It's really ignorance and drinking the "Kool-Aid" that the feminists churn out by the gallons.
Sorry, but most housewives nowadays don't need to depend on their husband's money. Most of them can work, but choose not to because they think it's way more important to be there for their children and not some stranger you have to pay to raise your kids.
Also, it's really not that great having to go to work. You really think it's glamorous to face commuting through traffic @ shitty hours and try and do your best without little recognition from whoever the power's that be, to get a meager paycheck and then possibly, have to suck up or rub elbows with people you wouldn't be caught dead with outside of work, just to keep your stupid slave-like job, so that the people you truly love can survive comfortably?
You tell me which sounds better. Getting up with your children to enjoy time with them (and remember, at a certain age, half the day, the kids are in school and you have the house to yourselves). Not having to really worry about a schedule per say except the one YOU make for the household. Being able to eat whenever you want, watch TV if you like, chill in you PJs the whole damn day if you like, talking on the phone while you do laundry (which entails throwing dirties into an automatic washer that you set and forget for a few hours at a time, then throw wets in the dryer for another set and forget time limit, while you can do whatever the fuck you want during that time frame), throw the dirty dishes in the dishwasher (which entails another automatic washing machine that you set and forget for another few hours) and then, if you thought about it the night before or you have weekly idea of what meals to set, throw some shit in a pot, wait for it to cook, then serve. Maybe go get the kids and bring them home. While your SO comes home stressed from the commute, stressed from the boss breathing down his neck because some stupid number isn't met and his well padded pockets are 5% smaller, even though he's making 5X more. Also, they know they have to get up @ 4, 5, 6am, half drowsy, get work clothes on and drive in shitty weather, shitty traffic, to see people who act fake sometimes to you to your face @ least 80% of the year.
Hell, I think housewives have it made and the workers are the slaves.
Most Helpful Opinions
Because of feminism. it convinced women that marriage was some how evil and bad when its not. Their is a conspiracy theory that suggests feminism was created by industrialist and the government so that they could increase the number of workers, reduce wages and increase taxes because it simply doesn't make sense otherwise. To clarify, women are told that motherhood and being a housewife are bad and that this some how makes them a slave, a slave to raise their children as they want, to do basic maintenance (cooking/cleaning) while their husband worked all day. They where then told that they would be "empowered" by getting a job (you know the thing that no one wants which is why we are paid to do it because nobody likes doing menial tasks while being told how to dress how to act how to talk by some one that can destroy your life with ease) and working all the time. Its idiotically stupid as raising the next generation of human beings is kind of a big deal, its a rather important task what with the entire survival of the species and society depending on it. But that is just one idea of why this happened. All we do know that at least in the west, feminist actively fought against the family unit and tried to destroy it (their words) and since feminist control academia children are raised to believe that being a housewife and raising children is some how bad. Their could be other factors but I don't know what those would be.
People keep stating "Because of feminism", which it is to some degree.
But you have to realize, for a good long while, all a woman could be was a housewife. In the 1950's and 60's, that's all men really wanted out of their wives. So, enter "Feminine Mystique" the book that addressed an "emptiness" found in most housewives.
In the 1970's, feminism took its first huge tidal wave in equal rights since the suffragist movement. Women demanded options and to not be judged for them. This included birth control and equal pay. Then enter us millenials in the 1990's where "girl power" became any woman's national anthem. We broke some glass ceilings at this point, but we still struggle with sexism, including our own government wanting to limit our healthcare.
But to answer your one question, no, I really see nothing bad about being a housewife. I think if your spouse can support you and your family, and you want to stay and take care of your home, that is completely your decision. I have friends who are housewives. Any hate you get from that, if they claim they are feminist, chances are they aren't. Because it's about supporting women's choices. I just thought I should remind you that there was a time we really didn't have a choice.
I don't look down on housewives, but personally I think it's a bit of a waste. It's living off a mans charity which could end at any time either through seperation or him passing away. I understand taking a few years away from work, or going part time while they're young but after that it just doesn't seem like much of a life to me.
I cook for my husband almost every night. I put his lunch together every day and deliver it to his desk. We share the house work. Nothing is missed and we still have abundant time to enjoy our own endeavours and spend time with each other.
I just personally can't see why someone would want to be totally financially reliant on someone else, but that just means it's not for me 😊 For others they have their reasons and it works for them
I don't think being a housewife is a bad thing. The mindset that being a housewife is the only thing a woman can be good at and that it's all she should do with her life - that's a bad thing.
