Girl's Behavior 
Guy's Behavior 
Flirting 
Dating 
Relationships 
Fashion & Beauty 
Health & Fitness 
Marriage & Weddings 
Shopping & Gifts 
Technology & Internet 
Break Up & Divorce 
Education & Career 
Entertainment & Arts 
Family & Friends 
Food & Beverage 
Hobbies & Leisure 
Other 
Religion & Spirituality 
Society & Politics 
Sports 
Travel 
Trending & News 
These are very selective photos that do not tell the whole story of anything. I was lucky enough to have travelled to Italy (after Trump was elected so nice try). And despite having armed soldiers all over the place I felt safer then I do in many North American cities. Germany gets picked on a lot so we will start with them. In 2017 it was claimed that Germany's crime rate had skyrocketed due to the influx of migrants. Sounds scary right? Too bad the crime figures in Germany don't support that at all. In fact Germany's crime rate was at a 30 year low in 2017, crimes committed by foreigners was also down. What we as critical thinkers have to remember is sensationalism sells and nostalgia warps the brain. A North American example of this is how many parents are convinced that their child is more likely to be kidnapped then they were, which was blatantly untrue. But kidnappings sell newspapers and cause worried parents to tune into news stations. Kidnappings weren't running rampant, she was just oversaturated with the stories. It's the same thing with Migrant Crime.
Something like that.
img.memecdn.com/merkel-die-fuehrer_o_6690213.jpg
German bitch
Yeah, she is.
A set of war mongers
do you have any personal experience on this or did you just read it somewhere and regurgitate it back on this forum? i've traveled Europe, middle east and africa more than i care to remember.
recommend you open your doors WIDE and invite them all to your place, where YOU personally foot the bill.
only then will anyone take you seriously.
I was stationed in Europe and the middle East. I've seen it all.
Not really. Every country held a popular vote to get in. Integration can only happen if there's a consensus. People talking about the EU and it's many problems should at least get educated on the matter. It's just gonna look intellectually lazy to compare it to Nazi Germany.
Where did I do that?
Opinion
29Opinion
Heading that way. That's why I voted Leave. #Brexit
While Germany does hold a lot of sway, Hungary and Poland as of late have proven that one doesn't have to bow to Cowrkel's wishes.
u And some Europeans like to lecture Americans about what is wrong with the US!
When there's idiots like this:
static.fjcdn.com/pictures/Nice_7a0371_891959.jpg
I don't blame em
@Trollfather Are there any idiots in Europe?
With U. S. A. culture being stolen by the Europeans, it's like I'm in America.
1 thing I've learned in life is there are idiots all over the world.
l would never think to do that and l am from scotland
Triggered!!! I went to EU before Team Trump showed up, it was a happy place. They had flowery meadows and rainbow skies, and rivers made of chocolate, where the children danced and laughed and played with gumdrop smiles.
(Also the empire where the sun never sets says no)
no but america sees it as a huge economic threat so spins the same crap about us as it does russia and china
Yeah that's what Poland, Hungary and Britain say lol
Syria and Libyia was about cheaper oil/gas to reduce Russian oil revenue and boost the US economy
... and it worked.
It's still sold in the petrodollars, why would russia sell it oil/gas in yuan.
What does Russia export to Britain except for vodka? As far as I remember Britain is a big exporter to Russia.
Trump was in the UK because thanks to benefit Britain has free hand to set it's own trade deals.
Why do you insulted Turks for no reason?
We are not the one who is immigrating to Europe. They are syrian refugees.
Turks odnt do any mass migration even we have a immigrant problem in out country too. We have 4 million syrian refugee currently.
Where did I insult Turks?
Yes. Have you read Jim Marrs book?
www.google.com/search
www.goodreads.com/.../2770492-the-rise-of-the-fourth-reich
I dont think so. I dont know if Germany has an intrest in ruling Europe anymore or other Germanic people's.
Islamic refugees and Nazis are one. Muslims were allies of Hitler because of their hatred to the jews
No, they were not. And they didn't hate the Jews, especially since the state of Israel hadn't actually come into being yet. Arabs were on Hitler's list, too, and they knew that. They never sided with Hitler. Rather, they were resisting the Balfour Declaration and the British, based on past performance over the previous 20 years. But that is nowhere near the same as siding with Hitler. Across Africa, the Arab Muslims were WITH the British and American forces (but not the French) because it meant the promise of independence from Italian and French and German occupation.
