Have an opinion?
Yes, sex sells, years ago car manufacturers used very attractive girls to advertise sports cars, it was supposed to make you think that if you drove that type of car then you could get that type of girl. Barmaids were another one, a barmaid with a large chest and low cut top was always guaranteed to bring the men in, quite often it was a case of, 'the ale may not be that good, but they've a barmaid with great tits'.At some of the trade shows I used to attend, it seemed at times that some of the exibitors were competing against each other for the most noticeable girls on their stands. I remember one show, there was one exhibitor and he had this tall blonde girl, all she was wearing were these black knee high boots and a lycra catsuit in pale blue, that was about 2 sizes too small, it left NOTHING to the imagination, not only did she attract a lot of people to the stand, but lots of people were talking about it for weeks after. You'd go into a suppliers and they'd ask if you went to the trade show, followed by, 'did you see the bird in the lycra?' and you'd reply, 'yes the one on the x#*& %$£ stand.I'm not going to name the company, but you get the point, it worked, a lot of women sales people are quite clever, and use the 'sex sells' bit to their advantage, quite often a male sales rep won't get in at a firm, yet a woman in a short skirt, tight top, or some other revealing clothes, will not only be invited in, but also secure an order, so they'll return.
They do kind of, but it's not the be-all end-all. There are many other things that matter when it comes to choosing a partner, especially for a long-term relationship.For a man, sexual market value is mainly determined by:- height- looks- earnings- age (late 20s early 30s being the prime years)For a woman, sexual market value is mainly determined by:- looks- number of sexual partners + casual partners- age (late teens early 20s being the prime years)In general as a man, the taller you are, the better looking you are, the more you earn, the more women will like you. In general as a woman, the better looking you are, the less sexual partners/casual partners you've had, and the younger you are, the more men will like you.But there's more to it than that right? Things such as:- sense of humour- personal compatibility- similarities/differences in values- emotional connectionMost people have an idea of what they expect from a partner, kind of a base level of SMV. Most people have an "ideal type". Yet, often they end up with someone who isn't that type, and are perhaps even lacking in those areas, because that person has other attractive qualities that make them attractive despite that.
This is very similar to my thoughts on the subject. I think it may be helpful to think of SMV as using just the easily-read traits, but not considering the deeper levels of compatibility. As such, focusing solely on SMV feels kinda dehumanizing, as it ignores personal depths.
For me, men who are unavailable, married or not are off the market. No matter how good lookibg they are.Me myself is too old, too indifferent to romance becuase I love researching about how our brains work. It's easier to understand what attraction is like rather than falling in love with someone myself.
Thank you for the MHO.
I don't even know what that means and I'm not sure that I care. I just want to give all of my love to someone. I hate all these dating rules and gimmicks and tricks.
It's an attempt to make a nerdy scientific model for attraction between men and women. So if a guy knows his SMV he'll know where he stands in the hierarchy of men as potential partners for women. Basically think rating people on a scale from 1 - 10 and taking that to the Nth degree lol. So you're not just a 6 or an 8 anymore. It's like, you're an 8 in looks, but your financial success might bump you up to a 9, but if your career type is viewed as low status that might bring you back down to an 8. It's kind of humorous, but has some truth behind it.
I see how it can make sense but do you really think that everyone in the world thinks this way? Like I can't be with this person because he's not this number or this rating, etc.
Not at all lol, but I understand the principle and it does carry some weight. While not everyone thinks in terms of "I only date 10's". Most do have a more vague idea in their head of a certain level of quality they are willing to date and a level quality they wouldn't consider. While we wouldn't look at it through the lens of "that's a 6 and I don't date 6's". We still do make that assessment in our minds. We just don't give them numbers.Like if you're determining things you value socially one could ask on a scale of 1 to 10 how important is that to you? And just go down the line with all the major points, then on paper you would have your idea of a theoretical 8, 9, 10 even tho you don't think in those terms. From that model of thinking that's what it would be for you.The average person has a naturalistic assessment as opposed to a scientific rating system assessment. But it's still an assessment, just without the number.
The rating system without the number, I think that's more accurate for me. I know that I couldn't date someone who is/isn't x but could date someone with x criteria.
Thanks for sharing your explanation.
Sounds like a concept developed to sell books and seminar tickets.
