leader.

A female leader of a patriarchal government is NOT matriarchy. What is notable about Margaret Thatcher is that she acted and behaved like a man. It would be impossible for a feminine, caring, and compassionate women to become a leader of a patriarchal political party and go on to be the leader of a patriarchal government. This is, unfortunately, true of many female politicians, businesswomen and professional women competing in a patriarchal society for wealth, status and power, they are forced to act and behave like men.

This is why we cannot get the full benefit of the feminine nurturing instincts in governments, of both men and women. The men will continue to compete with the women for power and status and the women will have to do likewise to hold their own. The sad fact is that in a patriarchal society the feminine virtues of nurturing, caring and compassion become weaknesses. This means that the government has to be totally dominated by women to allow women to express their maternal instincts for the benefit of the whole of society.

Q. Do you think men would fight and die for a Matriarchal government?

There is no reason why men shouldn't do this because a Matriarchal government can only come into being through democratic means, so the Matriarchal government's rule will be the will of the people. Patriarchy v. Matriarchy is not the same as men v. women. Many women today still strongly support patriarchal rule and in the future, many men will support Matriarchal rule.

Why We Need A Matriarchy

Q. Do you seriously think that people will vote for a Matriarchal political party?

If a Matriarchal political party was created, then at first, the people would not take it seriously. Yet this was also true of the Women's Liberation Movement in the 1960s where it become the target of jokes by male comedians. Yet when people began to listen to what they said, then public opinion changed in favour of the Feminists. Admittedly it is going to be very hard at the beginning because we all have been brainwashed into believing that only men can rule the world, so any idea of Women ruling the world would be unthinkable.

Yet I believe that the case for Women ruling the world is very strong, and once this message gets out to the common people then there will be support for this idea. In politics today there is a 'power vacuum', this is because in Western countries there is disillusion with all politicians, as many people don't vote because they don't trust any of the main political parties. All types of political philosophy have been discredited; few people now believe in communism or fascism, while socialist political parties have, sold out throughout the world and are now conservative parties. While the conservatives themselves have followed through with policies that has made the gap between rich and poor even wider than before. So it is no wonder the people find they cannot trust any political party. People have tried all sorts of political systems except for Matriarchy; every other political system can only offer more of the same failed policies of the past. Matriarchy can offer something new.

Q. Feminism advocated sexual equality, would Feminists be opposed to Matriarchy?

Yes, more than likely they will be very opposed to the whole concept of Matriarchy. Feminists have claimed that it is wrong for one sex to rule the world, so they would see Matriarchy as being as bad as patriarchy. Sexual equality may make sense to women but it clearly doesn't make any sense to men. Men have ruled this planet for the last five thousand years and in that time they have completely failed to create an equal society. Even when men set out with the deliberate purpose of creating equality as in the French Revolution and with communism they still completely failed.

It is men's completive instincts that make any society ruled by men unequal. Men will compete with each other for wealth, status and power and the winners get the lot and the losers get nothing. So even in a government of half men and half women, the men with compete with the women for power, forcing the women to be as completive as men or lose power altogether. This means that even if it was possible to create a society of sexual equality the nature of the society will still be patriarchal because women will be forced to act like men and be very competitive to retain equal share of power and wealth. This is why sexual equality is very difficult, if not impossible.

A Matriarchal society stands a far better chance in creating a fairly equal society. Women being less competitive than men won't have the same winner/loser mentality and so allow a more equilibrium society, but it won't be completely equal as men will have to be kept away from all positions of power and influence.

Why We Need A Matriarchy

Q. If tomorrow a Matriarchal political party was voted into power what would they do that would be different to a patriarchal political party?

I have to admit, that at first they will carry on more or less the same as any other patriarchal party. All women today have been brought up in a patriarchal society so patriarchy is all that they know, and so they will at first do everything the patriarchal way. But in time things will change; the new female rulers will have a far greater concern for children, old people and the disabled than a patriarchal party, so more attention and resources will be pushed in this direction. In so doing they will eliminate poverty in the country they rule and the gap between rich and poor will decrease. As poverty is the main cause of crime then the crime rate will slowly go down. Over many years of Matriarchal government, the whole of society will change, but it may take a few generations of Matriarchal rule before we have a true Matriarchal society.