PS - Islam and Nazism are diametrically opposed. Study a little more, and give yourself time to learn more about the issues before you go off half-cocked about such a complex issue of politics and religions.
Not true. I actually (sadly) live in Egypt. Actually Muslims here admire Hitler because of what he did to the jews, and also most of the middle East were resisting the British so they supported Hitler for fighting them. But some of them were forced to fight for the British forces
What about the 13th division of the waffen ss
I understand how you might be confused by modern day Brotherhood Muslims in Egypt for their misguided, and stupid, admiration of Hitler, but that's, again, all because of the focus on Israel now. Back then, it just wasn't the case. And yes, the Egyptians DID want to be rid of the British, but they weren't the least bit interested in siding with the Nazis to do it. They knew better.
by the way I've been living and working in the Middle East for 15 years now, so I totally understand what you're trying to say. I'm more than a little familiar with the psyche hereabouts.
Sami al-Jundi, wrote:
"We were racists. We admired the Nazis. We were immersed in reading Nazi literature and books that were the source of the Nazi spirit. We were the first who thought of a translation of Mein Kampf. Anyone who lived in Damascus at that time was witness to the Arab inclination toward Nazism. Michel Aflaq a founder of the Ba'athist philosophy admired Hitler and the Nazis for standing up to Britain and America. This admiration would combine aspects of Nazism into Ba'athism.
Muslims are not any more immune to racism than Christians or Hindus or Buddhists or what have you... Racism is a human condition, not a religious one.
One more thing, let's not try to call Baathists an example of Muslims, just as KKK doesn't represent Christians.
Sir, there are countless Bible verses that folks have used to justify and rationalize slavery and racism. Some of them are quite explicit (though they may not be accurate representations of the original word). The Bible ALSO has many verses that advocate killing non-believers, even more directly stated than any verses in the Qur'an. The Qur'anic verses you've alleged have clear context and implications as to meaning, which precludes any form of murder. But this isn't our topic of discussion here.
Jesus specifically said that he "came not to change the Law but to affirm it." But it's also important to point out that he emphasized the parts in God's laws about forgiveness on Earth, letting God pass ultimate judgment. It's also important to note that Muhammad expressed the exact same sentiment, that forgiveness is best.
Unlike many passages in the Bible (and it makes no difference whether OT or NT, for Christians must study and adhere to the Bible, not just the NT) which justify ruthless killing of non-believers, the Qur'an specifically states that killing is only permissible through adjudication or self-defense. Even collateral damage killing in war is expressly forbidden & a mortal sin.
Yes Jesus wasn't there to completely change the law but he changed some things like we don't stone sinners anymore, we don't use an eye for an eye anymore. But also Jesus said "and he who has no sword let him sell his garmet an buy one, because he knew that there is a time for war and a time for peace"
But Muhammad invaded other countries, the khaliphate invaded all the middle East, Muhammad destroyed other religious idols in Mecca.
Muhammad raped a 9 years old girl...
I know that there is good Muslims, but they don't understand this. Also the way Islam treats women is so bad, they are treated exactly like slaves
Again, sir, you appear to be misinformed.
Jesus didn't change anything - he simply pointed out the part of the laws that advised forgiveness (which was already in the law, but barbaric people chose to ignore).
Which countries did Muhammad invade?
What 9 y. o. was raped?
How are women treated as slaves according to Islam, when ONLY Islam clearly sets down women's rights? (Perhaps you are confusing Arab culture with Islam)
Malaysia and Indonesia comprise about 75% of the world's Muslim population, and BOTH those countries have elected women as Head of State.
I know what you're trying to get at, but I would like to show you how your information is incorrect.
https://youtu.be/5NXtIUv5i2w
Please watch this sir
No, I want YOUR thoughts, not some Islamophobic YouTube rant...
Please give me facts. by the way, are you Christian, sir, or other?
Point taken, I've never liked that term especially either, as it seems to imply phobia as the only dissension. However, you are still under that same umbrella. You don't have to agree with it, certainly.
