Au contraire! Fairness (i. e. balance, objectivity) is always important. How could it not be? People on both extremes of the political spectrum often complain about a lack of fairness in media reporting, so they at least think it's something worth fighting for. And what, exactly, is the "liberal" media? CNN? MSNBC? The BBC? Aren't these outlets always the most hawkish when it comes to "dealing with Russia"? If they were in any way "liberal", left-wing or truly progressive, they would consistently oppose war, and would never try to promote it, for any reason.
EXtacy wants free stuff. Free college, Free Home, Free gas, free car, and free love. Even someone to come wipe her ass. This is why education system is terrible and kids like her don't know anything.
Not really, more people rely on big daddy government to bail them out. So they live on the streets when it doesn't give them the money in a timely manner.
@888theGreat Bingo, @Xtcy2083 and others of her ilk have a definition of "Freedom" as the freedom to put anything in their mouths, vaginas or anuses without consequence, and the freedom to force others to pay for the consequences that happen. Well, it just does not work that way in the real world.
What Girls & Guys Said
Opinion
29Opinion
I think they like him for his economic policies. Every president is corrupt so nothing new to see here.
The fairness doctrine doesn't help discourse. It is just a talking point that the liberal media likes to harp on.
Au contraire! Fairness (i. e. balance, objectivity) is always important. How could it not be? People on both extremes of the political spectrum often complain about a lack of fairness in media reporting, so they at least think it's something worth fighting for.
And what, exactly, is the "liberal" media? CNN? MSNBC? The BBC? Aren't these outlets always the most hawkish when it comes to "dealing with Russia"? If they were in any way "liberal", left-wing or truly progressive, they would consistently oppose war, and would never try to promote it, for any reason.
When the government proposes bills they typically are the opposite of what they call it. The fairness doctrine is a perfect example of this.
See @nightdrot 's response.
Reagan was a piece of shit.
Reagan pushed the government towards freedom.
Yes, he did. The freedom to be poor, homeless and unemployed.
Freedom to fail is required for the freedom to succeed.
EXtacy wants free stuff. Free college, Free Home, Free gas, free car, and free love. Even someone to come wipe her ass. This is why education system is terrible and kids like her don't know anything.
Freedom to fail has put more people in tents on the streets. Not what normal people call success.
@888theGreat No, I don't actually. However, I do believe that medical care should be free, and in Australia and most of the civilised world, it is :)
Not really, more people rely on big daddy government to bail them out. So they live on the streets when it doesn't give them the money in a timely manner.
@888theGreat Bingo, @Xtcy2083 and others of her ilk have a definition of "Freedom" as the freedom to put anything in their mouths, vaginas or anuses without consequence, and the freedom to force others to pay for the consequences that happen. Well, it just does not work that way in the real world.
The right has a cukt of personality problem.
LOL, you are plenty old enough to remember the cult surrounding that criminal Barack Obama
@Avicenna No…we didn’t swallow and regurgitate everything he said. And the only criminals have been EVERYone working for Trump.
Probably the way he acted
Reagan era