Why racists and bigots hate The First Amendment.

[genuinlysensitive]

The First Amendment to the US Constitution has once again come under fire by racists and bigots. This time they are claiming The First Amendment should be abolished or "limited" (by them ofcourse) because it allows racists to speak. While this is true, the part too many people miss is that it allows racists and bigots to be CRITISCIZED as well. When people are allowed to critiscize racist, bigoted, and other stupid ideas those ideas can never flourish in society for long!

The First Amendment also allows for what is known as the "Freedom of Association" meaning people can organize peacably into political groups. The Abolitionist movement in America got its start thanks exclusively to the protections afforded by The First Amendment! One of the first groups to organize to oppose slavery, a bigoted and government backed institution, was the Pennsylvania Society for Promoting the Abolition of Slavery founded and led by Benjamin Franklin and actually petitioned Congress in 1790 to end the slave trade. Many other abolitionist groups were organized.

https://billofrightsinstitute.org/essays/benjamin-franklin-and-the-first-abolitionist-petitions

In the 1820s the Free Press clause of The First Amendment allowed the formation of "The Liberator" a newspaper that openly called for the complete abolition of slavery! It was the response of racists, bigots and tyrants, not to call for free speech but to call for CENSORSHIP!

In the 1830s Southern States begining with Missouri began passing laws attempting to outlaw all speech, press, even Religious sermons that in any way critiscized slavery. All under the guise that it "Incited violence."

https://mtsu.edu/first-amendment/article/2/abolitionists-and-free-speech

This is key because you can be arrested for violence then as now racists, bigots and tyrants are trying to turn speech that critscizes them into "inciting violence" because the only way these hateful people can win an argument is if their opposition is arrested and silenced.

After the Civil War, many racists and bigots in Southern states partitcularly still discriminated against Blacks. It was the First Amendment that allowed critiscism of their behavior that eventually led to the downfall of Jim Crow, and later the reduction in size and influence of racist organizations such as the klan.

Now in modern America racist, bigoted people in government, academia, press, and corporations are telling Americans that The First Amendment needs to be "limited" or "curated" by them, because "racists." Meanwhile many call for racial segregation and promote the idea that an entire group of people is "racist" because of the color of their skin. Do not be fooled!

1. Racists and bigots inferior ideas cannot survive when the Freedoms garanteed by The First Amendment are allowed. This is why they try so desperately to censor!

2. Saying any speech that exposes them as racists, bigots, or fascists are somehow "incitement to violence" is the SAME EXCUSE they used in the antebellum South to try and continue SLAVERY! Do not be fooled!

As Abolitionist Fredrick Douglass once said:

Abolitionist Fredrick Douglass

[Exterminatore]

You make many great points but I can’t fully agree. I think these people in reality love the first amendment…. for now….. despite being adamant about changing it.


Why?


Because these people have been exploiting the freedoms we have to bring communism and socialism here. They use that free speech to spread lies and condemn those who don’t agree. For example. They are free to say “if you invert your penis, dress in drag, have hormone therapy and give you’re self a girls name then you are a woman.” Is that true? Absolutely you are, pardon the expression a dickless dude. No I one can actually change their sex. They then use that same freedom of speech to condemn and attempt to shame everyone who doesn’t agree with their lies. They basically say: “if you don’t think being trans is ok or if you think it’s strange, abnormal, morally objectionable or disagree for any reason, then you’re a hate filled biggot who wants nothing more than to steal these peoples humanity by dehumanizing them and you’d have them all murdered if you could.” Once again another lie. There are a lot of variables in between full acceptance and fully being against that don’t necessarily include hate but simply disagreeing with the premise.


Without our freedoms these people would be unable to indoctrinate people. So I believe they love the freedoms we have and view them as vehicles to achieve their ends until they usher in their communist paradise. Then we’ll see the truth in who they are as they suspend and extinguish those freedoms making it impossible to have dissent.

[genuinlysensitive]

Yes, but these same people are pro CENSORSHIP. The same ones who say, " “if you invert your penis, dress in drag, have hormone therapy and give you’re self a girls name then you are a woman.” They also claim that if YOU don't agree you are "commiting violence" against them! Sound familiar? Just like in the antebellum South even the mildest critiscisms of slavery they said "incited violence."

***This is key because you can be ARRESTED for a violent act***

Yes communists and socialists, only want free speech and other rights for them, they want to censor everybody else, again by claiming speech they don't agree with is "violence" or "inciting violence." Take this op-ed in the NYT:

www.nytimes.com/.../...rvatives-supreme-court.html

"How conservaties WEAPONIZED The First Amendment" (emphasis mine). They go on to say Liberal (read communist) speech is a SHIELD and all other speech is a SWORD. Again implying any speech that they disagree with is VIOLENCE.

***This is key because you can be ARRESTED for a violent act***

The thing about Free Speech and the other Rights garanteed by The First Amendment is that either everybody has them or nobody has them. Communists and socialists, just like racists and bigots NEED CENSORSHIP or their crappy ideas will NEVER take hold!

[Exterminatore]

You know what? I think you may well be right.

[OlderAndWiser]

Our fundamental right are not protected by advocating for those who are popular, for they need no protections. But what is popular today may not be popular twenty years from now. It is only by insisting - always - on protecting the rights of the unpopular that we can be sure that our rights will be protected in the future.

[genuinlysensitive]

Exactly! Either everyone has Free Speech and the other Rights garanteed by The First Amendment or, eventually, no one will!

[BlackBeauty90]

@OlderAndWiser - Are you stupid? Uneducated? A social reject? All three? The unpopular rights involve educating five years old about sex. The unpopular rights involve making pedophilia normal. The unpopular rights involve legalizing certain drugs that should not be legalized. Etc, etc., etc. Essentially unpopular rights are the rights of the fringe of society... the losers of society... and that is why they're unpopular.

[OlderAndWiser]

@BlackBeauty90

1. "Are you stupid? Uneducated? A social reject? All three?" No, actually I graduated from law school with honors and One of my best subjects was Constitutional law. What about you?

2. "The unpopular rights involve educating five years old about sex." YOU have the right to start educating your child about sex at whatever age you choose, and many people do begin some rudimentary discussions at that age. No one else has the right to educate your child about sex without your consent.

3. "The unpopular rights involve making pedophilia normal." The First Amendment addresses free speech and must of our first amendment jurisprudence makes a great effort to distinguish between what you are allowed to say and what you are allowed to do. I have never heard any First Amendment advocate suggest that pedophilia should be accepted as normal. What an absurdly ridiculous argument for you to make!

