Nah, statements weren't as bad as they claim and they really aren't even transphobic but even if they were i don't think she should be punished for her views
weather or not the accusations are founded or not nobody accused of being racist, homophilic, transphobic or anything else like that is treated fairly anymore. their lives are torn apart and people cheer about it
no I don’t. No one deserves to be treated like that. Equality is a thing! People don’t know what the definition of how to treat people these days or the definition of equality !! That’s why society is the way it is.
I don't really care about her or the ones treating her unfairly. 🤷♀️
1
0 Reply
Anonymous
(Under 18)
+1 y
Yes. She can think those things to herself but when she puts it out on the internet people get to say what they want. She was asking for it putting it out there.
@Smashingdoozy Very, very few of them and it’s in their mind. Even after surgery and hormone therapy they just look like more like a woman as an example but they have a males chromosomes, no menstrual cycle, no history of being raised as a girl put in pink as an infant, frilly socks and dresses as a toddler, first period, girls restrooms since birth, talking about boys in elementary school with a group of other girls, and more experiences. They can pretend to be a girl/woman but they are not. I have a better chance of dressing like Batman and being more like him than a dressing as a woman and being like my sister. It’s doesn’t work that was and no amount of wishing, screaming, throwing tantrums and demanding that they are something they are not will change that.
@Smashingdoozy depends on which definition of gender you use. of course your definition of gendr as a thing you feel is a pseudoscience. totally unscientific concept that can never be studies, its not real. the entire field of gender studies has never produced a real scientific study. not one
if you attempt to show me one it will
A: violate the rule of internal validity (it won't use empirical design) B: violate the rule of external validity (it won't be able to show it is measuring the thing it claims it measures) C: not be a scientific study at all even in name
Sir, all it takes is one look at society. Gender roles exist. Why is pink a girls color and blue a boys color? We are forced into roles as babies. It's entirely social, many cultures don't recognize gender at all Maori for example only recognize masculine and feminine energy, either sex can have either one of these energies or both. Just because something doesn't align with your beliefs does not mean that it isn't real.
Speaking specifically about transgender people in relation to science there has been studies that show an adolescent trans persons brain more closely resembles that of their desired gender.
@Smashingdoozy you just played a little switch a roo; as i said there are 2 different definitions of gender. 1 as a synonym for sex and 2 "how you identify" you originally used the 2nd definition but now you switched to the first to respond to me
yes SEX ROLES exist; they are also not social constructs because they are the same in ALL CULTURES. yes there are some cultural differences like how we think pink is for girls but those are cultural differences; not gender roles
and yes: gender (using definition 1 now) is not a social construct
Even monkeys show gender differences the same as humans do……good luck saying that’s a social construct since they existed before society www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2583786/
Men and women literally don’t have the same receptors in their eyes, you don’t think these differences have had a profound impact on our divergent psychology from one another?
Sax, Leonard. 2005. Why Gender Matters: What Parents and Teachers Need to Know about the Emerging Science of Sex Differences. Random House, Inc. USA.
as i said about trannies all your research will fall into 1 of 3 categories; your study violates rule 2: external validity
your study doesn't show what you think it does, we also have studies that show cab drivers have unique brain chemistry exclusive to cab drivers... does that mean they were born cab drivers? no. you just rediscovered plasticity
There are some findings which suggest biology and environmental factors also play a role. Though many biology based gender differences seem to have originated from hormones in the womb (https://qz. com/1190996/scientific-research-shows-gender-is-not-just-a-social-construct/) this is also vaguely mentioned in your monkey article.
The art one really doesn't prove anything since by the age a child can draw they have already been influenced by their parents/ guardians or peers/media. Boys surrounded with masculine things, girls surrounded with feminine things it's kind of a given to draw what is familiar.
Eye receptors are a biological sex difference, so yeah I don't disagree that they are different. Though I don't think seeing colors or motions differently really have anything to do with gender identity.