Q. If we did have a world wide Matriarchal revolution and it did create a caring and compassionate world wouldn't this be a very boring world?

You don't need violence, war and conflict to make life interesting. Sport has been shown to be a good substitute for war, for men. So men can still continue to compete against each other through sports. Also modern technology has given us the means to better explore and understand the universe we live in. It would be far better for all of us to put our resources into understanding the world we live in, than into military spending.

Q. How will women treat men in a Matriarchal society?

A lot better than men have treated women in patriarchal societies. It would be understandable for women to want; "payback time". That is to say, to treat men as badly as men have treated women over thousands of years of patriarchal rule. Yet many women claim they don't want to do this. Yes, there are many angry women, who understandably feel they very aggrieved by the way they have been treated by men. Yet, at the same time many women claim they don't want to feel hatred for men.

As a man, I do feel that women have the right to treat men as badly as what men have done in the patriarchal age. Men have no right to say; "yes, we have abused women for thousands of years but women shouldn't want to revenge for this". But I am also aware that hatred and anger are not nice feelings to have and I can understand any woman who does not want to experience these feelings.

This can create a real problem for men, because if women do not take revenge on men when they have to power to do this.

Then it shows up men, and proves that women are far nicer people than what men are. For this reason many men will feel they owe a karma debt to women for the thousands of years of abuse they have inflicted on women. Yet, men cannot force women to abuse them if women don't wish to do this. So the only way men can pay back their karma debt will be through devoted service towards women.

Why We Need A Matriarchy

5|2
1663

Most Helpful Girl

  • Imma say let he or she whom is most qualified rule, regardless of thine naughty bits.

    10|35
    0|0
    • I'm sorry but i have to disagree, did you not agree with anything i said?

    • Show All
    • @spnsfi I know. My opinion remains unchanged.
      My point was that the government is a large scale mafia in itself. They can declare war to anyone and send us - the citizens - to kill each other. Plus they collect taxes and aren't really minding about us much.

      @applesandoranges22 Indeed. I know that.

    • I very much agree!

Most Helpful Guy

  • 'What is notable about Margaret Thatcher is that she acted and behaved like a man.'
    No, Margaret Thatcher didn't act like a Man, she acted like Margaret Thatcher.
    Women are no more or less violent than men, you know the serial killer with the highest body count is a woman?
    You know that Queens have been as bloody as kings.
    man or woman, doesn't matter

    0|12
    2|1

Recommended myTakes

Join the discussion

What Girls Said 15

  • I don't agree with installing a matriarchy, but you make some interesting points. I'm a feminist, I don't believe any one type of person should rule over all others. I think our governments and our financial systems should reflect the real population with more or less egalitarian representation for everyone.

    0|1
    0|1
  • But what the heck are men going to be doing if they can't pursue positions of power? Isn't that unfair to take that opportunity away from them? Also are men really that hopeless that they can't be compassionate and just leaders?
    I think women should rule the country at least some of the time, but I can't imagine keeping men as a gender away from power completely. That is a form of oppression.

    0|10
    1|0
  • We don't need a society governed by gender.
    We need a society governed by competence.
    We need a matriarchal society like we need rusted, tetanus coated saw blades shoved up our collective assholes.

    0|15
    0|0
    • Couldn't agree more. You forgot the salt and the vinegar on the swablades though.

  • What if guys get more lazy? I like this idea, but what if guys take over all the roles of being paid for on dates, and saying @ home, and other cool things? Of course people and relationships are more varied these days, but what if new stereotypes are made, or guys pick the ones they like that women used to have and it gets to be common...

    0|1
    1|4
    • I'm glad you like it :) and guys have been getting lazier already without the influence of a matriarchy, we can see this in education, not just in education but in relationships too. I personally think that men taking on the Traditional female role would be a great thing since it wouldn't be done in a sexist way. I think everyone would be happier this way. But back to your question, that is inevitable to happen eventually and it wouldn't be a shock to men since it would happen gradually and not just at once.

  • Now this is the idealistic in me speaking but I think the perfect society is not where one sex rules over the other, but where we strive to live in harmony. That would take a lot of work and compromise on both sides. But the question remains, are we willing?

    0|6
    0|0
  • Be prepared for the nasty comments by men on here lol.

    2|5
    0|9
  • or let all citizens run the government , both men and women

    0|5
    0|0
    • That would never practically work.