4. "The unpopular rights involve legalizing certain drugs that should not be legalized. Etc, etc., etc." The First Amendment addresses free speech and must of our first amendment jurisprudence makes a great effort to distinguish between what you are allowed to say and what you are allowed to do. I have never heard any First Amendment advocate suggest that pedophilia should be accepted as normal. What an absurdly ridiculous argument for you to make! Etc. Etc. Etc.

5. "Essentially unpopular rights are the rights of the fringe of society... the losers of society... and that is why they're unpopular." At one time, it was unpopular to suggest that black people should be given freedom and equal rights, but those who held those beliefs had their ideas and the expression of those ideas protected by the First Amendment.

[OlderAndWiser]

6. If your right to free speech depends on you saying things that are popular, then you DON'T have the right to free speech, and you will be silenced as soon as you have an idea that does not meet with approval from the Speech Control Committee.

If you do not understand these principles, perhaps you should try taking a course in Constitutional Law.

7. You do NOT have a right to free speech on this website, as it is not regulated by the government and private entities may control speech within their orbits of authority. Suggesting that another user is stupid, uneducated, or a social reject because they have said something with which you disagree is a violation of the posting guidelines. I have given you some indulgence in hopes of trying to educate you, but please make sure that your future posts do not violate the posting guidelines, or they may be removed by Admin or a Moderator.

[Lost_in_the_Woods]

Ngl, I call a lot of people on here stupid.

But I want to make an important distinction, I say that because they are stupid.

When people actually make inteligent counter arguments I keep it pretty constructive.

[genuinlysensitive]

Trying to equate Free Speech with pedophilia... That's a new one, but, not surprising. If equating violence with free speech doesn't work try pedophillia.

[OlderAndWiser]

Thanks for MHO!

[Lost_in_the_Woods]

Everything you said is true, but the reality is it has nothing to do with race and everything to do with slavery.

Slavery was never about race. It was always about money and convience. The fact that the slaves were all back was only because Africa was the cheapest/easiest place to buy slaves. Most of the people who were sold into slavery were sold by other Africans, and the slave traders paid them the same as they would anyone else.

The same is true today. The opression of free speech has nothing to do with racism, and everything to do with slavery. If you stop anyone from telling the truth, you can control whoever you want by telling them whatever you want them to believe.

Here's 5 hours of the guy who invented mRNA vaccines talking about how dangerous they are and how they are killing people left and right but the government is covering the whole thing up. They kind of avoid discussing the elephant in the room of, why... But they mention there is clearly an alternative motivation because they obviously aren't doing it to keep people safe.


content. blubrry. com/.../... Vaccine_Risks-FINAL. mp3


https://www. youtube. com/watch? v=6XkRq4PaHqo


The video they banned Trump for posting on Jan6 was literally the opposite of inciting violence. He literally told everyone to go home and be peaceful, not to play into the hands of the Democrats who wanted violence. They knew they could never convict him because he had the video. I still have a copy of it on my hard drive... But they concied half the country he was so evil that they will do anything they are told by the Democrats.




Truth is, if people knew what was going on there really would be violence. The people running the show would get gadafied in a week and we could get back to being productive and prosperous.


But, we are at a point where the rich no longer need poor people. They have robots. Mindless slaves are old fashioned, and the millions of poor people are literally just in the way.


So, they developed a secret bio weapon over many years, and used it to convince billions of people to take some secret drug, then silence everyone who tries to point out that isn't really in our best interest, and say they are racist/violent/whatever people will believe and send checks to make them sit there and believe what they are told.


It's not about stopping violence to help people. It's always been about preventing the slaves from realizing that they actually have the power to be free tomorrow if they just stop working for their masters and have a revolution instead.


Sure, censorship stops violence, but the Democrats love violence. Look at Chacago.


They just don't want people to hear the truth because the people would rise up and kill them tomorrow if they knew what was really going on. It's not that they want to prevent death, it's just a matter of controlling who it happens to. They want to prevent a revolution.


Trump said to be peaceful. The guy who invented mRNA vaccines is going around talking about how they are killing people and there are other far safer and far more effective options. Meanwhile the government wants to inject every last person in the country with some experimental shot that is known to cause all sorts of crazy side effects. To "save them" from a practically harmless man made virus that Fauchi paid to develop and got released "by accident" right before one of the most important elections the country has ever seen...


Honestly, I think they are trying to straight up get rid of poor people so they can have more resources for themselves. They don't need slaves anymore, they have robots.


But if people knew the facts that wouldn't sound so crazy. If people knew the truth they would rise up and stop them. So it's imperative that the people who figure it out can't post on Facebook and all disappear before they can tell anyone.

[Lost_in_the_Woods]

@thotmas97

Check out the links to the 5 hours of the guy who invented mRNA vaccines talking about how they are killing people and the government is trying to silence him to cover it up.

You haven't got a clue. You are a sheep, but the truth is right there if you want to click the link.

Don't take my word for it. Listen to the guy who literally invented the vaccine say that it's killing people and the government admits they don't know how many but they think its between 20,000 and 500,000 so far.

[Lliam]

I agree with you 100%, genuinlysensitive. And you did a great job of making your point.
I love your historical references.

Freedom of speech should never be tolerated. Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes' quote in 1919 about shouting fire in a crowded theater was dishonest. It was to justify Wilson's brutal crackdown on the first amendment rights of those who were protesting the U. S. entry into WWI and especially the newly instituted draft. Holmes was saying that those who were protesting were akin to someone shouting fire in a crowded theater.
So, as you said, it was the bad people who were suppressing first amendment rights for their own benefit.
It's amazing that Holmes' quote has been used ever since to justify censorship.

Today, the U. S. government employs corporations (mainstream and social media) to censor speech and keep people ignorant. It also persecutes whistle blowers.

[genuinlysensitive]

Also the decision regarding "fire in a crowded theater" was overturned in US v Schenk 1964, so when pro censors try to use that, remind them that even that decision was overturned!

[Lliam]

Exactly.

[rcljr]

But you have to admit, free speech or not, that’s a pretty fucked up thing to do.

[Lliam]

@rcljr. Agreed. But I think other charges could be brought for doing such a thing. No need to infringe upon the first amendment.

[Lost_in_the_Woods]

I think it's helarious and should be completely legal. (Although, only during the preview)

Teaches people a lesson for believing whatever they hear without using their own brain.