It's real. However, it could only be accurately measured by taking several different people's evaluations into account. Generally, a mans SMV could be broken down into Wealth/ Looks/ Sex, while a girls would be broken down into Looks/ Morals.Of course looks are predicted on preference in terms of race, or thick vs. thin, but generally people will prefer someone thinner as opposed to fatter, etc., and White/ Asian girls are more desirable than black girls.For example, a guy could be extremely wealthy, be average on looks, and be average on sex, but still get a 9.4. On the other hand, a girl could be broke, gorgeous, and have a body count under 5, and still be a 9.4. Girls value is heavily weighted on their looks, which decline in value as they age, until they are considered "expired" by most after 30. Also, some guys will weigh their morality, which impacts how their behavior as a partner would be perceived, differently. For some a girl with 20 partners, who was loyal to all of them could still be considered a "good girl." For others, loyalty doesn't matter as much as absolute number, which is why it's important to take many different perspectives in order to get an overall public Sexual Market Value figure. All things equal: low body count> high body count (any over 10), Loyal> cheater, and relationships> hookups.To be fair, a guy could be gorgeous, be broke af, and great in bed and they'll be initially high value (in high school), but quickly lose value as girls are looking for someone to take them out, and eventually provide for them (whether or not they make good money themselves).
It's not remotely as cut and dry as the MGTOW incels make it out to be, but there definitely is such a thing to a degree. Those who are considered to be physically attractive will of course have a higher SMV, and vice versa. But this is only really relevant when comparing people exclusively on looks. Not to mention, individual preferences can vary tremendously. A "6" to one person could be a "10" to another and vice versa. I would say it is mostly pseudoscience, as a coping mechanism for the have-nots.What I consider to be a more accurate assessment is "Dating Market Value" (DMV). This would factor personality and socioeconomic factors into the picture, often greatly outweighing physical attractiveness. SMV and DMV are positively correlated but that does not imply causation. One can have high SMV and low DMV - e. g. someone you'd happily hook up with or be friends with benefits, but would never want to commit to a relationship with, let alone marry. That's how I see it from my own experience.
"One can have high SMV and low DMV - e. g. someone you'd happily hook up with or be friends with benefits"That's exactly what they are implying or trying to define. Hence the sexual part in SMV. Somebody with high SMV can still ahve high DMV, but somebody with high DMV can't necessarily have high SMV like you mentioned.
I can see a degree of truth to it, in that people have preferences and most people are not so desperate as to have sex with anyone that will have them. That said, it's not like when people go looking for sex, they stop and say "let me grab my blue book". The SMV is simply overblown and greatly exaggerated in my opinion and while I don't think attractiveness is quite as subjective as some people think, it's not exactly so objective that you can assign a market value to everyone that everyone else will agree with.Stick to your gut.
100% Real. As I enter my 30s I see myself getting much MUCH better looking than I did at 25 years old while women my age seriously look more and more like shit. There were girls I had a crush on at 22 that are now 36 who turned me down when they were hot and now are interested in me even though I wouldn't go near them with another man's dick. Age obliterates women if they're not careful. Also as women these days less and less want to be seen as physical objects let me tell you that on the personality end they dont get better. women in their 30s and 40s become bitter and jaded. Nowhere NEAR as fun as younger girls.
Sounds like a decent theory. If it's like with demand and supply, and the value is decided by that, sure I can see the logic. Naturally, demand curves differ based on the individual's preferences, but that's the exact same in real economics and demand/supply analysis. Naturally, we could apply some basic algebra and assumptions and eventually come to certain relationships between variables (e. g. income) and attractiveness. However, those results would heavily depend on the assumptions someone makes. Nonetheless, it sounds decently acceptable that there are variables that increase one's attractiveness and others that decrease it.
That was all started by economist types and it is simply an easy way to evaluate the trends of the decline of relationships and marriage. It is like the butter vs guns curve or the Laffer curve, a concept that there exists some tax rate between 0% and 100% that will result in maximum tax revenue. One can simply apply that there is a minimum in relationships based on the maximum feminist-man-hate. Smv also applies, relationship gain vs. pain, looks, risks, etc. It isn’t a bad abstraction to explain a lot of things with male-female trends.