Brains again is biological sex difference, though like I mentioned before there is some evidence that transgender peoples brain activity match up more to their preferred gender.
"They don't want leadership roles" simply untrue many women aspire to lead. That article really doesn't prove your point on that one, basically states yeah men are more likely to do more labour jobs and political jobs because women don't want that life style. Makes sense since women typically are the ones to take care of their children. Though it mentions how the gaps are closing and the labour and political jobs being mostly men in future is just a guess based on trend.
I'm sure more and more studies will come out but as of right now studies on transgender* people are limited due to an obviously smaller population of them. Not a surprise at all you are going to find more studies about cis gendered people.
@Smashingdoozy world health organization is not a scientific source; you violated rule 3
was that link a peer reviewed study? no. it was an ARTICLE. anyone can write an article.
the field of gender is not studied empirically and thus does not meet the basic requirements to be a science
and the drawing study can be repeated at any age, in any culture. and the results are always the same. this proves its not a social construct. 1 year olds are not cultured yet. but they can draw.
your beliefs are a religious cult. not a science, "hormones in the womb"? yea that's called biology, its not a social construct
I can link a bunch of other sources but my second one was about that point.
How many of your links were peer-reviewed 🙃
Never said gender studies was a science.
A 1-year-old has still been influenced, have they done a drawing test on children who have been raised gender-neutral? Probably not yet so we will see when a study like that comes out.
If you reread what I said I was talking about biology there 😌😌
@Smashingdoozy all of my sources are either peer reviewed or contain a link to a peer reviewed study in them
and you did claim gender studies is a science, its the basis of your entire argument or you wouldn't be able to share sources at all (sharing sources inherently implies its a science)
my sources cross all cultural lines. when something crosses all cultural lines its proof that its a fact of biology, not culture. gender is therefore not a social construct
@Smashingdoozy "sharing a source is a way to back up a point" but the underlying assumption of "backing up a point" is that points can be supported with empirical data. the assertion that empirical data is worth sharing is the basis of science
so by asking for or using sources related to gender studies you are asserting that gender studies is a science and has empirical information to share (which it does not)
and you're 22, using emoji just makes you look stupid at this age
No, but SJWs gonna cry like the crybullies they are.
5
0 Reply
Anonymous
(18-24)
+1 y
"You're a wizard Harry!" "Call me Harriet." "Oh, I didn't realize you had severe mental issues. We are revoking your scholarship to Hogwarts. We don't want weirdos here."
What Girls & Guys Said
Opinion
32Opinion
She just needs to IGNORE social media. That is a fake world.
The same people freaking out over this were the same ones saying "follow the science!"
Science says trans people exist 🙃
@Smashingdoozy no, it actually doesn't
all "studies" claiming trannies are real will break 1 of 3 rules
1. internally invalid
2. externally invalid
3. not a scientific source at all
Why should she care? She's probably a Billionaire. With all that money she can tell anyone to suck off as she is set for life.
i think she's the richest woman in the world isn't she?
@007kingifrit No clue. As least you don't see her flaunting it.
Nah, statements weren't as bad as they claim and they really aren't even transphobic but even if they were i don't think she should be punished for her views
She was transphobic and people called her out on it. She gets what she deserves.
No, she hasn't been fairly. But that is to be expected. Once a person tells the truth they will get abuse for it. Some people can't handle the truth.
*She hasn't been treated fairly
weather or not the accusations are founded or not nobody accused of being racist, homophilic, transphobic or anything else like that is treated fairly anymore. their lives are torn apart and people cheer about it
no I don’t. No one deserves to be treated like that. Equality is a thing! People don’t know what the definition of how to treat people these days or the definition of equality !! That’s why society is the way it is.
I don't really care about her or the ones treating her unfairly. 🤷♀️
Yes. She can think those things to herself but when she puts it out on the internet people get to say what they want. She was asking for it putting it out there.
Yeah, seems fair to me. Say bigoted shit, deal with the consequences.