If it's what someone wants to do with their life, then good for them. I'm happy for people who make their own choices.
The criticism is mostly coming when it's forced, though. So of course people will call it slavery if it's forced, because that's essentially what it is. If the woman has no power to choose for herself and she's forced to live a life serving a man, then clearly it's a bad thing.
Its thanks to modern day feminism enxouraging women to work instead of staying at home.
there's nothing wrong with being a housewife, but peoole see it as bad because they see it as wasted potential. They think you would benefit more from having an independent job instead of being stuck in the house.
What Girls & Guys Said
Opinion
97Opinion
I think the feminism movement (specifically 3rd wave feminism) pushes this idea that if women have any self-respect then they should stay away from the housewife role. When in reality, if you are really a supporter of equality and women's rights then you that should also include a women's right to choose whether she wants to be a housewife or not. It's the same idea with males: being a house husband is looked down upon and seen as the guy not being man enough to "wear the trousers" in the relationship
I think it's because people don't know what is meant by "housewife." Your definition and interpretation is different from theirs.
Feminists are conflicted over house wives. On the one hand it's the woman's freedom to choose but on the other ir involves submission and a lack of career.
You can thank third-wave feminists for that one.
Everything you can think of is turned into a negative for women, no matter what it is.
If a guy wants to take on the responsibility of being the provider and literally make it so that his wife never has to work another day in her life, they make it a put-down for the wife somehow. Instead of the man having to work, it's the man GETS to work, and that's keeping the woman down.
If being a housewife makes you a slave than being the main bread-winner also makes you a slave. Doing chores and making meals is just how a housewife does her portion of the work since her husband is at his job working for 10 hours every weekday. It's just division of labor, not servitude. They both do their part to maintain a healthy household.
Anything remotely resembling traditional gender roles is despised by feminists these days, and they find ways to look down on even the women who are making their own life choices and following those roles. It's remarkably un-feminist of themCan I place some blame on the feminist movement of the 1960s and 1970s without being attacked for it? I understand how women viewed the role of at home mothers as slaves, especially when the husband had to be tended to when he arrived home from work, by this time the mother was tired as could be from all the house cleaning and chores she was responsible for during the day ON TOP OF taking care of and babysitting the children, which the father was usually not taking part in when back at home, he was "too tired"!
However, once more women were working and no longer being full-time at home mothers, you started running into problems with children growing up without active parents, parents who relied on child care services while they were working. For some children this may have not been a bad thing but for others, they were likely to get into trouble without strong role models and a mother to supervise them when they were at home.
Honestly, being a parent should be a shared responsibility and just as it has been done for ages, there needs to be an at home parent for the children to watch them, discipline them, and to indoctrinate them with good morals, something that may not be possible with child care services!People are probably just jealous of them. On the inside, the women are thinking, "lucky bitches, how much time away from my family, interests am I spending?" And then there might be a seed or two of doubt laid down. Yes, of course women can be as intelligent, competent as men. The feminist movement was successful. If it is their prerogative to pursue lucrative interests, that's the way they want to live. However, what may be available, having a crap job that you work salary but expected to work to 12 hours in one shift at times, then never really doing what you want... that seems ludicrous to defend as a laudable way of life.
Some are telling the feminists, "shut the hell up!! We have a good thing going with this housewife thing!!" Not a bad way to have it as long as they take care of the whole 'achievement' part of the ego in their own way.Because it implies the woman doesn't have ambition and doesn't want to work for a living.
Not saying housework and kids aren't work - they're tremendous work - this is why that work CAN'T and SHOULDN'T fall on one person... it should be a shared effort.
This is why I say working AND taking care of the kids and household is what both parties in a marriage should be doing.Well, I guess because that IS what it used to mean right?
However, my dad works all the daggum time and my mom stayed at home, raised 3 kids, kept the house perfect, managed our finances, volunteered at our schools and church and led my sisters girl scout troop. Together, my parents were 1 fully successful person. Whats wrong with that?
I suppose our generation is so individualistic that the idea of being anything less than the "i can do it all on my own" type is compromising. The idea that you need another person in your life to do everything is a weakness to us. Doesn't have to beI sometimes wonder if being a stay-at-home anyone or working-anyone is looked down upon mainly because people who feel insecure want to reassure their own views and choices in life for themselves.
I personally do not look down upon stay-at-home wives or husbands for that matter, nor do I look down upon career driven men and women either. They are different life choices and whatever works for that person, relationship or family works. That is ultimately the ideal goal no matter the choice, what works - works; and what doesn't - doesn't..I sometimes wonder if being a stay-at-home anyone or working-anyone is looked down upon mainly because people who feel insecure want to reassure their own views and choices in life for themselves.