Me, I paid like $40 to watch a movie so I must really want to see it. I used to be a mall cop... If I heard someone shouting fire in a movie theater I'd politely ask the person to calm down and tell me where the fire was so I could put it out for them.

It's usually not difficult, and a quick response can make a huge difference.

The people who's response is to just lose their shit and run for the hills without a second thought deserve to miss the movie.

They are probably the same idiots who laugh uncontrollably any time something even remotely funny happens anyways.

Honestly, I'd love to try it. I bet most people would look around and then tell me to shut the fuck up and get a life.

But I'm sure someone would flip out and call the cops and they would call it disturbing the peace or disorderly conduct. They already don't like me so, it's not worth the risk.

[rcljr]

Exactly

[pjf1958]

Outstanding! the same exact thing happened to Donald Trump. Whether or not you agree with the former President or not, the fact remains that the 'Ministers of Propaganda', in Silicon Valey, specifically the owners of "twitter", ostracized the former President by permanently banishing him from social networking. In the past, the press was labeled the "4th estate". A non intrusive watchdog entity, whose sole purpose was to monitor the political 'static equilibrium', of the interactions between the Executive, legislative, and Judicial branches of the Federal Government. Now, social networking has completely eclipsed the safeguard's of our Democracy. Since no one is safe from their wrath, they can kick out anyone who doesn't conform to their political sensibilities. This is unprecidented and provacotive!

[sage2021]

How do you know who are the real bigots and racist in this day in time? I am white and in my whole life I have never been a racist. Suddenly we get a different president, and since I am white, I am now a racist to certain people. Remember they are cancelling white culture. So, in 2024 when we get another president, will I be taken off the racist title they have branded me with? I have had plenty of reasons to be a racist snce I was a young girl when desegregation took effect. I was going through high school in a big city at the time. They would pick on me all of the time. They would come up to me almost daily with their 5 friends and ask me for a dime. It was more like "You better have a dime
witchyou or we're gonna kick that white ass of yours." There are many more examples I could give - but it never made me a racist. They were the true racists!

[pjf1958]

Because, I'm a guru

[Lost_in_the_Woods]

They are the people who say we should have different rules and different groups for different people based on skin color.

[rcljr]

So THATS why the democraps are trying to do away with the first amendment, they are racist bigots, can’t call anyone fat, stupid, slut, overachiever because some poor liberal snowflake will get his widdle feels hurt. Yes indeed you hit the nail on the head, democrat leftist bigots and racists. Either free speech is completely free to all or there’s no free speech, just leftist propaganda. It’s happened in Russia, Italy, Germany, China, Vietnam, Cubs, Argentina, it doesn’t work, but now you stupid brainwashed Che Guevara wanna be’s think it can work here, I just wish I could see you crying for mommy when you finally get the socialism you’re begging for, IDIOT.

[marc94]

You're right. What you're saying and suggesting is true.

[Stoner710]

Only thing I would disagree with is racism can survive but in very limited capacity as long as the first amendment exists. You will always have individual races there’s no amount of law or force that can change peoples opinion. And people will be racist no matter what but that’s their individual choice and their individual right which also goes along with the first amendment. Obviously we should not limit the first amendment because the first amendment not only gives the racist pieces of shit the right to speak but also the people who are against the majority who are against these racist pieces of shit

[Lost_in_the_Woods]

I say, let people be racist.
Some people believe in God. Some people believe in Scientology. Some people believe the world is flat...

People can believe what they want to believe. Racism is only a problem when it turns into actions of discrimination which are already illegal.

I don't care if my neighbor hates white people. I care if he robs me. I care if he hits me with a bat. And I care if he hurts me or my family... But those are all already illegal.

I don't really care if other people are racist. I think we need to let people be wrong if they want to, and enforce the laws we already have against discrimination.

[joesheks]

The problem is “what is racism?” If I point out racial differences in intelligence, creativity, crime rates, etc. you call me racist. If I point out that blacks are extremely violent as a group you call me racist. Yet, if I pointed out that yellow jackets are more violent than honey bees, it’s science.

The problem is the inventors of racism skillfully tied “racism” to hatred and groups like the KKK such that one cannot even observe racial differences anymore. I don’t hate anyone but don’t tell me I cannot notice what is clear as day.

Without the first amendment, there will be no such right to observe.

The reason “racism” lingers is that racial differences exist and they affect our everyday reality. We all notice them but are told that to speak them is professional and social suicide.

[Stoner710]

@joesheks you’re right, my definition of racism is discrimination based off of the color of the skin left somebody has.

Unfortunately the American left definition of racism is a system that results and the and the quality of the outcome. Which means every system in the world that’s not pure communism is racist

[rcljr]

@Lost_in_the_Woods , the flat earther bunch cracks me up with their mental contortions, gymnastics and excuses why the world is flat , but whatever, if it gets them through the day.

[Lost_in_the_Woods]

@rcljr

I actually love talking to those guys. Most them are pretty smart. (Believe it or not...)

I take a really scientific approach. Let's design an experiment we can do together to prove it. Lets examine the evidence, and analize where it could be flawed.

The results of those discussions were actually very eye opening to me. The truth is, it's extremely difficult to prove either one. Most people just believe whatever they are told without a scrap of hard evidence.

But, for me, the best evidence is that people stated thinking the earth might not be flat right around the time that they started building telescopes, ocean sailing ships, and accurate maps.

Seems like a strange conspiracy to invent. Seems especially hard to invent a theory that would evolve over thousands of years to explain nature better than anyones understanding of how it "really works" (ie: If the earth is flat, and Antarctica is a secret wall around the edge of the circle, I understand why it might be cold at the edge... But then why the Arctic? What is the source of heat that warms only a doughnut shaped ring and skips the middle and why?)

I think the earth is round.

But, here is my question to anyone who says the flat Earths are all a bunch of crazies who don't have any evidence...

Can you prove it's round? Yourself. With a scientific experiment that I can repeat and get the same result?

It's harder than you might think. They might be delusional, but they bring up a great point that, most of us just believe what we are told on way or the other.

[rcljr]

@Lost_in_the_Woods , NASA did my research for me, plenty of video proof from their orbital flights, plus footage from the SR-71 Blackbird does indeed prove the Earth is round like a marble not round like a pancake. Space has no atmosphere, it is total vacuum, airless, one can sybarite space in a glass of water to recreate the formation of a planet in space. Put 1 drop of oil into the water and watch it settle, does the oil take the shape of a marble, or a pancake? Plus Satellite video from hundreds of satellites in geosynchronous orbit confirm the videos of both NASA and The Air Force from a much greater altitude, videotaping as the Earth completes rotation after rotation.