But why hold Muhammad to a higher standard than God? After all, look how many times he ordered the killing, rape, and pillaging throughout the Bible. Do you believe that's true?
And on that higher standard, you think it's not ok that Muhammad had sexual relations with a 12-13 year old (she wasn't 9 at all), but you're ok with God impregnating Mary at that same age?
by the way, you didn't answer my last questions.
What changed after Jesus? ... (After Jesus was born by a 13 or 14 year old named Mary)
Didn't Jesus say he came not to change the Laws but to affirm them? Many things had already changed... The temple elders had become corrupt political entities, for one. Didn't he show out in the Great Temple to demonstrate this sinfulness?
And what about being a Christian precluded you from answering some questions?
Triggered!!! I went to EU before Team Trump showed up, it was a happy place. They had flowery meadows and rainbow skies, and rivers made of chocolate, where the children danced and laughed and played with gumdrop smiles.
Triggered!!! I went to EU before Team Trump showed up, it was a happy place. They had flowery meadows and rainbow skies, and rivers made of chocolate, where the children danced and laughed and played with gumdrop smiles.
This is amusing. The initial post details are much out of context. The comments are much out of relevant knowledge. I don't expect that right here and right now we find a solution. Not even a final one :D
Triggered!!! I went to EU before Team Trump showed up, it was a happy place. They had flowery meadows and rainbow skies, and rivers made of chocolate, where the children danced and laughed and played with gumdrop smiles.
Blame trump?
CNN troll spotted
the OP must be a Lefty. They see a Nazi everywhere.
Where did I say Nazi?
Reich a Germanic word that orginated in France, there were 3 Reich's In history hence why the nazis refered to their Nazi Empire as the 3rd Reich.
•The early medieval Frankish Realm (Francia) and Carolingian Empire (the Fränkisches Reich and Karolingerreich);
•The Holy Roman Empire (Heiliges Römisches Reich), which lasted from the coronation of Charlemagne as Holy Roman Emperor in 800, until 1806, when it was dissolved during the Napoleonic Wars;
• The German Empire (Deutsches Reich or Deutsches Kaiserreich), which lasted from the unification of Germany in 1871 until its collapse after World War I, during the German Revolution of 1918–1919;
•The Weimar Republic of 1919–1933 continued to use Deutsches Reich as its official name;
•Nazi Germany, the state often referred to as the Third Reich, which lasted from the Machtergreifung in 1933 until the end of World War II in Europe in 1945.
Yeah is the EU Germanic domination of Europe.
Wtf? I live in Germany and the biggest threat now are Pegida Activists and Hooligans running through The streets and beating Up Journalists and people they consider as not German
Says you live in Slovenia. Obviously the German people feel differently.
Your profile says Slovenia that's why I don't regard your opinion as genuine.
We all know what German people think because they are now speaking their minds in regards to imposed immigration and multiculturalism.
https://youtu.be/hl04r1OjRQs
https://youtu.be/8qOK3dZgZYE
Of course you did.
And Germany is seperated between 20% of the people who Vote for the AFD, NPD and the other anti-refugee parties WHO want to send refugees Back top war and the 80% (this is the majority) who Vote for middle or left Parties because they know Refugees are Not a Problem If WE manage to integrate Thema.
So the majority of us germans Supports and lives multiculturalism and has no Problem with Refugees (as Long as the criminal ones are sent Back as it is done according to our laws)
And what about at the next election. When the will if the people is ignored the people turn to those who listen.
The EU is a dying welfare state and Hitler would roll over in his grave if he knew what a basket case Europe has become. FYI, The Forth Reich, by design, is the good old USA. Welcome to the new world order!
No, its the primary thing keeping Europeans from killing each other, that and Nato.
If those two things didn't exist Europe would DEFINITELY have had a few more wars
That's like Europes most popular historical pastime, killing each other, at least in America that isn't the case
Your thinking of NATO and the United nations.
I don't know, Europeans really like killing each other.
Really the only ones I would trust to behave are the Irish and the swiss
We Americans reformed them of the warlike ways after ww2
I don't know
@goaded That's true. The Irish fought for the British in every major conflict the British ever had since Britain was founded and before that they fought for the Normans.
The war of independence and the troubles weren't big land wars.