Their is no scientific basis or any research validating concept of SMV. However concept SMV is used in research (SMV, LDV, SDV etc). I wouldn't call it pseudoscience as it doesn't necessarily go against any scientific reasoning.I think its good concept as it is good way of analyzing or dealing with specific concepts in dating, its good to use as comparison. It is of course subjective and can be determined by individual preferences. But SMV collectively would inherently include that, as we're basing it on our own preferences and what we may perceive preferences opposite sex has. I definitely believe both Men and Women have SMV, which can depend on different factors. Its clear specific proportion of guys are more successful and find it easier than other guys.
"Value" is a purely subjective phenomenon and has no applicability beyond a specific transaction. The actual "value" of something is what is exchanged for it. If the offer of exchange is refused, then the "something" doesn't have that value. Value can change in an instant because it is only pertinent to a specific transation. There is nothing at all intrinsic in value.Value is not merely personal, it is personal, temporal, and further contextual. Thus, speaking of a "sexual market value" should only be done with this knowledge. Treating it as some sort of "price tag" is stupid. Then again, people are stupid enough to treat price tags as actually stating the "value" of an item. They don't. They merely state the "asking price". If people aren't willing to pay that much for the item, it doesn't have that much value.
SMV exists, but it's relative to how ego driven, and obsessed with the physical plane we are as a society. Most of us have a sheer beauty that remains unseen that is muddied by the waters of our own compulsive thoughts and ego.For example, this comment ''Well I can assure, no one is going to want to buy a 48 year old bald man. That’s for sure.''Now look closely at the comment. It's mostly based on the physical plane. But there is no telling what lies beneath this bald 48 year old.The same goes for an old woman with sagging skin. How many would be capable to see beyond the physical?I once met a woman that I didn't find that attractive at all. But despite this, I decided to go on a trip with her. This was despite her wanting to be more than friends, and knowing how I felt.However, the more time I spent with her, the more I realized she was the most attractive person I'd ever met. it would have been my loss if I rejected her due to not being physically attracted.
What you need to realize is that "value" is SUBJECTIVE. So it's not an exact science, just a way of examining the aggregate behavior of people in search of a partner. Some people will value one factor, or one range, more than another. for example, I prefer skinny chicks. I adore the Olive Oyl girls; it's just my thing. And I much prefer older women to younger ones. I'm 57, after all. A 19-23 year old is more like a child to me.But in general, a woman's appeal will go down after about 35, or as she deviates form the ideal shape of her culture, because those are things that the average male in that culture prefer.
We all have a desirability amount to each potential mate. It's highly subject to the potential partner though and not like some fixed number for all. I'd think this would be fairly obvious? It's similar with cars or home types. Some like sports cars and others like luxury cars. Some like beach houses and some want to live in a cabin on a mountain.
More or less yeah. It's kinda hard to define because it differs slightly from person to person as well as gender wise.
Mostly true at about 80/20. The principle idea is pretty intuitive, but SMV is overstated in my opinion. I can think of more than one occasion where I or a friend competed for a girl, when another guy of higher SMV by superficial societal standards came up and the girl chose me or my friend over the other guy just because she liked us. Per SMV idea of the world that should be impossible and the girl will always choose the guy of higher SMV.I have heard certain concepts that would explain that, but they were not the SMV model of the world. Personally I don't prescribe to SMV, but it's pointing to a truth that is worth understanding.
This is absolutely disgusting in my opinion. Reducing someone’s worth as a person based on how much sex they have. A woman’s value (keep in mind this a PERSON with feelings, hopes and dreams) is not reduced to how often she has sex. That’s gross. The same for men. A virgin guy isn’t any less valuable as person because he’s never had sex. Some people may have a preference for the number of partners someone has had, and that’s okay, but to tie a value to a person is always quite gross in my opinion.
So I am guessing you don't believe it?
Smv is verifiably real and we all agree on it too.Just ask yourself, does a tall man with loads of money, many talents and an amazing personality have a better chance finding a quality woman than a short poor dude?9 times outa 10 he does, his smv is higher. An attractive woman with a greatpersonality has a higher smv than a mean ugly bitch
Personally, I don't see it I'm wanted more now tgan when I was younger. I can't figure it out. I'll be out with all my friends ages 20-70 and I'm getting hit on not them. I do believe there are individuals who may use this and will be sorry when they find it is all BS. I think many use this as an Excuse for why they can't get anyone. People have to have something to blame rather than look at themselves at find a way to fix what may be an issue/turn off to others...
very trueso take it your hot and you got great personality as well :D
@moonchild714 well according to the SMV you are washed up ! LOL
manmeat, No I would not say I'm hot, I think I'm average 7 at the most. Do have an amazing personality though. My friends say its my confidence and also what the guys and strangers say there is this Aura around me that they are all just drawn to me. I do know everyone says I'm very approachable to talk to.
coachTanthony, that's why it's all BS made up by people looking for Excuses...