[Lost_in_the_Woods]

I hear you.

But two things.

One, the oil will float to the top and be mostly flat. But that's only because its a liquid being shaped by the effects of gravity and density. I'm not sure what that experiment proves either way.

Two, I have a video of a dragon, but that doesn't prove dragons are real.

Saying you believe NASA isn't any more scientifically convincing than saying you believe Tom Cruise.

I think it is. But when it comes to factual evidence, you pretty much have to build your own rocket and go see for yourself.

And sure, you can say someone has and they found the answer, but I could just as easily say they lied.

That said, the flat earthers don't even have that much so... The reasonable earthbound human is forced to generally accept the evidence they are presented with even though it's inconclusive.

[Lost_in_the_Woods]

My question for them is why do we use satellites and under sea cables for communication instead of just big giant radio lasers to send messages across the ocean? Sure, even "flat" land is hilly... But the ocean can't be.

If the world isn't round you should be able to see and/or send light from one side to the other until something gets in the way.

[rcljr]

@Lost_in_the_Woods , depends on the weight and viscosity of the oil, it may not rise to the surface. Much as space rock coalesced to form our planet, some rocks became molten lava, other rocks. Cooled by water. Point being the Earth is NOT flat.

[HiveBee]

I think conservatives need to move and become libertarian.

Right now conservatives are not able to combat the left. The left will win in time.

I think the best way to combat the left is by embracing freedom and liberty.

Right now conservatives only pay lip service to freedom and liberty. Right now conservatives are only reactionaries to the left.

But if conservatives become libertarians, the only conservatives will be the left. Who wish to conserve authority's power over the people as it has for thousands of years.

This country's formation was radical. Radical liberalism. Meaning, freedom from authority.

Neither side is advocating freedom from authority.

[pjf1958]

The only way the left is able to succeed, is because they're able to force the president to abdicate his twitter account, by highjacking the 1st amendment.

[rcljr]

@pjf1958 👍🏻

[NamerOfStars]

I don't disagree with the core of what you're saying, but I don't think relying on the "marketplace of ideas" being self-correcting is enough to prevent the horrors of the past from reoccurring; remember that the ideas of slavery and racial bigotry flourished for quite a while in our society, even WITH those protections. They'd likely have lasted longer even without them, but it's no excuse to not leave bad ideas unengaged with.

[Lost_in_the_Woods]

Make a graph of freedom of speech for all in America since it was founded.

Now make a graph of racial violence and opression in America since it was founded.

Stand back and look at the two graphs side by side.

Nobody is saying racism would vanish if we went back to protecting free speech. Only that removing free speech and forcing division makes it worse.

[genuinlysensitive]

As I said those ideas were given to us from the British empire. Multiple colonies actually tried to outlaw slavery, but were overruled by the King of England. After The Revolution, it was the SLAVE HOLDERS, the racists, the bigots that called NOT for free speech but for CENSORSHIP!

And who decides what ideas are "bad"? You? Joe Biden? Donald Trump? Censorship inevitably leads to the same place. The place the slave holders, racists, and bigots want it to.

[loveslongnails]

Thomas Jefferson, a man of many good acts as well as faults, concluded that:
" if I had to choose between a government without newspapers or newspapers without a government, I should not hesitate a moment to prefer the latter” Think about that, especially all you trumpers.

[genuinlysensitive]

It is not only "tumpers" that care about The First Amendment, or the Rights that it guarantees. As for newspapers, Thomas Jefferson also concluded that, "The man who reads nothing at all is better educated than the man who reads nothing but newspapers."

[Lost_in_the_Woods]

The republicans have always been the party of small government.

Wasn't Thomas Jefferson one of them? I'm not sure.

But I know he was a huge fan of free speech and freedom of assembly.

[Lost_in_the_Woods]

In earnest, what did Thomas Jefferson ever do wrong?

I'm sure there was something, but I can't think of much.

[loveslongnails]

And that quote seems, no doubt, to imply that one has to think for themselves and not just accept what they read in newspapers. It may appear to contradict his previous statement, but they reference different things.

[loveslongnails]

@Lost_in_the_Woods The Republicans may have started out as the party for "less government", but it hasn't turned out that way. While it remains one of their battle cries and talking points, the numbers show that the largest government spending and expansions over the last 50 years has taken place under Republican admins, not Dems. Nor has there been a surplus under a Republican admin in the last 50 years. It's annoying to hear them touting that bs.

[Lost_in_the_Woods]

I love how one of the founding requirements for being a leftist is to not understand how out government works on a basic level.

The executive branch doesn't set the budget. So even if that was true your argument is invalid.

Let's talk about the infrastructure bill.

[zagor]

@Lost_in_the_Woods The Republicans weren't officially a thing until the 1850's. TJ was dead by then.

[rcljr]

@Lost_in_the_Woods , these days everyone loves free speech, so long as it’s speech in lock step with their agenda or ideals, if not, your a Nazi, racist, bigot, homophobe, misandrist, did I miss any of the lefts colorful names for Conservatives when the lefties get theiw widdle feews hurt by free speech?

[Lost_in_the_Woods]

Conspiracy theorist.

I actually like that one because it outs them as ignorant every time they say it.

They don't know what a conspiracy is, nor to they know why a theory is. They just think it means "false accusation" and that speaks volumes about the level of brainwashing that has taken place on a deep and pervasive level throughout our entire society.

If I think George Bush is actually from outer space, that isn't a conspiracy theory.

If I think casino employees intentionally design their games so they make more money than they lose and don't mention that to the customers, that is a conspiracy theory.

But the leftists will call the first one a conspiracy and the second one common sense.

It just shows they don't know the meaning of their own words.

[J2ohhhhh]

When I was working in journalism I always made proper research and avoid publishing anything bullshit, but soon came to the realisation that most of the people don't, so I couldn't really trust any source thinking that they wouldn't publish bs. And mostly had to read shitload of information to find the middle ground between political motives and reconstructive real events. Those fucking people who publish all that bullshit and even claim them to be truth shouldn't have free speech.

[genuinlysensitive]

And who decides who and what to censor? You? Joe Biden? Donald Trump? Sometimes there is no "middle ground." Especially when Inalienable Rights are concerned.

