Yes, past is in the past. Humans are not like used cars.
Nope.
Select gender and age to cast your vote:
Please select your age
If we have chemistry, I wouldn't let a number stand in my way.
A child or Herpes are completely different story. I ain't dating someone with STDs or bundle of pain.
Yes, I don't care about what happened in the past.
So u can't build rapport?
Opinion
19Opinion
The only two ways something like this could bother me are: 1) She had so many partners that it must have taken so much of her time that you could call it an addication/obsession, or 2) she had so few (or no) partners that I'd be concerned about her lack of experience.
P. S.: Calling it "body count" is cringy. Literally only incels and douchebags call it that.
it really depends , most girls aren't keen to reveal there true # a lot of the time so how would i even know , i liked this one girl and though she was low but as i got to know her realised she got a lot more male attention than i realised and other guys would always be trying to pick her up so i started to wonder how many she's really been with
No it would be a somewhat turn off for me bc I don’t like casual sex so I won’t date someone who likes sleeping around or do one night stands. I don’t have an exact number in mind that I would consider to be “high” tho, it all depends on context and his age.
A female grows attachment to ever guy she fucks, the more guys she fucks the more mental baggage and the more fucked up she is mentally.
The past may be the past but your past choices make you who you are, if it didn’t, murderers wouldn’t be in jail.
Yeah, but do a health check first haha but the past of someone doesn't hurt my ego
I rather not, I don't trust hos, and I am not a fan of used goods.
I would not if I knew but who really is honest. As bout it-NO”BODY”
No, I would treat a woman who had a higher body count than mine (mine is 8 by the way) like a pump and dump. Statistically the higher the body count for either gender, the greater chance of divorce and cheating.
I don't know its sort of a status symbol. The rarer the woman the more status she brings u. And if she's like jada pinkett... ud be a dumb ass to date her seriously.
I would date any hot female seriously but if its some ugly female whos not even somewhat unique. Yea fuck that
Can't respect a woman that does not respect herself.
No. The more partners a woman has had the more trouble she has bonding. It's a proven fact. After a certain amount. You have to consider her too damaged to consider. Sorry not sorry.
just no. clearly their relationships dont last long and thats what im looking for.
doesn't seem to like it should be an issue. But if it is for you, I guess thats cool.
No, I would feel like I'm dating a porn star. We could be friends but never the mother of my children. Some men share their wives with other men , some don't.
Not an issue for me at all.
A serious relationship no.. just sex yes
Past partners do not matter at all
Zero chance.
Not a chance.
No Never
You can also add your opinion below!
Most Helpful Opinions