    • Show All
    • By supporting a matriarchal society you aren't anti-men, like i said many times in this myTake a Matriarchy has huge benefits for men and women. It's much more equal then what we have today and much fairer.

    • @RealandGenuine26 How do you think that would work out?

  • I think we need a matriarchy is the west due to decline of families we need to think about families first. Instead of giving businesses money we need to think how we can improve the population growth! more and more people are having less babies because they can't afford it or be able to take care of them. That's why we need to make so more people can have the ability to raise a family. We also need to start teaching men how to be a father since most men don't feel a emotional connection to their children like a mother does.

    1|1
    0|0
  • Bonobos live in mostly matriarchal societies and they're doing pretty well! Besides the fact that humans are killing them..

    1|1
    0|2
    • Bonobos would go extinct quickly if humans didn't protect and hide them from chimps. The male chimps would rape and kill all the female bonobos and kill the males until they all died out or became part of the chimp genepool.

    • Show All
    • @justkidding93 I'm not saying we should live like them, just that we could learn from them. They don't only live in matriarchies either... they live in a society where everyone is equal, studies have shown they are even all bisexual. They choose who they seem to see as fit to rule without taking gender into consideration. Men are not more creative women.. there are creative men and there are creative women. We all have good and bad qualities and we are all people, whether we are male or female shouldn't matter.

    • wrong, bonobos are pretty all living in matriarchies. And another reason it kind of "works" for them is because they are very promiscuous, the females give out sex very often for all the males as long as they abide to them, if a male isn't acting like the females want him to they often gang up on him and bite off his penis etc, and the other males doesn't help him because they are satisfied with their sexual needs being met. So technically they dont really see everyone as equal as the females make the rules among bonobos, they also have low sexual dimorphism for this reason as the females get pregnant by pretty much any type of male they have access too with being so promiscuous.
      And again you're wrong. Men are definitely more creative than women on average, its cold hard fact, and it doesn't matter how much you are in denial it will always be scientific fact.

  • Personally, I think that feminism should be about equality. Fighting sexism will ultimately help everyone, not elevate any group of people over others.

    0|0
    0|0
  • Dude...

    You do know most people don't care about people in power right?

    0|3
    0|0
  • ''A lot better than men have treated women in patriarchal societies. It would be understandable for women to want; "payback time". That is to say, to treat men as badly as men have treated women over thousands of years of patriarchal rule.''

    Oh, believe it. Not me personally, I'm definitely an equal rights sort of person. But there will be hundreds millions of women who will abuse their new status throughout the world. Anyone honestly think that those women in the Middle East who are not allowed outside their house with a male escort won't want the men to experience that for a few decades?

    0|1
    0|0
  • Yeah, I'll pass.

    0|7
    0|0
  • A year ago I would have agreed with you. Then came the election of 2016 where half the women voted for a misogynist. I no longer support women's causes because I now believe it has all been a waste of time. Women support the very people who put them down. I also have come to believe there is some truth to that whole " women like jerks" thing. I wouldn't have said that a year ago, but now I believe it heart and soul.

    0|0
    1|5
    • That because these women are truly have their heads up their asses because they are more privilege then certain groups in other countries or even in the United States. I bet most of these women who voted for Trump where upper middle class and upper class. Or they wouldn't had voted for him. A news article went viral recently of a white women who voted for Trump, believe in his immigration policies then have the nerve to make it public that her husband got deport to Mexico and she wanted a pity party.

    • Show All
    • @Marinite You might want to check the stats on that.

    • She is right, if you look on the stats more women voted for Clinton than they did Trump so if it was just Women voting Trump wouldn't be president.

  • i will pass

    0|8
    0|0

What Guys Said 62

  • "Oh I will try and have a healthy discussion with OP and see if he can't be convinced otherwise."

    *looks at username*

    "oh..."

    0|13
    0|0
  • https://cdn.meme.am/instances/63295482.jpg
    The most capable must lead. Man or woman. That's all there's to it.

    0|10
    0|1
  • Yeah ok buddy, keep jerking off to your femdom cuckold porn

    scontent-ord1-1.xx.fbcdn.net/.../...08155722_n.jpg

    0|19
    0|1
  • In other news: Why We Need Vengeance Instead Of Justice
    "No, because men and women are different physically, mentally and emotionally. So a female dominated government would therefore, be very different to a male dominated government."