[J2ohhhhh]

Now thinking about it, holding people accountable for what they publish would be the way rather than censorship.

[LeeannaDD]

The left is now socialist/communist. What do you expect

[pjf1958]

What gets me is that no one saw this coming.

[ForgottenFuRyan]

Speak for yourself, boomer.

[rcljr]

@pjf1958 , bull shit, we’ve been warning people since the 60’s, everyone said “ can’t happen here” conspiracy theorist” etc…

[Lost_in_the_Woods]

I'd like to apologise on behalf of my generation.

But I also want to point out that the source of the problem is that so many of them were only educated by their state and federal governments.

[pjf1958]

sorry, didn't mean to offend

[MyAtaraxia]

@Lost_in_the_Woods I agree.

[pjf1958]

Are everyone's feelings free of emotional and/or psychological scaring? we don't want anyone traumatized.

[Hypnos0929]

You know your comment would matter more if the right actually defined socialism and communism instead of thinking they're the same thing or calling everything they don't like socialist/communist.

[Lost_in_the_Woods]

@Hypnos0929 "Someone somewhere is wrong, so, therefore, the left isn't communist."

Well, I guess that proves it then.
Guys our comments don't matter because Hypnos0929 said that someone else thinks socialism and communism are the same thing. Not that they are very different, but he said someone else was wrong so we must be racist now. Pack your shit, you can either join the klan or the CCP but you can't talk about free speech on the internet because some guy named Hypnos wants to convince you that someone else is wrong. x'D

Please, spare us from your mighty fact check chairmen 0929.

[rcljr]

@Hypnos0929 , kinda like lefties calling conservatives NAZI, huh? Where do you think we learned it?

[pjf1958]

Obviously not from history.

[Hypnos0929]

@Lost_in_the_Woods
Describe the differences between communism and socialism without plagiarism.

[rcljr]

@Lost_in_the_Woods , Communism is the goal of Socialism.

[Lost_in_the_Woods]

Both are ideologies that encourage the "collective" ownership of property.

But Communism is more absolute and socialism is more volentary.

If everyone votes to own nothing, you have socialism. (Or Dominion voting machines)

If the government owns everything and the people have no option/no say you have communism.

Socialism is a transitional step that leads to communism, in the same way "emergency executive orders" are a transitional step that lead to facism.

[Lost_in_the_Woods]

Ps, Mariam Webster is free and defines them as almost exactly the same thing.

[Dargil]

Because it makes the First Amendment enforceable. And make no mistakes about it. As in the past, Democrats are todays racists and bigots. When was the last time you heard a Republican make an overtly racist statement?

[ForgottenFuRyan]

Every race has more slaves today than white people ever did according to the current global slavery index... that's were we're headed.

[Grond21]

Can you give me the source to this map? I really need it

[Lost_in_the_Woods]

@Grond21 looks like it says Washington Post down in the corner.

[ForgottenFuRyan]

[Searches current world slavery map] ... yeah, it's called the global slavery index findings map. Spread the word!

[Grond21]

Thank you!!

[worldscolide]

I fully agree with you.. Only idiots who wish to have you jailed for disagreeing are the ones that want it removed.. This includes worthless piece of shit leftists.

[worldscolide]

Anyone notice that it is the democrats, the party of slavery that always talk about abolishing the first and second amendments?

[worldscolide]

Then you're blind.. Take cancel culture, mostly a leftist thing.. Take the destruction of statues and monuments, also a leftist thing.. But again that's the party of slavery for you.

[worldscolide]

Lol again you're too blind to see it.

[worldscolide]

Oh and here is the example reason.com/.../

[Lost_in_the_Woods]

Whoever you are talking to either blocked me or I blocked them.

But, check out my comment for the links to 5 hours of the guy who invented mRNA vaccines talking about how they are killing people and the government is trying to ban all the safer and more effective options that already exist.

They want those people in jail because if the masses ever find out what is really going on, Fauchis head will be on a stake by the next morning.

The censorship is truly to prevent violence and keep people safe, but it's only to protect the people who are actually killing millions for there own personal gain.

People taking about that sort of thing could really be very dangerous to them.

[worldscolide]

I know I saw the thread

[rcljr]

Bingo

[anylolone]

The sole purpose of their racism is to hide their flaws with a prescribed "outgroup".

Being a "jogger" or a "dindu" is not tied to skin color, and they will always deflect and project.

The deflection comes in mainly two forms:
"The devil made me do it", IE, robin de angelo
"I can't be wrong because I'm of the chosen" IE Ibran.

[hellionthesagereborn]

Nothing to add, its all true. The only people who censor others are those who are afraid of the truth, and the only people afraid to hear the truth are liars and fools.

[FunkyMonkee]

That's the way demoncraps are!! To them, EVERYTHING (except them!!) is racist!!! In the meantime, the exact opposite is true!

[JesseJayNeak]

They don't know anything because they live in a country that defends their rights. If they went outside the US, may God have mercy on their souls

[thotmas97]

Have you even been to a country outside the US? You know having rights isn’t an uncommon thing right?

[JesseJayNeak]

@thotmas97 hello, old friend

[thotmas97]

I don’t remember who you are tbh. You probably said something stupid at one point though

[JesseJayNeak]

@thotmas97 you were fear mongering trying to convince me to get the vaccine

[thotmas97]

Were you the guy claiming the vaccine killed your family? There were a lot of idiots on that post

[JesseJayNeak]

@thotmas97 killed my family? You said that you you wanted my family to die

[thotmas97]

I definitely never told anyone I wanted their family to die, I can assure you that.

[JesseJayNeak]

@thotmas97 yeah, right

[thotmas97]

I didn’t. Actually I do remember the conversation, you literally said you’d rather let your dad die then try to prevent it. I pointed out awful of a thing that was to say.

[thotmas97]

*how awful

[JesseJayNeak]

@thotmas97 and you were saying that COVID was the most dangerous disease of all time even though it isn't and tried to fear monger me into getting the vaccine

[thotmas97]

I never said that.

[JesseJayNeak]

@thotmas97 yes, you were

[thotmas97]

Most of that conversation was you making things up and acting like I said them.

[JesseJayNeak]

@thotmas97 but you underlined them.

[thotmas97]

No, go back to the conversation, I quite literally denied that it was “the most dangerous disease of all time”, which was something you claimed I said even though I never did. Honestly I felt talking to you was extremely frustrating because you continuously made straw man arguments and used words incorrectly to the point where it was almost impossible to tell what you were trying to say.

