Would the world be a safer place if there were no men?

Question

IVG allows a woman to turn her skin cells into an artificial sperm and inject it into another woman. So two women can have a kid with each other. And Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) allows for gender selection. Thus eliminating the need for men.

Let be honest men start all the wars and commit most of the violent crimes and are all the of the world Dictators. Donald Trump has a strong desire to become a Dictator like Vladimir Putin and Viktor Orban. Alabama Governor Kay Ivey recently ban IVF in their state.

She stated IVF should be ban due to cloning and other things that are related to IVG. IVF is not the same as IVG it is a newer technology, but people in power are so scared of their husbands or powerful losing their power they are going after women's rights.

Men become very corrupted with once they gain power you can just like Caligula, Hitler and many others to see how evil and corrupt men are.

I believe it is time we make the world female and stop giving into patriarchal. There is no longer need for men with robots and artificial intelligence on the raise. Men are fall behind in education because have proved that they are the smarter gender and are graduating at higher than men.

MrOracle · Accepted Answer

I didn't know that so many wrong ideas could be packed into a single post.

Let me give you a hypothetical situation. Let's say that tomorrow morning, the Earth was somehow cloned, but all the men were on one copy and all the women on the other, and after exactly one year, they would be recombined. What would happen?

On the men's planet, there would be *some* chaos, for sure. Certainly some regional chaos in some places, even possibly a regional war or two. But, overall, live would largely continue as normal after maybe 30 days of adjustment.

On the women's planet, within 48 hours, the power grid would fail. Why? Because men hold 99.8 of the jobs that keep the grid alive (and the few women in the industry are almost all administrative). With the power grid out, water treatment and pumping would end, as would sewer treatment. Fuel refining and distribution would also very quickly end, as would farming, food processing, and food deliveries. Within a week, every grocery store would be empty, with no deliveries forthcoming. Medicines would also run out quickly, and anything that required refrigeration (such as, say, insulin), would go bad.

This is just the first couple of weeks. I'll spare you the rest, but lets just say that you'd probably be looking at 2 billion deaths on the female copy of the world in that first year - and that might be conservative.

Why? Because over 93% of people employed in infrastructure jobs are men (and, again, where there ARE women, they are largely administrative - they aren't building, repairing, or running things physically), and so there just aren't women who would know what to do - there's simply no experienced female operators, much less enough to go around to keep things going. Less than 1% of electrical linemen are female, for example. Only 4% of truck drivers are female. 0% of (non-administrative) oil refinery workers are female. 0% of ocean shipping workers are female. 0% of (non-administrative) dock-workers are female. Less than 1% of garbage collectors are female. You get the point.

On the men's planet, there would be confusion and loss, but men would largely go to work and do their jobs, and the power would stay on, the water, sewer, garbage, and fuel refining would continue, and the infrastructure would continue to function.

A couple of months ago, on Iceland, all the female workers went on strike for a day, representing 1/3 of all workers on Iceland. What happened that day? All the infrastructure stayed working, and there was very minimal disruption to the economy - even the coffee shops stayed open. And that was eye-opening for a lot of people who had never really considered the KIND of jobs that men and women do - because they are NOT the same.

Anonymous · Accepted Answer

Even if we remove procreation from the equation, humans would have never advanced beyond the stone age without men, which means women would have gone extinct long ago.

Even if we took the modern world, with all of its conveniences and techniogical advancements, if we remove men from the world women would all die out within a very short period of time. Why? Becaume literally every critical role in the word is filled by men. Society would implode within weeks without men to keep things working.

By the way, why did you post this question under your blue account instead of your pink one? Did you forget which one you were logged into?

Paul09 · Answer

A lot of that you said is true about man. But women aren't perfect lol. A lot of women hate each other. Men can literally fight physically and they are still friends. One woman says the wrong thing and it's over. So in the end You need both to stabilize each other. And that cloning sperm thing is so weird. I do not t even understand why humans are so obbssed with making kids. Always with the marriage and kids.. We have enough humans on earth.

Anonymous · Answer

There would be less violence, but losing 50% of the work force would be chaos. Supply chains disrupted, mass starvation and disease as infrastructure (sewage, garbage) breaks down.

Anonymous · Answer

It's coming so we might as well embrace it Overpopulation needs clearing by 5 billion Killing all the men covers the bulk of the requirements

gorydetails · Answer

lol, no. Think of all the pickle jars that would remain unopened.

Would the world be a safer place if there were no men?

Most Helpful Opinions

What Girls & Guys Said

Would the world be a safer place if there were no men?

Most Helpful Opinions

What Girls & Guys Said

We're glad to see you liked this post.