1. What do you think of sugar dating, and why? 2. Is it the same as prostitution in your eyes?
Definition: Sugar dating is when a person (often young and beautiful/handsome) gets paid and given gifts for giving someone else (often older, wealthy and lonely) their companionship. They may eat together, go to the cinema, travel and do other activities together. The person providing the companionship are often called "sugar baby" or "sugar girl/boy", while the person who pays are either a sugar daddy or mommy. They may also be called for "sugar lord" and "sugar lady". #SugarDating
I think it should be illegal (Why)
I think it's wrong, but shouldn't be illegal (Explain Why)
I wouldn't do it myself, but thinks it's fine other are doing it (Why)
It's a nice way to make money and something I consider doing (Why)
I'm fine with it and is currently sugar dating (Why)
Unless there is deception about the nature of the relationship, I don't think that it is any more or less immoral than other types of promiscuity. That's not saying that I endorse it, but I would be careful to judge it. I will say that I would not date someone if I knew that they previously engaged in either 'sugar dating' or prostitution. I wouldn't consider them less of a human being because of their behavior. I think many guys may have a problem dating someone who has shown that they are willing to exchange intimacy for money.
If that's the consented agreement between two or more adults, then I don't see a problem with it.
As far as prostitution goes, if there's sex involved, like getting paid extra for sex or getting paid specifically for sex, then yeah, I think it'd be prostitution then.
Don’t see anything wrong with that as long as the sugar daddy isn’t married. The man want a young attractive arm candy to fuck in exchange of money , and the girl want a powerful provider in exchange of sex.
Some of these sugar babies are actually smart and educated and their sugar daddies love having real conversations with them.
There have been paid companions for many years. Most of them didn't include sexual favors, but as escorts. When you throw sex in the mix... it does reek of glorified prostitution... You're selling your time and your body for financial remuneration. It's an odd job.
I think it's wrong. I think prostitution is wrong, and I think this type of relationship -- while not prostitution -- is wrong as well. The reason is you're doing it for the wrong reasons. A man and a woman should come together in love. What you just described is not love. It's fake. It's an artificial relationship. There's nothing real or true or genuine about it. If I was being harsh, I would say that it is an abomination. At the very least, it's just sad. I feel bad for those people. I think they're being used (on both sides.)
If both people consent and know about it going in I really don't care what they do. I ownly have a problem with the women who go out on dates just for free food and have no intentions on actually being with the guy.
I personally don't think prostitution should be illegal either. If they legalized it and had standards, prostitutes could have more protection and regular testing to reduce STDS and them being abused.
I really, truly believe that one of the most beautiful things a guy can do is to say to a woman, 'I adore you and I'd like to spoil you with money, gifts and pay for your dates with other guys, but I know I'll never be allowed to fuck you, and that's how it should be'
Honestly, it’s sometimes better to sugar date than to date a broke asshole. Your tuition got paid for, you were given a car, or they paid your rent. Now you don’t have to worry about paying off student loans, and received financial help at that time you were struggliing to pay rent or other bills. Dating a broke asshole leaves you with a broken heart and no benefits cause you still have to pay that student loan debt
Personally, I feel like that's domestic prostitution, to a degree. One should not literally be bought to show affection towards someone who can't find it in his or herself to go out there and find love for his or herself. Nevermind age, this human soliciting.
Being a sugar boy or girl does not involve sex so its not prostitution. Does that mean some men or women do not do this, of course not. I've had friends who do this and do have sex with the individual as well, and i am not a fan of that just because you need money.
Definitely situational. Some people are attracted to older individuals. Some people in this situation know they can get more money by sleeping with a sugar mommy or daddy. But most people will be happy with getting paid on top of where ever their date is just to spend time with someone who needs that 1 on 1 time in their life.
Lol, you gotta do more than just hang out with me to get my money. I rather hire a prostitute or fly out don't legally. You're Loser if you're a sugar daddy. You really have no game and your old and alone. Those woman aren't providing you anything that a friend could lol
I had been made an offer from a potential "sugar mommy" at work. I declined since there was no romantic attraction to that older lady. Months later, I found out that they were building a 'team' to take the employer for a 'ride'. They needed someone in my department to assist with the crime.
It's absolutely prostitution, regardless to how much the pathetic lowlives who partake in it would like to lie to themselves that it isn't. However, I don't believe in legal defenses against stupidity. If you want to whore yourself or pay for whores - go ahead. If you want to slowly kill yourself with drugs, alcohol and tobacco - go ahead. Stupidity should in fact hurt, it's natural selection at its finest. Let the whores be "sugar babies" and let the cucks pay them for it.
Nothing to do with the picture, in Casino Royal the money is for the two for wining the poker tournament and the two left the Agency and used to survive. Yes, Vesper steal it but she was obligated, since then the relation is romantic and nothing materialistic. James Bond never use money to flirt.
As for the post, one thing is your friend or lover spoils you a lot and supports you and another that the whole relationship be so materialistic. I am disgusted that people encourage it, a thing is a service or a day or a week, but a lifetime? Above all, it is very sad that so many young girls want that: easy money. there's no love anymore in this neoliberal world, women complain about being sexually objectified, it is worse to be treated like an ATM.
I know what the movie is about, but I choose the pictures because of if you've not watched the movie they could pass as sugar daters or escorts. A picture doesn't always reveal the actually plot.
I think it's okay. And NOT prostitution. It's not like they're being paid to have sex. It's more like they're kinda being paid to be his girlfriend. I'm pretty sure the sugar baby is given a choice whether they want to have sex or not.
Older people need love and need to be made love to too. I don't see an issue with it, it usually isn't anybody else's money, but the other person giving gifts. I wouldn't be interested in it since I'm not materialistic.
It's literally being someones personal prostitute. I know the common argument is "you don't have to have sex with your sugar daddy", but what guy is gonna pay a girl $5,000.00 a month just to talk to her?
Unless there is abuse on one side (e. g., girls try to make the guy fall in love to take all his money or the guy purposely gives the girls a STD etc.) everyone wins. The older guy gets to be with a young hot girl and the girl gets some money. No one loses. Except maybe the jealous losers and moralists who have nothing to do with the relationship.
I wouldn't mind a sugar momma, and I probably would be a sugar daddy too one day, but I think at my age it's just "dating". Women burn a hole in your pocket anyway, all dating is sugar dating these days.
Most Helpful Opinions