[thotmas97]

What do you mean I “underlined them”? What are you talking about?

[JesseJayNeak]

@thotmas97 you were flaunting the fact that you took the vaccine

[thotmas97]

No all I said was that I didn’t get Covid because I was vaccinated and you said I was bragging. It was really weird

[JesseJayNeak]

@thotmas97 I didn't get COVID either and I'm not vaccinated. How am I supposed to feel? Better than everyone else?

[thotmas97]

No? Why do you think I feel better than anyone? Do you have an inferiority complex or something?

[JesseJayNeak]

@thotmas97 I don't. And I don't like the superiority complex you're showing

[thotmas97]

Uh huh. Sure.

[JesseJayNeak]

@thotmas97 flaunting your superiority again? Wanna make yourself feel better?

[thotmas97]

Yeah that’s what I’m doing. You caught me. I’m just so superior to everyone I’m experiencing ego death weekly.

[JesseJayNeak]

@thotmas97 bland sarcasm. Joking about suicide now?

[thotmas97]

Ego death is not suicide lmao

[JesseJayNeak]

@thotmas97 yeah, laugh. That's what you did better last time

[thotmas97]

How about you just google words you don’t know that would make these conversations far easier.

[JesseJayNeak]

@thotmas97 like the one we had last time?

[JesseJayNeak]

@thotmas97 when you said that COVID was a serious matter despite the fact there are way more dangerous diseases out there?

[thotmas97]

I mean if I remember correctly you misused so many words that I had to correct you just to understand what you were talking about.

[thotmas97]

Yeah I did say that. What’s your point?

[JesseJayNeak]

@thotmas97 so you indeed were fear mongering

[thotmas97]

How so? More people die from heart disease than the flu, does that mean we shouldn’t vaccinate for the flu? Your logic makes no sense.

[JesseJayNeak]

@thotmas97 no but that doesn't you have to buy everything that someone tells you

[thotmas97]

What am I buying in this instance?

[JesseJayNeak]

@thotmas97 get the vaccine and soon everything will go back to normal! That's what

[thotmas97]

And you don’t think that’s accurate? Are people getting the vaccine still getting Covid?

[JesseJayNeak]

@thotmas97 yes, they are. Ask the Senate but they'll probably deny it

[thotmas97]

Ok well I don’t need the senate to tell me if they are or aren’t. A study demonstrating that’s the case would be nice. Could you show me that?

[JesseJayNeak]

@thotmas97 www.usatoday.com/.../

[thotmas97]

I can’t read that

[JesseJayNeak]

@thotmas97 can't read click on a link now?

[thotmas97]

No, I’m not a subscriber to usatoday so I can’t open the article. Are you?

[JesseJayNeak]

@thotmas97 yes, I am. Fine, I'll take another one

[JesseJayNeak]

@thotmas97 gidmk.medium.com/why-are-vaccinated-people-getting-covid-19-951f49d77215

[thotmas97]

Did you actually read the article you sent me?

[JesseJayNeak]

@thotmas97 yes, I have. Way back

[thotmas97]

So I’m wondering why you sent me article that agrees with my point? Is this some form of reverse psychology?

[JesseJayNeak]

@thotmas97 i sent the first one. You couldn't "read" it so I had to send you another one. Even so, I'm not taking the vaccine

[thotmas97]

Well I couldn’t read it because I don’t pay 5 dollars a month for a pretty bad newspaper. My point here is that the only other article you could find, which I don’t think you read, literally comes to the conclusion that the Covid vaccine is extremely effective.

[JesseJayNeak]

@thotmas97 but there's still a possibility to get infected, isn't there?

[JesseJayNeak]

@thotmas97 or you're going to fear monger me again inti taking the vaccine? Because apparently COVID is "dangerous"?

[thotmas97]

Yes. But something that’s 94 percent effective should probably be given the benefit of the doubt. That’s the point the article was making. Also you claimed to have read the article a while back, even though it’s two days old. I don’t know why you feel the need to lie as much as you do.

[JesseJayNeak]

@thotmas97 which one? The first or the second? Also there IS a possibility then

[JesseJayNeak]

@thotmas97 and lastly are you going to fear monger me again?

[JesseJayNeak]

Into becoming a human light bulb? Or a magnet?

[thotmas97]

I didn’t read the first article because I don’t have a five dollar subscription. We established this. And yes there’s a possibility of getting it, I don’t think any vaccine is 100% effective.

[thotmas97]

A human light bulb? What are you talking about?

[JesseJayNeak]

@thotmas97 after effects of the vaccine. Some put a light bulb near the puncture wound and it lit. Or they put a coin and it stuck. And I'm supposed to trust it? A rushed vaccine that came in less than a year?

[thotmas97]

Oh. You’re really gullible huh?

[JesseJayNeak]

@thotmas97 not as much as you willing to trust the government and become a Guinea pig

[thotmas97]

For the record those videos are fake, people put them on tik tok for attention. It’s not scientifically possible to have enough metal in your bloodstream to allow your body to become “magnetic”, which would require roughly the same polarity as a refrigerator.

[thotmas97]

Jesse you believe fake tik tok videos because you don’t have a basic knowledge of anatomy or science. Explain to me how the metals in a vaccine could produce a flowing electric current.

[thotmas97]

Like do you have any idea how many joules are required to turn a lightbulb on? The human body couldn’t sustain anything close to that.

[JesseJayNeak]

@thotmas97 I don't know about that, being honest. Also, not trusting the government and I'm not taking the vaccine.

[thotmas97]

Ok but you can see why I consider you stupid, right Jesse? I’d be embarrassed if a 12 year old were that gullible, but you’re a grown adult.

[thotmas97]

I’m sorry call me egotistical or whatever but I genuinely think you’re not smart at all.

[JesseJayNeak]

@thotmas97 so I'm stupid because I question the government decisions and I should sell my soul and body to them? Is that what you are saying?

[JesseJayNeak]

@thotmas97 that I should purposely take the vaccine knowing there's a risk to be infected?

[JesseJayNeak]

@thotmas97 and also you're flaunting your superiority again because you took the shot and I didn't?

[JesseJayNeak]

@thotmas97 so you are bragging

[thotmas97]

You’re stupid because you believe viral tik tok videos that defy basic science because you think your mistrust of the government makes you intelligent automatically. You don’t trust authority? Fine by me. You believe literally anything that goes against whatever you believe the governments agenda is, regardless of merit? Moron.