Over 200,000 Irishmen fought in the ww1 in several theatres and either 30,000, or, if one includes those who died serving in armies other than Britain's, 49,400 died. When you consider the small size of the population of Ireland and compare the loses to Canada 61,000 and 62,000 for Australia you realise how many it was.
The Irish also fought for the British in the Boer war and also for the boers against the British.
No offense but world war 1 happened before the war for independence, and WW2 was pretty much, god it would suck if the world fell to fascism.
I can't imagine a conflict that would draw the men and women of the Republic of Ireland to fight for the British now
And notice that they fought for the British. The Irish themselves never were the true invaders of another country, which means despite the troubles, that probably makes them less war like than most of Europe
True but the Easter rising happened in 1916. After the Irish war of independence was the Irish civil war. The Irish at one time invaded Canada.
Historically before the Vikings came the Irish invaded England and once ruled half of Scotland which is why Gaelic is spoken in the highlands.
Thousands of Irish (rep of Ireland born and NI catholics) have served in the British military since ww2 espicially in royal Irish regiment, thanks to the peace in the north and the economic crash there hasn't been this many Irish men in the British military since WW2. The Irish of course have their own military but it's actually very difficult to get into due to the competition as it's very small and members are very well paid, well educated, well trained and very fit.
The troubles were bad but not as bad as they could have been, there was some restraint unlike say in Bosnia.
https://youtu.be/cjDXWPW9f9s
https://youtu.be/Ah-wLbj1EUc
Merkel was part of the Communist party in her youth.
Her father was part of the Nazi party in his youth (I dont actually know that)
Germany should stop trying to control other countries and start focusing on itself.
The EU has problems, but I don't that being the F R is one of them.
Mmm gumdrop smiles...
More like the successor state to the Soviet Union
EUSSR is more accurate
We should declare war on Germany
If you knew any actual history you would know the union of soviet shit republics would have lost to germany without the lend lease act
@disgustingweebtrash i do know about that and the fact that the supply chain was broken by the germans but russia still was first in berlin
Supply chain from the pacific was broken by Germany? LUL
@disgustingweebtrash it didn't go west and the chain was broken above finland and norway
Imports were done through vladivostock too and Japanese Imperial Navy couldnt do anything to risk war with the USSR to counter it. The non aggression pact between the USSR and Japan saved Japan early on in the war
@disgustingweebtrash it wasn't a popular route though because of the land distance between vladivostok and the western front
Not popular and the supply chain still delivered lots of munitions, artillety and guns for the USSR and even then had to send their soldiers to the meat grinder "Not one step back"
@disgustingweebtrash well again we see things differently so no surprise there... i do feel none of it actually has any thing to do with the original askers question though... i mean do you think the eu is some how a modern dictatorship or meerly a huge trading block that threatens america?
It is threatening individual sovereignty of nations. A European Union is not going to be as easy as a United States of America. Partly because the USA has been a union of states since its conception. If any member state in Europe has too much power it threatens the balance however if it was united it could threaten the US but because of ideological, linguist and economic difference it could not last.
@disgustingweebtrash see i dont buy that sovereignty argument because i think the uk has benefited massively from some decissions made outside the uk like workers rights, food standards, health and safety and such but i still feel pride when lewis wins a grandprix or our scientists discover something new etc. i personally feel less favourably about britain sinse the brexit vote but i know we dont agree on that so dont feel the need to argue the point. we have been there before and neither of us are going to change our minds
Those rights and standards can be instated under the correct government here ourselves, brexit will happen and we have to buckle our belts and do the best to persuade others to follow suit
@disgustingweebtrash yeah... what bothers me is the likes of boris and rees mog dont give a shit about the little people and will use it to run roughshod over us all but gladly i won't be around for that
I dont like any politicians in Westminster anyway
This turned into a weird discussion, still though Germany should be nuked
@wankiam America was uninvolved in the war in Europe until after pearl harbour.
War aid was sent to the soviet union via the Arctic Convoys, the Persian Corridor, and the Pacific Route.
Some 3,964,000 tons of goods were shipped by the Arctic route; 7% was lost, while 93% arrived safely. This constituted some 23% of the total aid to the USSR during the war.
The Persian Corridor was the longest route, and was not fully operational until mid-1942. Thereafter it saw the passage of 4,160,000 tons of goods, 27% of the total.