I don't know if it's fair or not but I never liked JK Rowling or Harry Potter
I don't feel bad for her. She made her bed, so let her sleep in it!
she said nothing wrong
@007kingifrit No she didn't. And I love her work.
she is the victim of her suicidal ideas exactly as it's been expected. That's what every communist gets eventually.
yes, i do. i think a lot of shit that has been under wraps for so long, is finally coming out. trump started it
no she was entirely correct, boys can't become girls
‘It’s true.
Except trans people exist 🤔
@Smashingdoozy Very, very few of them and it’s in their mind. Even after surgery and hormone therapy they just look like more like a woman as an example but they have a males chromosomes, no menstrual cycle, no history of being raised as a girl put in pink as an infant, frilly socks and dresses as a toddler, first period, girls restrooms since birth, talking about boys in elementary school with a group of other girls, and more experiences. They can pretend to be a girl/woman but they are not. I have a better chance of dressing like Batman and being more like him than a dressing as a woman and being like my sister. It’s doesn’t work that was and no amount of wishing, screaming, throwing tantrums and demanding that they are something they are not will change that.
@Smashingdoozy the people exist, but their beliefs about themselves are fake
Gender and sex are different 🤦🏻♀️
@Smashingdoozy depends on which definition of gender you use. of course your definition of gendr as a thing you feel is a pseudoscience. totally unscientific concept that can never be studies, its not real. the entire field of gender studies has never produced a real scientific study. not one
if you attempt to show me one it will
A: violate the rule of internal validity (it won't use empirical design)
B: violate the rule of external validity (it won't be able to show it is measuring the thing it claims it measures)
C: not be a scientific study at all even in name
Sir, all it takes is one look at society. Gender roles exist. Why is pink a girls color and blue a boys color? We are forced into roles as babies. It's entirely social, many cultures don't recognize gender at all Maori for example only recognize masculine and feminine energy, either sex can have either one of these energies or both. Just because something doesn't align with your beliefs does not mean that it isn't real.
Speaking specifically about transgender people in relation to science there has been studies that show an adolescent trans persons brain more closely resembles that of their desired gender.
www.sciencedaily.com/.../180524112351.htm
@Smashingdoozy you just played a little switch a roo; as i said there are 2 different definitions of gender. 1 as a synonym for sex and 2 "how you identify" you originally used the 2nd definition but now you switched to the first to respond to me
yes SEX ROLES exist; they are also not social constructs because they are the same in ALL CULTURES. yes there are some cultural differences like how we think pink is for girls but those are cultural differences; not gender roles
and yes: gender (using definition 1 now) is not a social construct
Even monkeys show gender differences the same as humans do……good luck saying that’s a social construct since they existed before society www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2583786/
Across all cultures boys and girls draw differently at a young age, boys draw actions and weapons and girls draw faces www.sciencedirect.com/.../S0197455614000045
Men and women literally don’t have the same receptors in their eyes, you don’t think these differences have had a profound impact on our divergent psychology from one another?
Sax, Leonard. 2005. Why Gender Matters: What Parents and Teachers Need to Know about the Emerging Science of Sex Differences. Random House, Inc. USA.
www.psychologytoday.com/.../when-it-comes-color-men-women-arent-seeing-eye-eye
the brains literally emit different chemicals from one another
www.sciencedaily.com/.../190301160901.htm
Women seek work life balance for life satisfaction, they don’t want leadership roles is.muni.cz/.../Hakim_2006.pdf
Men on the other hand value material objects as the source of their happiness far more than women, meaning men are motivated by status and wealth onlinelibrary.wiley.com/.../...1-9004.2010.00320.x
as i said about trannies all your research will fall into 1 of 3 categories; your study violates rule 2: external validity
your study doesn't show what you think it does, we also have studies that show cab drivers have unique brain chemistry exclusive to cab drivers... does that mean they were born cab drivers? no. you just rediscovered plasticity
I did not do a switcharoo 😂.
It is gender roles not sex roles.