Saying it isn't real is just nonsense. A) SMV isn't a science. It's a social construct, but even a construct is real. B) SMV just gives a name to something we already do. It was always an observable phenomenon. Someone just bothered to put a label on it.
It's not real. It's real for people who want to discriminate others because it makes them feel better and get them the attractive partners for sex they want. And harm others who are sincere and truly desire a good relationship. I honestly now don't care what others think of me. I know what I am deserving of. And it's not based on somebody biased SMV. Everybody has value and its not based on sexual attraction. It's a choice to be DE-valued.
I agree, its very real, but many have different perceptions on what it means it has nothing to do with price tags.
Its absolutely real. We see it play out all the time. Now I think, with all things, their are certain parameters and deviations of course, but it does exist.
I don't know if I can call it "science" since I have never seen any research studies in a peer-reviewed journal.However, I got to experience that in my life as I grew older, and more financially independent.
I have looked up the components of this value system, it is really quite obvious. Improve upon yourself and you won't have as many problem finding a partner, be it serious or casual.I do think there is a sexual market value, but I do think sexual instinct precedes all the specific components addressed within this value system. I would say the value system pertains more to serious relationships.
Ya of course, that's why the older I get the easier my dating life becomes and my mom who is now 60 has an incredibly hard time dating like I did when I was younger, definitely women have a higher value sexuality in teens and 20s but drops when they get older while men get more value the older they get
It's veiled in some of the rhetoric of pseudoscience, but I think it just happens to be *accurate* pseudoscience.
Sure.People will chase after the hot ones.They always did.However, something interesting is that people will still cheat on the hot ones too appearantly.So their value only lasts so long.
it's not "science". it's just an idea. and yeah i think you could say it like that. a female sexual market value falls with age, while a male value starts out low and grows over time.
If it wasn't true then poor and ugly guys in their 20's would be getting as much pussy as rich and good looking guys and online dating apps wouldn't be dominated by 30 year old single mothers looking for a "good man" who is willing to raise another man's child.
It exists yes It has to exist since people have preferencesHow does a hot girl have a million options while one that isn’t has almost none
There is a SMV but it's definitely not a fixed science with any definite quantitative meaning. There are just very broadly defined degrees of desirability all around.
It's self-evidently true.Why do you think Western men flock to countries like Thailand and the Philippines?Because they don't have a chance in hell with women at home, but can date beautiful women there.
Yes, women's value is based on their looks and their amount of use (how easily they put out)Men are valued on how they look, their job, health, status, wealth, material ability, longevity, and the interest of other women.
It’s primarily a scare tactic. The red pill likes to take basic ideas, repackage them, and sell them to sucker women to committing to lesser men (such as themselves). I’m turning 35 soon and STILL wondering where that dang “Wall” is.
SMV is a real thing though.
There’s truth to it. Basically the more attractive you are as a person the more options you have. However the red pill definition of attractive when it comes to both men and women is pretty warped.
MzAsh what’s the “red pill”?
Not every woman is blessed with Good genetics Meaby u are Thats all
@Petju plenty of women in their 40s have more options than you.
@Aphrodite801 yeyeye U mad i see that nie STFU
That’s why your hairline is receding at 25 🤣🖕
@Aphrodite801 U so pretty u dont even show ur face hahaha 🤣🖕
The red pill is a group of average to low value men who market themselves as above average and call themselves “alpha.” They have an attitude against free women who don’t stay home and cook and clean. (Aka anti feminists)
Interesting, yes, men who constantly regard to themselves as “alpha” or “beta” are obviously fools.
"They have an attitude against free women who don’t stay home and cook and clean."Kind of hypocritical considering there are just as much women that have an attitude against men that do not fit the typical archetype of a traditional man. Don't complain about men wanting women to be feminine and adhere to their gender roles if you expect men to be masculine and adhere to their gender roles.
I certainly don’t expect them to. Never wanted a traditional man. She asked me what the red pill is, and I gave her my answer.