[thotmas97]

No I’m pointing out that you’re ridiculously gullible. If you had a good argument for not taking the shot, I could at least respect that, but you’re relying on tik tok videos made by children.

[JesseJayNeak]

@thotmas97 so you are trying to fear monger me into getting the vaccine

[thotmas97]

No, I’m pointing out how bad your reasoning is for not getting it. At no point did I say anything about the threats of not getting it in this conversation.

[JesseJayNeak]

@thotmas97 coming from the guy who's trying to convert someone else because "the experts said so".

[thotmas97]

Yeah I do trust medical experts over attention seeking children. I didn’t know that was wrong.

[JesseJayNeak]

@thotmas97 so you call me gullible and insecure but you're quite passionate for a virus who's not even that dangerous.

[thotmas97]

I wouldn’t call it passion, no. I will say I support getting it because it is dangerous for a segment of the population, just like I support getting the flu shot or really any other vaccination of a contagious disease.

[JesseJayNeak]

@thotmas97 and how dangerous is this disease?

[JesseJayNeak]

@thotmas97 like the black plague?

[JesseJayNeak]

@thotmas97 like cholera?

[JesseJayNeak]

@thotmas97 like AIDS?

[JesseJayNeak]

@thotmas97 like the Spanish flu?

[JesseJayNeak]

@thotmas97 like H1N1?

[JesseJayNeak]

@thotmas97 I'm starting to get "Get the vaccine or die!" vibes from you

[thotmas97]

Less dangerous than any of those. Well except H1N1.

[thotmas97]

I never said that. You have this really difficult time understanding nuance. No one is insisting you will die if you don’t get the vaccine.

[JesseJayNeak]

@thotmas97 yet you're saying it's dangerous. You're not saying how much

[JesseJayNeak]

@thotmas97 is it as dangerous as the Black Plague?

[thotmas97]

Does it matter? If people can die from it if is by definition dangerous. Perhaps you won’t die from it, but people still do.

[thotmas97]

So by your logic the only reason to get a vaccine is it’s it as dangerous as the Black Plague? Do you get flu shots?

[JesseJayNeak]

@thotmas97 you're avoiding the question

[thotmas97]

I answered the question actually. Take your time and read my responses first, it will prevent you from looking as dumb as you often do.

[JesseJayNeak]

@thotmas97 no, you haven't. There's no yes, there's no no. So, you're avoiding the question

[JesseJayNeak]

@thotmas97 also, no. I don't get flu shots

[thotmas97]

I said it’s less dangerous. Those were literally my words.

[thotmas97]

So you’re just anti vaccination all around?

[JesseJayNeak]

@thotmas97 no, I actually got vaccinated for different diseases such as tetanus, staphylococcus and other jazz

[JesseJayNeak]

@thotmas97 what about AIDS? Is COVID more dangerous than AIDS?

[thotmas97]

Are those as dangerous as the Black Plague?

[JesseJayNeak]

@thotmas97 and the last flu shot I took nearly made a chalk line.

[thotmas97]

Again, I said it’s not. Or at least not in the heyday of the AIDS virus

[JesseJayNeak]

@thotmas97 no, nowhere near

[JesseJayNeak]

@thotmas97 also, you didn't answer my question

[thotmas97]

I’ve literally answered all every question you’ve asked

[JesseJayNeak]

@thotmas97 no you haven't

[thotmas97]

If tentanus isn’t as dangerous as the Black Plague why get the vaccine?

[thotmas97]

@JesseJayNeak yes I did. You asked if it was as dangerous as the Black Plague I said no. You asked if it was as dangerous as AIDS I said no. Read your responses

[JesseJayNeak]

@thotmas97 what about the other ones? Like cholera? Did you answer that one? Or H1N1? Did you answer that one?

[thotmas97]

I said no to all except H1N1. Read. Your. Responses.

[thotmas97]

The only one who has avoided any question here is you.

[JesseJayNeak]

@thotmas97 when? Cause I don't see 'em

[thotmas97]

“Less dangerous than any of those. Well except H1N1.”—me less than five minutes ago. Jesus Christ dude.

[thotmas97]

Meanwhile you won’t explain why you bothered to get a tetanus shot.

[JesseJayNeak]

@thotmas97 what about the cholera one? You didn't answer that one

[thotmas97]

WHAT DO YOU THINK “ANY” MEANS? Oh my godddd

[thotmas97]

Do you have a learning disability?

[JesseJayNeak]

@thotmas97 no. You're assuming now?

[JesseJayNeak]

@thotmas97 ableist

[thotmas97]

I’m asking a question because the only people who I’ve ever talked to who had this much trouble parsing language or using cognitive reasoning are people who have been diagnosed with learning disabilities.

[JesseJayNeak]

@thotmas97 you're calling me disabled now, huh? Again ableist

[thotmas97]

I’m asking if you were diagnosed with a learning disability. I for one have adhd.

[JesseJayNeak]

@thotmas97 yeah, right. Hiding behind the "special needs" excuse because of the serious implications you threw before, now?

[thotmas97]

What are you talking about? What implications?

[thotmas97]

I’m pointing out that you seem to have an actual learning disability.

[JesseJayNeak]

@thotmas97 you're implying i have a learning disability when I'm not. That's a serious implication right there. I didn't imply that you "allegedly" had ADHD and even if I were correct, I'd keep it to myself

[JesseJayNeak]

@thotmas97 but you straight up assumed that I have a learning disability which it's not true by the way without solid evidence

[thotmas97]

Ok, I’m just saying that for an adult you seem to have a very difficult time with things like abstraction and the English language in general.

[JesseJayNeak]

@thotmas97 I, in this whole argument, never would bring this up. Why would you? You say you're not trying to feel superior yet here you are. Trying to shame for a disability I do not possess

[thotmas97]

No, I asked if you’ve ever been diagnosed with one, because you show all of the signs of someone I knew in high school who had one. I’m not assuming anything.

[JesseJayNeak]

@thotmas97 again with your assumptions

[thotmas97]

Well personally I don’t think I show any obvious signs of a learning disability over text. The only way you’d know I had adhd is if you saw me irl.

[thotmas97]

Alright fine, no disability. You’re probably just dumb. Happy?

[JesseJayNeak]

@thotmas97 yeah, I don't believe you. You're just saying that so that I don't call you ableist

[thotmas97]

I do not give a single fuck if you call me ableist.