    All governments are equally intrusive, equally authoritarian in intent. You can acknowledge that and limit it's growth or you can make excuses and keep repeating the same mistake.

    "Men create a world of violence and chaos because they are driven by their basic animal instincts."

    "This then is the problem when men rule our world, men will compete with each other for power and wealth and use war and violence to do this. If we were to live in a world ruled by women then men can then be taught to be caring and loving people. But this doesn't mean that men are evil and women are good. It means both sexes are driven by different instincts, men are destructive because of their instincts and women are very constructive again because of their basic instincts."

    Get off your high horse. Female instincts are reproductive and frequently are not caring. All you're showing are HUMAN defects and putting them as male defects. You're not saying men are evil, you're "just" naming everything bad about the world after us. Don complain when you get called a feminazi.

    "This is because a Matriarchal government will work harder at eliminating poverty than any patriarchal government, which will benefit both men and women."

    The govenrment is the least effective way of reducin poverty. Want ot reduce poverty. Take the government faway from the economy. Nobody needs a matriarchy for that.

    "Men will no longer be used as 'cannon folder' in the many insane wars that patriarchal governments fight. It is true men will no longer get the chance to rule countries or large corporations, but the vast majority of men don't get this chance anyway, under patriarchy."

    Will women be used as canno fodder then, or are you seriously so dumb as to think women won't start wars equally disastrous as the ones started by men?

    Oh, ok, you'll "just" eliminate meritocracy entirely and pretend women are better for these positions because of some 'natural' compassion you are not proving in your text.

    0|1
    0|0
    • "All types of political philosophy have been discredited; few people now believe in communism or fascism, while socialist political parties have, sold out throughout the world and are now conservative parties. While the conservatives themselves have followed through with policies that has made the gap between rich and poor even wider than before."

      I was going to ask if you're some kind of idiotic illiterate bigot, but I got my answer right here.

      "Feminists have claimed that it is wrong for one sex to rule the world, so they would see Matriarchy as being as bad as patriarchy."

      Sure. We've all seen the feminist outrage over divorce laws, false rape allegations and sexual inequality in low-income physical jobs, right? /s

      "It is men's completive instincts that make any society ruled by men unequal. Men will compete with each other for wealth, status and power and the winners get the lot and the losers get nothing."

      I'll stop complaining, because you can't possibly be this dumb.

    • Show All
    • Let me give you some rational answers then.
      1-The government isn't the solution. It's the problem. A small group of individuals presumably elected by millions have no authority to disrespect my rights and define ever-higher taxes to help the poor, even tough that usually means that the money destined for it will be spent on welfare and extensive bureaucracy, none of which are helpful in the long-run. Economic liberalism has always been the best way of letting people enrich themselves. You complained about unequality, but you dont grasp that capitalism is not a zero-sum equation where someone has to lose in order for another to win. Stop this activism, and pick a book on Mises, Friedman or Hayek.
      2-All you showed were human defects. Women compete just as much, and frequently even harder than men. You're selecting a few characteristics of the human race, putting them on men, pretending that's the problem with the world, and saying that you dont hate men. That's absurd.

    • 3-You're trying to define leadership and rule by feelings and empathy. They are incompatible by definition. Ruling implies in lack of empathy. Pushing it to the other direction won't change it, just aggravate it. You dont liberate people by meddling ever more in their lives.
      4-Female monarchs are more prone than male moarchs to start wars. Here: nymag.com/.../...s-waged-more-wars-than-kings.html
      5-You dont know anything about economy, so you dont know anything about politics. Dont pretend to be different than this. Again, study. Hard. You dont know how small you really are.
      6-Feminism isn't about equality. Too long for me to even write a single book on it. Watch the Red Pill, then we can discuss it a bit.

  • A noble dream, but once brought to fruition, it would only be fueled by revenge and cruelty.
    Meritocracy and Social Darwinism makes for the best society. There, power is determined by might, wisdom, skill, and vision, not penises and vaginas.

    0|7
    0|1
  • Don't you feel like you're taking your pitiful fetish a bit too far?

    1|6
    0|0
  • No.