The Pacific Route opened in August 1941, but was affected by the start of hostilities between Japan and the US; after December 1941, only Soviet ships could be used, and, as Japan and the USSR observed a strict neutrality towards each other, only non-military goods could be transported. Nevertheless, some 8,244,000 tons of goods went by this route, 50% of the total.
@wankiam In total, the U. S. deliveries through Lend-Lease amounted to $11 billion in materials: over 400,000 jeeps and trucks; 12,000 armored vehicles (including 7,000 tanks, about 1,386 of which were M3 Lees and 4,102 M4 Shermans);11,400 aircraft (4,719 of which were Bell P-39 Airacobras) and 1.75 million tons of food.
Roughly 17.5 million tons of military equipment, vehicles, industrial supplies, and food were shipped from the Western Hemisphere to the USSR, 94% coming from the US. For comparison, a total of 22 million tons landed in Europe to supply American forces from January 1942 to May 1945. It has been estimated that American deliveries to the USSR through the Persian Corridor alone were sufficient, by US Army standards, to maintain sixty combat divisions in the line.
@wankiam The United States delivered to the Soviet Union from October 1, 1941 to May 31, 1945 the following: 427,284 trucks, 13,303 combat vehicles, 35,170 motorcycles, 2,328 ordnance service vehicles, 2,670,371 tons of petroleum products (gasoline and oil) or 57.8 percent of the High-octane aviation fuel, 4,478,116 tons of foodstuffs (canned meats, sugar, flour, salt, etc.), 1,911 steam locomotives, 66 Diesel locomotives, 9,920 flat cars, 1,000 dump cars, 120 tank cars, and 35 heavy machinery cars. Provided ordnance goods (ammunition, artillery shells, mines, assorted explosives) amounted to 53 percent of total domestic production. One item typical of many was a tire plant that was lifted bodily from the Ford Company's River Rouge Plant and transferred to the USSR. The 1947 money value of the supplies and services amounted to about eleven billion dollars.
@wankiam In June 1941, within weeks of the German invasion of the USSR, the first British aid convoy set off along the dangerous Arctic sea route to Murmansk, arriving in September. It carried 40 Hawker Hurricanes along with 550 mechanics and pilots of No. 151 Wing to provide immediate air defence of the port and to train Soviet pilots. The convoy was the first of many convoys to Murmansk and Archangelsk in what became known as the Arctic convoys, the returning ships carried the gold that the USSR was using to pay the US.
By the end of 1941, early shipments of Matilda, Valentine and Tetrarch tanks represented only 6.5% of total Soviet tank production but over 25% of medium and heavy tanks produced for the Red Army. The British tanks first saw action with the 138 Independent Tank Battalion in the Volga Reservoir on 20 November 1941. Lend-Lease tanks constituted 30 to 40 percent of heavy and medium tank strength before Moscow at the beginning of December 1941.
@wankiam Significant numbers of British Churchill, Matilda and Valentine tanks were shipped to the USSR.
Between June 1941 and May 1945, Britain delivered to the USSR:
3,000+ Hurricanes
4,000+ other aircraft
27 naval vessels
5,218 tanks (including 1,380 Valentines from Canada)
5,000+ anti-tank guns
4,020 ambulances and trucks
323 machinery trucks (mobile vehicle workshops equipped with generators and all the welding and power tools required to perform heavy servicing)
1,212 Universal Carriers and Loyd Carriers (with another 1,348 from Canada )
1,721 motorcycles
£1.15bn worth of aircraft engines
1,474 radar sets
4,338 radio sets
600 naval radar and sonar sets
Hundreds of naval guns
15 million pairs of boots
In total 4 million tonnes of war material including food and medical supplies were delivered. The munitions totaled £308m (not including naval munitions supplied), the food and raw materials totaled £120m in 1946 index.
When you put it that way it is kind of eerie
Yes it is and its the one world order
No, you're just a whiner and loser.
How so?
Well it's getting there
Uuuh I have no idea
Imagine letting g*rmans run Europe
Uhhh. they already are?
europoors eternally dumbed
Merkrel is trying to run Europe through the EU and break down national borders.
I dunno. :)
LOLZ
You can also add your opinion below!
Most Helpful Opinions