"They have an attitude against free women who don’t stay home and cook and clean."I prefer independent ambitious women I am anti-feminism, so are majority of men. In UK is majority everyone, only 26% of people as a whole support feminism. Only 17% of men in America support feminism. Its a political organization today not an egalitarian one. Nothing to be proud of being a feminist :)
^Feminism is supported by millions of people in the Uk and America. Just cause you’re a bitter no good feminist hater doesn’t mean everyone else is.
@Aphrodite801 I am from UK and not bitter ty :) Want to look at bitterness look at feminists clear to see. I actually posted stats above, only 17% of men support feminism in America. Only 26% of people overall support feminism in UK, it also has been as low as 17%. And what exactly is grand achievement of feminism? Toxic masculinity? Masnplaining? Cultural appropriation? Male gaze? I mean really how exactly is feminism elevating the lives of women? Lol :)
Yes you’re obviously bitter. I don’t believe your crap stats, bitter men always lie. Feminists have everything to be proud of, starting with who they are. Feminists are literally everywhere in the world. A hater like you can’t change the fact that feminism is good. It’s also growing now more than ever thankfully.
@Aphrodite801 Trust me calling me bitter because you're upset and BITTER because feminism is on decline isn't going to change anything. Again I am awaiting for you to enlighten us what grand achievement should feminists be proud of today or how they are elevating the lives of their fellow women? :)From what I notice on GAG its mostly girls ranging between age 16-24 that seemed to be strongly attached to feminism. MYTH of gender pay gap is last thing left sustaining feminism, as that myth gets busted it'll be end of feminism.My point here wasn't merely to just bash feminism. But make a statement in reply to @MzAsh, where she stated "They have an attitude against free women who don’t stay home and cook and clean. (Aka anti feminists)"My point was I love independent women, I don't desire traditional partner, same for majority of men. But majority of men do not hate our gender hence don't identify as a feminist. Wanting an independent, ambitious partner is NOT in anyway for us synonymous with supporting feminism :)
^ I’m not reading that. I don’t argue with woman haters. Just sit back, be bitter, and continue watching feminism grow 😁 www.marketwatch.com/.../feminism-is-slowly-taking-over-america-2018-08-14-11884534
You prefer independent and ambitious women then there’s no way you’re anti feminist.
your darn hot what ever age you are :D
@Aphrodite801 A YouGov survey finds that 30% of Americans now identify as feminists, compared to 26% in 201630%, 30% wowww that's just too much :p :D
Feminism is really just the female equivalent of an r/incels circlejerk.At its best, it's a bunch of sexually frustrated women blaming their ineptitude on the evil white man.. At it's worst, its a bunch of vicious bullies that harass, dox and send death threats over a twitter post someone made 10 years ago.
Feminism for me extends to our bodily autonomy. Leave abortion rights alone and don’t touch us without our permission (unless I’m married to you). And we’ll all get along just fine.
Are you married?
Then you're not on the market, and have no idea what your market value is minus a few glances you might get. Try being single at 35 and see how people respond to you. Spoiler: you won't garner anywhere near the attention of even a 29 year old. The wall is real.
Being off the market doesn’t mean the options still don’t present themselves.
@MzAsh these guys are obviously bitter fools. If Meghan Markle can attract straight royalty in her late 30s than why would other women have a problem attracting regular men?
@Aphrodite801 Megan M. knew how to play the game, which most people don't know how to do... at least as well as her (i. e. being in the right place to meet him, knowing how to talk to him, etc etc). If you girls keep taking her, or "timeless" celebrity women (e. g. J-lo) as your model for women over 30 then you're in for a rude awakening when you hit that number, live up your 20's with reckless abandon, and find the kind of guys you want to settle down w/ not interested.
@mattdzz You sound like a bitter fool. Obviously all women under 30 aren’t attractive. For you to say that shows how damn creepy you are. Plenty of women in their 30s have more options than you. Now that’s a fact.
@Aphrodite801 What do I have to be bitter about? You're probably ugly, and have guys tell you how "smart" you are to get you to hookup NSA (before bailing), which is why you think your dumbass little girl opinion has any credibility. Grow tf up, idiot.
Let me just mention that after rejecting my bio father in her 30s my mother finally decided to settle down and marry at 41. She had plenty of men to choose from. She still does. Actually, she’s broken up with my step father, and is now messing with a man 13 years younger than her. They are getting a divorce soon.