    First of all, to say that good and evil are matters of opinion is wrong. You're not going to make yourself right by saying that it's an "opinion". If that's the case, then Hitler, Stalin, Mao Tse Tung, Osama bin Laden, Timothy McVeigh, Fidel Castro, Pol Pot... and since we're talking about women, then Marie Antoinette, Biljana Plavsic, Isle Koch, and Queen Ranavalona I of Madagascar should ALL get a free pass.

    Moral relativism is a cancer in society. All it does is welcome evil ideas and shut down opposition. It's also self-defeating. One uses an absolute statement to argue that there are no absolutes, which is absurd. And in a world where people are motivated by facts and proof - neither of which you offer here - once again, it's preposterous.

    Furthermore, the "are men basically evil" question has absolutely nothing to do with the preceding question.

    So, if men have such violent and uncontrollable tempers, was my father wasting his time and energy whenever I or my brother would throw tantrums when we were little or otherwise wouldn't get our way and he would tell us, often VERY forcefully, to control ourselves?

    Men are not automatically conditioned to be violent. If we are, then how come I'm not in jail? Or my father? Or my roommates? Or any of the numerous other men whom I am blessed and honored to call my friends? If anything, the bold, active, and aggressive masculinity of our fathers did more to restrain our so-called "primal urges" than encourage them

    John F. Kennedy once said that "war has been mankind's constant companion". War wouldn't go away just because women would be in charge. Personally, I want someone who will aggressively and, yes, VIOLENTLY storm those beaches and take those hills in order to destroy the enemy so that I can sleep peacefully at night, my mom and sisters don't have to wear burqas, my black friends don't have to work in cotton fields all day every day, and the Stars and Stripes are on my government's buildings rather than a swastika.

    You and those who think like you don't give men enough credit.

    0|0
    0|0
  • We've already seen examples of matriarchys. The American Indians, who never developed a civilization beyond basic levels and were conquered by European patriarchies.

    Some european nations have somewhat become matriarchys, and now their traitorous female rulers are inviting the savages inside the city gates to rape and pillage.

    1|4
    0|0
  • Feminists are the biggest hypocrites of society to date. You are going to fight sexism by being sexist? This whole thing is filled with ignorant statements about males and how they behave.

    0|4
    1|0
  • I'm sorry but there is a reason there are no female dominated societies. It doesn't work.
    In any position of power, tough decisions have to be made, feelings will be hurt. It is simply absurd to think otherwise. Men are (generally) going to be the natural leaders. The world isn't fair, it can't be.

    0|4
    0|0
    • Yeah. @MatriarchalFuture is stupid. If he'd read the Bible, he would know that God has ordained that men be the leaders. It's time people accept that. Women are suppose to be submissive and let the men rule and lead. That, however, does not mean the man should force women to do things that's wrong. It means men should be the ones that guides and directs women and she be the followers.

      I'm fed up with pussy whipped men like him or should I say boys like him.

    • @deathcat42 You lost me at quoting the bible, but it's just basic biology. Put a group of people on a task and chances are a guy will take charge.

    • You don't have to @ me. We're the only 2 in the conversation. You do that when there's 3 or more.

  • As a man who came from a female dominated family, woman can worse than men any day of the week. Woman don't feel the need to explain themselves and are quite capable of the ignorance of "because I said so.' When you look at all total Domestic abuse (including the elderly and children) woman are far and away the biggest offenders, contrary to popular belief. Your whole argument is a fallacy. Anytime one gender is place in complete control, the other will suffer as they can't see the other's point of view. look at modern feminists the mess they've created; hypergamy is out of control and sadly it's not going to get any better as young woman are far outstripping their male counterparts.

    Pull your head out of your mangina already!

    0|6
    0|0
    • Correction- men are the biggest offenders of all domestic abuse

      I'm just speaking the truth.

    • actually, you aren't speaking the truth. Women dominate child abuse cases and elderly people, this is already a known fact. Women commit about 43% of domestic abuse against males so males dominate their spouse abuse by 7% while women dominate child and elder abuse cases too.

    • @applesandoranges22 And over 70% of all reciprocated attacks...

  • I like a lot of this. I think women could be less emotionally driven than men in leadership positions. Ironically while men complain that women are too emotional to lead, men are the ones driven by lust, vengeance, anger, jealousy, all that great stuff. Of course there would be problems for such a society not getting taken over by patriarchal societies, and there would be still be a role for masculinity in helping to defend us.