[JesseJayNeak]

@thotmas97 yet you're excusing yourself because I told you that you were

[thotmas97]

That’s not why. I legitimately believe you have a learning disability. Call me whatever you want but I think you should get tested regardless.

[JesseJayNeak]

@thotmas97 I don't need to. And yes, you're excusing yourself behind the ADHD facade so that you can't be called ableist

[thotmas97]

Call me ableist I don’t give a shit.

[JesseJayNeak]

@thotmas97 I admit that I've said that many lies before. But lying about something like this it's no joking matter

[JesseJayNeak]

@thotmas97 apperently you do

[thotmas97]

I’m not lying about having adhd lmao

[thotmas97]

Did you ever get tested in grade school?

[JesseJayNeak]

@thotmas97

[thotmas97]

Take an IQ test first, if you score high enough it’s probably nothing.

[JesseJayNeak]

@thotmas97 yes, I have been tested. Nothing was found

[thotmas97]

Alright, then I take it back. You’re just dumb. Congratulations

[JesseJayNeak]

@thotmas97 I've done that too. Also, lying about ADHD is not a laughing matter

[thotmas97]

Ok well it’s a good thing I didn’t lie about it then.

[thotmas97]

Also when did you take an IQ test? High school?

[JesseJayNeak]

@thotmas97 yeah, like taking it back is going to do anything.

[JesseJayNeak]

@thotmas97 that won't hide your ableist comments from before

[thotmas97]

Be as offended as you want I don’t care

[JesseJayNeak]

@thotmas97 not offended. Just surprised you'd lie about having ADHD

[thotmas97]

If I would’ve lied I probably would’ve picked a disability slightly more debilitating than adhd.

[JesseJayNeak]

@thotmas97

[thotmas97]

You really need something to latch onto huh?

[JesseJayNeak]

@thotmas97 you're the one who brought the argument. And you're the one hiding behind the excuse after throwing serious accusations. It's clear YOU don't take ADHD seriously since you're comment was "I'm not lying about ADHD lmao"

[thotmas97]

It’s not that big of a deal and doesn’t effect my life much. What, am I supposed to be crying because I used to take meds in grade school? At most it makes some aspects of work more difficult. Meanwhile you’re crying up a storm because I dared ask if you have a learning disability, as if that’s the worst thing one can possibly have. Give me a break.

[thotmas97]

Lots of people have adhd, lots of people are on the spectrum, it’s not some taboo subject. Tbh it’s the only way I can even make sense of some of the absolute nonsensical things you choose to focus on is if you’re cognitively impaired in some way.

[JesseJayNeak]

@thotmas97 so it is a joking to you. It's funny to you to call me people mentally defective, isn't it?

[thotmas97]

By that reasoning I’m mentally defective. I’d proudly admit to that if that’s the bar here.

[JesseJayNeak]

@thotmas97

[thotmas97]

I’d love to prove it but I really don’t think you’re worth doxxing myself over

[JesseJayNeak]

@thotmas97 you have nothing to prove. You showed yourself already

[thotmas97]

Uh huh. The word of a confirmed liar and idiot claiming I’m a liar. You really showed me.

[JesseJayNeak]

@thotmas97 because you are. You only claimed you had ADHD after I accused you of being ableist

[thotmas97]

The problem with this is that you vastly overestimate what I think of you. I don’t care what you have to say. I argue with you out of boredom and it’s amusing because you’re consistently dumb. You continuously top yourself in that regard. But now that you’re taking some weird moral stance because you’re pretending to be offended on behalf of the adhd (?) community it’s getting stale.

[thotmas97]

Dude I don’t give a fuck if you call me ableist lmao. I’ve been called far worse. I actually have adhd it’s not that big a deal.

[JesseJayNeak]

@thotmas97 "I don't care what you have to say" yet you're trying to excuse yourself

[thotmas97]

I’m not. I’m an asshole who talks down to stupid people because I have little patience for them. I think you’re either impaired in some way or have a far below average IQ. I have adhd, it doesn’t effect me in the slightest.

[JesseJayNeak]

@thotmas97 liar liar, pants of fire. Pinocchio's nose is my desire

[JesseJayNeak]

@thotmas97 you're still trying to excuse yourself after the I accused you yet you pretend that you don't care about what I say

[thotmas97]

Ok? Call me what you want, you literally believe vaccines make you into electrical outlets.

[JesseJayNeak]

@thotmas97 bad but not as bad as lying about having ADHD

[thotmas97]

Feel free to check my banner. Only one of us here is a liar

[JesseJayNeak]

@thotmas97 that's cute. Did you put it on after the accusations I sent you?

[thotmas97]

I put in on because I’m petty and don’t like being called a liar, because I’m not.

[JesseJayNeak]

@thotmas97 sure...

[JesseJayNeak]

@thotmas97 so you DID put after

[thotmas97]

Well no shit. Why would I put that on before someone accused me of lying about adhd? That doesn’t make any sense. Then again you have a very difficult time thinking, so I get it.

[JesseJayNeak]

@thotmas97 so it'd be more convincing. But if you truly were then you would have put it way before my accusations

[thotmas97]

? That makes no sense. I was supposed to anticipate you calling me a liar and keep that posted before you said anything? What? Does your brain not work?

You called me a liar, so I texted and asked about my old adhd meds and got that response, thus proving I’m not a liar. I’m sorry that’s too complicated for your brain to understand.

[JesseJayNeak]

@thotmas97
You: I don't care what you call me and I don't care what you say
Also you: here's my meds, I'm not lying.
So, you do care about what I say.

[JesseJayNeak]

@thotmas97 also where are those meds cause I I don't see 'em

[thotmas97]

Adderrall. Do you not know what that is? Also I was going to ignore it but I realized it would be more satisfying to prove you wrong.

[JesseJayNeak]

@thotmas97 no, never heard of it

[thotmas97]

Ok well googles your friend, try using it

[JesseJayNeak]

@thotmas97 Google ain't my friend.

[JesseJayNeak]

@thotmas97 Google is not a person

[genuinlysensitive]

@JesseJayNeak Don't feed the trolls.

[rcljr]

@thotmas97 , yeah, go to Russia and tell Uncle Vladimir that his policies and leadership suck ass.

[SlightlyEccentric]

Last I checked the only ones actively suppressing free speech are leftists. Leftists who are unironically racist towards white people.

[najekim]

And without The Second Amendment, there would be no First.

[genuinlysensitive]

And without The First Amendment, they would take the Second, and the rest while they were at it.

[rcljr]

It’s coming within the next 7-8 months