It is a social construct. (
www.who.int/health-topics/gender#tab=tab_1)
There are some findings which suggest biology and environmental factors also play a role. Though many biology based gender differences seem to have originated from hormones in the womb (https://qz. com/1190996/scientific-research-shows-gender-is-not-just-a-social-construct/) this is also vaguely mentioned in your monkey article.
The art one really doesn't prove anything since by the age a child can draw they have already been influenced by their parents/ guardians or peers/media. Boys surrounded with masculine things, girls surrounded with feminine things it's kind of a given to draw what is familiar.
Eye receptors are a biological sex difference, so yeah I don't disagree that they are different. Though I don't think seeing colors or motions differently really have anything to do with gender identity.
Brains again is biological sex difference, though like I mentioned before there is some evidence that transgender peoples brain activity match up more to their preferred gender.
"They don't want leadership roles" simply untrue many women aspire to lead. That article really doesn't prove your point on that one, basically states yeah men are more likely to do more labour jobs and political jobs because women don't want that life style. Makes sense since women typically are the ones to take care of their children. Though it mentions how the gaps are closing and the labour and political jobs being mostly men in future is just a guess based on trend.
I'm sure more and more studies will come out but as of right now studies on transgender* people are limited due to an obviously smaller population of them. Not a surprise at all you are going to find more studies about cis gendered people.
@Smashingdoozy world health organization is not a scientific source; you violated rule 3
was that link a peer reviewed study? no. it was an ARTICLE. anyone can write an article.
the field of gender is not studied empirically and thus does not meet the basic requirements to be a science
and the drawing study can be repeated at any age, in any culture. and the results are always the same. this proves its not a social construct. 1 year olds are not cultured yet. but they can draw.
your beliefs are a religious cult. not a science, "hormones in the womb"? yea that's called biology, its not a social construct
I can link a bunch of other sources but my second one was about that point.
How many of your links were peer-reviewed 🙃
Never said gender studies was a science.
A 1-year-old has still been influenced, have they done a drawing test on children who have been raised gender-neutral? Probably not yet so we will see when a study like that comes out.
If you reread what I said I was talking about biology there 😌😌
@Smashingdoozy all of my sources are either peer reviewed or contain a link to a peer reviewed study in them
and you did claim gender studies is a science, its the basis of your entire argument or you wouldn't be able to share sources at all (sharing sources inherently implies its a science)
my sources cross all cultural lines. when something crosses all cultural lines its proof that its a fact of biology, not culture. gender is therefore not a social construct
Um no you can share sources about anything. Sharing a source is a way to back up a point. Did you not go to school like at all?
Also not true.
Your arguments are getting fewer and fewer and trying to twist my words to suit your narrative. I think we are done here 😌
@Smashingdoozy "sharing a source is a way to back up a point" but the underlying assumption of "backing up a point" is that points can be supported with empirical data. the assertion that empirical data is worth sharing is the basis of science
so by asking for or using sources related to gender studies you are asserting that gender studies is a science and has empirical information to share (which it does not)
and you're 22, using emoji just makes you look stupid at this age
Ah so we are resulting to insults now because I use emojis? ✌🏻😬✌🏻 classy
@Smashingdoozy i said far more than that. you chose to only respond to the last line
She got what she deserves or maybe not enough of negative attention. She is an attention whore anyways so I don't care.
You are acting as if pronoun retards and trans people aren’t attention seekers 😂
@Mensur002 Yes you're right.
You think trans people aren’t attention seekers?
And pronoun facts deniers?
@Mensur002 They are attention seekers. I don't believe in that tranny shit or pronouns.
Oh lol that is strange.. ok
your opinion of jk rowling is clouding your judgement on the issues
No, but SJWs gonna cry like the crybullies they are.
"You're a wizard Harry!"
"Call me Harriet."
"Oh, I didn't realize you had severe mental issues. We are revoking your scholarship to Hogwarts. We don't want weirdos here."
She shouldn’t be a bigot 🤷♀️