    There are a few things here I do disagree with. One is that men would have to be kept away from positions of power in a matriarchy. Just like in our patriarchy today, women are still allowed to get into positions of power if they compete like a man, men should be able to hold positions of power equally in a matriarchy. The difference would be the type of men who would get into those positions. They would not be like the men leading today - they would have to be caring, compassionate men who have the same agenda as the matriarchy. These same men are barred from leadership today anyway, and worse than that are mocked and made to feel second class for not being manly enough.

    Also I do not think women in a matriarchy have any right to take out revenge against men for the previous generations of patriarchy. I don't agree with being violent or holding back women in any way, so I'm not willing to take the heat for the sins of my forefathers which I have no control over. In fact I would argue that even the worst of them were just doing what they thought was right or what was expected of them, and don't need to be punished for it. Fortunately, I think in a matriarchy we would not have the same motives for punishment as a society. We would be more understanding, and punishments would be decided objectively based on what will result in the best overall outcome, rather than on anger and fear.

    I think this needs to be more about whether we behave more like typical men or typical women as a society, not about the actual gender of the people sitting in office. And with that, I would like to see society behave more like a typical woman. Again fortunately, I think a matriarchy would be a lot more inclusive for all genders.

    0|0
    0|4
  • There have been matriarchy based societies in the past examples being some native Americans, some Polynesian societies, some societies in India, and some in Africa. What did all of these have in common, their lack of technological advancement, and I don't just mean in terms of weapons I mean in terms of life saving medicines and farming techniques. Women do not have the means to control and harness the cruel mistress that is mother nature.

    0|3
    0|0
    • Every society on the planet got outcompeted by Western Europe, which brought technological advancement to the world. So most patriarchies weren't doing that well either.

    • Show All
    • @applesandoranges22 The neighboring patriarchies did not industrialize, but they were still a lot more advanced.

    • @applesandoranges22 Sorry I was trying to respond to raspberry0416

  • LMAO nice troll. A+ for effort.

    1|11
    3|1
  • Matriarchy, if it were implemented, would be the end of the human race.

    1|8
    0|0
  • wow nice thoughts bro/sis. i think you should stop watching femdom cuckold porn. i think you are forgetting how cleopatra ruled in her time. women leaders are no different when it comes to cruelty. so , whoever is worthy of leadership should chosen as leader. not because they male or female.

    it's guys (if you are really a guy) like you in the dating scene who can't stop whining and complaining that they are a "nice guy" and no girl is interested in you. you guys put women on a pedestal and now you want a matriarchal society? geez... bro relax if you don't get a girl when you put her on pedestal, that doesn't mean you should put the whole gender on a pedestal.

    0|7
    0|0
  • "Matriarchy is the norm in human society, but you might not have noticed if you've been living through the patriarchal nightmare of the past several thousand years."

    In other words, all recorded history. Such a fatuous statement speaks for itself.

    0|1
    0|0
  • This is obviously a throwaway account in order to publish such a MyTake ๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚

    But for real now, I see quite some truth in it and I wouldn't mind if we can try out matriarchy for a while. To my mind comes Ekaterina the second?
    Indeed. Men have ruled long enough and we got plenty of wars and greed as a result.
    https://quotepix.com/member_post/166305.jpg
    Just to make this clear: I carry 0 responsibility for what men have done over the ages to women in the patriarchy society. I'm just a young man doing my duties in order to live and I didn't harm anyone and nobody really harmed me nor do I intend to.

    1|1
    0|1
    • It's not a throwaway account.

    • Show All
    • I don't get what's funny.

    • Well, it is probably my sense of humor.
      Like I said, I wouldn't mind trying out a matriarchal society or at least a combination of both. I'd like to see what the women will do.

      Ignore Angela Merkel. It's one horrendous example out of how many? I don't know, I do not know more than very few female leaders. I however heard, that Ekaterina was doing a great job back in Russia.

  • Have you actually looked at the few matriarchal societies that have existed in history? Some of the Celts as an example. Most did not fare as you expect a modern one would. Further as women are at least as bloody as men, and certainly more teritorial I propose that it would lead to more bloodshed not less.

    0|0
    0|0
  • More from Guys
    42

Recommended Questions

Loading...