@mattdzz lmao are you still mad that I said I only date hot guys? I know I’m attractive. You shouldn’t be calling anyone ugly with that weird shaped face.
@Aphrodite801 Let's see a pic, ugly?
Eh I’m not going to argue with some bitter dude who will be bald in a few years. Just understand that it’s true that many women 30 and over look way better than you. In fact most men would back me up on this. And also have more options than you. Stay bitter.
@Aphrodite801 That's what I though, you're not only an ugly online troll, you've got about five iq points below a chimp :D
@mattdz last words lmao, your hairline is doing backflips.
@Aphrodite801 last words, I'm sure all those guys would say you're a 4/10, just enough to get them to come out after midnite.
I’m about hit 35 and I’m still fertile Myrtle. Can’t wait to be be able to go off birth control but doctors say it will be a while. 20 year olds are still falling in love and trying to replace my man. Granted, many of them don’t know my age and that I’m married but that’s the point. Take care of yourself, lead an interesting life, and you’ll still have options.Besides, most men say they want one thing but in reality they take what they can get. A middle aged decent looking woman still has more options than the average middle aged man.
Interesting you’re such a fool that you don’t even realize you’re going against your own bitter theory about SMV. I’m only 17, so shouldn’t I have all the dating power? Dumbass.
You do know what happens to fertility after 35, right?20 year old guys will fk damn near anything, don't let it get to your head.And, no.
Every guy will fuck damn near anything. Lol
I'd reluctantly agree.
@MzAsh you didn’t answer my question.
That sounds like a pseudoscience cooked up by people who weren't dating and had too much free time on their hands.
It exists because there are people who subscribe to that mindset. It is real for anyone who chooses to play that game.
It's likely the game is mostly played subconsciously.
You would have to be pretty naive to not believe it
You know…it's probably BS, but I kind of buy into it. Like…look around. You see it everywhere.
What is a sexual market value? I need a definition to answer.
Its pretty real except the red pill community doesn't really have a good understanding of how it actually works for men
Ya the fact that female hookers make way more than male ones should be enough prood
Sorry im a bit throw off with the level part? if you could elborate a bit more.
The theory that as women enter their 30s and 40s they become less wanted by men but as men enter our 30s and 40s we become better looking and dating gets better for us. I agree. My dating and sex life has gotten MUCH better in my 30s while a lot of women I know who are in their 30s and 40s are struggle to find 'good men' and say that they got more attention in their 20s.
I wouldn't worry i love sex with all ages older women are more experienced less immature and still sexy as hell if they look after themselves its the ones that let them selves go that loose out.ye younger girls are fitter and tighter but an older woman thats looked after herself is just as appealing
@ronaldo75 OHH ok thanks for explaining that because I truly did miss the boat on this one.
your welcomefancy a chat follow me?
Are we products to sell? Man you really ask stupid questions.
YES. You are on clearance though.
Well I can assure, no one is going to want to buy a 48 year old bald man. That’s for sure.
Oh shoot, if we are talking about being able to get sex then yes women 100% lead in that.
care to elaborate on what that term actually means?
While some of it makes sense, especially in the younger ages of boys and girls, but of course, it's pseudoscience". It's all relative to the ages of those looking for love. The value of any human is relative to those in the market.
Of course it's real. To say it's not real is basically denying sexuality.
There is definitely a market value on sex or there wouldn't be prostitution or porn both of which dominated with women as the muse.
There's levels to this game Coach!
I know that... shhhhhh
Oh, it's real alright. Everybody judges. AKA: discernment.
Its opinion. Whichever type the person prefers (e. g. Thicker, thin, athletic, short, tall, blond, black, Asian, etc) will rate it higher.
Not sure. Based off of my experience, I think it might be real.
@kas19whats your experience?
It is pseudoscience. It has to be. If people were based on a sexual value system, then we would have abolished the marriage system long ago.
They do. Ask a prostitute and she/he will tell you the exact rate.
I believe their are levels
Yes and no. It exists but not with universality.
Sounds like prostitution to me.
i dont even knnow what that is?
I am a back in Science class? I really don't know.
Sure - if they're a prostitute.
This nonsense must stop.
Hahahahahahahaha Yes it should!
It's certainly valid.
Yes, it's real. Ask any man below 5'9" or any woman with a flat ass.
You cannot undo this action. The opinion owner is going to be notified and earn 7 XPER points.