I personally do not look down upon stay-at-home wives or husbands for that matter, nor do I look down upon career driven men and women either. They are different life choices and whatever works for that person, relationship or family works. That is ultimately the ideal goal no matter the choice, what works - works; and what doesn't - doesn't..It is not. Only the RADICAL feminists and their male feminist lapdogs say so.
Being a housewife is a part of being an honorable mother. A keeper of house's hearth. The one who prepares our future - the next generation. It is natural. It is normal.
While according to radical feminists, being a slave to your employer AND (inevitably) having children at the same time is liberation :D laughable!The dynamic of one man being able to provide everything needed for a wife, home, & children on a single income is increasingly impossible for people to achieve, and the economy is evolving in a way that not only welcomes feminist pulls towards women being in the workplace but actually demands it. I think for feminists its considered a less than empowering way to live, and they look down on women who do it, but for many men they just don't want the financial pressures of that lifestyle and prefer to pair with women who have a semblance of their own independence prior to uniting households with them.
Woman have made it that way. Woman believe that they should be independent and not to rely on a man. Me personally I think it's bullshit, I believe in traditional values but of course, if my gf/wife did want to work I'd have no problem with it. But yeah woman think you're weak if you rely on a man. I see no shame in it.
Tv, old school underappreciation, and feminism.
Tv shows women as being sick of not being appreciated of the work they do. And whether thats the case with most marriages or not is irrelevant when millions of women are being told that that is how millions of women feel.
Actually being underappreciated or not being shown enough appreciation by their husbands and/or being told that what they do isn't real work was a pretty big thing back in the 20s up to the 40s and less so in the 50s up to the 80s.
And finally because of the old school stigmata that housework is demeaning work, feminism will do anything it can to keep as many women out of the kitchen as possible.Feminism is gonna drive the human race to extinction !
soon men will turn their heads toward brothels and sex robots, a woman is a natural born mother when she does house works it doesn't degenerate her as when a man work hard to provide !
I would love to stay home and do house works and go hopping and see friends while my wife works her ass off to provide for my needs !
I can't understand the non-sense in the new logic of women these days, they think they are doing house works for free and men are using them... many men nowadays (including me) help their women in house works beside their other duties and other house works which comes under "men responsibilities" title, the problem is we stopped to complain and we paved the way for women to ride us, so now we can't complain about it !I used to loath the "housewives" in my neighborhood. Why? I worked 50+ hours a week, maintained my house/yard on my own. I didn't have a house maid, yard guy, or "man" to help me. My downtime I just wanted to sit at the pool and read... could I? No like 5 of those catty bitches would show up and get hammered and loud at the pool. Then they'd pick at me "why are you single? Can you watch my kids so I can have some me time?" Now I live in a wonderful condo building and there are more single 30 somethings than married couples... ahhh bliss
Simply because the media has given the job a bad image, makin it out to be wives just being maids for the husbands, when of course it's much more than that.. Feminism has some type of role to play in the negative appearance of a housewife.. The Western world mostly has the sort of mindset..
I personally don't see a problem with wit. I've done it for the past four years. I am now in college to go do what I want but being a housewife is a lot of fun for me. I may get a job after college or I may not. Being a stay at home wife is also being a stay at home mother and a lot of people don't realize that. Its a great thing for you and the kids. Plus my husband helps out a lot. So I'm not "a slave"
being a mother and/or a housewife is in the dna and the biochemistry of females . if no1 knew .
maybe being tougher and more honorable than being a mother/housewife is serving your country .
growing up i have been bombarded by 1000's of choices . i'm glad for the choices . who earns
what is irrelevant . as for me in college and 20 i don't want to be a mother or a housewife now .
single moms and housewives who don't earn their own money should never be objectified by ne1
you become a slave if (a) you're a bad mother and/or (b) you married an asshole .It's a cultural shift. Back when feminism was first starting out being a housewife was the only thing women were allowed to do. Being a housewife as fulfilling as it may be for some is not for everyone. At the time the only way women could move outside the home was by proving they were capable at doing the things men could. We've succeeded on that front, but we now need to show that their is value in "traditional" feminine things as well. There is nothing wrong with being a housewife as long as nobody is being forced to do it.
Learn more
We're glad to see you liked this post.
You can also add your opinion below!
Most Helpful Opinions